NATION

PASSWORD

Latinos to outnumber Whites in CA in March

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
God Kefka
Senator
 
Posts: 4546
Founded: Aug 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby God Kefka » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:45 pm

Divair wrote:
God Kefka wrote:It appears that with every passing day the white is becoming more and more of an endangered species in his own homelands... this is terrible...

what will happen to the beautiful pale-skinned bright-eyed girls in the future?

My grandson needs to get married too you know...

This California thing... is it just the beginning (*looks at Europe and shudders)?

It is amusing to watch you give a fuck.


We should forget about the polar bear... there are clearly higher priorities in terms of the endangered.
Art thread
viewtopic.php?f=19&t=261761


''WAIT?! Do I look like a waiter to you?''

User avatar
Libertarian California
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: May 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Libertarian California » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:45 pm

Divair wrote:
Libertarian California wrote:This has been white country since the 1840s, much longer than it was ever Mexican land (a mere 27 years).

And?


Thus making it white land...and thus making it okay for whites maintain their majority status.
I'm a trans-beanstalk giantkin. My pronouns are fee/fie/foe/fum.

American nationalist

I am the infamous North California (DEATed 11/13/12). Now in the NS "Hall of Fame", or whatever
(Add 2137 posts)

On the American Revolution
Everyone should watch this video

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:45 pm

Geilinor wrote:Ifreann didn't say that white people shouldn't be able to move to non-white countries. You're bringing up a red herring.


Regardless, that is now the reality in which we live. We're primarily seeing non-Whites flood into majority White countries but not the reverse. I don't think it is a stretch to say that various White ethnicities may well perish eventually.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Israeli Defense Force
Envoy
 
Posts: 253
Founded: Nov 15, 2012
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Israeli Defense Force » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:45 pm

Socialist Tera wrote:white privilege.

I bet you believe in the easter bunny too.

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:46 pm

Geilinor wrote:
God Kefka wrote:what will happen to the beautiful fair-skinned bright-eyed girls in the future?

That's your concern in this world? "Where are my girls, I have a right to girls!" :p

Good thing mixed-race people are so damned beautiful.
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Wolfmanne
Senator
 
Posts: 4418
Founded: Mar 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Wolfmanne » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:46 pm

God Kefka wrote:It appears that with every passing day the white is becoming more and more of an endangered species in his own homelands... this is terrible...

what will happen to the beautiful fair-skinned bright-eyed girls in the future?

My grandson needs to get married too you know...

This California thing... is it just the beginning (*looks at Europe and shudders)?

I'm brown and I consider myself as British as any British person. As a matter of fact, I'm probably more patriotic than the average British person. So what does it matter if more people have brown skin? People can be proud of their country no matter the colour of their skin. A Latino man is as American as an American in the US.

Besides, blonde, blue eyes and fair skinned? Yelch. Too pure for me. Brunette and brown eyes are nicer, no matter the skin colour.
Last edited by Wolfmanne on Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:47 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Cicero thinks I'm Rome's Helen of Troy and Octavian thinks he'll get his money, the stupid fools.

User avatar
Libertarian California
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: May 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Libertarian California » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:46 pm

Saiwania wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Ifreann didn't say that white people shouldn't be able to move to non-white countries. You're bringing up a red herring.


Regardless, that is now the reality in which we live. We're primarily seeing non-Whites flood into majority White countries but not the reverse. I don't think it is a stretch to say that various White ethnicities may well perish eventually.


Well the Lithuanians are rather resilient. As are the Polish and Hungarians.

But Western Europe is toast.
I'm a trans-beanstalk giantkin. My pronouns are fee/fie/foe/fum.

American nationalist

I am the infamous North California (DEATed 11/13/12). Now in the NS "Hall of Fame", or whatever
(Add 2137 posts)

On the American Revolution
Everyone should watch this video

User avatar
Shofercia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2008
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Shofercia » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:47 pm

I'm not going to read beyond the first page, but for me it comes down to two issues:

1. Have any of you seen how ridiculous our census looks? The numbers don't add up to 100%. Seriously:

White: 61.6%
Hispanic: 37.6%
Asian: 14.9%
Black or Politically Correct Term: 7.2%
Multiracial: 4.8%
Native American: 1.9%
Pacific Islander: 0.7%
Grand Total: 128.7%


Don't you just love it when Democrats and Republicans do math? So what happens? Right, instead of redoing the census, they split up the first two categories, and add one, so they get:

White: 61.6%
White, not of Hispanic Origin: 42.3%
Hispanic of Latino of any Race: 37.6%
Multiracial: 4.8%


Whoever came up with this method should be... deported if possible. Even if they're white. Is Sweden taking white people in? Of course even with that fix, that still fails to add up to 100, (adds 109.4%) which is a mere rounding error for the idiots in Sacramento. Addition is so hard! Now, here's my idea of how the census should be done:

White:
Asian:
Latin American:
Black:
Mixed Race/Ethnicity:
Native American:
Pacific Islander:
Other:


This methodology is too complex for the idiots in Sacramento to comprehend. Now, wait a second, the astute reader might ask. "If 61.6% are white of any race/ethnicity, and 42.3% are just white, wouldn't that make 19.3% people of mixed race/ethnicity?" Yes, it would! "But isn't that already a category?" Welcome to Sacramento politics, where common sense is severely lacking.

2. How will this actually effect California's economy? Anyone do any analysis on it? Or are we going to go with the "hurr durr racism, cuz idiots in Sacramento cannot count" routine?
Last edited by Shofercia on Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:49 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Come, learn about Russian Culture! Bring Vodka and Ushanka. Interested in Slavic Culture? Fill this out.
Stonk Power! (North) Kosovo is (a de facto part of) Serbia and Crimea is (a de facto part of) Russia
I used pronouns until the mods made using wrong pronouns warnable, so I use names instead; if you see malice there, that's entirely on you, and if pronouns are no longer warnable, I'll go back to using them

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:47 pm

God Kefka wrote:
Divair wrote:It is amusing to watch you give a fuck.


We should forget about the polar bear... there are clearly higher priorities in terms of the endangered.

I agree. Dolphins are far cooler.

Libertarian California wrote:
Divair wrote:And?


Thus making it white land...and thus making it okay for whites maintain their majority status.

Says who?

User avatar
Aeken
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17135
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Aeken » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:47 pm

Libertarian California wrote:
Divair wrote:And?


Thus making it white land...and thus making it okay for whites maintain their majority status.

Races aren't entitled to land.

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:47 pm

Libertarian California wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Why do white people have an inherent right to be the majority? The United States was founded on civic nationalism.


All people have the inherent right to be a majority in their own land. This has been white country since the 1840s, much longer than it was ever Mexican land (a mere 27 years).

Let's not forget that land does not inherently belong to a certain group. If we traced everyone's ancestry back to the origins of humanity, all of us would have a claim to Ethiopia. Also, Mexico is not taking that land back. All Hispanics are not Mexican, if your problem is Mexicans.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Skeckoa
Minister
 
Posts: 2123
Founded: Jan 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Skeckoa » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:47 pm

Divair wrote:
Libertarian California wrote:This has been white country since the 1840s, much longer than it was ever Mexican land (a mere 27 years).
And?
The reconquista mexicana is here! Mwahaha. On tha realz though: The United States is a nation based on civic nationalism. There is no 'race' of people whom the country is meant to give voice to. If anything, the belief in Liberty and Freedom are markers of people who belong in this nation, not skin color, and arguably, not even language.
One of those PC liberals with anti-colonist sympathies
——————————
————————————
————————————
CALIFORNIA REPUBLIC
————————————
Xie Jia Ju, Revolutionary People's Party, NS Parliament, Queen of the Opposition Bench, and a thorn in the side of the corrupt and misguided

User avatar
Libertarian California
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: May 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Libertarian California » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:47 pm

Sun Wukong wrote:
Geilinor wrote:That's your concern in this world? "Where are my girls, I have a right to girls!" :p

Good thing mixed-race people are so damned beautiful.


Not really. Take it from someone with a large Puerto Rican family.
I'm a trans-beanstalk giantkin. My pronouns are fee/fie/foe/fum.

American nationalist

I am the infamous North California (DEATed 11/13/12). Now in the NS "Hall of Fame", or whatever
(Add 2137 posts)

On the American Revolution
Everyone should watch this video

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159014
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:47 pm

Libertarian California wrote:
Ifreann wrote:It's good that people are allowed to live wherever they want without anyone in authority interfering to maintain the majority status of white people.


That is horrible.

It's basically white genocide.


Saiwania wrote:
Ifreann wrote:It's good that people are allowed to live wherever they want without anyone in authority interfering to maintain the majority status of white people.


So you are saying it is fine for non-Whites to maintain majorities in their own countries but not so for Whites?

Where the fuck did you get that idea?

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:48 pm

Aeken wrote:
Libertarian California wrote:
Thus making it white land...and thus making it okay for whites maintain their majority status.

Races aren't entitled to land.

I don't think he understands how national boundaries work. It may be American soil, but it is not white soil.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Jamjai
Minister
 
Posts: 2348
Founded: Jul 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Jamjai » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:48 pm

Wolfmanne wrote: Besides, blonde, blue eyes and fair skinned?

that is Aryan
RP: 34 million

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:49 pm

Saiwania wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Ifreann didn't say that white people shouldn't be able to move to non-white countries. You're bringing up a red herring.


Regardless, that is now the reality in which we live. We're primarily seeing non-Whites flood into majority White countries but not the reverse. I don't think it is a stretch to say that various White ethnicities may well perish eventually.

This is simple enough to reverse. All you have to do is collapse the economies of a few majority white countries, and simple demographics demand that their reproduction will go way up.
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:49 pm

Sun Wukong wrote:
Saiwania wrote:
Regardless, that is now the reality in which we live. We're primarily seeing non-Whites flood into majority White countries but not the reverse. I don't think it is a stretch to say that various White ethnicities may well perish eventually.

This is simple enough to reverse. All you have to do is collapse the economies of a few majority white countries, and simple demographics demand that their reproduction will go way up.

That explains the GOP's economic policies.

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:49 pm

Jamjai wrote:
Wolfmanne wrote: Besides, blonde, blue eyes and fair skinned?

that is Aryan

Well... really more Finish or Swedish. The Iranians tend not to be.
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Sun Wukong
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9798
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Sun Wukong » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:50 pm

Divair wrote:
Sun Wukong wrote:This is simple enough to reverse. All you have to do is collapse the economies of a few majority white countries, and simple demographics demand that their reproduction will go way up.

That explains the GOP's economic policies.

I know, right?
Great Sage, Equal of Heaven.

User avatar
Aelbica
Envoy
 
Posts: 253
Founded: Jan 26, 2014
Ex-Nation

Postby Aelbica » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:50 pm

Saiwania wrote:
Geilinor wrote:Ifreann didn't say that white people shouldn't be able to move to non-white countries. You're bringing up a red herring.


Regardless, that is now the reality in which we live. We're primarily seeing non-Whites flood into majority White countries but not the reverse. I don't think it is a stretch to say that various White ethnicities may well perish eventually.


Yes, because obviously the (mostly White people) that lead tech sector businesses who want to reform US immigration laws so skilled technical employees (which we lack) can come in to this country are absolutely, positively, most definitely trying to destroy White ethnicity (not even sure what that phrase really means, tbh), right?
Last edited by Aelbica on Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:50 pm, edited 1 time in total.
The Kingdom of Aelbica
Monarch: Queen Brigid III
Prime Minister: Walter Clarke


ENFJ
Unitarian Universalist/Wiccan, Democratic Socialist/Social Democrat
Economic Left/Right: -8.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.90

User avatar
Skeckoa
Minister
 
Posts: 2123
Founded: Jan 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Skeckoa » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:50 pm

Shofercia wrote:I'm not going to read beyond the first page, but for me it comes down to two issues:
Well, that is not how it is done anymore. Now, at least on a federal level, it goes like this.

Are you Latino? [Y/N]
If so, what ethnicity? ________________
What race do you identify with? blah blah.

Latino is an ethnicity, not a race. It is possible to be a Latino Asian for example... I should really do a factbook on this.
One of those PC liberals with anti-colonist sympathies
——————————
————————————
————————————
CALIFORNIA REPUBLIC
————————————
Xie Jia Ju, Revolutionary People's Party, NS Parliament, Queen of the Opposition Bench, and a thorn in the side of the corrupt and misguided

User avatar
The Mathematical States
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 141
Founded: Aug 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Mathematical States » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:51 pm

Shofercia wrote:I'm not going to read beyond the first page, but for me it comes down to two issues:

1. Have any of you seen how ridiculous our census looks? The numbers don't add up to 100%. Seriously:

White: 61.6%
Hispanic: 37.6%
Asian: 14.9%
Black or Politically Correct Term: 7.2%
Multiracial: 4.8%
Native American: 1.9%
Pacific Islander: 0.7%
Grand Total: 128.7%


Don't you just love it when Democrats and Republicans do math? So what happens? Right, instead of redoing the census, they split up the first two categories, and add one, so they get:

White: 61.6%
White, not of Hispanic Origin: 42.3%
Hispanic of Latino of any Race: 37.6%
Multiracial: 4.8%


Whoever came up with this method should be... deported if possible. Even if they're white. Is Sweden taking white people in? Of course even with that fix, that still fails to add up to 100, (adds 109.4%) which is a mere rounding error for the idiots in Sacramento. Addition is so hard! Now, here's my idea of how the census should be done:

White:
Asian:
Latin American:
Black:
Mixed Race/Ethnicity:
Native American:
Pacific Islander:
Other:


This methodology is too complex for the idiots in Sacramento to comprehend. Now, wait a second, the astute reader might ask. "If 61.6% are white of any race/ethnicity, and 42.3% are just white, wouldn't that make 19.3% people of mixed race/ethnicity?" Yes, it would! "But isn't that already a category?" Welcome to Sacramento politics, where common sense is severely lacking.

2. How will this actually effect California's economy? Anyone do any analysis on it? Or are we going to go with the "hurr durr racism, cuz idiots in Sacramento cannot count" routine?


Yeah, this was rather strange when I saw it too. I don't think you can group Latinos/Hispanics into one group though. They're not even genetically homogeneous (within a reasonable tolerance).

User avatar
Libertarian California
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10637
Founded: May 31, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Libertarian California » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:51 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Libertarian California wrote:
All people have the inherent right to be a majority in their own land. This has been white country since the 1840s, much longer than it was ever Mexican land (a mere 27 years).

Let's not forget that land does not inherently belong to a certain group. If we traced everyone's ancestry back to the origins of humanity, all of us would have a claim to Ethiopia. Also, Mexico is not taking that land back. All Hispanics are not Mexican, if your problem is Mexicans.


The land belongs to the nation that inhabits it.

Who cares where we came from millions of years ago? We've diverged and evolved since then.

Mexico is not taking back the land, but Mexicans are. Ever hear of the Reconquista movement? Or how the majority of Hispanics in the US identify with another ethnic or culture group before American? Of course not all Hispanics are Mexicans, but most Hispanics in California are.
I'm a trans-beanstalk giantkin. My pronouns are fee/fie/foe/fum.

American nationalist

I am the infamous North California (DEATed 11/13/12). Now in the NS "Hall of Fame", or whatever
(Add 2137 posts)

On the American Revolution
Everyone should watch this video

User avatar
Carto-Geography
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 130
Founded: Dec 21, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Carto-Geography » Mon Jan 27, 2014 12:51 pm

Skeckoa wrote:Colonel Gaddafi once said: We have 50 million Muslims in Europe. There are signs that Allah will grant Islam victory in Europe—without swords, without guns, without conquest—will turn it into a Muslim continent within a few decades.

I like this, but for another reason. That reason being that in March of 2014, it is expected that the number of ethnic latinos will overtake the number of non-latino whites in California. It is like Gaddafi's words hold precedence in everywhere, and the evils of what the Anglos did to the Californios following the signing of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo will be reprimanded.

Lol. No.

So Nationstates, there are two questions here for you right here: One is economic, one is cultural. 1) How good is this for the economy of California? 2) On a culture basis, is this a healthy fact to live with.

My opinion:
1) Yes. This is phenomenal. This is great and has the ability to further what has already been happening for decades. In the East, Miami has made itself the economic capital of the Caribbean. I believe that Los Angeles is the western equivalent for Mexico and Central America. It has served as a mesh pot for these different ethnicities and the number of businesses that cater to these populations are immense and growing. My favorite example has to be Univision. For those who don't have to watch the women of the family fight over which Telenovela is best, let me run this down for you: Univision and Telemundo are the big giants in Spanish language entertainment. Although there are others, these are the two giants. Univision has seemed to win the battle. The reason as to why may stem from their ability to target non-Mexican latinos better but whatever. Univision has propelled itself to the fourth most popular TV station in the country. It even topped all channels, Eng or Spanish, in the 18 to 49 demographic in September of 2010. But back to California, this goes without to say, that there are people who think otherwise. Afterall, the immigrants that usually come to California are much poorer than the ones that go to New York or Miami. But given that illegal immigrants (most of which are Mexican) make up 6.8% of the population and 9.7% of the work force, it is clear that like the Poles in the UK (Represent), Latinos subsidize the unemployment benefits and programs of California, of which there are many, and of which many of these people cannot participate or benefit from. However, with legal residents and American-born latinos, they also tend to be poorer than the average white or asian child in the state. But the increased trade with MCA (Mexico and Central America) that comes with the growth is also another boost.

2) Yes, I think that this is a culturally healthy thing as well. This may seem like the reconquista mexicana to some, but really, with the rate of assimilation in the country being so high, most of these immigrants' grandchildren will only know Spanish through school, and will be essentially United Statian. After three generations, they are no longer Mexican-American, but just American. What has allowed the language to flourish is the constant stream of new migrants ready to but on their boots and work. This large population is giving California a new mixed hybrid culture and identity that I see as a great thing.

This was very tangent-y, but I feel is something that is important. I feel a personal desire to attach to this news and run with it. I am happy that the Latinos are able to call this state home, as well as essentially every other state in the Southwest, South, and East, but I still see that political power and economic power still lies with the White population as it has for the past four centuries. Nothing much will change as you walk through the streets, but when these people have babies (of which, Latinos have been found to have many more babies, and ensure that the USA doesn't have a European-styled crisis), they will grow, and ensure that the race question gets solved once and for all, whatever that means.

So NSG, what do you think?

Since Hispanics are generally Catholic, I think that its a good thing.
Our father, who art in heaven, hallowed be thy name. Thy kingdom come, thy will be done, on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread, and forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us, and lead us not into temptation, but deliver us from evil. Amen.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Dumb Ideologies, Fartsniffage, Teckopian, The Selkie

Advertisement

Remove ads