NATION

PASSWORD

Scotland to legalize Gay Marriage

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Gaelic Celtia
Minister
 
Posts: 3179
Founded: Oct 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Gaelic Celtia » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:34 pm

Phoenixfox wrote:
Othelos wrote:Been there, done that. The relationship with God is entirely psychological.

It's made up.

It's possible but I doubt it. It feels to real to me. I've felt God in my life. What explanation could be for that and don't tell me it's all in my fucking head.

It feels real to the religious gays too but apparently you can tell them they are wrong.
Last edited by Llywelyn ap Iorwerth on Thur May 6, 1208 11:45 am, edited 100 times in total.

Sibirsky wrote:You are offensive to me.
Welsh
Pride!
Economic Left/Right: -7.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.00
Social Attitude Result
Cosmopolitan Social Democrat
Pro: Gay Rights, secularism, Welsh independence, democratic socialism, gun control, choice, progressive tax, death penalty, environmental protection, Plaid Cymru, Stark
Conflicted/Unsure About: Israel, Catalan Independence
Anti: Theocracy, Fundamentalism, Communism, Fascism, National Socialism, Nationalism, USA, Golden Dawn, nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, Lannister

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:35 pm

Phoenixfox wrote:
Solaray wrote:That's still a form of discrimination. Plus, some Christian gay couples may desire to be wed in the eyes of God.

Impossible. I'm sorry but God does not condone it. I'm not the one making the rules, don't get mad at me.

Except you are making the rules, and you are imposing them of others by ignoring a certain thing called "religious liberty". You seem to have trouble understanding the following: You don't get to say what religion is more legitimate than the other in the eyes of the law.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:35 pm

Phoenixfox wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
If they are differentiating a term for which all the legal benefits are exactly the same, then that is by definition discrimination. It is probably the best example of how separate but equal does not exist.

That's like saying calling one place a town and calling the other a village is discrimination because the descriptive terms are different. If for all secular intents and purposes the new gay civil unions and traditional marriages are equal, then they are equal.


actually in most countries they are very different things with very different entitlements and meanings... so it would be more than descriptive...

Phoenixfox wrote:
Solaray wrote:That's still a form of discrimination. Plus, some Christian gay couples may desire to be wed in the eyes of God.

Impossible. I'm sorry but God does not condone it. I'm not the one making the rules, don't get mad at me.


god also isn't too big on people that judge other people, or people that presume to talk and judge on his behalf, especially if they are not actually properly educated in scripture and authorized to do so. now don't take this is me judging you but i mean i'm just sayin'.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Phoenixfox
Diplomat
 
Posts: 572
Founded: May 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Phoenixfox » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:36 pm

Meowfoundland wrote:
Phoenixfox wrote:Don't delude yourself...there not really such thing as marriage without God. That is why gay partners marrying is so offensive to me...it is literally shoving your sin and defiance in the face of God

Do you support banning atheists, Hindus, Buddhists etc. from getting married?

No because even though they do not believe in God, they might one day see the light. As long as it is a man and a woman who love each other God smiles upon the love regardless of current religious belief.
Servant of God since 2011
Proud Mississippian

Hey Hey - Telegram me, I like telegrams ;)

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:36 pm

Phoenixfox wrote:
Othelos wrote:Been there, done that. The relationship with God is entirely psychological.

It's made up.

It's possible but I doubt it. It feels to real to me. I've felt God in my life. What explanation could be for that and don't tell me it's all in my fucking head.

...It is.

I mean, it's not like God suddenly appears and you have a nice chat over tea.

User avatar
Regnum Dominae
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12345
Founded: Feb 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Regnum Dominae » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:37 pm

Phoenixfox wrote:
Meowfoundland wrote:Do you support banning atheists, Hindus, Buddhists etc. from getting married?

No because even though they do not believe in God, they might one day see the light. As long as it is a man and a woman who love each other God smiles upon the love regardless of current religious belief.

Regardless, your religious beliefs have no relevance to marriage, which is a CIVIL institution.

And what if it's a man and a man who love each other? Or a woman and a woman? Who are you to tell them that they have no right to love each other in the way that straight couples do?
Last edited by Regnum Dominae on Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
I support peace in Israel and Palestine. The governments and people in power on all sides are an absolute disgrace, and their unwillingness to pursue peace is a disservice to the people they are meant to be serving. The status quo is not simply untenable; it is unquestionably unacceptable.

User avatar
Gaelic Celtia
Minister
 
Posts: 3179
Founded: Oct 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Gaelic Celtia » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:38 pm

Regnum Dominae wrote:
Phoenixfox wrote:No because even though they do not believe in God, they might one day see the light. As long as it is a man and a woman who love each other God smiles upon the love regardless of current religious belief.

Regardless, your religious beliefs have no relevance to marriage, which is a CIVIL institution.

Well apparently all the legal systems in the world are wrong because it doesn't exist. After all, Phoenix knows everything remember? He even can speak for what god does and does not condone. :roll:
Last edited by Llywelyn ap Iorwerth on Thur May 6, 1208 11:45 am, edited 100 times in total.

Sibirsky wrote:You are offensive to me.
Welsh
Pride!
Economic Left/Right: -7.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.00
Social Attitude Result
Cosmopolitan Social Democrat
Pro: Gay Rights, secularism, Welsh independence, democratic socialism, gun control, choice, progressive tax, death penalty, environmental protection, Plaid Cymru, Stark
Conflicted/Unsure About: Israel, Catalan Independence
Anti: Theocracy, Fundamentalism, Communism, Fascism, National Socialism, Nationalism, USA, Golden Dawn, nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, Lannister

User avatar
Phoenixfox
Diplomat
 
Posts: 572
Founded: May 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Phoenixfox » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:39 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Phoenixfox wrote:Gay sex results in high transmission of disease, studies have shown...more than heterosexual. Gays adopting denies the child the right to either a mother or father. Though I am more accepting of adoption than marriage for gays because I have seen the some children CAN be happy without a father or mother.


For the first, there is such a thing as protection. People can use it. That is not inherent in sexuality. Also, lesbian women have the lowest transmission rates. Second, studies show that while having a two parent stable household is important, the sex of those parents does not affect the health or well-being of the child.

If you're a young girl, going through early puberty having your first period...two fathers can't really help you with that. The child is at a disadvantage. Many examples like that where a child would benefit more from having one parent from each sex.
Servant of God since 2011
Proud Mississippian

Hey Hey - Telegram me, I like telegrams ;)

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:39 pm

Phoenixfox wrote:
Meowfoundland wrote:Do you support banning atheists, Hindus, Buddhists etc. from getting married?

No because even though they do not believe in God, they might one day see the light. As long as it is a man and a woman who love each other God smiles upon the love regardless of current religious belief.

Let me ask you this: Do you understand the term "separation of Church and State"? And if you do, do you intend to respect it? If you intend to respect it, why do you base your arguments against the legal recognition of same-sex unions on your personal religious values? Remember, your personal religious values are just as legitimate in the eyes of the law as those of pro-LGBT Christians and pagans, so the legitimacy of such arguments is severely lacking.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:39 pm

Regnum Dominae wrote:
Phoenixfox wrote:No because even though they do not believe in God, they might one day see the light. As long as it is a man and a woman who love each other God smiles upon the love regardless of current religious belief.

Regardless, your religious beliefs have no relevance to marriage, which is a CIVIL institution.

And what if it's a man and a man who love each other? Or a woman and a woman? Who are you to tell them that they have no right to love each other in the way that straight couples do?

That argument does not seem to work.

Otherwise, why are there 832+ posts?
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Gaelic Celtia
Minister
 
Posts: 3179
Founded: Oct 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Gaelic Celtia » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:40 pm

Phoenixfox wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
For the first, there is such a thing as protection. People can use it. That is not inherent in sexuality. Also, lesbian women have the lowest transmission rates. Second, studies show that while having a two parent stable household is important, the sex of those parents does not affect the health or well-being of the child.

If you're a young girl, going through early puberty having your first period...two fathers can't really help you with that. The child is at a disadvantage. Many examples like that where a child would benefit more from having one parent from each sex.

Because as we all know, the internet doesnt exist, and doctors CERTAINLY cannot help with that. :roll:
Last edited by Llywelyn ap Iorwerth on Thur May 6, 1208 11:45 am, edited 100 times in total.

Sibirsky wrote:You are offensive to me.
Welsh
Pride!
Economic Left/Right: -7.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.00
Social Attitude Result
Cosmopolitan Social Democrat
Pro: Gay Rights, secularism, Welsh independence, democratic socialism, gun control, choice, progressive tax, death penalty, environmental protection, Plaid Cymru, Stark
Conflicted/Unsure About: Israel, Catalan Independence
Anti: Theocracy, Fundamentalism, Communism, Fascism, National Socialism, Nationalism, USA, Golden Dawn, nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, Lannister

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:40 pm

Phoenixfox wrote:
Meowfoundland wrote:Do you support banning atheists, Hindus, Buddhists etc. from getting married?

No because even though they do not believe in God, they might one day see the light. As long as it is a man and a woman who love each other God smiles upon the love regardless of current religious belief.

How is two people in love any different than two other people in love?

User avatar
Alyakia
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18422
Founded: Jul 12, 2011
Democratic Socialists

Postby Alyakia » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:40 pm

Phoenixfox wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
For the first, there is such a thing as protection. People can use it. That is not inherent in sexuality. Also, lesbian women have the lowest transmission rates. Second, studies show that while having a two parent stable household is important, the sex of those parents does not affect the health or well-being of the child.

If you're a young girl, going through early puberty having your first period...two fathers can't really help you with that. The child is at a disadvantage. Many examples like that where a child would benefit more from having one parent from each sex.


on the plus side if they were stuck in an orphanage they'd probably have female staff.
pro: good
anti: bad

The UK and EU are Better Together

"Margaret Thatcher showed the world that women are not too soft or the weaker sex, and can be as heartless, horrible, and amoral as any male politician."

User avatar
Utceforp
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10328
Founded: Apr 10, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Utceforp » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:42 pm

Gaelic Celtia wrote:
Phoenixfox wrote:If you're a young girl, going through early puberty having your first period...two fathers can't really help you with that. The child is at a disadvantage. Many examples like that where a child would benefit more from having one parent from each sex.

Because as we all know, the internet doesnt exist, and doctors CERTAINLY cannot help with that. :roll:

And apparently aunts, sisters, cousins, grandmothers and other older female relatives don't exist either.
Signatures are so 2014.

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:42 pm

Phoenixfox wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
For the first, there is such a thing as protection. People can use it. That is not inherent in sexuality. Also, lesbian women have the lowest transmission rates. Second, studies show that while having a two parent stable household is important, the sex of those parents does not affect the health or well-being of the child.

If you're a young girl, going through early puberty having your first period...two fathers can't really help you with that. The child is at a disadvantage. Many examples like that where a child would benefit more from having one parent from each sex.

Being born to religious parents can also very often become a real disadvantage.

Ban religion?
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Phoenixfox
Diplomat
 
Posts: 572
Founded: May 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Phoenixfox » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:42 pm

Gaelic Celtia wrote:
Phoenixfox wrote:What they experience is a temporary surge of pleasure and freedom as a result of abandoning the rules God has in place for our own good. Not true happiness...can never be, even if they convince themselves otherwise.

Don't melt the glue holding your wings together Icarus. Might want to come down lower to earth. Do not insult me and every other person here with your high horse religious snobbery. It is pathetic.

I pity you, truly. :hug:
Servant of God since 2011
Proud Mississippian

Hey Hey - Telegram me, I like telegrams ;)

User avatar
Gaelic Celtia
Minister
 
Posts: 3179
Founded: Oct 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Gaelic Celtia » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:43 pm

Utceforp wrote:
Gaelic Celtia wrote:Because as we all know, the internet doesnt exist, and doctors CERTAINLY cannot help with that. :roll:

And apparently aunts, sisters, cousins, grandmothers and other older female relatives don't exist either.

Well, fuck, if he says it is so, it must be so!
Last edited by Llywelyn ap Iorwerth on Thur May 6, 1208 11:45 am, edited 100 times in total.

Sibirsky wrote:You are offensive to me.
Welsh
Pride!
Economic Left/Right: -7.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.00
Social Attitude Result
Cosmopolitan Social Democrat
Pro: Gay Rights, secularism, Welsh independence, democratic socialism, gun control, choice, progressive tax, death penalty, environmental protection, Plaid Cymru, Stark
Conflicted/Unsure About: Israel, Catalan Independence
Anti: Theocracy, Fundamentalism, Communism, Fascism, National Socialism, Nationalism, USA, Golden Dawn, nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, Lannister

User avatar
Krazakistan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5230
Founded: May 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Krazakistan » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:43 pm

Phoenixfox wrote:
Gaelic Celtia wrote:Don't melt the glue holding your wings together Icarus. Might want to come down lower to earth. Do not insult me and every other person here with your high horse religious snobbery. It is pathetic.

I pity you, truly. :hug:

Okay, enough. Seriously. Enough with this religious high horse bullshit.

You're embarrassing yourself.
Secularism, restricted immigration policy, against affirmative action, voter ID laws, gun rights, democracy, free-market capitalism, egalitarianism, nationalism, and lastly, Rhodesia > Zimbabwe

Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: 6.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -0.56
"On the other hand, and let's face it, there's always another hand, unless you're a Saudi Arabian shoplifter of course, hurt feelings can be quite traumatic. I've heard that it can take seconds, sometimes even minutes, to get over it" ~ Pat Condell

"Communism works only in heaven, where they don't need it, and in hell, where they've already got it." ~ Ronald Reagan

"Communism was a mistake" ~ (((((((((Karl Marx)))))))))
CANT STUMP THE TRUMP

User avatar
Gaelic Celtia
Minister
 
Posts: 3179
Founded: Oct 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Gaelic Celtia » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:43 pm

Phoenixfox wrote:
Gaelic Celtia wrote:Don't melt the glue holding your wings together Icarus. Might want to come down lower to earth. Do not insult me and every other person here with your high horse religious snobbery. It is pathetic.

I pity you, truly. :hug:

Oh spare me the self righteous bull shit :roll:
Last edited by Llywelyn ap Iorwerth on Thur May 6, 1208 11:45 am, edited 100 times in total.

Sibirsky wrote:You are offensive to me.
Welsh
Pride!
Economic Left/Right: -7.62
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.00
Social Attitude Result
Cosmopolitan Social Democrat
Pro: Gay Rights, secularism, Welsh independence, democratic socialism, gun control, choice, progressive tax, death penalty, environmental protection, Plaid Cymru, Stark
Conflicted/Unsure About: Israel, Catalan Independence
Anti: Theocracy, Fundamentalism, Communism, Fascism, National Socialism, Nationalism, USA, Golden Dawn, nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, Lannister

User avatar
Phoenixfox
Diplomat
 
Posts: 572
Founded: May 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Phoenixfox » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:44 pm

Sibirsky wrote:
Phoenixfox wrote:Don't delude yourself...there not really such thing as marriage without God. That is why gay partners marrying is so offensive to me...it is literally shoving your sin and defiance in the face of God

You are offensive to me.

Sometimes the truth hurts.
Servant of God since 2011
Proud Mississippian

Hey Hey - Telegram me, I like telegrams ;)

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:44 pm

Phoenixfox wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
For the first, there is such a thing as protection. People can use it. That is not inherent in sexuality. Also, lesbian women have the lowest transmission rates. Second, studies show that while having a two parent stable household is important, the sex of those parents does not affect the health or well-being of the child.

If you're a young girl, going through early puberty having your first period...two fathers can't really help you with that. The child is at a disadvantage. Many examples like that where a child would benefit more from having one parent from each sex.

First of all, your example assumes that those two fathers would be utterly unable to aid and comfort the girl through her first period. This is blatantly false. Unless those two fathers happened to be abysmally stupid, I'm sure they would understand, or research to try to understand what their daughter is going through, and help her to the best of their ability.

Furthermore, unless we're talking about a very special case (and I'm already bracing myself for your ad hoc), I'm sure that there would be at least one woman (either a family friend, an aunt, a grandmother, the biological mother, etc.) who would be able to guide the girl through her period.

Got any more examples based on the premise that homosexual parents are idiots who don't know the first thing about the opposide sex's physiology and psychological processes, can't do the research, and have absolutely no acquaintances of the opposite they can rely on?
Last edited by Liriena on Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:46 pm, edited 1 time in total.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Sibirsky
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44940
Founded: Mar 22, 2009
Anarchy

Postby Sibirsky » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:45 pm

Phoenixfox wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:You are offensive to me.

Sometimes the truth hurts.

You haven't said anything truthful. You're just using religion to justify your bigotry.
Free market capitalism, path to prosperity
Свободный рынок капитализма, путь к процветанию
IBC 7 Finalists
8 Gold, 9 Silver, 2 Bronze medals IV Summer Olympics
2 Silver, 4 Bronze medals V Winter Olympics
Golfinator Classic Champion
Scott Cup I Champions
World Bowl 11 4th Place

User avatar
Meowfoundland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5962
Founded: Mar 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Meowfoundland » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:45 pm

Phoenixfox wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
For the first, there is such a thing as protection. People can use it. That is not inherent in sexuality. Also, lesbian women have the lowest transmission rates. Second, studies show that while having a two parent stable household is important, the sex of those parents does not affect the health or well-being of the child.

If you're a young girl, going through early puberty having your first period...two fathers can't really help you with that. The child is at a disadvantage. Many examples like that where a child would benefit more from having one parent from each sex.

You do realise that there are more role models than just parents, right? And that people are actually capable of understanding what someone of another gender is going through?
This was formerly a signature. One day, it may return to its splendid past. In the meantime, enjoy some pictures of my cats.

User avatar
Liriena
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 60885
Founded: Nov 19, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Liriena » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:45 pm

Phoenixfox wrote:
Sibirsky wrote:You are offensive to me.

Sometimes the truth hurts.

Pot, that's not a kettle.
be gay do crime


I am:
A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist
An aspiring writer and journalist
Political compass stuff:
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92
For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism
Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism,
cynicism


⚧Copy and paste this in your sig
if you passed biology and know
gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧

I disown most of my previous posts

User avatar
Regnum Dominae
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12345
Founded: Feb 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Regnum Dominae » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:45 pm

Phoenixfox, you still have yet to provide a single valid reason that gay marriage should be banned.
I support peace in Israel and Palestine. The governments and people in power on all sides are an absolute disgrace, and their unwillingness to pursue peace is a disservice to the people they are meant to be serving. The status quo is not simply untenable; it is unquestionably unacceptable.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Eahland, Ioudaia, The Lone Alliance, The Notorious Mad Jack

Advertisement

Remove ads