Page 1 of 2

Civil Eatery

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:23 pm
by FreeAgency
Shellfish

The very thought of them is disgusting is it not? Not only that but to eat them is wholy unnatural. Lobsters aren't found in Africa; I've never seen a single scientific studdy which showed that men are supposed to eat crab, and indeed doing so is entirely a result of our modern hedonistic society. It's true that in ancient times men knew not to eat shellfish, and to punish those among them who did. Studdies have even shown that God was wise in prohibiting them thus, and he has rained his justice down upon those who would refuse his will: Cholera, Botchulism; the shellfish-eating plagues.

Eating shellfish is an afront to all good Americans, and those who are actively trying to subvert our culture. They run commercials for Red Lobster at peak prime-time hours, and shows such as 'deadliest catch' to seduce our youth by making the 'shellfish lifestyle' seem thrilling and "cool."

Indeed there is no escaping it. Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin, and -I- am told to leave when I ask, politely, for him to please keep his lifestyle private. They run adds in newspapers, on public busses, and throughout the godless internet. They are even trying to subvert our education system by telling children that eating shellfish is perfectly healthy if done "safely," that it is not unnatural, and that people who do so are not evil. If we don't stand up against these headons now, what will happen to the next generation?

That's why I am proposing that all good Godfearing Americans join forces and propose legislation to thwart the Pro-Shellfish agenda. Now don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to introduce religion into the government - even though this nation was founded on Christian ideals - or force anyone to do anything. I hate the sin, not the sinner, and it must be their decision to embrase Christ and abandon their wicked dietary habits. Instead, I propose only that we act to preserve traditional values, by constitutionally defining a restaurant as an institution that serves non-shellfish only.

Those who wish to persue their godless ways will still be allowed to. We will create seperate, but equal, "Civil Eateries," where they can eat whatever horrid things they like. This we must do, for the preservation of our morals, our society, and our children. America depends upon it, god bless!

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:37 pm
by Rejistania
:rofl: excellent satire! :rofl:

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:42 pm
by FreeAgency
Rejistania wrote::rofl: excellent satire! :rofl:


What ever do you mean? ;)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 3:56 pm
by Vectrova
10/10, would read again. Cool satire, bro.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:10 pm
by Redwulf
You made me hungry. Now I have to go have some shrimp.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:11 pm
by Chrobalta
Hey!!! It is a friday night, how about we all take a NSG road trip down to Red Lobster?

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:11 pm
by Saige Dragon
Has anyone ever tried to eat a lobster in a civil manner? Damn near impossible...

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:18 pm
by Nation of Quebec
Please tell me that this is satire.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:18 pm
by Chrobalta
Nation of Quebec wrote:Please tell me that this is satire.

No, he is deadly serious!!!

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:21 pm
by FreeAgency
Chrobalta wrote:
Nation of Quebec wrote:Please tell me that this is satire.

No, he is deadly serious!!!


Indeed. Deadly.







In all seriousness, satirizing the fundies is a tad tricky. I was convinced westboro was fake for longer then I'd care to admit.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:23 pm
by Tokos
I thought this was satirising vegetarianism.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:24 pm
by New Kereptica
Tokos wrote:I thought this was satirising vegetarianism.


It's not. That's silly.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:24 pm
by Andaluciae
FreeAgency wrote:Indeed there is no escaping it. Shellfish eating used to be restricted to dens of sin such as Red Lobster and Long John Silvers, but now days I cannot even take my children to a public restaurant anymore (even the supposedly "family friendly ones") without risking their having to watch some deranged individual flaunting his sin,


Sigged.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:25 pm
by Tokos
Except it falls a little short as satire because eating shellfish is very very very very good for you.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:25 pm
by FreeAgency
Tokos wrote:I thought this was satirising vegetarianism.

It can be that too, an author's works belong to the masses. There is no 'right' interpretation.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:26 pm
by New Kereptica
Tokos wrote:Except it falls a little short as satire because eating shellfish is very very very very good for you.


So is gay sex.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:27 pm
by Tokos
New Kereptica wrote:
Tokos wrote:Except it falls a little short as satire because eating shellfish is very very very very good for you.


So is gay sex.


No it's not. Not by any stretch of the imagination. Even heterosexual sex is, at best, neutral.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:28 pm
by Cosmopoles
Tokos wrote:Except it falls a little short as satire because eating shellfish is very very very very good for you.


How is invoking God's Wrath very good for you? I can't think of anything that could be more hazardous to one's health.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:29 pm
by New Kereptica
Tokos wrote:
New Kereptica wrote:
Tokos wrote:Except it falls a little short as satire because eating shellfish is very very very very good for you.


So is gay sex.


No it's not. Not by any stretch of the imagination. Even heterosexual sex is, at best, neutral.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article ... troke.html

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:29 pm
by Tokos
Cosmopoles wrote:
Tokos wrote:Except it falls a little short as satire because eating shellfish is very very very very good for you.


How is invoking God's Wrath very good for you? I can't think of anything that could be more hazardous to one's health.


Obviously we're not going to let the Jews eat our lovely shellfish.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:29 pm
by Flameswroth
I support the creation/classification of 'civil eateries'.

Why the heck should I have to sit by and listen as some glutton digs into lobster tail or a shrimp platter. It's disgusting, and needs to be separated from mainstream society.

If God intended for us to eat shellfish, why'd he make the shell so hard? Hmmm?!

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:30 pm
by New Kereptica
Flameswroth wrote:I support the creation/classification of 'civil eateries'.

Why the heck should I have to sit by and listen as some glutton digs into lobster tail or a shrimp platter. It's disgusting, and needs to be separated from mainstream society.

If God intended for us to eat shellfish, why'd he make the shell so hard? Hmmm?!


That just means you're supposed to eat them after they molt ;)

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:35 pm
by Flameswroth
New Kereptica wrote:
Flameswroth wrote:I support the creation/classification of 'civil eateries'.

Why the heck should I have to sit by and listen as some glutton digs into lobster tail or a shrimp platter. It's disgusting, and needs to be separated from mainstream society.

If God intended for us to eat shellfish, why'd he make the shell so hard? Hmmm?!


That just means you're supposed to eat them after they molt ;)

Nay, for God hath commanded us saying:

And if a shellfish have an issue, and its issue in its shell be softened, it shall be put apart seven days: and whosoever toucheth it shall be unclean until the even.

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:41 pm
by Cosmopoles
What exactly changed that made the eating of shellfish and other activities prohibited in the Old Testament acceptable for Christians to engage in now? Did God make a mistake - is he fallible? Or just indecisive? How come its fine to ignore certain provisions from Leviticus but not Genesis?

PostPosted: Fri Dec 11, 2009 4:47 pm
by JuNii
easy. encourage the enslavement of shell fish. after seeing the fun hours that can be spent watching their silly antics, no owner would be able to stand cooking em up and devouring their flesh.