NATION

PASSWORD

LGBT Rights & Issues Thread

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:23 pm

Nightkill the Emperor wrote:And I do.

You're so mean.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Nightkill the Emperor
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 88776
Founded: Dec 28, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Nightkill the Emperor » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:25 pm

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:And I do.

You're so mean.

It's the frank truth. I won't be condescending by giving you a sugarcoated lie.
Hi! I'm Khan, your local misanthropic Indian.
I wear teal, blue & pink for Swith.
P2TM RP Discussion Thread
If you want a good rp, read this shit.
Tiami is cool.
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".

Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.

Monfrox wrote:
The balkens wrote:
# went there....

It's Nightkill. He's been there so long he rents out rooms to other people at a flat rate, but demands cash up front.

User avatar
Kiruri
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17883
Founded: Dec 26, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kiruri » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:26 pm

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Kiruri wrote:Yes. Because generalizations are always true :(

99% of rapes are men-on-women. 99.9% involve men somehow.

Does that mean that 99% of all men you meet will rape women? Does that mean that men are all intent on raping women?

It's not a stupid thing. If you claim it is misandrist, you are missing half of the point of describing attitudes as discriminatory.That's like saying you're a racist for taking vaccines before a trip to Africa if you don't take them against the risks that might affect you in America..
I was referring to the bathroom thing.
I'm BIwinning
CelebrateBisexualityDaySeptember 23rd
Costa Rican
Dirty Paws!
d(^o^)b¸¸♬·¯·♩¸¸♪·¯·♫¸¸
=^..^=

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:30 pm

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:99% of rapes are men-on-women. 99.9% involve men somehow.

It's not a stupid thing. If you claim it is misandrist, you are missing half of the point of describing attitudes as discriminatory.

That's like saying you're a racist for taking vaccines before a trip to Africa if you don't take them against the risks that might affect you in America.


Except race is incidental in Africa, sex is inherent to the beast here. A better comparison is clutching your wallet when a black person walks by because they tend to commit more crimes.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:32 pm

Nightkill the Emperor wrote:
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:You're so mean.

It's the frank truth. I won't be condescending by giving you a sugarcoated lie.

"Often in a shallow or not well-thought-out way, for the purpose of raising their own personal reputation. A social justice warrior, or SJW, does not necessarily strongly believe all that they say, or even care about the groups they are fighting on behalf of."

It's rude to admit to thinking that even if you had a decently rational basis to think so.
Kiruri wrote:
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:It's not a stupid thing. If you claim it is misandrist, you are missing half of the point of describing attitudes as discriminatory.That's like saying you're a racist for taking vaccines before a trip to Africa if you don't take them against the risks that might affect you in America..
I was referring to the bathroom thing.

Yeah, but pay attention to my comparison. You are doing the same thing.

"Oh, but it's not like America doesn't have deadly diseases and like Africa will necessarily get you on the border between life and death! You are being so bigoted and judgmental for taking precautions and getting a safe distance from vulnerable spaces where you can be predated with a very strong possibility of having no one for you to seek help!"

There can be arguments on whether this is the case, but for this we need studies.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Kiruri
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17883
Founded: Dec 26, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kiruri » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:36 pm

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Yeah, but pay attention to my comparison. You are doing the same thing.

"Oh, but it's not like America doesn't have deadly diseases and like Africa will necessarily get you on the border between life and death! You are being so bigoted and judgmental for taking precautions and getting a safe distance from vulnerable spaces where you can be predated with a very strong possibility of having no one for you to seek help!"

There can be arguments on whether this is the case, but for this we need studies.

I fail to see how it's the same.
I'm BIwinning
CelebrateBisexualityDaySeptember 23rd
Costa Rican
Dirty Paws!
d(^o^)b¸¸♬·¯·♩¸¸♪·¯·♫¸¸
=^..^=

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:39 pm

Kiruri wrote:
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Yeah, but pay attention to my comparison. You are doing the same thing.

"Oh, but it's not like America doesn't have deadly diseases and like Africa will necessarily get you on the border between life and death! You are being so bigoted and judgmental for taking precautions and getting a safe distance from vulnerable spaces where you can be predated with a very strong possibility of having no one for you to seek help!"

There can be arguments on whether this is the case, but for this we need studies.

I fail to see how it's the same.

99.9% of rape involve men. 99.9% of your chances to acquire, say, malaria, happen in fucked up countries.

Let's forget the risk and focus on how it's an unfair, dehumanizing stereotype!
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Kiruri
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17883
Founded: Dec 26, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kiruri » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:43 pm

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Kiruri wrote:I fail to see how it's the same.

99.9% of rape involve men. 99.9% of your chances to acquire, say, malaria, happen in fucked up countries.

Let's forget the risk and focus on how it's an unfair, dehumanizing stereotype!

Um.. are we agreeing on the same thing?
Or I'm to sleepy that I have no idea what I'm blabbing about :p
I'm BIwinning
CelebrateBisexualityDaySeptember 23rd
Costa Rican
Dirty Paws!
d(^o^)b¸¸♬·¯·♩¸¸♪·¯·♫¸¸
=^..^=

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:47 pm

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:99.9% of rape involve men. 99.9% of your chances to acquire, say, malaria, happen in fucked up countries.

Let's forget the risk and focus on how it's an unfair, dehumanizing stereotype!


Why the actual hell would segregated bathrooms prevent rape? Is the logic that if a man chances upon a woman, perhaps dressed provocatively, in the bathroom he will be overcome with rape lust and rape her? What's stopping him from waiting outside the bathroom and following her in? Hell, if anything doubling the chance a non-rapist will stumble into the bathroom is a good thing.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:52 pm

Des-Bal wrote:Why the actual hell would segregated bathrooms prevent rape? Is the logic that if a man chances upon a woman, perhaps dressed provocatively, in the bathroom he will be overcome with rape lust and rape her? What's stopping him from waiting outside the bathroom and following her in? Hell, if anything doubling the chance a non-rapist will stumble into the bathroom is a good thing.

This is a reason why people would preferentially go to places where plenty of other people for them to seek help of are available, and where men entering women's restrooms would cause plenty of issue.

This aside, most rapes are practiced by someone the victim knows. It's not absurd to expect that it would make certain kinds of workplace safer.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Kiruri
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17883
Founded: Dec 26, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kiruri » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:53 pm

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:Why the actual hell would segregated bathrooms prevent rape? Is the logic that if a man chances upon a woman, perhaps dressed provocatively, in the bathroom he will be overcome with rape lust and rape her? What's stopping him from waiting outside the bathroom and following her in? Hell, if anything doubling the chance a non-rapist will stumble into the bathroom is a good thing.

This is a reason why people would preferentially go to places where plenty of other people for them to seek help of are available, and where men entering women's restrooms would cause plenty of issue.

This aside, most rapes are practiced by someone the victim knows. It's not absurd to expect that it would make certain kinds of workplace safer.

How does bathrooms have anything to do with this? Besides.. I argue that you stated bathrooms are segregated for safety... but I beg to differ.
I'm BIwinning
CelebrateBisexualityDaySeptember 23rd
Costa Rican
Dirty Paws!
d(^o^)b¸¸♬·¯·♩¸¸♪·¯·♫¸¸
=^..^=

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:55 pm

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:This is a reason why people would preferentially go to places where plenty of other people for them to seek help of are available, and where men entering women's restrooms would cause plenty of issue.

This aside, most rapes are practiced by someone the victim knows. It's not absurd to expect that it would make certain kinds of workplace safer.


Uh no, see that doesn't matter. Nobody is going to rape someone and expect to get away with it while there's someone else in the bathroom or a reasonable risk that someone else might be in the bathroom. Unisex bathrooms mean there is twice as much foot traffic in that bathroom.

By that logic men and women should just be segregated in the workplace.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:59 pm

Des-Bal wrote:Uh no, see that doesn't matter. Nobody is going to rape someone and expect to get away with it while there's someone else in the bathroom or a reasonable risk that someone else might be in the bathroom. Unisex bathrooms mean there is twice as much foot traffic in that bathroom.

By that logic men and women should just be segregated in the workplace.

I don't necessarily agree with their logic.

It's more of how I think it shouldn't be misrepresented.

Since I don't actually believe it, I'm not the best to do it though.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Apr 05, 2014 2:27 am

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Kiruri wrote:Yes. Because generalizations are always true :(

99% of rapes are men-on-women. 99.9% involve men somehow.

It's not a stupid thing. If you claim it is misandrist, you are missing half of the point of describing attitudes as discriminatory.

That's like saying you're a racist for taking vaccines before a trip to Africa if you don't take them against the risks that might affect you in America.


Do you have actual data that 99% of rapes are men on women and that 99.9% involve men somehow?

I mean, surely, you have accurate statistics to back this mathematical impossibility that makes your country seem like it's inhabited by a disparingly amount of men who behave like monkeys and you are seemingly the only enlightened one.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Divair2
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6666
Founded: Feb 23, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair2 » Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:01 am

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Kiruri wrote:I fail to see how it's the same.

99.9% of rape involve men. 99.9% of your chances to acquire, say, malaria, happen in fucked up countries.

Let's forget the risk and focus on how it's an unfair, dehumanizing stereotype!

Source.

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:21 am

Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:
Des-Bal wrote:Why the actual hell would segregated bathrooms prevent rape? Is the logic that if a man chances upon a woman, perhaps dressed provocatively, in the bathroom he will be overcome with rape lust and rape her? What's stopping him from waiting outside the bathroom and following her in? Hell, if anything doubling the chance a non-rapist will stumble into the bathroom is a good thing.

This is a reason why people would preferentially go to places where plenty of other people for them to seek help of are available, and where men entering women's restrooms would cause plenty of issue.
What bullshit. All segregated restrooms do is place increased burden on the disabled and elderly and make the lives of trans people hell. Someone willing to rape someone is not going to be stopped by a sign on the door.

This aside, most rapes are practiced by someone the victim knows. It's not absurd to expect that it would make certain kinds of workplace safer.
It is absurd. A place that literally anyone can use and frequent use is honestly expected is one of the less likely places for a rape to occur.
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Degenerate Heart of HetRio
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10600
Founded: Feb 12, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:32 am

Divair2 wrote:Source.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rape_by_gender

Got the number wrong. Memory failed me. :oops:

91% of the ones that are registered as such are man-on-woman, 9% man-on-man.
Pro: Communism/anarchism, Indigenous rights, MOGAI stuff, bodily autonomy, disability rights, environmentalism
Meh: Animal rights, non-harmful religion/superstition, militant atheism, left-leaning reform of capitalism
Anti: Dyadic superstructure (sex-gender birth designation and hierarchy), positivism, conservatism, imperialism, Zionism, Orientalism, fascism, religious right, bending to reactionary concerns before freedom/common concern, fraudulent beliefs and ideologies

Formerly "Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro".

Compass: -10.00, -9.13
S-E Ideology: Demc. Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)
S-E school of thought: Communist (100% ditto, 96% Post-Keynesian)

Though this says I'm a social democrat, I'm largely a left communist.

User avatar
-The Unified Earth Governments-
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12215
Founded: Aug 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby -The Unified Earth Governments- » Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:37 am

Nightkill the Emperor wrote:
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:You're so mean.

It's the frank truth. I won't be condescending by giving you a sugarcoated lie.

Oh boy!

I love sugar!
FactbookHistoryColoniesEmbassy Program V.IIUNSC Navy (WIP)InfantryAmmo Mods
/// A.N.N. \\\
News - 10/27/2558: Deglassing of Reach is going smoother than expected. | First prototype laser rifle is beginning experimentation. | The Sangheili Civil War is officially over, Arbiter Thel'Vadam and his Swords of Sanghelios have successfully eliminated remaining Covenant cells on Sanghelios. | President Ruth Charet to hold press meeting within the hour on the end of the Sangheili Civil War. | The Citadel Council official introduces the Unggoy as a member of the Citadel.

The Most Important Issue Result - "Robosexual marriages are increasingly common."

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36757
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:59 am

-The Unified Earth Governments- wrote:
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:It's the frank truth. I won't be condescending by giving you a sugarcoated lie.

Oh boy!

I love sugar!

Sugar kills people you know.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sat Apr 05, 2014 10:43 pm

Nightkill the Emperor wrote:
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Why should cis people be somehow protected of oh-so-mean-and-invasive-and-obnoxious us trans people?

As if you didn't already have privilege in all other areas of life? :eyebrow:

Why should one care about how they feel about our existence and how they judge our gender as legitimate?

In most cultures, a cis man walking into a woman's bathroom would make the women very uncomfortable.

A woman who is biologically male walking into a woman's bathroom would have the same effect, is what he's saying.


Why should a transwoman have to use the men's room, then? Where she would be most likely exposed as a transwoman, and likely subsequently beaten/raped/killed?

Nightkill the Emperor wrote:
Linux and the X wrote:Ah, no. See, the argument is that trans women should be allowed to use the women's restroom because they're women.

And the other argument is that they may be women, but cis women would feel extremely uncomfortable by this. In my area, it would never fly.


And the counter argument is that by not allowing transwomen to use the women's room, you're allowing them to get beaten/raped/killed just for trying to use the fucking bathroom. In any reasonable society, that is what should never fly.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sat Apr 05, 2014 11:07 pm

Grenartia wrote:

Why should a transwoman have to use the men's room, then? Where she would be most likely exposed as a transwoman, and likely subsequently beaten/raped/killed?


And the counter argument is that by not allowing transwomen to use the women's room, you're allowing them to get beaten/raped/killed just for trying to use the fucking bathroom. In any reasonable society, that is what should never fly.


You said likely a couple times there, how likely exactly?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sat Apr 05, 2014 11:18 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Grenartia wrote:

Why should a transwoman have to use the men's room, then? Where she would be most likely exposed as a transwoman, and likely subsequently beaten/raped/killed?


And the counter argument is that by not allowing transwomen to use the women's room, you're allowing them to get beaten/raped/killed just for trying to use the fucking bathroom. In any reasonable society, that is what should never fly.


You said likely a couple times there, how likely exactly?


I'm afraid I don't have any exact numbers immediately on hand (I'd rather not keep too many depressing statistics dedicated to memory, for obvious reasons of personal morale), but this source should provide the relevant information.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Sat Apr 05, 2014 11:35 pm

Grenartia wrote:
I'm afraid I don't have any exact numbers immediately on hand (I'd rather not keep too many depressing statistics dedicated to memory, for obvious reasons of personal morale), but this source should provide the relevant information.


That's 219 pages, I searched a few keywords and didn't come up with anything that would answer my question.

You're talking about violent criminals making rampant attacks of opportunity in mens restrooms. Can I use the ladies room? I'm not fond of violent criminals either. I'm a fella but given that gender is a matter of your internal state I'm no different than an mtf who isn't passing. I might make the patrons uncomfortable but I believe we've established that's of no real concern.
Last edited by Des-Bal on Sat Apr 05, 2014 11:36 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:57 pm

Des-Bal wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
I'm afraid I don't have any exact numbers immediately on hand (I'd rather not keep too many depressing statistics dedicated to memory, for obvious reasons of personal morale), but this source should provide the relevant information.


That's 219 pages, I searched a few keywords and didn't come up with anything that would answer my question.

You're talking about violent criminals making rampant attacks of opportunity in mens restrooms. Can I use the ladies room? I'm not fond of violent criminals either. I'm a fella but given that gender is a matter of your internal state I'm no different than an mtf who isn't passing. I might make the patrons uncomfortable but I believe we've established that's of no real concern.


You're not a woman. And you're not a woman who would otherwise have to use the men's room.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Des-Bal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 32055
Founded: Jan 24, 2010
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Des-Bal » Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:58 pm

Grenartia wrote:
You're not a woman. And you're not a woman who would otherwise have to use the men's room.


So?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bawkie

Advertisement

Remove ads