NATION

PASSWORD

Nigeria denies fundamental rights to homosexuals

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54749
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:42 am

The New Lowlands wrote:
United Misotheist wrote:
WW2 wasnt because of the HOLOCAUST. Jesus what world history class did you take. Germany started punishment of the Jews in the 1930's, America declared war because it was attacked on a major naval base by the Empire of Japan. On that day Germany and Italy declared war on the US. Germany invaded poland in 1939, thats what started WW2.

I don't like the cut of your jib.
1) Punishment? Really? Punishment implies they did something wrong.
2) The United States was already supporting the Allies with supplies and equipment, including the 'ebul godless communists' of the U.S.S.R.
3) WW2 can easily be attributed to the failure of the Allies to intervene against Hitler at the right time.


Eh.

I'd go further and state that the Munich betrayal (which is what basically gave Hitler the idea that France and Britain would have done nothing even had he invaded Poland) was already the consequence of the Society of Nations lowering their collective pants to Italy and Japan when they attacked Ethiopia and China respectively.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:42 am

United Misotheist wrote:
Lost heros wrote:Let the German citizens and the Jews handle the holocaust, it isn't our fight.


WW2 wasnt because of the HOLOCAUST. Jesus what world history class did you take. Germany started punishment of the Jews in the 1930's, America only declared war because it was attacked on a major naval base by the Empire of Japan. On that day Germany and Italy declared war on the US. Germany invaded poland in 1939, thats what started WW2.


Actually, the U.S. and in particular Franklin Roosevelt wanted to go to war as early as 1939. The delay of the U.S. was because the population was harshly anti-war. Then he saw Japan as a good scapegoat and started to play with them until they were forced to attack Pearl Harbor. In other words Roosevelt wanted the attack on Pearl Harbor as an excuse to enter the war.

The Holocaust was revealed in 1945 and stopped swiftly. After that the Nuremberg Trials started which was the last vestige of the World War 2 era, to prevent the Holocaust from happening again.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:43 am

Vitaphone Racing wrote:
Luveria wrote:
I see you forget South Africa had severe economic sanctions against it.

Not sure how you saw that, considering I simply said they abandoned apartheid without the presence of the USMC in their capital. If this is you finally putting to rest the military occupation idea, good I'll take it.


My question is this; Nigeria gets hit with sanctions. They ignore it. Another African country decides to start killing LGBT people. What then? Sanctions against both? Even when a third African country decides to join in on the LGBT killings?

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:43 am

Swedish Realm wrote:
Olivaero wrote:That's like 3.3 milllion people... thats 30+% of the population of Sweden.

So you think we should go over there right? Yeah, let's not say we did. Like I said, let them handle their problems.

If one person in Sweden was threatening to say... bomb Stockholm with lets say a suitcase nuke, would you agree to stopping them? If yes, then why just because it's not a single person but a state that's said "okay we're going to kill or imprison large parts of population" should we not stop them?
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
United Misotheist
Envoy
 
Posts: 220
Founded: Aug 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby United Misotheist » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:44 am

Vitaphone Racing wrote:
Luveria wrote:
I will take a guess you want the UN to do nothing?

Believe it or not, doing nothing is a lot better than making something worse. The last I checked, I'm pretty sure SA abandoned apartheid without the presence of the USMC in their capital.


But why wasnt there intervention in South Africa during Apartheid? Thats a violation of human rights? Just admit that because these people are gay you all up in arms. If it was catholics, muslims, or protestants you wouldnt care. You only care because gay people are being oppressed. Another part of this whole liberal game.
Last edited by United Misotheist on Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
Pro: Fascism, Authoritarianism, Oligarchy, Single Party State, Corporatocratic Government, National Sovereignty, and Misotheism.

Anti: LGBT, Communism, Democracy, Labor Unions, Capitalism, Gun Rights, Illegal Drugs, Multi-Party State, and Libertarianism.

User avatar
Vitaphone Racing
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10123
Founded: Aug 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Vitaphone Racing » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:44 am

United Misotheist wrote:
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Believe it or not, doing nothing is a lot better than making something worse. The last I checked, I'm pretty sure SA abandoned apartheid without the presence of the USMC in their capital.


But why wasnt there intervention in South Africa during Apartheid? Thats a violation of human rights? Just admit that because these people are gay you all up in arms. If it was catholics, muslims, or protestants you wouldnt care. You only care because gay people are be oppressed. Another part of this whole liberal game.

Lmao.
Parhe on my Asian-ness.
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.

ayy lmao

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:44 am

Olivaero wrote:
Swedish Realm wrote:So you think we should go over there right? Yeah, let's not say we did. Like I said, let them handle their problems.

If one person in Sweden was threatening to say... bomb Stockholm with lets say a suitcase nuke, would you agree to stopping them? If yes, then why just because it's not a single person but a state that's said "okay we're going to kill or imprison large parts of population" should we not stop them?


Large parts of our population based on arbitrary and irrelevant criteria.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:44 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The New Lowlands wrote:Isn't that called the centre-left?


The centre-left is a term people use to describe conservatives who realized other conservatives were going a little nuts. :p

I'm a conservative? Well then.

User avatar
The New Lowlands
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12498
Founded: Jun 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Lowlands » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:45 am

United Misotheist wrote:
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Believe it or not, doing nothing is a lot better than making something worse. The last I checked, I'm pretty sure SA abandoned apartheid without the presence of the USMC in their capital.


But why wasnt there intervention in South Africa during Apartheid? Thats a violation of human rights? Just admit that because these people are gay you all up in arms. If it was catholics, muslims, or protestants you wouldnt care. You only care because gay people are be oppressed. Another part of this whole liberal game.

That's honestly just not true. And extremely hypocritical.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:45 am

United Misotheist wrote:
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Believe it or not, doing nothing is a lot better than making something worse. The last I checked, I'm pretty sure SA abandoned apartheid without the presence of the USMC in their capital.


But why wasnt there intervention in South Africa during Apartheid? Thats a violation of human rights? Just admit that because these people are gay you all up in arms. If it was catholics, muslims, or protestants you wouldnt care. You only care because gay people are be oppressed. Another part of this whole liberal game.


You are comparing it to another situation. Nice try.

South Africa was the only one with Apartheid. It had a large domestic movement wanting to end Apartheid. The sanctions made that possible.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:45 am

Divair wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
The centre-left is a term people use to describe conservatives who realized other conservatives were going a little nuts. :p

I'm a conservative? Well then.


Seems like I am a conservative too.

I was lied to all these years
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
The New Lowlands
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12498
Founded: Jun 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Lowlands » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:45 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The New Lowlands wrote:Isn't that called the centre-left?


The centre-left is a term people use to describe conservatives who realized other conservatives were going a little nuts. :p

But I'm not a dirty libernazifazipants! D:

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:46 am

Divair wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
The centre-left is a term people use to describe conservatives who realized other conservatives were going a little nuts. :p

I'm a conservative? Well then.


Think about it.
No, seriously, think about it. :p
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:46 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Divair wrote:I'm a conservative? Well then.


Seems like I am a conservative too.

I was lied to all these years


Lets all start calling ourselves conservatives so everyone who screams "Liberal" at us is wasting their time.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:46 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Divair wrote:I'm a conservative? Well then.


Seems like I am a conservative too.

I was lied to all these years

I thought I was a social democrat, but apparently not.

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Divair wrote:I'm a conservative? Well then.


Think about it.
No, seriously, think about it. :p

I thought about it. I shrugged and took a sip of tea. Now what?

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:47 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Divair wrote:I'm a conservative? Well then.


Seems like I am a conservative too.

I was lied to all these years


I've come at this from a previously communist perspective, so it may be a little warped.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Vitaphone Racing
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10123
Founded: Aug 25, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Vitaphone Racing » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:47 am

Luveria wrote:
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Not sure how you saw that, considering I simply said they abandoned apartheid without the presence of the USMC in their capital. If this is you finally putting to rest the military occupation idea, good I'll take it.


My question is this; Nigeria gets hit with sanctions. They ignore it. Another African country decides to start killing LGBT people. What then? Sanctions against both? Even when a third African country decides to join in on the LGBT killings?

Well let me answer it with this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Africa We aren't really at the start, this is just the latest in a series.

Regardless of the Nigerian government's position, if you live in the north, you'll be executed by a roving death squad of hardcore islamists for being gay. The same is true of roving death squads through all areas of Africa where there is no strong presence of law enforcement.
Parhe on my Asian-ness.
Parhe wrote:Guess what, maybe you don't know what it is like to be Asian.

ayy lmao

User avatar
Lost heros
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9622
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost heros » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:47 am

United Misotheist wrote:
Vitaphone Racing wrote:Believe it or not, doing nothing is a lot better than making something worse. The last I checked, I'm pretty sure SA abandoned apartheid without the presence of the USMC in their capital.


But why wasnt there intervention in South Africa during Apartheid? Thats a violation of human rights? Just admit that because these people are gay you all up in arms. If it was catholics, muslims, or protestants you wouldnt care. You only care because gay people are being oppressed. Another part of this whole liberal game.

Except I would. You shouldn't make generalizations.
Last edited by Lost Heros on Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:00, edited 173 times in total.


You can send me a TG. I won't mind.

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot." - Salvador Dali

User avatar
United Misotheist
Envoy
 
Posts: 220
Founded: Aug 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby United Misotheist » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:48 am

Luveria wrote:
United Misotheist wrote:
But why wasnt there intervention in South Africa during Apartheid? Thats a violation of human rights? Just admit that because these people are gay you all up in arms. If it was catholics, muslims, or protestants you wouldnt care. You only care because gay people are be oppressed. Another part of this whole liberal game.


You are comparing it to another situation. Nice try.

South Africa was the only one with Apartheid. It had a large domestic movement wanting to end Apartheid. The sanctions made that possible.


But if it was catholics, muslims, or protestants being oppressed would you care as much as you do about gays? Would you start a war for them?
Pro: Fascism, Authoritarianism, Oligarchy, Single Party State, Corporatocratic Government, National Sovereignty, and Misotheism.

Anti: LGBT, Communism, Democracy, Labor Unions, Capitalism, Gun Rights, Illegal Drugs, Multi-Party State, and Libertarianism.

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:48 am

Divair wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Seems like I am a conservative too.

I was lied to all these years

I thought I was a social democrat, but apparently not.


Tbf Social Democracy has been the status quo for quite a while now in the western world...
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
The New Lowlands
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12498
Founded: Jun 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Lowlands » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:48 am

United Misotheist wrote:
Luveria wrote:
You are comparing it to another situation. Nice try.

South Africa was the only one with Apartheid. It had a large domestic movement wanting to end Apartheid. The sanctions made that possible.


But if it was catholics, muslims, or protestants being oppressed would you care as much as you do about gays? Would you start a war for them?

Duh.

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:48 am

United Misotheist wrote:
Luveria wrote:
You are comparing it to another situation. Nice try.

South Africa was the only one with Apartheid. It had a large domestic movement wanting to end Apartheid. The sanctions made that possible.


But if it was catholics, muslims, or protestants being oppressed would you care as much as you do about gays? Would you start a war for them?

Duh.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:48 am

Vitaphone Racing wrote:
Luveria wrote:
My question is this; Nigeria gets hit with sanctions. They ignore it. Another African country decides to start killing LGBT people. What then? Sanctions against both? Even when a third African country decides to join in on the LGBT killings?

Well let me answer it with this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_rights_in_Africa We aren't really at the start, this is just the latest in a series.

Regardless of the Nigerian government's position, if you live in the north, you'll be executed by a roving death squad of hardcore islamists for being gay. The same is true of roving death squads through all areas of Africa where there is no strong presence of law enforcement.


The problem is that if Nigeria is allowed to illegally worsen LGBT rights, what is to stop other African countries from taking the next step and also legislating unconstitutional death penalties against their LGBT citizens?

User avatar
Divair
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63434
Founded: May 06, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Divair » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:49 am

Olivaero wrote:
Divair wrote:I thought I was a social democrat, but apparently not.


Tbf Social Democracy has been the status quo for quite a while now in the western world...

Not really. I'm talking Nordic model style social democracy. Not what I like to call "social democracy lite".

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:49 am

United Misotheist wrote:
Luveria wrote:
You are comparing it to another situation. Nice try.

South Africa was the only one with Apartheid. It had a large domestic movement wanting to end Apartheid. The sanctions made that possible.


But if it was catholics, muslims, or protestants being oppressed would you care as much as you do about gays? Would you start a war for them?


Yes.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Andsed, Continental Free States, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, Elwher, Emotional Support Crocodile, Eragon Island, Habsburg Mexico, Immoren, Kenmoria, Page, Picairn, Raskana, South Africa3, Stellar Colonies, The Archregimancy, The Rio Grande River Basin, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Thermodolia

Advertisement

Remove ads