NATION

PASSWORD

Where are you on the Kinsey Scale?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

asdfjkl;

0
123
34%
1
57
16%
2
41
11%
3
33
9%
4
23
6%
5
21
6%
6
24
7%
X
37
10%
 
Total votes : 359

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:21 pm

Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:
Blasveck wrote:Are you sure?

Can one be romantically attracted to men but not sexually attracted?

This is bi-affective/biromantic heterosexuality.

It's kinda bi, but aesthetic attraction sure doesn't factor in.


I have my doubts.

I mean, I personally would kiss a guy, hug him, do all that lovey dovey stuff.

But sleep with him? Not exactly my cup of tea
Forever a Communist

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:21 pm

Mkuki wrote:
The Scientific States wrote:The Kinsey Scale is 1-6.

Did not know that. :oops: Then which way is heterosexual?

0 for pure, 1 for young Brad Pitt in a summer in the beach in '97.
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
New Frenco Empire
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7787
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Frenco Empire » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:22 pm

Mkuki wrote:
The Scientific States wrote:
The Kinsey Scale is 1-6.

Did not know that. :oops: Then which way is heterosexual?

0 (pure)
1 (mostly pure, but with some minor attractions)
2 (bi-curious)
NEW FRENCO EMPIRE

Transferring information from disorganized notes into presentable factbooks is way too time consuming for a procrastinator. Just ask if you have questions.
Plutocratic Evil Empire™ situated in a post-apocalyptic Decopunk North America. Extreme PMT, yet socially stuck in the interwar/immediate post-war era, with Jazz music and flapper culture alongside nanotechnology and Martian colonies. Tier I power of the Frencoverse.


Las Palmeras wrote:Roaring 20s but in the future and with mutants

Alyakia wrote:you are a modern poet
Top Hits of 2132! (Imperial Public Radio)
Coming at you from Fort Orwell! (Imperial Forces Network)



User avatar
The Scientific States
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18643
Founded: Apr 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Scientific States » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:22 pm

Mkuki wrote:
The Scientific States wrote:
The Kinsey Scale is 1-6.

Did not know that. :oops: Then which way is heterosexual?


If you are 0 you are exclusively heterosexual. If you're a 1, you're heterosexual, but you can find men attractive. If you're a 2, you're heterosexual, but you have homosexual desires. If you're a 3, you'd fuck both ways.
Centrist, Ordoliberal, Bisexual, Agnostic, Pro Social Market Economy, Pro Labour Union, Secular Humanist, Cautious Optimist, Pro LGBT, Pro Marijuana Legalization, Pro Humanitarian Intervention etc etc.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Liberal/Authoritarian: -6.62
Political Stuff I Wrote
Why Pinochet and Allende were both terrible
The UKIP: A Bad Choice for Britain
Why South Africa is in a sorry state, and how it can be fixed.
Massive List of My OOC Pros and Cons
Hey, Putin! Leave Ukraine Alone!

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:22 pm

Blasveck wrote:I have my doubts.

I mean, I personally would kiss a guy, hug him, do all that lovey dovey stuff.

But sleep with him? Not exactly my cup of tea

No idea. I'd sure try with women, even if just for the hell of it.
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
The Roman Imperial Republic
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1269
Founded: Feb 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Roman Imperial Republic » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:23 pm

Blasveck wrote:
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:This is bi-affective/biromantic heterosexuality.

It's kinda bi, but aesthetic attraction sure doesn't factor in.


I have my doubts.

I mean, I personally would kiss a guy, hug him, do all that lovey dovey stuff.

But sleep with him? Not exactly my cup of tea


People always forget/never heard of romantic orientation. You may be biromantic.
Economic Left/Right: -5.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 8.31
Likes=LGBTTIQQ2SA (Amongst other Initialisms), Imperialism, Moderate Socialism, Palestine and Israel, Liberalism, Islam, Secularism, Social Freedoms, Science, and Authoritarianism
Dislikes=Islamophobia, Homophobia (Amongst other Phobias), All things Russian or German, Isolationism, Laissez Faire, Catholic Power,Anarchism, Racism, Muslim Extemism, and Libertarianism


"Religion can never reform mankind, because Religion is slavery." - Robert G. Ingersoll

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:24 pm

New Frenco Empire wrote:
Mkuki wrote:Did not know that. :oops: Then which way is heterosexual?

0 (pure)
1 (mostly pure, but with some minor attractions)
2 (bi-curious)

2 and 4 are both bi. -_-
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
Mkuki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10584
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mkuki » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:24 pm

The Scientific States wrote:
Mkuki wrote:Did not know that. :oops: Then which way is heterosexual?


If you are 0 you are exclusively heterosexual. If you're a 1, you're heterosexual, but you can find men attractive. If you're a 2, you're heterosexual, but you have homosexual desires. If you're a 3, you'd fuck both ways.

I'll settle with one then.
Economic Left/Right: -4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

Political Test (Results)
Who Do I Side With?
Vision of the Justice Party - Justice Party Platform
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
HAVE FUN BURNING IN HELL!

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:25 pm

Mkuki wrote:I'll settle with one then.

Would you do anything date-y or sexy with any of them, even if just in fantasy, though?
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
Arkiasis
Senator
 
Posts: 3586
Founded: Aug 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Arkiasis » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:25 pm

Blasveck wrote:
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:This is bi-affective/biromantic heterosexuality.

It's kinda bi, but aesthetic attraction sure doesn't factor in.


I have my doubts.

I mean, I personally would kiss a guy, hug him, do all that lovey dovey stuff.

But sleep with him? Not exactly my cup of tea



Man, you're an ultimate cockblocker.
The Republic of Arkiasis
NSwiki | IIwiki | Factbook | Map
Economic Left/Right: -4.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.56
I like: You <3
I dislike: Fax machines
Move along, nothing to see here.

User avatar
United Marxist Nations
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33804
Founded: Dec 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United Marxist Nations » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:25 pm

0 - exclusively heterosexual.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.

Eastern Orthodox Catechumen. Religious communitarian with Sorelian, Marxist, and Traditionalist influences. Sympathies toward Sunni Islam. All flags/avatars are chosen for aesthetic or humor purposes only
An open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

User avatar
Vulkaniya
Envoy
 
Posts: 294
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Vulkaniya » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:26 pm

6, though it doesn't really account for all genders. Then gain that's understandable I suppose.
"Krieg ohne hasse."
Gay, vegan, communist, world-weary pacifist.
DEFCON
Peace - 5
Increased Awareness - 4
Standby - 3
Conflict - 2
Full Mobilisation- 1

User avatar
New Frenco Empire
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7787
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Frenco Empire » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:26 pm

Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:
New Frenco Empire wrote:0 (pure)
1 (mostly pure, but with some minor attractions)
2 (bi-curious)

2 and 4 are both bi. -_-

Meh. To hear the kinsey scale explained, it sounds like 2s and 4s would only really go so far as to join in on an orgy with the same or opposite sex, assuming someone of their preferred sex were involved.

Either way, it's somewhat confusing, though easy to use.
NEW FRENCO EMPIRE

Transferring information from disorganized notes into presentable factbooks is way too time consuming for a procrastinator. Just ask if you have questions.
Plutocratic Evil Empire™ situated in a post-apocalyptic Decopunk North America. Extreme PMT, yet socially stuck in the interwar/immediate post-war era, with Jazz music and flapper culture alongside nanotechnology and Martian colonies. Tier I power of the Frencoverse.


Las Palmeras wrote:Roaring 20s but in the future and with mutants

Alyakia wrote:you are a modern poet
Top Hits of 2132! (Imperial Public Radio)
Coming at you from Fort Orwell! (Imperial Forces Network)



User avatar
The Roman Imperial Republic
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1269
Founded: Feb 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Roman Imperial Republic » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:27 pm

Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:
Blasveck wrote:I have my doubts.

I mean, I personally would kiss a guy, hug him, do all that lovey dovey stuff.

But sleep with him? Not exactly my cup of tea

No idea. I'd sure try with women, even if just for the hell of it.


For me this is a very slim area where that would be a possibility. However, I find it interesting that the few women I am attracted to are all Latina. It does fit in with my main area of attraction with men. I can be attracted to any man, but for some reason I have a tendency to lose it over Latinos.

Probably just me.
Economic Left/Right: -5.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 8.31
Likes=LGBTTIQQ2SA (Amongst other Initialisms), Imperialism, Moderate Socialism, Palestine and Israel, Liberalism, Islam, Secularism, Social Freedoms, Science, and Authoritarianism
Dislikes=Islamophobia, Homophobia (Amongst other Phobias), All things Russian or German, Isolationism, Laissez Faire, Catholic Power,Anarchism, Racism, Muslim Extemism, and Libertarianism


"Religion can never reform mankind, because Religion is slavery." - Robert G. Ingersoll

User avatar
Mkuki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10584
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mkuki » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:27 pm

Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:
Mkuki wrote:I'll settle with one then.

Would you do anything date-y or sexy with any of them, even if just in fantasy, though?

Hell if I know. A date? Possible, though rather unlikely. Sex? There's a very low probability that I would have sex with a man.
Economic Left/Right: -4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

Political Test (Results)
Who Do I Side With?
Vision of the Justice Party - Justice Party Platform
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
HAVE FUN BURNING IN HELL!

User avatar
Sungai Pusat
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15048
Founded: Mar 27, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sungai Pusat » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:28 pm

Officially, I voted at number 2.

Really, however, I'd be either 1 or X.
Now mostly a politik discuss account.

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:29 pm

Something I find funny are the monosexuals that can find attractive people extremely mesmerizing, but wouldn't fuck with them by no means.

I find it paradoxal. Isn't sex better than masturbation, so pleasing yourself mutually as a fun activity rather than as lone business sounds the most logic option?
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
United Marxist Nations
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33804
Founded: Dec 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United Marxist Nations » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:29 pm

Is it me, or has this basically a discussion of what we would ideally fuck?
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.

Eastern Orthodox Catechumen. Religious communitarian with Sorelian, Marxist, and Traditionalist influences. Sympathies toward Sunni Islam. All flags/avatars are chosen for aesthetic or humor purposes only
An open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:29 pm

United Marxist Nations wrote:Is it me, or has this basically a discussion of what we would ideally fuck?

That's what the Kinsey Scale is about.
American & German, ich kann auch Deutsch. I have a B.S. in finance.
Pro: Human rights, equality, LGBT rights, socialized healthcare, the EU in theory, green energy, public transportation, the internet as a utility
Anti: Authoritarian regimes and systems, the Chinese government, identity politics, die AfD, populism, organized religion, Erdogan, assault weapon ownership
Free Tibet and Hong Kong | Keep Taiwan Independent

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:29 pm

Arkiasis wrote:
Blasveck wrote:
I have my doubts.

I mean, I personally would kiss a guy, hug him, do all that lovey dovey stuff.

But sleep with him? Not exactly my cup of tea



Man, you're an ultimate cockblocker.


I should put that on a plaque above my fireplace.

The Ultimate Cockblocker.
Forever a Communist

User avatar
New Frenco Empire
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7787
Founded: Mar 14, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Frenco Empire » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:30 pm

The Roman Imperial Republic wrote:
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:No idea. I'd sure try with women, even if just for the hell of it.


For me this is a very slim area where that would be a possibility. However, I find it interesting that the few women I am attracted to are all Latina. It does fit in with my main area of attraction with men. I can be attracted to any man, but for some reason I have a tendency to lose it over Latinos.

Probably just me.

You could be a specific bisexual. I know my taste in men is a bit more picky than my taste in women, but the types of men I'm into I share an equal amount of attraction to the women. Maybe a 4 or 5, if not a super-picky 3?
NEW FRENCO EMPIRE

Transferring information from disorganized notes into presentable factbooks is way too time consuming for a procrastinator. Just ask if you have questions.
Plutocratic Evil Empire™ situated in a post-apocalyptic Decopunk North America. Extreme PMT, yet socially stuck in the interwar/immediate post-war era, with Jazz music and flapper culture alongside nanotechnology and Martian colonies. Tier I power of the Frencoverse.


Las Palmeras wrote:Roaring 20s but in the future and with mutants

Alyakia wrote:you are a modern poet
Top Hits of 2132! (Imperial Public Radio)
Coming at you from Fort Orwell! (Imperial Forces Network)



User avatar
Taoju
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6231
Founded: Nov 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Taoju » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:31 pm

Blasveck wrote:
Arkiasis wrote:

Man, you're an ultimate cockblocker.


I should put that on a plaque above my fireplace.

The Ultimate Cockblocker.

I can't cockblock people, teach me your ways.
The Republic of Taoju ― Tauzhur Mineli ― Таужур Минули

User avatar
United Marxist Nations
Post Czar
 
Posts: 33804
Founded: Dec 02, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby United Marxist Nations » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:31 pm

Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro wrote:Something I find funny are the monosexuals that can find attractive people extremely mesmerizing, but wouldn't fuck with them by no means.

I find it paradoxal. Isn't sex better than masturbation, so pleasing yourself mutually as a fun activity rather than as lone business sounds the most logic option?

I don't speak for anyone else, but I tend to be at least a little nervous (but can reach to quite terrified) when approaching or being approached by an attractive woman if I interpret her as being flirtatious or if I'm interested in being so.
The Kievan People wrote: United Marxist Nations: A prayer for every soul, a plan for every economy and a waifu for every man. Solid.

Eastern Orthodox Catechumen. Religious communitarian with Sorelian, Marxist, and Traditionalist influences. Sympathies toward Sunni Islam. All flags/avatars are chosen for aesthetic or humor purposes only
An open mind is like a fortress with its gates unbarred and unguarded.
St. John Chrysostom wrote:A comprehended God is no God.

User avatar
Mkuki
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10584
Founded: Sep 22, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Mkuki » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:32 pm

United Marxist Nations wrote:Is it me, or has this basically a discussion of what we would ideally fuck?

Isn't that what sexual attraction is all about?
Economic Left/Right: -4.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

Political Test (Results)
Who Do I Side With?
Vision of the Justice Party - Justice Party Platform
John Rawls wrote:In justice as fairness, the concept of right is prior to that of the good.
HAVE FUN BURNING IN HELL!

User avatar
The Roman Imperial Republic
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1269
Founded: Feb 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Roman Imperial Republic » Fri Jan 31, 2014 10:32 pm

New Frenco Empire wrote:
The Roman Imperial Republic wrote:
For me this is a very slim area where that would be a possibility. However, I find it interesting that the few women I am attracted to are all Latina. It does fit in with my main area of attraction with men. I can be attracted to any man, but for some reason I have a tendency to lose it over Latinos.

Probably just me.

You could be a specific bisexual. I know my taste in men is a bit more picky than my taste in women, but the types of men I'm into I share an equal amount of attraction to the women. Maybe a 4 or 5, if not a super-picky 3?


No. I place myself around 5.83. The women I have been attracted to I can count on my hands.
Economic Left/Right: -5.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 8.31
Likes=LGBTTIQQ2SA (Amongst other Initialisms), Imperialism, Moderate Socialism, Palestine and Israel, Liberalism, Islam, Secularism, Social Freedoms, Science, and Authoritarianism
Dislikes=Islamophobia, Homophobia (Amongst other Phobias), All things Russian or German, Isolationism, Laissez Faire, Catholic Power,Anarchism, Racism, Muslim Extemism, and Libertarianism


"Religion can never reform mankind, because Religion is slavery." - Robert G. Ingersoll

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Abserdia, Aggicificicerous, Alternate Garza, American Legionaries, Duvniask, Eden Ultima, Grinning Dragon, Kubra, Mutualist Chaos, Nilokeras, Rary, Riviere Renard, Socialistic Britain, Stellar Colonies, Super Pakistan, The Corparation, The Jamesian Republic, Uiiop, Umeria

Advertisement

Remove ads