LGBT Rights & Issues Thread

[Ostroeuropa]

So you don't think males are worthy of respect?

Don't you think men are going through enough?

Why should men tough it out, but not women?

Women also hate to be treated like weak little children.

Most often than not, when they aren't brainwashed about how they should be because someone taught them that this is their inherent natural role, they want to show they're as capable of stuff and as strong as men, if not more in the context.

Sure. Problem is that his rhetoric is based entirely around being nice to women and fucking over men.

[Degenerate Heart of HetRio]

... I'm not sure how I feel about you two turning feminism into a dick/clitoral-measuring contest.

Admittedly, my approach was more of "common enemy" in nature this time.

[Kelinfort]

So you don't think males are worthy of respect?

Don't you think men are going through enough?

Why should men tough it out, but not women?

The only males worthy of respect as strong ones, men of actin, virtue, honor, and action.

A real man can go through anything and tough it out. No man should ever become emotionally weak. The only time for sensitivity is during romantic quality time with your woman.

Women should not have to tough it out. They're sensitive and prone to strong emotions, and are already plagued with menstrual cycles, and after, child rearing and labor.

Men have the same emotional responses as women. Why shouldn't both be subject to the same burden? Also, you're gonna need a source for those ideals. Your own opinion doesn't suffice.

I love the smell of fascist in the evening.

[Ostroeuropa]

So you don't think males are worthy of respect?

Don't you think men are going through enough?

Why should men tough it out, but not women?

The only males worthy of respect as strong ones, men of actin, virtue, honor, and action.

A real man can go through anything and tough it out. No man should ever become emotionally weak. The only time for sensitivity is during romantic quality time with your woman.

Women should not have to tough it out. They're sensitive and prone to strong emotions, and are already plagued with menstrual cycles, and after, child rearing and labor.

Right.
And have you consulted people other than histories wackiest dictators to come to this conclusion, or would it be too much trouble to talk to, say, a sociologist?

[Degenerate Heart of HetRio]

The only males worthy of respect as strong ones, men of actin, virtue, honor, and action.

A real man can go through anything and tough it out. No man should ever become emotionally weak. The only time for sensitivity is during romantic quality time with your woman.

Women should not have to tough it out. They're sensitive and prone to strong emotions, and are already plagued with menstrual cycles, and after, child rearing and labor.

Many women nevertheless are stronger than any of these white cis straight middle class guys in developed countries around the internet crying oppression and/or being at the spot of a campaign of hate and persecution.

And they want equal opportunity and treatment as such.

[Its a Texas Thing]

So you don't think males are worthy of respect?

Don't you think men are going through enough?

Why should men tough it out, but not women?

The only males worthy of respect as strong ones, men of actin, virtue, honor, and action.

A real man can go through anything and tough it out. No man should ever become emotionally weak. The only time for sensitivity is during romantic quality time with your woman.

Women should not have to tough it out. They're sensitive and prone to strong emotions, and are already plagued with menstrual cycles, and after, child rearing and labor.

Sorry, the only qualifications needed to be Male^TM are male chromosomes, gonads and genitals.

[Kelinfort]

Women also hate to be treated like weak little children.

Most often than not, when they aren't brainwashed about how they should be because someone taught them that this is their inherent natural role, they want to show they're as capable of stuff and as strong as men, if not more in the context.

Sure. Problem is that his rhetoric is based entirely around being nice to women and fucking over men.

I haven't seen that much 'fucking over' of men. Besides the traditionalist view, it seems men benefit far more in the current system.

[Ostroeuropa]

Sure. Problem is that his rhetoric is based entirely around being nice to women and fucking over men.

I haven't seen that much 'fucking over' of men. Besides the traditionalist view, it seems men benefit far more in the current system.

Source? (Remember that a disempowered women has high visibility due to feminism currently. A disempowered men? No.)

[Degenerate Heart of HetRio]

Right.
And have you consulted people other than histories wackiest dictators to come to this conclusion, or would it be too much trouble to talk to, say, a sociologist?

This, really. lol

Maybe he will say it's impossible for people who specialize in Humanities be anything alike his "New Man". It's not valid if it doesn't worship fucked up gender roles enough.

[The New World Oceania]

The only males worthy of respect as strong ones, men of actin, virtue, honor, and action.

A real man can go through anything and tough it out. No man should ever become emotionally weak. The only time for sensitivity is during romantic quality time with your woman.

Women should not have to tough it out. They're sensitive and prone to strong emotions, and are already plagued with menstrual cycles, and after, child rearing and labor.

Sorry, the only qualifications needed to be Male^TM are male chromosomes, gonads and genitals.

I imagine psychological identity should suffice, even.

[Degenerate Heart of HetRio]

Sorry, the only qualifications needed to be Male^TM are male chromosomes, gonads and genitals. identifying as such.

Ficks'd.

[Ostroeuropa]

Right.
And have you consulted people other than histories wackiest dictators to come to this conclusion, or would it be too much trouble to talk to, say, a sociologist?

This, really. lol

Maybe he will say it's impossible for people who specialize in Humanities be anything alike his "New Man". It's not valid if it doesn't worship fucked up gender roles enough.

I think bugs bunny has some real strong points on the economy. I'll just base my worldview around that without looking any further into the matter.

[Degenerate Heart of HetRio]

I imagine psychological identity should suffice, even.

Damn Mormon ninjas.

[Its a Texas Thing]

Sorry, the only qualifications needed to be Male^TM are male chromosomes, gonads and genitals. identifying as such.

Ficks'd.

Whatever, I meant the sex with balls and a penis, not the identity.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

The only males worthy of respect as strong ones, men of actin, virtue, honor, and action.

A real man can go through anything and tough it out. No man should ever become emotionally weak. The only time for sensitivity is during romantic quality time with your woman.

Women should not have to tough it out. They're sensitive and prone to strong emotions, and are already plagued with menstrual cycles, and after, child rearing and labor.

Sorry, the only qualifications needed to be Male^TM are male chromosomes, gonads and genitals.

Redundant, are we?

[Degenerate Heart of HetRio]

Redundant, are we?

There was a Chinese man who found after 10 years of marriage in his 40s he actually had an uterus, ovaries and menstrual cycles, so not really.

[Its a Texas Thing]

Sorry, the only qualifications needed to be Male^TM are male chromosomes, gonads and genitals.

Redundant, are we?

Isn't it possible to have male chromosomes and female genitals or have I missed out on anything on the intersex lessons?

[Degenerate Heart of HetRio]

Redundant, are we?

Isn't it possible to have male chromosomes and female genitals or have I missed out on anything on the intersex lessons?

No, you weren't redundant.

[The Rich Port]

... I'm not sure how I feel about you two turning feminism into a dick/clitoral-measuring contest.

Admittedly, my approach was more of "common enemy" in nature this time.

Actually, if I can be perfectly frank, that aspect turns me on for some reason.

[Its a Texas Thing]

Isn't it possible to have male chromosomes and female genitals or have I missed out on anything on the intersex lessons?

No, you weren't redundant.

My body is confused. What's are you talking about?

[Ostroeuropa]

... I'm not sure how I feel about you two turning feminism into a dick/clitoral-measuring contest.

Admittedly, my approach was more of "common enemy" in nature this time.

Pretty much.
I think Hetrio is wrong.
I think Iron Man is damned wrong.

[Degenerate Heart of HetRio]

Actually, if I can be perfectly frank, that aspect turns me on for some reason.

I'm actually not that different from Ostro, in comparison to the mainstream of feminism in my country.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

Redundant, are we?

There was a Chinese man who found after 10 years of marriage in his 40s he actually had an uterus, ovaries and menstrual cycles, so not really.

Aren't gonads part of your genitals?!

Or did I make a left turn in anatomy 101?

[Its a Texas Thing]

There was a Chinese man who found after 10 years of marriage in his 40s he actually had an uterus, ovaries and menstrual cycles, so not really.

Aren't gonads part of your genitals?!

Or did I make a left turn in anatomy 101?

Nah. AFAIK balls and ovaries are the gonads while penis and vagina are the genitals.

[Degenerate Heart of HetRio]

No, you weren't redundant.

My body is confused. What's are you talking about?

You gave the correct definition.

Chromosomes, gonads, genital shape, endocrine gearing and neurological wiring are all independent from each other in continua "male"-ambiguous/absent-"female".

You need chromosomes, gonads and genital shape aligned to be regarded as a "full man" or "full woman" (i.e. dyadic), but endocrine gearing function that is "reverse" from the expected is also regarded as an intersex condition.