Where are you on the Kinsey Scale?

[Zhouran]

I checked on this site http://www.mysexualorientation.com/

Mean Sexual Orientation: 4
Sexual Orientation Range: 7
Sex Drive: 9.5
Same-Sex Attraction: 7
Opposite-Sex Attraction: 12

[Reliquary]

On this I am a 4 as well, although closer to 3 rather than closer to 5 like on the Kinsey.

What was making the result different?

On Kinsey, I was going off of attraction to people. I prefer other males over females most of the time. The types of males are irrelevent when using the Kinsey scale.

On Luvsey, I was going off of attraction to traits of physical appearance. I generally prefer a mixture of feminine and masculine physical traits, with both extremes (entirely feminine and entirely masculine) being equally uninteresting to me. I prefer androgyny over both feminity and masculinity, but I lean more towards masculinity. The types of males I was speaking of when addressing the Kinsey scale are generally more masculine than feminine, but not to that large a degree.

[New Bierstaat]

Big-time zero. Can't keep my eyes off them small, busty women.

[Breadknife]

I definitely read this as 'Where are you on the Kinky Scale?'

Oh Tofu.

That'd be the inverse of the one of the classic Purity Test results, I suppose...

(Everyone on the 'Net in the '80s did a Purity Test. Quite a few people even used copies of the list as a "To Do List", losing a percentile or two of Purity along the way. But that was the '80s for you.)

[Seangoli]

I checked on:

vistriai.com/kinseyscaletest/

And I failed. Not the "X", but a straight up fail. Exact quote:

"The test failed to match you to a Kinsey Type profile. Either you answered some questions wrong, or you are a very unusual person."

I don't know how I could answer questions wrong on a test like this, but apparently I did.

[Meryuma]

On Luvsey, I was going off of attraction to traits of physical appearance. I generally prefer a mixture of feminine and masculine physical traits, with both extremes (entirely feminine and entirely masculine) being equally uninteresting to me. I prefer androgyny over both feminity and masculinity, but I lean more towards masculinity.

That's the same sub-orientation as me.

I checked on:

vistriai.com/kinseyscaletest/

And I failed. Not the "X", but a straight up fail. Exact quote:

"The test failed to match you to a Kinsey Type profile. Either you answered some questions wrong, or you are a very unusual person."

I don't know how I could answer questions wrong on a test like this, but apparently I did.

I got that too. It's not a very good test.

[Rehansu Tir]

The what?

have search engines killed your family or something else of the calibre to make you ignore them out of spite?

that is the funniest thing all day. thanks for that.

[Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro]

On Luvsey, I was going off of attraction to traits of physical appearance. I generally prefer a mixture of feminine and masculine physical traits, with both extremes (entirely feminine and entirely masculine) being equally uninteresting to me. I prefer androgyny over both feminity and masculinity, but I lean more towards masculinity.

That's the same sub-orientation as me.

:/

I like more-to-masculine androgynous, normal masculine and hypermasculine pretty equally (initially I also found hypermasculine weird, but then my sexual orientation fluid moved gayer, and gave my full heterosexuality almost as if in exchange for me appreciating it), but I prefer normal feminine and hyperfeminine over more-to-feminine androgynous in a sexual attraction context. I find whatever kind of androgyny pretty cool rationally, though.

[Todlichebujoku]

As usual I'm sitting on the fence but leaning to one side.

[Thafoo]

As usual I'm sitting on the fence but leaning to one side.

I think I know which side. :3

[Westeastern Dicantia]

Somewhere in the realm of 1-2. At the moment I've been thinking a lot about sexuality and, frankly I'm confused.

[Uieurnthlaal]

Somewhere in the realm of 1-2. At the moment I've been thinking a lot about sexuality and, frankly I'm confused.

confused = gay

Come to terms with your true identity, closet fab person.

[Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro]

Somewhere in the realm of 1-2. At the moment I've been thinking a lot about sexuality and, frankly I'm confused.

confused = gay

In school I would say that is a heterosexist statement, as if everything past "normal" was already just gay deep inside... I don't know how to react now.

[Luveria]

What was making the result different?

On Kinsey, I was going off of attraction to people.

For both I go by attraction to physical traits.

I prefer other males over females most of the time.

Then wouldn't it be more accurate to categorize that as a preference for masculinity instead of it being an inclination for same-sex relations?

The types of males are irrelevent when using the Kinsey scale.

Unfortunately. The Kinsey scale does not take into account when someone physically male has a female form, which would normally make it a heterosexual attraction.

On Luvsey, I was going off of attraction to traits of physical appearance. I generally prefer a mixture of feminine and masculine physical traits, with both extremes (entirely feminine and entirely masculine) being equally uninteresting to me. I prefer androgyny over both feminity and masculinity, but I lean more towards masculinity. The types of males I was speaking of when addressing the Kinsey scale are generally more masculine than feminine, but not to that large a degree.

That's similar to mine with the difference being femininity takes precedence. Ideally my preference is for females who are of the male sex, and feminine males. Cis females are close but secondary. On the Kinsey scale that would make me a 4? Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual". I've now managed to place myself on the Kinsey scale alongside the Luvsey result.

Kinsey:
4) Predominantly homosexual, but more than incidentally heterosexual

Luvsey:
2) Predominantly gynephilic, but more than incidentally androphilic

I'm quite satisfied with how using both scales is representative of a person's orientation.

[Aksun]

Got a 0

[Luveria]

Got a 0

It seems kind of lacking to score a 0 or a 6. Much less options that way.

I suppose unless a person already knows the joys of variety, they couldn't possibly be aware of what they don't have.

[Thafoo]

Got a 0

It seems kind of lacking to score a 0 or a 6. Much less options that way.

I suppose unless a person already knows the joys of variety, they couldn't possibly be aware of what they don't have.

I've tried and tried again to see if I'm attracted to females.

Nope.

[Luveria]

It seems kind of lacking to score a 0 or a 6. Much less options that way.

I suppose unless a person already knows the joys of variety, they couldn't possibly be aware of what they don't have.

I've tried and tried again to see if I'm attracted to females.

Nope.

You haven't done enough non-PG-13 searches for trans men. It's important that there is a larger sample size to understand the responses gay males have to trans men.

As for myself, I really don't know if I'm attracted to trans men or not because I speculate it would be possible if one were a feminine trans man. But then that's like a masculine trans woman... so I'm guessing it's rare. I do know I'm not attracted to masculine men, so that applies to trans men too if they are masculine, and all the ones that have passed through sights have been masculine.

I'm guessing if a trans man were feminine enough they would be comparable to a feminine twink with a vagina.

[Merconitonitopia]

3

[Greater Beggnig]

According to a test I did, I'm a 7, but I'd say I would fit in more at 1 or 2.

[Tritanope]

I'd say a 3.5.

I don't have much of a preference, but if I had to choose, I would take someone who is the same gender.

[Blekksprutia]

big fat 6

[Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro]

You haven't done enough non-PG-13 searches for trans men. It's important that there is a larger sample size to understand the responses gay males have to trans men.

As for myself, I really don't know if I'm attracted to trans men or not because I speculate it would be possible if one were a feminine trans man. But then that's like a masculine trans woman... so I'm guessing it's rare. I do know I'm not attracted to masculine men, so that applies to trans men too if they are masculine, and all the ones that have passed through sights have been masculine.

I'm guessing if a trans man were feminine enough they would be comparable to a feminine twink with a vagina.

Female-born genderqueer people who have transition can often be like this. :3

[Estado Paulista]

-5

[Olthar]

Seven.