Nightkill the Emperor wrote:And I do.
You're so mean.
Advertisement

by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:23 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:And I do.

by Nightkill the Emperor » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:25 pm
Nat: Night's always in some bizarre state somewhere between "intoxicated enough to kill a hair metal lead singer" and "annoying Mormon missionary sober".
Swith: It's because you're so awesome. God himself refreshes the screen before he types just to see if Nightkill has written anything while he was off somewhere else.
by Kiruri » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:26 pm
I was referring to the bathroom thing.It's not a stupid thing. If you claim it is misandrist, you are missing half of the point of describing attitudes as discriminatory.That's like saying you're a racist for taking vaccines before a trip to Africa if you don't take them against the risks that might affect you in America..

by Des-Bal » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:30 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:99% of rapes are men-on-women. 99.9% involve men somehow.
It's not a stupid thing. If you claim it is misandrist, you are missing half of the point of describing attitudes as discriminatory.
That's like saying you're a racist for taking vaccines before a trip to Africa if you don't take them against the risks that might affect you in America.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:32 pm
Kiruri wrote:I was referring to the bathroom thing.Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:It's not a stupid thing. If you claim it is misandrist, you are missing half of the point of describing attitudes as discriminatory.That's like saying you're a racist for taking vaccines before a trip to Africa if you don't take them against the risks that might affect you in America..
by Kiruri » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:36 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Yeah, but pay attention to my comparison. You are doing the same thing.
"Oh, but it's not like America doesn't have deadly diseases and like Africa will necessarily get you on the border between life and death! You are being so bigoted and judgmental for taking precautions and getting a safe distance from vulnerable spaces where you can be predated with a very strong possibility of having no one for you to seek help!"
There can be arguments on whether this is the case, but for this we need studies.

by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:39 pm
Kiruri wrote:Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Yeah, but pay attention to my comparison. You are doing the same thing.
"Oh, but it's not like America doesn't have deadly diseases and like Africa will necessarily get you on the border between life and death! You are being so bigoted and judgmental for taking precautions and getting a safe distance from vulnerable spaces where you can be predated with a very strong possibility of having no one for you to seek help!"
There can be arguments on whether this is the case, but for this we need studies.
I fail to see how it's the same.
by Kiruri » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:43 pm


by Des-Bal » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:47 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:99.9% of rape involve men. 99.9% of your chances to acquire, say, malaria, happen in fucked up countries.
Let's forget the risk and focus on how it's an unfair, dehumanizing stereotype!
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:52 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Why the actual hell would segregated bathrooms prevent rape? Is the logic that if a man chances upon a woman, perhaps dressed provocatively, in the bathroom he will be overcome with rape lust and rape her? What's stopping him from waiting outside the bathroom and following her in? Hell, if anything doubling the chance a non-rapist will stumble into the bathroom is a good thing.
by Kiruri » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:53 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Des-Bal wrote:Why the actual hell would segregated bathrooms prevent rape? Is the logic that if a man chances upon a woman, perhaps dressed provocatively, in the bathroom he will be overcome with rape lust and rape her? What's stopping him from waiting outside the bathroom and following her in? Hell, if anything doubling the chance a non-rapist will stumble into the bathroom is a good thing.
This is a reason why people would preferentially go to places where plenty of other people for them to seek help of are available, and where men entering women's restrooms would cause plenty of issue.
This aside, most rapes are practiced by someone the victim knows. It's not absurd to expect that it would make certain kinds of workplace safer.

by Des-Bal » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:55 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:This is a reason why people would preferentially go to places where plenty of other people for them to seek help of are available, and where men entering women's restrooms would cause plenty of issue.
This aside, most rapes are practiced by someone the victim knows. It's not absurd to expect that it would make certain kinds of workplace safer.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Thu Apr 03, 2014 5:59 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Uh no, see that doesn't matter. Nobody is going to rape someone and expect to get away with it while there's someone else in the bathroom or a reasonable risk that someone else might be in the bathroom. Unisex bathrooms mean there is twice as much foot traffic in that bathroom.
By that logic men and women should just be segregated in the workplace.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Sat Apr 05, 2014 2:27 am
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Kiruri wrote:Yes. Because generalizations are always true
99% of rapes are men-on-women. 99.9% involve men somehow.
It's not a stupid thing. If you claim it is misandrist, you are missing half of the point of describing attitudes as discriminatory.
That's like saying you're a racist for taking vaccines before a trip to Africa if you don't take them against the risks that might affect you in America.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Threlizdun » Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:21 am
What bullshit. All segregated restrooms do is place increased burden on the disabled and elderly and make the lives of trans people hell. Someone willing to rape someone is not going to be stopped by a sign on the door.Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Des-Bal wrote:Why the actual hell would segregated bathrooms prevent rape? Is the logic that if a man chances upon a woman, perhaps dressed provocatively, in the bathroom he will be overcome with rape lust and rape her? What's stopping him from waiting outside the bathroom and following her in? Hell, if anything doubling the chance a non-rapist will stumble into the bathroom is a good thing.
This is a reason why people would preferentially go to places where plenty of other people for them to seek help of are available, and where men entering women's restrooms would cause plenty of issue.
It is absurd. A place that literally anyone can use and frequent use is honestly expected is one of the less likely places for a rape to occur.This aside, most rapes are practiced by someone the victim knows. It's not absurd to expect that it would make certain kinds of workplace safer.

by Degenerate Heart of HetRio » Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:32 am
Divair2 wrote:Source.

by -The Unified Earth Governments- » Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:37 am
News - 10/27/2558: Deglassing of Reach is going smoother than expected. | First prototype laser rifle is beginning experimentation. | The Sangheili Civil War is officially over, Arbiter Thel'Vadam and his Swords of Sanghelios have successfully eliminated remaining Covenant cells on Sanghelios. | President Ruth Charet to hold press meeting within the hour on the end of the Sangheili Civil War. | The Citadel Council official introduces the Unggoy as a member of the Citadel.

by Benuty » Sat Apr 05, 2014 7:59 am

by Grenartia » Sat Apr 05, 2014 10:43 pm
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Why should cis people be somehow protected of oh-so-mean-and-invasive-and-obnoxious us trans people?
As if you didn't already have privilege in all other areas of life?![]()
Why should one care about how they feel about our existence and how they judge our gender as legitimate?
In most cultures, a cis man walking into a woman's bathroom would make the women very uncomfortable.
A woman who is biologically male walking into a woman's bathroom would have the same effect, is what he's saying.
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Linux and the X wrote:Ah, no. See, the argument is that trans women should be allowed to use the women's restroom because they're women.
And the other argument is that they may be women, but cis women would feel extremely uncomfortable by this. In my area, it would never fly.

by Des-Bal » Sat Apr 05, 2014 11:07 pm
Grenartia wrote:
Why should a transwoman have to use the men's room, then? Where she would be most likely exposed as a transwoman, and likely subsequently beaten/raped/killed?
And the counter argument is that by not allowing transwomen to use the women's room, you're allowing them to get beaten/raped/killed just for trying to use the fucking bathroom. In any reasonable society, that is what should never fly.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Grenartia » Sat Apr 05, 2014 11:18 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Grenartia wrote:
Why should a transwoman have to use the men's room, then? Where she would be most likely exposed as a transwoman, and likely subsequently beaten/raped/killed?
And the counter argument is that by not allowing transwomen to use the women's room, you're allowing them to get beaten/raped/killed just for trying to use the fucking bathroom. In any reasonable society, that is what should never fly.
You said likely a couple times there, how likely exactly?

by Des-Bal » Sat Apr 05, 2014 11:35 pm
Grenartia wrote:
I'm afraid I don't have any exact numbers immediately on hand (I'd rather not keep too many depressing statistics dedicated to memory, for obvious reasons of personal morale), but this source should provide the relevant information.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Grenartia » Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:57 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Grenartia wrote:
I'm afraid I don't have any exact numbers immediately on hand (I'd rather not keep too many depressing statistics dedicated to memory, for obvious reasons of personal morale), but this source should provide the relevant information.
That's 219 pages, I searched a few keywords and didn't come up with anything that would answer my question.
You're talking about violent criminals making rampant attacks of opportunity in mens restrooms. Can I use the ladies room? I'm not fond of violent criminals either. I'm a fella but given that gender is a matter of your internal state I'm no different than an mtf who isn't passing. I might make the patrons uncomfortable but I believe we've established that's of no real concern.

by Des-Bal » Mon Apr 07, 2014 10:58 pm
Grenartia wrote:
You're not a woman. And you're not a woman who would otherwise have to use the men's room.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bawkie
Advertisement