NATION

PASSWORD

How did the Universe come to be?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

How did the Universe come to be?

1.) The Big Bang
274
58%
2.) A Universal God
104
22%
3.) everything formed on it's own
9
2%
4.) everything was already here and has always been
24
5%
5.) other: your own theory if you have one that isn't listed
58
12%
 
Total votes : 469

User avatar
Ozzy
Minister
 
Posts: 2876
Founded: Jan 06, 2012
Compulsory Consumerist State

Postby Ozzy » Sun Feb 09, 2014 6:36 pm

The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:
Ozzy wrote:I like how the poll is expecting me to provide a straightforward answer as if I really know the question. It is called a theory for a reason, no one really knows what was created from nothingness.

Its an online forum, no one expects you to know anything.

That explains all the trollish threads with rhetorical topics.
Last edited by IM Meen on Wed May 15, 1996 1:29 pm, edited 756 times in total.

Long live the Global Liberation Army!
Leader of NS Hoofington Reapers

In this world we stand for what we love, for what is right and for our rights. If you don't stand for either one of these you don't stand at all. You're crippled mentally. Your rights give you your life, that life gives you the right to stand for what is right for the world and one of those rights in the world is standing strong for those you love and what you love as a whole.

User avatar
The Type II Gods
Secretary
 
Posts: 30
Founded: Feb 07, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Type II Gods » Sun Feb 09, 2014 6:37 pm

Ozzy wrote:I like how the poll is expecting me to provide a straightforward answer as if I really know the question. It is called a theory for a reason, no one really knows what was created from nothingness.

You are right for the most part with the exception of your usage of "theory." But yes, I don't understand how anyone here hopes to answer flaws that the greatest physicists could not understand.
"We live in a society exquisitely dependent on science and technology, in which hardly anyone knows anything about science and technology." - Carl Sagan
Pro: Science, critical thinking, democracy, environmentalism.
Anti: Superstition, theocracy, credulous ufology.

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Sun Feb 09, 2014 6:37 pm

Ozzy wrote:I like how the poll is expecting me to provide a straightforward answer as if I really know the question. It is called a theory for a reason, no one really knows what was created from nothingness.

Well, a theory is the highest level of confidence science can achieve, so I'm not sure what you're on about there.

But no, obviously we are not expecting all that much from the random plebiscite of an internet forum.
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Mandicoria
Senator
 
Posts: 4053
Founded: Sep 10, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby Mandicoria » Sun Feb 09, 2014 6:37 pm

A giant green alien from the 55th dimension had the sniffles one day, and when he sneezed the first time the universe was born.
silly little creature, she/they
apologies if im like, really aloof. this site has an affect on me.
What if Humanity was as Important as it thought it was... But it turned out to not be a very good thing.
also i rip off warhammer, DOOM, and halo unapologetically
Highly suggest listening to this when reading anything I post about this nation.
A [1.18] civilization, according to this index.

User avatar
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9720
Founded: Jul 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace » Sun Feb 09, 2014 6:40 pm

The Type II Gods wrote:
Ozzy wrote:I like how the poll is expecting me to provide a straightforward answer as if I really know the question. It is called a theory for a reason, no one really knows what was created from nothingness.

You are right for the most part with the exception of your usage of "theory." But yes, I don't understand how anyone here hopes to answer flaws that the greatest physicists could not understand.

The universe doesn't have flaws, it just fucking exists.

That's like saying the sun rotates in the wrong direction.
Founder of the Church of Ass.

No Homo.
TET sex chat link
Neo Art wrote:
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:Ironic ain't it, now there really IS 47% of the country that feels like victims.

........fuck it, you win the internet.

User avatar
The Type II Gods
Secretary
 
Posts: 30
Founded: Feb 07, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby The Type II Gods » Sun Feb 09, 2014 6:41 pm

The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:
The Type II Gods wrote:You are right for the most part with the exception of your usage of "theory." But yes, I don't understand how anyone here hopes to answer flaws that the greatest physicists could not understand.

The universe doesn't have flaws, it just fucking exists.

That's like saying the sun rotates in the wrong direction.

I was referring to "flaws," as in flaws pertaining to scientific hypotheses, not the "universe."
"We live in a society exquisitely dependent on science and technology, in which hardly anyone knows anything about science and technology." - Carl Sagan
Pro: Science, critical thinking, democracy, environmentalism.
Anti: Superstition, theocracy, credulous ufology.

User avatar
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9720
Founded: Jul 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace » Sun Feb 09, 2014 6:44 pm

The Type II Gods wrote:
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:The universe doesn't have flaws, it just fucking exists.

That's like saying the sun rotates in the wrong direction.

I was referring to "flaws," as in flaws pertaining to scientific hypotheses, not the "universe."

Oh, thank hypothetical god.
Founder of the Church of Ass.

No Homo.
TET sex chat link
Neo Art wrote:
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:Ironic ain't it, now there really IS 47% of the country that feels like victims.

........fuck it, you win the internet.

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Sun Feb 09, 2014 7:16 pm

The Solar System Scope wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:
A curious assertion, given that there are human artifacts easily 3 or 4 times that age. What species were we when we created those, and what marks the point where we stopped being that species and started being this one?

We always were human. We never were anything else.


Can't have it both ways. Either our species has existed longer than your original number (based on much older human artifacts) -and thus your original claim was wrong, or we are now a different species than the one who created the artifacts.

All the material evidence suggests the former is true.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
United Christian America
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 405
Founded: Nov 21, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby United Christian America » Mon Feb 10, 2014 12:02 am

Sun Wukong wrote:But no, obviously we are not expecting all that much from the random plebiscite of an internet forum.


Um, don't we all follow that criteria?
Political Compass:
Economic Left/Right: 6.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 6.05

We are officially the Christian Democratic Republic of United Christian America, and this sentence will stay here until I can express that properly.
United Christian Alliance(UCA) member
Crusadin' for a Better Tomorrow!

*OOC Sigh* If this nation were real, then this world would be a horrible place since this nation exists. That should tell you what I really think about this nation and its views.

User avatar
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9720
Founded: Jul 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace » Mon Feb 10, 2014 12:05 am

United Christian America wrote:
Sun Wukong wrote:But no, obviously we are not expecting all that much from the random plebiscite of an internet forum.


Um, don't we all follow that criteria?

I'm not random at all.
Founder of the Church of Ass.

No Homo.
TET sex chat link
Neo Art wrote:
The Land Fomerly Known as Ligerplace wrote:Ironic ain't it, now there really IS 47% of the country that feels like victims.

........fuck it, you win the internet.

User avatar
New Waterford
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1393
Founded: Apr 09, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby New Waterford » Mon Feb 10, 2014 1:30 am

I don't see why the existence of the Big Bang and that of God are mutually exclusive. I mean, one of the central figures in the creation of the Big Bang theory was a Catholic priest.
Economic Left/Right: -8.38
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -7.49
Now known IC'ly as An Déise.

User avatar
Republic of Coldwater
Senator
 
Posts: 4500
Founded: Jul 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Republic of Coldwater » Mon Feb 10, 2014 4:22 am

The Big Bang created this universe. I don't know how the big bang ever happened. Perhaps there was a lot of hydrogen and other elements in the Universe waiting to be released, and it got released.

Perhaps it is god which created the Big Bang?

I don't know.

User avatar
Nervium
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6513
Founded: Jan 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Nervium » Mon Feb 10, 2014 4:27 am

Republic of Coldwater wrote:The Big Bang created this universe. I don't know how the big bang ever happened. Perhaps there was a lot of hydrogen and other elements in the Universe waiting to be released, and it got released.

Perhaps it is god which created the Big Bang?

I don't know.


Maybe it was a spacesphip from the previous Universe that exploded and thus created this one?
I've retired from the forums.

User avatar
Myrensis
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5752
Founded: Oct 05, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Myrensis » Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:08 am

Grave_n_idle wrote:I love the argument that the universe we've evolved to be perfectly suited to... is perfectly suited to us.


Technically we've evolved to be reasonably well-suited to particular portions of a single planet. :p

That chain of logic always baffles me, "99.999999% of the known universe is inimical to life as we know it, vast swathes of our own planet are inaccessible to us without expensive technological aid that still only lets us dabble...yup, clearly a Benevolent Creator God designed everything to perfectly suit us."

User avatar
Breadknife
Minister
 
Posts: 2803
Founded: Jul 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Breadknife » Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:20 am

The Solar System Scope wrote:Let's sum up here:
Most of you believe Earth is going to get cooked by the Sun getting into a red giant, humanity and all life will get wiped out, Earth will get swallowed by the Sun, then after a long time Sun will die, and a really long time after that Universe will end and then you have no idea. How optimistic you are! 8)

Oh no, no at all. I think humanity on Earth will get wiped out long before the Earth gets cooked.

(Or, more optimistically, that at least some of us will volountarily vacate the place well in advance. Then the Earthbound remnants of humanity will die out. Still well before the Sun becomes a major natural factor in that. Unless someone deliberately blows up the Sun, of course, which would be a whole new ball-game. - See! That's a far more optimistic prediction!)
Ceci n'est pas une griffe.

User avatar
L Ron Cupboard
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9054
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby L Ron Cupboard » Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:22 am

Republic of Coldwater wrote:The Big Bang created this universe. I don't know how the big bang ever happened. Perhaps there was a lot of hydrogen and other elements in the Universe waiting to be released, and it got released.

Perhaps it is god which created the Big Bang?

I don't know.


Hydrogen and other elements didn't exist, those appeared later.
A leopard in every home, you know it makes sense.

User avatar
Nervium
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6513
Founded: Jan 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Nervium » Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:25 am

L Ron Cupboard wrote:
Republic of Coldwater wrote:The Big Bang created this universe. I don't know how the big bang ever happened. Perhaps there was a lot of hydrogen and other elements in the Universe waiting to be released, and it got released.

Perhaps it is god which created the Big Bang?

I don't know.


Hydrogen and other elements didn't exist, those appeared later.


Seconds later.
I've retired from the forums.

User avatar
L Ron Cupboard
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9054
Founded: Mar 30, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby L Ron Cupboard » Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:25 am

Nervium wrote:
L Ron Cupboard wrote:
Hydrogen and other elements didn't exist, those appeared later.


Seconds later.


Well timing is the secret of good cosmology.
A leopard in every home, you know it makes sense.

User avatar
The Archregimancy
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 29249
Founded: Aug 01, 2005
Democratic Socialists

Postby The Archregimancy » Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:28 am

I woke up one morning and saw that the universe was without form and void, and that darkness was upon the face of the deep.

So I decided to do something about it.

The rest is, I believe, history.

User avatar
Grave_n_idle
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44837
Founded: Feb 11, 2004
Psychotic Dictatorship

Postby Grave_n_idle » Mon Feb 10, 2014 5:32 am

Myrensis wrote:
Grave_n_idle wrote:I love the argument that the universe we've evolved to be perfectly suited to... is perfectly suited to us.


Technically we've evolved to be reasonably well-suited to particular portions of a single planet. :p

That chain of logic always baffles me, "99.999999% of the known universe is inimical to life as we know it, vast swathes of our own planet are inaccessible to us without expensive technological aid that still only lets us dabble...yup, clearly a Benevolent Creator God designed everything to perfectly suit us."


Right. I was just talking about our little corner. It's the story of the puddle deciding that the hollow in the ground was made specifically for it, because the puddle and the hollow are miraculously the same shape.
I identify as
a problem

User avatar
Czechanada
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14851
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Czechanada » Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:32 am

Ozzy wrote:I like how the poll is expecting me to provide a straightforward answer as if I really know the question. It is called a theory for a reason, no one really knows what was created from nothingness.


You do know that the term theory has a different definition in science than that of the vernacular?
"You know what I was. You see what I am. Change me, change me!" - Randall Jarrell.

User avatar
Breadknife
Minister
 
Posts: 2803
Founded: Jul 03, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Breadknife » Mon Feb 10, 2014 8:49 am

Sociobiology wrote:
Utceforp wrote:It's an effective system because sixty has so many divisors.
so do many other numbers,

But it's one of the useful high-points...

Plotting number of divisors per number, per log (natural) of that number (to moderate the 'usefulness' quotient as the value itself gets less managable)...
Image


What you could do, when looking for a nice major division with a number of useful divisions, is choose a number with a large number of prime factors. In that case numbers that are 2N would be expiditious choices (the absolute largest number of prime factors for any given magnitude, all of them being '2'). But the problem with such choices is that the non-prime factors are limited. 8 has PFs of 2, 2 and 2. And non-prime factors of 4, 4 and 4 and 8 (1st two times second two, 1st two times 3rd two, 2nd two times first two, then finally all the factors rerecombined), but those three fours are effectively just one four, so it doesn't give us quite as many options as it could have.

So maybe you want single-instance prime-factors? Take each prime. 2 (gives 2), 3 (with the 2, gives), 5 (=30), 7 (=210), etc. Except that multiplying by the seven (especially) does give you a large number that can be split into... 15? possible combinations. But sevenths/fourteenths/21sts/35ths, etc? *shudder* Human maths doesn't work too well with that.

But an eight, instead, is very nearly the same as seven (when it comes to the large number it gives you) but combined with a three (or a couple of threes) gives a number of other useful NPFs along the way. Factors of two (easily), three (barely) and five (a handful) are much more useful components than the increasingly larger primes. (Perhaps eleven is somewhat useful, but you can also wonder if ten contributing 2 and 5 to the mix for slightly less magnitude might be better, when building your perfect larger number...)

60 factors into 2, 2, 3 and 5, which would give 4+6+4a intermediate factors (between from 1/1ths and 1/60ths themselves) if it weren't for the duplicated '2'. Instead it has 3+4+3b of them, which is still quite a lot.

12 is handier (for inches in feet, or hours in half-a-dayc) for counting, being barely beyond a couple of handfuls. 360 is less handy for everyday use but gives a lot more integer divisions (from three '2's, two '3's, one '5', at its core) so made itself useful for degrees-in-a-full-circle, in classroom geometry especially. 240 has been used in other applications (adding an extra '2' and, perhaps more usefully, a '5' to the factors that 24 natively posesses... or two '2's to 60's compliment), but I think perhaps has a little too much magnitude given its effective "factor load".

So... yes... what was I saying? I forget. But aren't numbers interesting? (Even if I am not!)


a (First-only, Second-only, Third-only, Fourth-only)+(First-and-second, First-and-third, First-and-fourth, Second-and-third, Second-and-fourth, third-and-fourth)+(1st2nd3rd, 1st2nd4th, 1st3rd4th, 2nd3rd4th)

b (First-only, Second-only, Third-only, Fourth-only)+(First-and-second, First-and-third, First-and-fourth, Second-and-third, Second-and-fourth, third-and-fourth)+(1st2nd3rd, 1st2nd4th, 1st3rd4th, 2nd3rd4th)

c As I recall, the 24-hours a day arose from the night-time sky (roughly half a day) being administratively (by the Egyptian priest order, or whoever it was again) split into not-necessarily-even twelfths, which eventually became twice that for the full day, then eventually regularised. But that was what I was taught several decades back, so doubtless it's a fact that's crucially wrong in some key way. ;)
Ceci n'est pas une griffe.

User avatar
Sociobiology
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18396
Founded: Aug 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Sociobiology » Mon Feb 10, 2014 9:04 am

Breadknife wrote:
Sociobiology wrote:so do many other numbers,

But it's one of the useful high-points...

Plotting number of divisors per number, per log (natural) of that number (to moderate the 'usefulness' quotient as the value itself gets less managable)...
Image


What you could do, when looking for a nice major division with a number of useful divisions, is choose a number with a large number of prime factors. In that case numbers that are 2N would be expiditious choices (the absolute largest number of prime factors for any given magnitude, all of them being '2'). But the problem with such choices is that the non-prime factors are limited. 8 has PFs of 2, 2 and 2. And non-prime factors of 4, 4 and 4 and 8 (1st two times second two, 1st two times 3rd two, 2nd two times first two, then finally all the factors rerecombined), but those three fours are effectively just one four, so it doesn't give us quite as many options as it could have.

So maybe you want single-instance prime-factors? Take each prime. 2 (gives 2), 3 (with the 2, gives), 5 (=30), 7 (=210), etc. Except that multiplying by the seven (especially) does give you a large number that can be split into... 15? possible combinations. But sevenths/fourteenths/21sts/35ths, etc? *shudder* Human maths doesn't work too well with that.

But an eight, instead, is very nearly the same as seven (when it comes to the large number it gives you) but combined with a three (or a couple of threes) gives a number of other useful NPFs along the way. Factors of two (easily), three (barely) and five (a handful) are much more useful components than the increasingly larger primes. (Perhaps eleven is somewhat useful, but you can also wonder if ten contributing 2 and 5 to the mix for slightly less magnitude might be better, when building your perfect larger number...)

60 factors into 2, 2, 3 and 5, which would give 4+6+4a intermediate factors (between from 1/1ths and 1/60ths themselves) if it weren't for the duplicated '2'. Instead it has 3+4+3b of them, which is still quite a lot.

12 is handier (for inches in feet, or hours in half-a-dayc) for counting, being barely beyond a couple of handfuls. 360 is less handy for everyday use but gives a lot more integer divisions (from three '2's, two '3's, one '5', at its core) so made itself useful for degrees-in-a-full-circle, in classroom geometry especially. 240 has been used in other applications (adding an extra '2' and, perhaps more usefully, a '5' to the factors that 24 natively posesses... or two '2's to 60's compliment), but I think perhaps has a little too much magnitude given its effective "factor load".

So... yes... what was I saying? I forget. But aren't numbers interesting? (Even if I am not!)


a (First-only, Second-only, Third-only, Fourth-only)+(First-and-second, First-and-third, First-and-fourth, Second-and-third, Second-and-fourth, third-and-fourth)+(1st2nd3rd, 1st2nd4th, 1st3rd4th, 2nd3rd4th)

b (First-only, Second-only, Third-only, Fourth-only)+(First-and-second, First-and-third, First-and-fourth, Second-and-third, Second-and-fourth, third-and-fourth)+(1st2nd3rd, 1st2nd4th, 1st3rd4th, 2nd3rd4th)

c As I recall, the 24-hours a day arose from the night-time sky (roughly half a day) being administratively (by the Egyptian priest order, or whoever it was again) split into not-necessarily-even twelfths, which eventually became twice that for the full day, then eventually regularised. But that was what I was taught several decades back, so doubtless it's a fact that's crucially wrong in some key way. ;)

actually the Egyptians carried the length of an hour to keep 12 hours during night and day throughout the year.
higher division ability is secondary to being small enough for human grouping ability to work, 12 would be far better than 60.
I think we risk becoming the best informed society that has ever died of ignorance. ~Reuben Blades

I got quite annoyed after the Haiti earthquake. A baby was taken from the wreckage and people said it was a miracle. It would have been a miracle had God stopped the earthquake. More wonderful was that a load of evolved monkeys got together to save the life of a child that wasn't theirs. ~Terry Pratchett

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Mon Feb 10, 2014 9:05 am

Nervium wrote:
L Ron Cupboard wrote:
Hydrogen and other elements didn't exist, those appeared later.


Seconds later.

Actually it took over 300,000 years for hydrogen and other light atoms to appear. Before then, the universe was too hot for the forces to seperate.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
New Zreuche
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 151
Founded: Nov 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Zreuche » Mon Feb 10, 2014 9:30 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Nervium wrote:
Seconds later.

Actually it took over 300,000 years for hydrogen and other light atoms to appear. Before then, the universe was too hot for the forces to seperate.

Well, the forces split apart in less than a second, though we have an incredibly detailed account of the history of the first second. Past that ye had the little electrons and quarks, and a gigantic hunk of anti matter we've never found

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Chernobyl and Pripyat, Denoidumbutoniurucwivobrs, La Xinga, Orcuo, Pizza Friday Forever91, Shrillland, The Holy Therns, Thermodolia, Uiiop, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads