Okay, disasters then.
Advertisement

by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:01 am
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by United Misotheist » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:02 am
Soldati senza confini wrote:United Misotheist wrote:
Declaration of war, dispersing chemical or radioactive agents within one's hemisphere, intervention in an allied nation.
Then you would like to know Nigeria is our most important African trading partner and most important African diplomatic partner:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigeria%E2 ... _relations
What else do we need to intervene, either diplomatically or militarily?

by Swedish Realm » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:02 am
Olivaero wrote:Swedish Realm wrote:I also care for humans, which is why sending troops will make it worse. I will not let my Kinsman be killed over such a petty situation, that can be easily resolved by Nigerian Revolution.
Yeah, I'm sure i'll be a walk in the park for homosexuals to overthrow the Nigerian government. The Nigerians are as much your Kinsmen as your fellow swedes.

by Risottia » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:03 am
The New Lowlands wrote:Social Democracy was probably someone or other going "Hey, this socialism idea is great, guys, but how about we don't do the whole 'dictatorship of the proletariat' schtick?"
He proceeded to be kicked out of the DDR.

by Risottia » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:04 am
United Misotheist wrote:Swedish Realm wrote:I also care for humans, which is why sending troops will make it worse. I will not let my Kinsman be killed over such a petty situation, that can be easily resolved by Nigerian Revolution.
Well we wouldnt a revolution, that implies that a communist government could be established. Revolutions are dangerous, I mean personally I would not mind still being a servant of the crown.

by Ostroeuropa » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:04 am
Swedish Realm wrote:Olivaero wrote:Yeah, I'm sure i'll be a walk in the park for homosexuals to overthrow the Nigerian government. The Nigerians are as much your Kinsmen as your fellow swedes.
They are not my kinsman, while I do support a coup d'etat there, I do not think we should send men and women, or weapons. We must not interfere, we are neutral.

by Olivaero » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:05 am
Swedish Realm wrote:Olivaero wrote:Yeah, I'm sure i'll be a walk in the park for homosexuals to overthrow the Nigerian government. The Nigerians are as much your Kinsmen as your fellow swedes.
They are not my kinsman, while I do support a coup d'etat there, I do not think we should send men and women, or weapons. We must not interfere, we are neutral.

by The New Lowlands » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:05 am
United Misotheist wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
Then you would like to know Nigeria is our most important African trading partner and most important African diplomatic partner:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigeria%E2 ... _relations
What else do we need to intervene, either diplomatically or militarily?
If they are important to us then we seek diplomacy, not a liberal war of dominination and destruction.

by Swedish Realm » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:06 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Swedish Realm wrote:They are not my kinsman, while I do support a coup d'etat there, I do not think we should send men and women, or weapons. We must not interfere, we are neutral.
Ahh I see.
It's not intervening to protect homosexuals you object to.
It's intervening to protect black homosexuals.

by Risottia » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:06 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:Swedish Realm wrote:They are not my kinsman, while I do support a coup d'etat there, I do not think we should send men and women, or weapons. We must not interfere, we are neutral.
Ahh I see.
It's not intervening to protect homosexuals you object to.
It's intervening to protect black homosexuals.


by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:10 am
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Magna Libero » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:11 am
Gravlen wrote:in my opinion the international community must react in a strong and decisive manner. That includes condemnation,
Gravlen wrote:international pressure,
Gravlen wrote:and cutting off aid. This is totally unacceptable.
Gravlen wrote:"Rarely have I seen a piece of legislation that in so few paragraphs directly violates so many basic, universal human rights"
- Navi Pillay
Do you agree, or do you think the international community should stay out of what is largely a domestic affair?

by Iuronia » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:11 am

by The New Lowlands » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:11 am
Iuronia wrote:Honestly, I couldn't care. Nigeria is a backwards country, and it has far bigger issues than the fact that homosexuals can't marry - something commonplace in many countries, many of them quite advanced.

by Swedish Realm » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:13 am

by Luveria » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:14 am
Iuronia wrote:Honestly, I couldn't care. Nigeria is a backwards country, and it has far bigger issues than the fact that homosexuals can't marry - something commonplace in many countries, many of them quite advanced.

by Ostroeuropa » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:14 am
Swedish Realm wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
Well, if we were to go with Foreign relations, Sweden is trying to develop relations with Nigeria from what I understand, so you guys' government has an interest in the region as well.
The only thing in Africa that Sweden needs to intervene with is the AIDS epidemic. Send medicine and the like, etc.

by Luveria » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:14 am
Swedish Realm wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
Well, if we were to go with Foreign relations, Sweden is trying to develop relations with Nigeria from what I understand, so you guys' government has an interest in the region as well.
The only thing in Africa that Sweden needs to intervene with is the AIDS epidemic. Send medicine and the like, etc.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:15 am
Swedish Realm wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
Well, if we were to go with Foreign relations, Sweden is trying to develop relations with Nigeria from what I understand, so you guys' government has an interest in the region as well.
The only thing in Africa that Sweden needs to intervene with is the AIDS epidemic. Send medicine and the like, etc.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Swedish Realm » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:16 am

by Imperium Sidhicum » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:16 am

by Swedish Realm » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:16 am

by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:17 am

Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:18 am
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Luveria » Thu Jan 16, 2014 9:18 am
Imperium Sidhicum wrote:I love how some people here follow the mentality of "we are so civilized we know how things should be handled better than anybody, and it's our moral duty to civilize the poor ignorant savages for their own good, whether they want it or not", and yet vehemently deny any accusations of cultural bigotry.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Andsed, Continental Free States, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, Elwher, Emotional Support Crocodile, Eragon Island, Habsburg Mexico, Immoren, Page, Picairn, Raskana, South Africa3, Stellar Colonies, The Archregimancy, The Rio Grande River Basin, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Thermodolia
Advertisement