Advertisement

by Napkiraly » Fri Feb 07, 2014 1:06 pm

by United Marxist Nations » Fri Feb 07, 2014 1:15 pm
United Marxist Nations wrote:Someone who used to be in my region (I say used to because shortly after, there was a split between pro-DPRK and skeptical members, of which I was in the latter) went there on an independent tour, and was exposed to more of (not the whole of, I'm sure), so that might be a better option.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

by Grenartia » Fri Feb 07, 2014 1:43 pm
United Marxist Nations wrote:United Marxist Nations wrote:Someone who used to be in my region (I say used to because shortly after, there was a split between pro-DPRK and skeptical members, of which I was in the latter) went there on an independent tour, and was exposed to more of (not the whole of, I'm sure), so that might be a better option.
Just for the record, this is the Anti-Revisionist Marxist-Leninist saying that N Korea is not socialist.

by The Joseon Dynasty » Fri Feb 07, 2014 1:45 pm

by Vulpae » Fri Feb 07, 2014 1:52 pm
Glasgia wrote:Vulpae wrote:it is technically communist as it is a mono-party system and all things are owned by The State including the people.
Communism has no state, as opposed to the totalitarian state of North Korea. Communism has no classes, as opposed to the strict classist structure with which the elite oppress the working class. Communism has no currency, as opposed to the use of the North Korean Won. Communism has no property, as opposed to the state ownership of business and the private ownership of the elite. Communism has no inheritance, as opposed to the private inheritance of power shown through the succession of the Kims.
North Korea is not Communist, please don't simply use the term as an insult to totalitarian states. It's a distinct political ideology and theoretical social order, not a type of authoritarian dictatorship.

by Grenartia » Fri Feb 07, 2014 1:57 pm
Vulpae wrote:Glasgia wrote:
Communism has no state, as opposed to the totalitarian state of North Korea. Communism has no classes, as opposed to the strict classist structure with which the elite oppress the working class. Communism has no currency, as opposed to the use of the North Korean Won. Communism has no property, as opposed to the state ownership of business and the private ownership of the elite. Communism has no inheritance, as opposed to the private inheritance of power shown through the succession of the Kims.
North Korea is not Communist, please don't simply use the term as an insult to totalitarian states. It's a distinct political ideology and theoretical social order, not a type of authoritarian dictatorship.
Right, what I mean is it falls into the "We are Communists!" political camp, and like every state that's tried it, fell into a mono-party system, where the propaganda of "industry owned by the workers" actually means "everyone is owned by bureaucrats" instead of what it was supposed to mean.
I like the communist ideas, but Marx over idealized the communal village of Germany's not so distant past at the time. To live in a truly communist system would require the brutal squashing of individual goals, and ambitions. It would requires man to be made into machine.
Unless it's savagely puritanical the system eventually breaks down as people have ideas, and try to better themselves within the community, or in other cases at the expense of the community.
Have you ever read the short story "the lottery" it's a surprisingly terrifying tale of what a communal system can be like at it's worst.

by Tritanope » Fri Feb 07, 2014 1:57 pm
Vulpae wrote:Have you ever read the short story "the lottery" it's a surprisingly terrifying tale of what a communal system can be like at it's worst.

by Glasgia » Fri Feb 07, 2014 1:59 pm
Vulpae wrote:Glasgia wrote:
Communism has no state, as opposed to the totalitarian state of North Korea. Communism has no classes, as opposed to the strict classist structure with which the elite oppress the working class. Communism has no currency, as opposed to the use of the North Korean Won. Communism has no property, as opposed to the state ownership of business and the private ownership of the elite. Communism has no inheritance, as opposed to the private inheritance of power shown through the succession of the Kims.
North Korea is not Communist, please don't simply use the term as an insult to totalitarian states. It's a distinct political ideology and theoretical social order, not a type of authoritarian dictatorship.
Right, what I mean is it falls into the "We are Communists!" political camp, and like every state that's tried it, fell into a mono-party system, where the propaganda of "industry owned by the workers" actually means "everyone is owned by bureaucrats" instead of what it was supposed to mean.
Vulpae wrote:I like the communist ideas, but Marx over idealized the communal village of Germany's not so distant past at the time. To live in a truly communist system would require the brutal squashing of individual goals, and ambitions. It would requires man to be made into machine.
Unless it's savagely puritanical the system eventually breaks down as people have ideas, and try to better themselves within the community, or in other cases at the expense of the community.
Vulpae wrote:Have you ever read the short story "the lottery" it's a surprisingly terrifying tale of what a communal system can be like at it's worst.
by Kiruri » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:00 pm
The Fascist German Union wrote:North Korea isn't that bad, they have snow.


by Arglorand » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:01 pm

by Grenartia » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:04 pm
Arglorand wrote:I'm, personally, going to wish you survive.
Because I may not like you, but neither do I want you to go the absolutely wrong way and perish in motherfucking North Korea.
by Herrebrugh » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:05 pm
Arglorand wrote:I'm, personally, going to wish you survive.
Because I may not like you, but neither do I want you to go the absolutely wrong way and perish in motherfucking North Korea.
by Kiruri » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:06 pm
Grenartia wrote:Arglorand wrote:I'm, personally, going to wish you survive.
Because I may not like you, but neither do I want you to go the absolutely wrong way and perish in motherfucking North Korea.
My question is, how many people must somebody oppress and kill to be convicted of crimes against humanity?

by Arglorand » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:07 pm
Herrebrugh wrote:Arglorand wrote:I'm, personally, going to wish you survive.
Because I may not like you, but neither do I want you to go the absolutely wrong way and perish in motherfucking North Korea.
As has been said here plenty of times, the chance of something going wrong for a tourist in North Korea actually isn't big at all.

by Glasgia » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:07 pm
Herrebrugh wrote:Arglorand wrote:I'm, personally, going to wish you survive.
Because I may not like you, but neither do I want you to go the absolutely wrong way and perish in motherfucking North Korea.
As has been said here plenty of times, the chance of something going wrong for a tourist in North Korea actually isn't big at all.

by Divair » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:07 pm
Herrebrugh wrote:Arglorand wrote:I'm, personally, going to wish you survive.
Because I may not like you, but neither do I want you to go the absolutely wrong way and perish in motherfucking North Korea.
As has been said here plenty of times, the chance of something going wrong for a tourist in North Korea actually isn't big at all.
by Kiruri » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:09 pm
by Herrebrugh » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:10 pm
by Kiruri » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:12 pm
Herrebrugh wrote:Arglorand wrote:If you're careful, sure, that possibility is rather low.
There's a distinct chance Dok isn't careful by any meaning of the term.
I really doubt the North Koreans are going to do anything to you unless you commit a serious offence. Mainly because tourism = money, and North Korea doesn't have a whole lot of that. They don't want to scare the small amount of people going to their country away.

by United Marxist Nations » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:13 pm
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.
by Herrebrugh » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:15 pm
Kiruri wrote:Herrebrugh wrote:
I really doubt the North Koreans are going to do anything to you unless you commit a serious offence. Mainly because tourism = money, and North Korea doesn't have a whole lot of that. They don't want to scare the small amount of people going to their country away.
Define "serious offence", now, ask for the NK's definition of "serious offence"

by Grenartia » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:16 pm
by Herrebrugh » Fri Feb 07, 2014 2:18 pm
Grenartia wrote:Glasgia wrote:
Actually, with all the state surveillance you're under as a possible spy, it's probably one of the safest places in the world.
Not safe from the government. One wrong move, and they'll frame you for anything they possibly can (which, given their bullshit, is a lot), and destroy any evidence that will exonerate you (if not outright openly ignoring it).
So yes, maybe a tourist there is safe from the citizens, but almost certainly not from the government.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Cachard Calia, Floofybit, Nationalist Northumbria, Saor Alba, United Good
Advertisement