I have my doubts.
I mean, I personally would kiss a guy, hug him, do all that lovey dovey stuff.
But sleep with him? Not exactly my cup of tea
Advertisement

by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:21 pm

by New Frenco Empire » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:22 pm

by The Scientific States » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:22 pm

by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:22 pm
Blasveck wrote:I have my doubts.
I mean, I personally would kiss a guy, hug him, do all that lovey dovey stuff.
But sleep with him? Not exactly my cup of tea

by The Roman Imperial Republic » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:23 pm
Blasveck wrote:Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:This is bi-affective/biromantic heterosexuality.
It's kinda bi, but aesthetic attraction sure doesn't factor in.
I have my doubts.
I mean, I personally would kiss a guy, hug him, do all that lovey dovey stuff.
But sleep with him? Not exactly my cup of tea

by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:24 pm

by Mkuki » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:24 pm
The Scientific States wrote:Mkuki wrote:Did not know that.Then which way is heterosexual?
If you are 0 you are exclusively heterosexual. If you're a 1, you're heterosexual, but you can find men attractive. If you're a 2, you're heterosexual, but you have homosexual desires. If you're a 3, you'd fuck both ways.
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.

by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:25 pm
Mkuki wrote:I'll settle with one then.

by Arkiasis » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:25 pm
Blasveck wrote:Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:This is bi-affective/biromantic heterosexuality.
It's kinda bi, but aesthetic attraction sure doesn't factor in.
I have my doubts.
I mean, I personally would kiss a guy, hug him, do all that lovey dovey stuff.
But sleep with him? Not exactly my cup of tea

by United Marxist Nations » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:25 pm
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

by Vulkaniya » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:26 pm

by New Frenco Empire » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:26 pm

by The Roman Imperial Republic » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:27 pm

by Mkuki » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:27 pm
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.

by Sungai Pusat » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:28 pm

by Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:29 pm

by United Marxist Nations » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:29 pm
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

by Othelos » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:29 pm
United Marxist Nations wrote:Is it me, or has this basically a discussion of what we would ideally fuck?

by New Frenco Empire » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:30 pm
The Roman Imperial Republic wrote:Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:No idea. I'd sure try with women, even if just for the hell of it.
For me this is a very slim area where that would be a possibility. However, I find it interesting that the few women I am attracted to are all Latina. It does fit in with my main area of attraction with men. I can be attracted to any man, but for some reason I have a tendency to lose it over Latinos.
Probably just me.

by United Marxist Nations » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:31 pm
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:Something I find funny are the monosexuals that can find attractive people extremely mesmerizing, but wouldn't fuck with them by no means.
I find it paradoxal. Isn't sex better than masturbation, so pleasing yourself mutually as a fun activity rather than as lone business sounds the most logic option?
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

by Mkuki » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:32 pm
United Marxist Nations wrote:Is it me, or has this basically a discussion of what we would ideally fuck?
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.

by The Roman Imperial Republic » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:32 pm
New Frenco Empire wrote:The Roman Imperial Republic wrote:
For me this is a very slim area where that would be a possibility. However, I find it interesting that the few women I am attracted to are all Latina. It does fit in with my main area of attraction with men. I can be attracted to any man, but for some reason I have a tendency to lose it over Latinos.
Probably just me.
You could be a specific bisexual. I know my taste in men is a bit more picky than my taste in women, but the types of men I'm into I share an equal amount of attraction to the women. Maybe a 4 or 5, if not a super-picky 3?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Aggicificicerous, Alternate Garza, American Legionaries, Duvniask, Eden Ultima, Grinning Dragon, Kubra, Mutualist Chaos, Nilokeras, Rary, Riviere Renard, Socialistic Britain, Stellar Colonies, Super Pakistan, The Corparation, The Jamesian Republic, Uiiop, Umeria
Advertisement