So we should just fight fire with worse fire, yes?
Advertisement

by Swedish Realm » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:07 am

by Ostroeuropa » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:07 am
The New Lowlands wrote:Luveria wrote:
It would be for the best. There is an obligation to guide democracies to adhering to a minimum standard of human rights.
So after invading, costing who knows how many innocent civilians' lives and damaging the already-shit reputation of LGBT people in Nigeria, we leave, and rather than state-sponsored violence we get violence by private citizens. Remind me how this is a solution?

by United Misotheist » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:07 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:The New Lowlands wrote:These aren't 'fascists.' Nigeria is a democracy; this isn't like liberating North Korea or Cuba or Belarus, where you'll be displacing a small oligarchy or a dictator, where the people are much more inclined to be nice and democratic, this is the people implementing a law which they approve of. Intervening will merely incite violence on a larger, unofficial scale.
I'll be honest with you, I don't know for certain. Economic improvement might, or might not; increased education might, or might not. What I am reasonably sure of is that going in guns blazing is going to have the exact opposite effect of that intended.
It might not help the nigerians.
But what it will do is sufficiently stem the tide.
You wont see other nations thinking they can get away with this shit.

by G-Tech Corporation » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:08 am
Luveria wrote:It is especially problematic for AIDS relief groups trying to help LGBT Nigerians, as that is considered a "meeting". Effectively, international groups are barred from distributing any medical help to LGBT Nigerians under fear of being jailed.

by Blackledge » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:08 am

by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:08 am
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Swedish Realm » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:08 am

by Luveria » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:09 am
United Misotheist wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
It might not help the nigerians.
But what it will do is sufficiently stem the tide.
You wont see other nations thinking they can get away with this shit.
You know what I am so sick of liberals sitting behind their computer and convincing themselves they call the shots. Our troops go through alot, and liberals, communist, your all alike, all you want is international intervention and war. War causes suffering and death, more people would die than they are now. War would make things worse. It is such a small minority its not worth it. Gays make up a very small portion of Nigeria, I mean its not worth it. We should take diplomatic route, negotiate with them. Negotitian should be our priority not war, I mean you just want to see Nigeria suffer because of your own liberal agenda.


by Ostroeuropa » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:09 am
United Misotheist wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
It might not help the nigerians.
But what it will do is sufficiently stem the tide.
You wont see other nations thinking they can get away with this shit.
You know what I am so sick of liberals sitting behind their computer and convincing themselves they call the shots. Our troops go through alot, and liberals, communist, your all alike, all you want is international intervention and war. War causes suffering and death, more people would die than they are now. War would make things worse. It is such a small minority its not worth it. Gays make up a very small portion of Nigeria, I mean its not worth it. We should take diplomatic route, negotiate with them. Negotitian should be our priority not war, I mean you just want to see Nigeria suffer because of your own liberal agenda.

by Swedish Realm » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:10 am

by Ostroeuropa » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:10 am

by The New Lowlands » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:10 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:The New Lowlands wrote:So after invading, costing who knows how many innocent civilians' lives and damaging the already-shit reputation of LGBT people in Nigeria, we leave, and rather than state-sponsored violence we get violence by private citizens. Remind me how this is a solution?
i) Private citizens can be arrested by the government of Nigeria for violence against other private citizens.
There is no solution other than boxing up the creeps or warring at them.
ii) That the war becomes one of Nigerian Government VS iii) Nigerian Homophobes instead of UN Vs Nigeria, is no concern of mine, though i'd be happy to send aid.

by Luveria » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:10 am
G-Tech Corporation wrote:Luveria wrote:It is especially problematic for AIDS relief groups trying to help LGBT Nigerians, as that is considered a "meeting". Effectively, international groups are barred from distributing any medical help to LGBT Nigerians under fear of being jailed.
That is unfortunate. Even so, as I mentioned earlier, a more sensible interpretation of the law would to prohibit meetings of two or more LGBT Nigerians who are meeting due to their LGBT nature; that is how prohibition of assembly laws are categorically interpreted, and would leave ample room for assembly of LGBT persons in Nigeria for reasons aside from their sexual orientation, such as political rallies, healthcare reasons, family events, etc. which would cover the distribution of AIDS relief supplies. The law as it stands now could, by straight verbiage, be used to arrest and imprison everyone in a political rally that happened to include two LGBT individuals, but I sincerely doubt you will see it utilized in such a manner; if it is, that would obviously be a gross abuse of the law's purpose.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:11 am
Ostroeuropa wrote:The New Lowlands wrote:So after invading, costing who knows how many innocent civilians' lives and damaging the already-shit reputation of LGBT people in Nigeria, we leave, and rather than state-sponsored violence we get violence by private citizens. Remind me how this is a solution?
Private citizens can be arrested by the government of Nigeria for violence against other private citizens.
There is no solution other than boxing up the creeps or warring at them.
That the war becomes one of Nigerian Government VS Nigerian Homophobes instead of UN Vs Nigeria, is no concern of mine, though i'd be happy to send aid.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by United Misotheist » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:12 am
Luveria wrote:United Misotheist wrote:
You know what I am so sick of liberals sitting behind their computer and convincing themselves they call the shots. Our troops go through alot, and liberals, communist, your all alike, all you want is international intervention and war. War causes suffering and death, more people would die than they are now. War would make things worse. It is such a small minority its not worth it. Gays make up a very small portion of Nigeria, I mean its not worth it. We should take diplomatic route, negotiate with them. Negotitian should be our priority not war, I mean you just want to see Nigeria suffer because of your own liberal agenda.
Huh, a totalitarian giving an anti-war sermon but only when it's because he doesn't want LGBT rights restored?

by Swedish Realm » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:12 am
United Misotheist wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
It might not help the nigerians.
But what it will do is sufficiently stem the tide.
You wont see other nations thinking they can get away with this shit.
You know what I am so sick of liberals sitting behind their computer and convincing themselves they call the shots. Our troops go through alot, and liberals, communist, your all alike, all you want is international intervention and war. War causes suffering and death, more people would die than they are now. War would make things worse. It is such a small minority its not worth it. Gays make up a very small portion of Nigeria, I mean its not worth it. We should take diplomatic route, negotiate with them. Negotitian should be our priority not war, I mean you just want to see Nigeria suffer because of your own liberal agenda.

by Luveria » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:12 am
United Misotheist wrote:Luveria wrote:
Huh, a totalitarian giving an anti-war sermon but only when it's because he doesn't want LGBT rights restored?
I am a anti-war because liberals are using this an excuse to go in to a country, destroy through war, then establish a puppet government. War is not the answer, diplomacy is the answer. The liberal agenda needs to stop.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:12 am
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by The New Lowlands » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:12 am
Swedish Realm wrote:United Misotheist wrote:
You know what I am so sick of liberals sitting behind their computer and convincing themselves they call the shots. Our troops go through alot, and liberals, communist, your all alike, all you want is international intervention and war. War causes suffering and death, more people would die than they are now. War would make things worse. It is such a small minority its not worth it. Gays make up a very small portion of Nigeria, I mean its not worth it. We should take diplomatic route, negotiate with them. Negotitian should be our priority not war, I mean you just want to see Nigeria suffer because of your own liberal agenda.
You're right, diplomacy might be the key. Going to fight in a country to save like 2 percent of the population is fucking pointless. Left wingers show too much compassion for the LGBT community and not their military. I highly doubt our troops want to be sent out to fight for 2 percent a nation.

by Ostroeuropa » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:13 am
Soldati senza confini wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
Private citizens can be arrested by the government of Nigeria for violence against other private citizens.
There is no solution other than boxing up the creeps or warring at them.
That the war becomes one of Nigerian Government VS Nigerian Homophobes instead of UN Vs Nigeria, is no concern of mine, though i'd be happy to send aid.
Well this is grand.
You obviously have no idea how the aftermath of war works. Homophobes are not going to go against their government. Oh no, they will hate and make life miserable for LGBT people down in Nigeria, and then you just say "fuck them, we did our job, we showed the world. Good fucking job everyone" while we will hear more cases about LGBT people getting killed or raped.

by Luveria » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:13 am

by The New Lowlands » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:13 am
United Misotheist wrote:Luveria wrote:
Huh, a totalitarian giving an anti-war sermon but only when it's because he doesn't want LGBT rights restored?
I am a anti-war because liberals are using this an excuse to go in to a country, destroy through war, then establish a puppet government. War is not the answer, diplomacy is the answer. The liberal agenda needs to stop.

by Olivaero » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:14 am
United Misotheist wrote:Luveria wrote:
Huh, a totalitarian giving an anti-war sermon but only when it's because he doesn't want LGBT rights restored?
I am a anti-war because liberals are using this an excuse to go in to a country, destroy through war, then establish a puppet government. War is not the answer, diplomacy is the answer. The liberal agenda needs to stop.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:14 am
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
Advertisement
Advertisement