Page 7 of 8

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:01 pm
by Divair
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Divair wrote:Most historical figures were probably dramatically over-exaggerated.


I would not think that in their youth they were over-exaggerated.

I mean, Charlotte Bronte's descriptions are convincing enough to want to go back in time and shag her.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... Bronte.jpg
You and I have different tastes.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:04 pm
by Marcurix
Liberonscien wrote:
Divair wrote:Most historical figures were probably dramatically over-exaggerated.

Not all of them were… hopefully.


All this reminds me of is that one Horrible Histories book that said Inca women washed their hair in pee to attract a man.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:05 pm
by Soldati Senza Confini
Divair wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
I would not think that in their youth they were over-exaggerated.

I mean, Charlotte Bronte's descriptions are convincing enough to want to go back in time and shag her.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... Bronte.jpg
You and I have different tastes.


She's fine enough for a one-night stand.

I am not sure I would prefer her for a relationship though (which isn't the point of time travel in the first place. I mean, who would want to be stuck in 19th century England or in a relationship with a potential ancestor? Although make sure you carry a lot of condoms and whatnot with you to the past, you'll need them.)

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:14 pm
by Mirkana
This is just an excuse for you to sleep with lots of hot Inca women.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:20 pm
by Soldati Senza Confini
Mirkana wrote:This is just an excuse for you to sleep with lots of hot Inca women.


Inca women were not exactly "hot".

Although, I don't know much about how wild they were in bed; while I never had sex with any of them in the past, I did hear stories here and there about their partners being satisfied enough.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:22 pm
by Farnhamia
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Divair wrote:http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/c ... Bronte.jpg
You and I have different tastes.


She's fine enough for a one-night stand.

I am not sure I would prefer her for a relationship though (which isn't the point of time travel in the first place. I mean, who would want to be stuck in 19th century England or in a relationship with a potential ancestor? Although make sure you carry a lot of condoms and whatnot with you to the past, you'll need them.)

Charlotte had a lovely smile but that family ... *shudders* Miss Austen was much livelier, an excellent dancer. I rather liked Miss Evans, George Eliot, that is. Mrs. Carlyle was a true character, though not unlikeable. Mr. Butler said, "It was very good of God to let Carlyle and Mrs Carlyle marry one another, and so make only two people miserable and not four."

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:24 pm
by CTALNH
Impregnate every single woman?

Isn't that a little difficult?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:24 pm
by Tagmatium
Yaltabaoth wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:
you want a time machine so that you can have limitless amounts of sex?

You don't?

Sounds like an idea for a TV programme from one of my colleagues - he called it Time Shagger.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:24 pm
by Tagmatium
CTALNH wrote:Impregnate every single woman?

Isn't that a little difficult?

Not when you have a time machine.

Duh.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:33 pm
by Reploid Productions
CTALNH wrote:Impregnate every single woman?

Isn't that a little difficult?

Well, with sufficient time-management skills, maybe some spreadsheets or a database to keep track of the numbers... I'm sure it could be done, but it'd take an awful lot of time given the equipment involved has a biologically-enforced cooldown period.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:34 pm
by Tagmatium
Reploid Productions wrote:
CTALNH wrote:Impregnate every single woman?

Isn't that a little difficult?

Well, with sufficient time-management skills, maybe some spreadsheets or a database to keep track of the numbers... I'm sure it could be done, but it'd take an awful lot of time given the equipment involved has a biologically-enforced cooldown period.

Time.

Machine.

It's a magical solution to all of these problems.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:34 pm
by Soldati Senza Confini
Reploid Productions wrote:
CTALNH wrote:Impregnate every single woman?

Isn't that a little difficult?

Well, with sufficient time-management skills, maybe some spreadsheets or a database to keep track of the numbers... I'm sure it could be done, but it'd take an awful lot of time given the equipment involved has a biologically-enforced cooldown period.


That usually varies even then though.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:35 pm
by Reploid Productions
Tagmatium wrote:
Reploid Productions wrote:Well, with sufficient time-management skills, maybe some spreadsheets or a database to keep track of the numbers... I'm sure it could be done, but it'd take an awful lot of time given the equipment involved has a biologically-enforced cooldown period.

Time.

Machine.

It's a magical solution to all of these problems.

I'm not even a Doctor Who fan, and my first thought was "Sonic screwdriver *immature giggling*" :lol: (I'm so mature!)

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:37 pm
by Soldati Senza Confini
Farnhamia wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
She's fine enough for a one-night stand.

I am not sure I would prefer her for a relationship though (which isn't the point of time travel in the first place. I mean, who would want to be stuck in 19th century England or in a relationship with a potential ancestor? Although make sure you carry a lot of condoms and whatnot with you to the past, you'll need them.)

Charlotte had a lovely smile but that family ... *shudders* Miss Austen was much livelier, an excellent dancer. I rather liked Miss Evans, George Eliot, that is. Mrs. Carlyle was a true character, though not unlikeable. Mr. Butler said, "It was very good of God to let Carlyle and Mrs Carlyle marry one another, and so make only two people miserable and not four."


You sure were social back then.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:40 pm
by Farnhamia
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Farnhamia wrote:Charlotte had a lovely smile but that family ... *shudders* Miss Austen was much livelier, an excellent dancer. I rather liked Miss Evans, George Eliot, that is. Mrs. Carlyle was a true character, though not unlikeable. Mr. Butler said, "It was very good of God to let Carlyle and Mrs Carlyle marry one another, and so make only two people miserable and not four."


You sure were social back then.

I've always been fairly social. Oh, there were times when I had to go wandering but I generally do like people.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:40 pm
by Dakran
Tagmatium wrote:
Reploid Productions wrote:Well, with sufficient time-management skills, maybe some spreadsheets or a database to keep track of the numbers... I'm sure it could be done, but it'd take an awful lot of time given the equipment involved has a biologically-enforced cooldown period.

Time.

Machine.

It's a magical solution to all of these problems.

If you use the time machine to wait for the cool down to end where would you go? If you go to the time before you shag the one person only to do another person would that not cause a paradox since there's more than one of you in that part of time? And if it repeats tht would tear apart the universe and THEN where would we be?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:42 pm
by Farnhamia
Dakran wrote:
Tagmatium wrote:Time.

Machine.

It's a magical solution to all of these problems.

If you use the time machine to wait for the cool down to end where would you go? If you go to the time before you shag the one person only to do another person would that not cause a paradox since there's more than one of you in that part of time? And if it repeats tht would tear apart the universe and THEN where would we be?

Hmmm ... the universe would be filled with eternally tumescent men, all of whom look the same. Not a good image, no.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:45 pm
by Soldati Senza Confini
Farnhamia wrote:
Dakran wrote:If you use the time machine to wait for the cool down to end where would you go? If you go to the time before you shag the one person only to do another person would that not cause a paradox since there's more than one of you in that part of time? And if it repeats tht would tear apart the universe and THEN where would we be?

Hmmm ... the universe would be filled with eternally tumescent men, all of whom look the same. Not a good image, no.


This doesn't sound like something anyone wants, really. It would be a very sad universe.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 12:55 pm
by Rio Cana
Drawing of an Inca Warrior
http://clio.missouristate.edu/chuchiak/ ... rriors.htm

Even though the Inca had Centralized rule, cities, organized military and had a so called sophisticated bureaucratic civilization and had conquered many other people, they could never conquer the Shuar tribes which were primitive people who lived in family or extended family units in the jungle. They had no Central Government. They came together when threatened. And they would not surrender.

Actual old photo of a Shuar Warrior. Did you see what he has on top of that pole. They were famous for that. Inca and Spanish steered clear of them.

Photo - http://h24-original.s3.amazonaws.com/22 ... _1931-.jpg

So the only way the OP could possibly conquer them is by defoliating the entire jungle.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:07 pm
by Tagmatium
Dakran wrote:
Tagmatium wrote:Time.

Machine.

It's a magical solution to all of these problems.

If you use the time machine to wait for the cool down to end where would you go? If you go to the time before you shag the one person only to do another person would that not cause a paradox since there's more than one of you in that part of time? And if it repeats tht would tear apart the universe and THEN where would we be?

Time.

Machine?

I dunno, I'm not the one presenting the problem, merely a solution of sorts.

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:11 pm
by Liberonscien
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Liberonscien wrote:Not all of them were… hopefully.


We're just going for having sex, perhaps drunk sex, but sex nevertheless.

I'm sure looks don't matter at that point.

Hard to get started if they are unattractive, but alcohol could fix that I suppose...

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:12 pm
by Tagmatium
Liberonscien wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
We're just going for having sex, perhaps drunk sex, but sex nevertheless.

I'm sure looks don't matter at that point.

Hard to get started if they are unattractive, but alcohol could fix that I suppose...

Or lie back and think of your empire-to-be?

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:16 pm
by Liberonscien
Tagmatium wrote:
Liberonscien wrote:Hard to get started if they are unattractive, but alcohol could fix that I suppose...

Or lie back and think of your empire-to-be?

I don't get turned on by power. Intelligence however... And alcohol enhances all the good and minimizes the bad...

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:18 pm
by Tagmatium
Liberonscien wrote:
Tagmatium wrote:Or lie back and think of your empire-to-be?

I don't get turned on by power.

Personally, I don't know - I've never been in the position where I might have power, nor do I know anyone who might be considered "powerful".

Well, bar superiors at work.
Liberonscien wrote:Intelligence however... And alcohol enhances all the good and minimizes the bad...

I like the cut of your jib!

PostPosted: Mon Feb 24, 2014 1:20 pm
by Liberonscien
Tagmatium wrote:
Liberonscien wrote:I don't get turned on by power.

Personally, I don't know - I've never been in the position where I might have power, nor do I know anyone who might be considered "powerful".

Well, bar superiors at work.
Liberonscien wrote:Intelligence however... And alcohol enhances all the good and minimizes the bad...

I like the cut of your jib!

Thank you. I wasn't even trying.