NATION

PASSWORD

What do you think about UKIP?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What is your opinion of UKIP?

A very positive one
56
18%
Somewhat positive
33
11%
Pretty neutral
24
8%
Somewhat negative
38
12%
Very negative
154
50%
 
Total votes : 305

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:38 pm

Divair wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:None, it was purely a hypothetical statement and I should have clarified.

Though for next year's general election I will be voting in the Liverpool constituency (whatever it is) and will probably have a second postal vote to my hometown.

Ah. I'm rather screwed, as I vote in Philip Hammond's constituency. Solidly Tory.

My hometown used to be a Labour safe seat until the last election when it inexplicably flipped Tory, to a wazzock who can't even get someone to spellcheck his website.

Though I shouldn't be surprised, since Grimsby is somewhat... racially homogenous, and this MP is pretty anti-immigration and not much else.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Scholencia
Minister
 
Posts: 3017
Founded: Feb 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Scholencia » Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:50 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:I guess from this you think Gove's whitewashing of WWI politics is an excellent policy and we should be rounding up these leftist scholars? I mean, what do they know with their period texts written by people who were there and basic analysis of the politics of the world of the era.

No, just give a more patriotic tune into the explaining of history. Like for examply instead of teaching the kids how the "soldiers fell in the battle fields for nothing" says how they are a great example of the dedication to the love of their country. Truth is twosided and just to teach you one sided truth is bad.

Germany violated the Treaty of Versailles because it was one of the maddest things put to paper. A second War was predicted by... someone, entirely because of how ludicrous the Treaty was. It carved up Germany's wealth, empire and production for the victors. They might as well have just bloody occupied it, carved up the country itself, disbanded Germany and been done with it.
If you didn't expect a second war to come about from that treaty, you were a colossal bellend.
If you wanted that treaty to lead to a second war, you're a worse bellend, because you're now complicit into politicking into existence the holocaust.

Paying reparations is just fair. Why did Germany declared war in first place if it did not want to pay reparations?

It was already occupied in Saar province and there was also a separatist movement initiated by France. But wiothout results.

Also, what has the holocaust to do with this now?

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:53 pm

Germany declared war, because Russia declared war on the Austro-Hungarian Empire because they declared war on Serbia because a Serbian terror group backed by Serbian military commanders assassinated the Archduke of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

WWI politics were a massive clusterfuck of criss-crossing allianced, which is why the same shit doesn't still exist today.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Alf Landon
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 472
Founded: Oct 13, 2009
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Alf Landon » Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:53 pm

Divair wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:None, it was purely a hypothetical statement and I should have clarified.

Though for next year's general election I will be voting in the Liverpool constituency (whatever it is) and will probably have a second postal vote to my hometown.

Ah. I'm rather screwed, as I vote in Philip Hammond's constituency. Solidly Tory.


You poor man.

User avatar
Scholencia
Minister
 
Posts: 3017
Founded: Feb 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Scholencia » Thu Feb 20, 2014 3:57 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:Germany declared war, because Russia declared war on the Austro-Hungarian Empire because they declared war on Serbia because a Serbian terror group backed by Serbian military commanders assassinated the Archduke of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

WWI politics were a massive clusterfuck of criss-crossing allianced, which is why the same shit doesn't still exist today.

Why did declared war on belgium? It was necesarly, and the UK would not enter in the war.

It could easily attack France directly, but no Germany was a power hungry nation and had to attack Belgium.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Feb 20, 2014 4:06 pm

Scholencia wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Germany declared war, because Russia declared war on the Austro-Hungarian Empire because they declared war on Serbia because a Serbian terror group backed by Serbian military commanders assassinated the Archduke of the Austro-Hungarian Empire.

WWI politics were a massive clusterfuck of criss-crossing allianced, which is why the same shit doesn't still exist today.

Why did declared war on belgium? It was necesarly, and the UK would not enter in the war.

It could easily attack France directly, but no Germany was a power hungry nation and had to attack Belgium.

It's one more place that France and Britain can't use to fight Germany. And one more place that Germany could use to fight them.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Densaner
Minister
 
Posts: 2750
Founded: Jul 19, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Densaner » Thu Feb 20, 2014 4:07 pm

I support their policy over EU membership. They are the only party in the UK with elected representation (mostly MEPs) who want to end Britain's membership of the EU. I don't like the EU. I don't like the agenda of a federal Europe. I particularly dislike the fact that many of the major changes brought in by the EU are proposed by people without an electoral mandate.

User avatar
Alf Landon
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 472
Founded: Oct 13, 2009
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Alf Landon » Thu Feb 20, 2014 4:11 pm

I'm surprised the positive opinion side of this poll isn't doing better. After that general election poll I did, I was expecting a rush of UKIP groupies, but that hasn't really materialised.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Thu Feb 20, 2014 4:13 pm

Densaner wrote:I support their policy over EU membership. They are the only party in the UK with elected representation (mostly MEPs) who want to end Britain's membership of the EU. I don't like the EU. I don't like the agenda of a federal Europe. I particularly dislike the fact that many of the major changes brought in by the EU are proposed by people without an electoral mandate.

The idea of a federal Europe isn't going to happen, it's mostly just talk.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Densaner
Minister
 
Posts: 2750
Founded: Jul 19, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Densaner » Thu Feb 20, 2014 4:18 pm

Alf Landon wrote:I'm surprised the positive opinion side of this poll isn't doing better. After that general election poll I did, I was expecting a rush of UKIP groupies, but that hasn't really materialised.


Not a UKIP groupie or member for that matter. However the lib/lab/con "groupies" ignoring the view that the UK should have a referendum on the EU is worthy of a mention. That view has been as high as 80% of the UK population according to opinion polls.

User avatar
Densaner
Minister
 
Posts: 2750
Founded: Jul 19, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Densaner » Thu Feb 20, 2014 4:19 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Densaner wrote:I support their policy over EU membership. They are the only party in the UK with elected representation (mostly MEPs) who want to end Britain's membership of the EU. I don't like the EU. I don't like the agenda of a federal Europe. I particularly dislike the fact that many of the major changes brought in by the EU are proposed by people without an electoral mandate.

The idea of a federal Europe isn't going to happen, it's mostly just talk.


Tell that to the Union of European Federalists and EU Commissioner Viviane Reding.

User avatar
Britanno
Minister
 
Posts: 2992
Founded: Apr 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Britanno » Thu Feb 20, 2014 4:20 pm

Scholencia wrote:Why did declared war on belgium? It was necesarly, and the UK would not enter in the war.

It could easily attack France directly, but no Germany was a power hungry nation and had to attack Belgium.


Germany attacked Belgium because France had been building up its defences on the border with Germany, and Germany needed to get to France quickly for the Schlieffen Plan to work and it thought going through Belgium would make it much quicker. However, they completely underestimated the Belgians, leading me to admire them massively.
NSGS Liberal Democrats - The Centrist Alternative
British, male, heterosexual, aged 26, liberal conservative, unitarian universalist
Pro: marriage equality, polygamy, abortion up to viability, UK Lib Dems, US Democrats
Anti: discrimination, euroscepticism, UKIP, immigrant bashing, UK Labour, US Republicans
British Home Counties wrote:
Alyakia wrote:our nations greatest achievement is slowly but surely being destroyed
America is doing fine atm

User avatar
Neo Rome Republic
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5363
Founded: Dec 27, 2012
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Neo Rome Republic » Thu Feb 20, 2014 4:25 pm

Lets see Xenophobic, Socially Conservative, Far-Right economically. Yep, I despise their existence.
Ethical and Metaphysical: (Pan) Humanist and Naturalist.
Political Views Sum: Centrist on social issues, Market Socialist on economic, and Radical Civic universalist on political governance.
This nation DOES(for most part) represent my OOC views.
''A rich man complaining about regulation and taxes, is like the drunkard at a party, complaining about not having enough to drink.'',

"An empty mind is a mind without a filter, the mind of a gullible fool. A closed mind is the mind unwilling to look at the reality outside its bubble. An open mind is one that is cautious, flexible yet balanced; looking at both the reality and the possibility."
OOC Info Page Pros And Cons Political Ideology

User avatar
The USOT
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5862
Founded: Mar 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The USOT » Thu Feb 20, 2014 5:37 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:The good thing about being human is that our ancestors are fucking monsters, they are pieces of shit. There is nothing to be glad of in them. The only way to look is forward. It's a liberating realization.

:eyebrow:

Because screw art, all the good people who ever lived, the wonderful insights of culture and poetry because of the past?
I don't even...
Eco-Friendly Green Cyborg Santa Claus

Contrary to the propaganda, we live in probably the least materialistic culture in history. If we cared about the things of the world, we would treat them quite differently. We would be concerned with their materiality. We would be interested in their beginnings and their ends, before and after they left our grasp.

Peter Timmerman, “Defending Materialism"

User avatar
Rabopari
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1061
Founded: Aug 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rabopari » Thu Feb 20, 2014 6:30 pm

DesAnges wrote:
Rabopari wrote:
that's the critisicm article and remember ANYBODY can edit wikipedia

Which is why you follow the references used to make the Wikipedia page. Do people not realise this?


i have'nt been on the page
For the bureaucrat, the world is a mere object to be manipulated by him- Karl Marx
Economic Left/Right: -1.50
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -1.13

I have a short temper. You have been warned

Pro: NHS,Libertarianism,Hezbollah,Hamas,Fascism,Palestine,Iran,Anti-Maiden,Houthi,Sufism,Capital Punishment.
Anti:Israel,Zionism,EU,NATO,EuroMaiden,US,Thatcher,London,German,Progressive Causes,Bankers,SJW's,LG

User avatar
Shove Piggy Shove
Diplomat
 
Posts: 757
Founded: Oct 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Shove Piggy Shove » Thu Feb 20, 2014 6:37 pm

Scholencia wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Ah yes, the class that bickered for centuries on whether or not slavery was a shit thing to do.
The class that argued with eachother on whether the poor and women deserve a vote.
The class that wasn't quite sure if the races should be equal.

Ah... common :rofl:
This all what you said did also the islamic caliphates and african tribes yet I bet because of your guilt complex you would never say that muslims and africans were evil.

At least the Britan was the first on the world who abolished that. 1Britain gave first to the women the right to vote, 2Bitain abolished slavery in the 18th century, and gave voting rights to all people regardless of race. All that even the african tribes or muslim caliphates did not even know what voting means.

But the class that was resolutely behind the multi-polar clusterfuck that led directly to two world wars, and risked a third that would have ended the human race with the Suez fiasco.
Splendid, splendid individuals. Heros one and all.

Umm... you need to use history lessons.


The bolded statement makes me want to point a couple of things out here:

1. The first country to give women the right to vote was New Zealand in 1893, the UK granted partial suffrage in 1918 and full suffrage in 1928 - we weren't even the first country in Europe to allow women to vote, this was Finland in 1906.

2. Slavery wasn't ended in the British empire until the 19th Century. The slave trade was outlawed in 1807 throughout the empire and slavery was abolished (via gradual manumission) in 1833. The united kingdoms of Denmark & Norway, however, did issue a decree in the 18th Century (1792) abolishing the slave trade, coming into full effect by 1803 and in doing so became the earliest European nation to ban the slave trade.
Save the Creme Egg!

Tim Minchin wrote:I'm not pessimistic about the supernatural, but rather I'm optimistic about the natural
Jasper Fforde wrote:If the real world were a book, it would never find a publisher. Overlong, detailed to the point of distraction - and ultimately, without a major resolution.
Dennis the peasant wrote:Listen. Strange women lying in ponds distributing swords is no basis for a system of government. Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.

User avatar
Greater-London
Senator
 
Posts: 3791
Founded: Nov 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater-London » Thu Feb 20, 2014 7:12 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:Because instead of refusing to play the system outright, I've instead tried to play it, exactly how it was intended to be played.


So playing a broken system is better somehow than rejecting it? fair enough. It's also debatable as to wether spoiling your ballot is refusing to play the system, I dont refuse liberal representative democracy just the candidates they give to me. The system however wasn't designed to be a mechanism to elect lesser of two evils, it was designed to allow people to choose the government of the day that they wanted.
Last edited by Greater-London on Thu Feb 20, 2014 7:18 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Born in Cambridge in 1993, just graduated with a 2.1 in Politics and International Relations from the University of Manchester - WHICH IS SICK

PRO: British Unionism, Commonwealth, Liberalism, Federalism, Palestine, NHS, Decriminalizing Drugs, West Ham UTD , Garage Music &, Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Tuition Fees, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties, Hypocrisy, Religious Fanaticism, Religion Bashing & Armchair activists

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

User avatar
Breadknife
Minister
 
Posts: 2803
Founded: Jul 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Breadknife » Thu Feb 20, 2014 7:27 pm

Britanno wrote:
Scholencia wrote:Why did declared war on belgium? It was necesarly, and the UK would not enter in the war.

It could easily attack France directly, but no Germany was a power hungry nation and had to attack Belgium.


Germany attacked Belgium because France had been building up its defences on the border with Germany, and Germany needed to get to France quickly for the Schlieffen Plan to work and it thought going through Belgium would make it much quicker. However, they completely underestimated the Belgians, leading me to admire them massively.

Still, it managed to work much better the second-time round, when doing effectively the same thing just to avoiding the Maginot Line.
Ceci n'est pas une griffe.

User avatar
Parti Ouvrier
Minister
 
Posts: 2804
Founded: Aug 19, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Parti Ouvrier » Thu Feb 20, 2014 7:39 pm

Greater-London wrote:
Bolrieg wrote:they're a bunch of useless out of touch arsehole like the rest of the dickheads who are in that nursery everyone calls Westminster


Wow. Okay fact check UKIP are very much out of the Westminster bubble, they are very much anti-establishment. As for being out of touch, I think your also wrong, notice how they have hoovered up votes from all 3 main political parties and also from people who say they haven't voted in years. Like it or not Farage and his ilk speak for millions of people up and down the United Kingdom in many areas more than our 3 big political parties.

David Cameron, educated at a public school, Nigel Farrage, also educated at a public school, Farrage's father was a stockbroker, as was Nigel Farrage. This man of the people PR is wearing very thin!
For a voluntary Socialist democratic republic of England, Scotland, Wales and a United Socialist Democratic Federal Republic of Ireland in a United Socialist Europe.
Leave Nato - abolish trident, abolish presidential monarchies (directly elected presidents) and presidential Prime Ministers

User avatar
Parti Ouvrier
Minister
 
Posts: 2804
Founded: Aug 19, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Parti Ouvrier » Thu Feb 20, 2014 7:44 pm

Estormo wrote:
Greater-London wrote:
I just don't understand how anyone can call themselves a Labour member or voter post 1997. Whilst I wouldn't have voted for the likes of old Labour they were worthy opponents with integrity. New Labour is just an election winning machine and mouth peace for middle-class gaurdian readers.

The...Guardian......*Cringe*

To be fair on the guardian, it was the same paper that pursued the Ed Snowden story and NSA surveillance with gusto, until the British state resorted to intimidation of the paper and American journalist Glen Greenwald.
Anyway, what is it with you out-dated nationalists? And what about human heritage? Why does both your Xenophobic party and ukip oppose the free movement of people?

By the way, I'm not voting Labour, too nationalist for my liking.
Last edited by Parti Ouvrier on Thu Feb 20, 2014 7:45 pm, edited 1 time in total.
For a voluntary Socialist democratic republic of England, Scotland, Wales and a United Socialist Democratic Federal Republic of Ireland in a United Socialist Europe.
Leave Nato - abolish trident, abolish presidential monarchies (directly elected presidents) and presidential Prime Ministers

User avatar
Parti Ouvrier
Minister
 
Posts: 2804
Founded: Aug 19, 2010
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Parti Ouvrier » Thu Feb 20, 2014 7:48 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Densaner wrote:I support their policy over EU membership. They are the only party in the UK with elected representation (mostly MEPs) who want to end Britain's membership of the EU. I don't like the EU. I don't like the agenda of a federal Europe. I particularly dislike the fact that many of the major changes brought in by the EU are proposed by people without an electoral mandate.

The idea of a federal Europe isn't going to happen, it's mostly just talk.

The EU is a confederation, how else is Spain able to threaten a veto potentially independent Scotland seeking to join the EU?
For a voluntary Socialist democratic republic of England, Scotland, Wales and a United Socialist Democratic Federal Republic of Ireland in a United Socialist Europe.
Leave Nato - abolish trident, abolish presidential monarchies (directly elected presidents) and presidential Prime Ministers

User avatar
Malgrave
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5719
Founded: Mar 29, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Malgrave » Thu Feb 20, 2014 7:55 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
Malgrave wrote:
You are quite lucky then. John Whittingdale, the homophobic Thatcherite is my MP. I'm half-tempted to try and steal his seat in the next election but I know that is an impossible pipe dream >_>

You don't know how much I'm tingling at the thought of an NSer as MP.

doitdoitdoitdoit


I'm tempted but I keep imagining people trawling through my post history on this website and assuming everything I post is my opinion. :unsure:
Frenequesta wrote:Well-dressed mad scientists with an edge.

United Kingdom of Malgrave (1910-)
Population: 331 million
GDP Per Capita: 42,000 dollars
Join the Leftist Cooperation and Security Pact

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Thu Feb 20, 2014 11:22 pm

Greater-London wrote:
Imperializt Russia wrote:Because instead of refusing to play the system outright, I've instead tried to play it, exactly how it was intended to be played.


So playing a broken system is better somehow than rejecting it? fair enough. It's also debatable as to wether spoiling your ballot is refusing to play the system, I dont refuse liberal representative democracy just the candidates they give to me. The system however wasn't designed to be a mechanism to elect lesser of two evils, it was designed to allow people to choose the government of the day that they wanted.

I believe that's an impossible idealism to ask of democracies.
Look at America. You're given a binary choice. Two shit sandwiches.

At least here we can actually compromise on some of our political wants to see our political needs better supported.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Scholencia
Minister
 
Posts: 3017
Founded: Feb 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Scholencia » Fri Feb 21, 2014 4:07 am

Shove Piggy Shove wrote:
Scholencia wrote:Ah... common :rofl:
This all what you said did also the islamic caliphates and african tribes yet I bet because of your guilt complex you would never say that muslims and africans were evil.

At least the Britan was the first on the world who abolished that. 1Britain gave first to the women the right to vote, 2Bitain abolished slavery in the 18th century, and gave voting rights to all people regardless of race. All that even the african tribes or muslim caliphates did not even know what voting means.


Umm... you need to use history lessons.


The bolded statement makes me want to point a couple of things out here:

1. The first country to give women the right to vote was New Zealand in 1893, the UK granted partial suffrage in 1918 and full suffrage in 1928 - we weren't even the first country in Europe to allow women to vote, this was Finland in 1906.

2. Slavery wasn't ended in the British empire until the 19th Century. The slave trade was outlawed in 1807 throughout the empire and slavery was abolished (via gradual manumission) in 1833. The united kingdoms of Denmark & Norway, however, did issue a decree in the 18th Century (1792) abolishing the slave trade, coming into full effect by 1803 and in doing so became the earliest European nation to ban the slave trade.


1. New Zealand was part of the British Empire back than so indeed the UK was tge first country who abolished.
2. Slavery was banned in the British island in the mid 18th century while the whole Empire abolished it later. When did the muslim caliphates abolished by the way?

User avatar
Tagmatium
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16600
Founded: Dec 17, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Tagmatium » Fri Feb 21, 2014 4:36 am

Scholencia wrote:UKIP may have its problems and to be honest it is not perfect but at least they are not traitors as the labour and LibDem who dedicated themselfs to the cause of Brussels and the Europroject.

Britain had a brilliant political class in the golden age of the Empire (for which I am bit nostalgic) which ended in the 1950s. UKIP at least share some stances of thoose capable statesmen.

Because UKIP likes to pretend that the Empire is still a think, and that Britain is a special enough snowflake that it can do what the fuck it wants.

There's a reason why it ended in the 1950s - reality happened, and shit had to change.
The above post may or may not be serious.
"For too long, we have been a passive, tolerant society, saying to our citizens: as long as you obey the law, we will leave you alone."
North Calaveras wrote:Tagmatium, it was never about pie...

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Bienenhalde, Calption, Free Stalliongrad, Galloism, Gaybeans, Manidontcare, Nantoraka, Ostroeuropa, Raskana, The Archregimancy, The Jamesian Republic, The Matthew Islands, The Rio Grande River Basin

Advertisement

Remove ads