NATION

PASSWORD

Nigeria denies fundamental rights to homosexuals

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Swedish Realm
Diplomat
 
Posts: 906
Founded: Oct 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Swedish Realm » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:07 am

Luveria wrote:
Swedish Realm wrote:No, that will just end up killing innocents.


Funny, that. You should explain to the Nigerian government that they are killing innocent LGBT people.

So we should just fight fire with worse fire, yes?
Long live the King! Long live Lutheranism! Long live Sweden!
So I herd u liek cultural marxism?
Pro : KD, SD, (Sometimes the Moderates, I said SOMETIMES!)
Anti : SAP, V,
"Everything is better with more Testosterone"

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57854
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:07 am

The New Lowlands wrote:
Luveria wrote:
It would be for the best. There is an obligation to guide democracies to adhering to a minimum standard of human rights.

So after invading, costing who knows how many innocent civilians' lives and damaging the already-shit reputation of LGBT people in Nigeria, we leave, and rather than state-sponsored violence we get violence by private citizens. Remind me how this is a solution?


Private citizens can be arrested by the government of Nigeria for violence against other private citizens.
There is no solution other than boxing up the creeps or warring at them.
That the war becomes one of Nigerian Government VS Nigerian Homophobes instead of UN Vs Nigeria, is no concern of mine, though i'd be happy to send aid.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
United Misotheist
Envoy
 
Posts: 220
Founded: Aug 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby United Misotheist » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:07 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The New Lowlands wrote:These aren't 'fascists.' Nigeria is a democracy; this isn't like liberating North Korea or Cuba or Belarus, where you'll be displacing a small oligarchy or a dictator, where the people are much more inclined to be nice and democratic, this is the people implementing a law which they approve of. Intervening will merely incite violence on a larger, unofficial scale.

I'll be honest with you, I don't know for certain. Economic improvement might, or might not; increased education might, or might not. What I am reasonably sure of is that going in guns blazing is going to have the exact opposite effect of that intended.


It might not help the nigerians.
But what it will do is sufficiently stem the tide.
You wont see other nations thinking they can get away with this shit.


You know what I am so sick of liberals sitting behind their computer and convincing themselves they call the shots. Our troops go through alot, and liberals, communist, your all alike, all you want is international intervention and war. War causes suffering and death, more people would die than they are now. War would make things worse. It is such a small minority its not worth it. Gays make up a very small portion of Nigeria, I mean its not worth it. We should take diplomatic route, negotiate with them. Negotitian should be our priority not war, I mean you just want to see Nigeria suffer because of your own liberal agenda.
Pro: Fascism, Authoritarianism, Oligarchy, Single Party State, Corporatocratic Government, National Sovereignty, and Misotheism.

Anti: LGBT, Communism, Democracy, Labor Unions, Capitalism, Gun Rights, Illegal Drugs, Multi-Party State, and Libertarianism.

User avatar
G-Tech Corporation
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 62465
Founded: Feb 03, 2010
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby G-Tech Corporation » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:08 am

Luveria wrote:It is especially problematic for AIDS relief groups trying to help LGBT Nigerians, as that is considered a "meeting". Effectively, international groups are barred from distributing any medical help to LGBT Nigerians under fear of being jailed.


That is unfortunate. Even so, as I mentioned earlier, a more sensible interpretation of the law would to prohibit meetings of two or more LGBT Nigerians who are meeting due to their LGBT nature; that is how prohibition of assembly laws are categorically interpreted, and would leave ample room for assembly of LGBT persons in Nigeria for reasons aside from their sexual orientation, such as political rallies, healthcare reasons, family events, etc. which would cover the distribution of AIDS relief supplies. The law as it stands now could, by straight verbiage, be used to arrest and imprison everyone in a political rally that happened to include two LGBT individuals, but I sincerely doubt you will see it utilized in such a manner; if it is, that would obviously be a gross abuse of the law's purpose.
TG if you have questions about RP. If I don't know the answer, I know someone who does.

Quite the unofficial fellow. P2TM Mentor specializing in faction and nation RPs, as well as RPGs.

User avatar
Blackledge
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1170
Founded: Aug 27, 2004
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Blackledge » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:08 am

Luveria wrote:
Swedish Realm wrote:So we should send the troops, right? No, that is fucking stupid.


We don't need any boots on the ground. Drones and cruise missiles will do nicely.

It's time to fight for their right to party be homosexuals.
Cattle die, kinsmen die, and so shall you die, too. But one thing I know that never dies: the fame of a dead man’s deeds.
A concise history of the Falklands War
The Commonwealth States of Blackledge
Factbook|Internal Matters|

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:08 am

Luveria wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
This is a good point.

Sending troops to Nigeria will have us investing at least 2 - 5 years at the very least in there.


It would be for the best. There is an obligation to guide democracies to adhering to a minimum standard of human rights.


Just like we did in Iraq, right.

Remind me how that was such a good idea?
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Swedish Realm
Diplomat
 
Posts: 906
Founded: Oct 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Swedish Realm » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:08 am

Risottia wrote:
Swedish Realm wrote:What do you mean?

It's very comfy to ignore how Nigeria is behaving towards its gay citizens in the same way apartheid-times South Africa behaved towards its non-white citizens.

What I mean is, let them handle on their own, we need to worry about our own affairs.
Long live the King! Long live Lutheranism! Long live Sweden!
So I herd u liek cultural marxism?
Pro : KD, SD, (Sometimes the Moderates, I said SOMETIMES!)
Anti : SAP, V,
"Everything is better with more Testosterone"

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:09 am

United Misotheist wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
It might not help the nigerians.
But what it will do is sufficiently stem the tide.
You wont see other nations thinking they can get away with this shit.


You know what I am so sick of liberals sitting behind their computer and convincing themselves they call the shots. Our troops go through alot, and liberals, communist, your all alike, all you want is international intervention and war. War causes suffering and death, more people would die than they are now. War would make things worse. It is such a small minority its not worth it. Gays make up a very small portion of Nigeria, I mean its not worth it. We should take diplomatic route, negotiate with them. Negotitian should be our priority not war, I mean you just want to see Nigeria suffer because of your own liberal agenda.


Huh, a totalitarian giving an anti-war sermon but only when it's because he doesn't want LGBT rights restored? :roll:
Last edited by Luveria on Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:09 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57854
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:09 am

United Misotheist wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
It might not help the nigerians.
But what it will do is sufficiently stem the tide.
You wont see other nations thinking they can get away with this shit.


You know what I am so sick of liberals sitting behind their computer and convincing themselves they call the shots. Our troops go through alot, and liberals, communist, your all alike, all you want is international intervention and war. War causes suffering and death, more people would die than they are now. War would make things worse. It is such a small minority its not worth it. Gays make up a very small portion of Nigeria, I mean its not worth it. We should take diplomatic route, negotiate with them. Negotitian should be our priority not war, I mean you just want to see Nigeria suffer because of your own liberal agenda.


Sure man, i'll take you seriously after seeing your sig.

"Oh shit, your serious!? We can talk this out!"
"Anti: LGBT, Communism, Democracy, Labor Unions, Capitalism, Gun Rights, Illegal Drugs, Multi-Party State, and Libertarianism."
Sounds hilarious to me man.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:09 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Swedish Realm
Diplomat
 
Posts: 906
Founded: Oct 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Swedish Realm » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:10 am

Blackledge wrote:
Luveria wrote:
We don't need any boots on the ground. Drones and cruise missiles will do nicely.

It's time to fight for their right to party be homosexuals.

Exactly, let them handle it, let pull a revolution or something. Europe and North America need to just stay out.
Long live the King! Long live Lutheranism! Long live Sweden!
So I herd u liek cultural marxism?
Pro : KD, SD, (Sometimes the Moderates, I said SOMETIMES!)
Anti : SAP, V,
"Everything is better with more Testosterone"

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57854
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:10 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Luveria wrote:
It would be for the best. There is an obligation to guide democracies to adhering to a minimum standard of human rights.


Just like we did in Iraq, right.

Remind me how that was such a good idea?


It was a good idea executed poorly.
Which is almost worse than being a bad idea.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
The New Lowlands
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12498
Founded: Jun 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Lowlands » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:10 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The New Lowlands wrote:So after invading, costing who knows how many innocent civilians' lives and damaging the already-shit reputation of LGBT people in Nigeria, we leave, and rather than state-sponsored violence we get violence by private citizens. Remind me how this is a solution?


i) Private citizens can be arrested by the government of Nigeria for violence against other private citizens.
There is no solution other than boxing up the creeps or warring at them.
ii) That the war becomes one of Nigerian Government VS iii) Nigerian Homophobes instead of UN Vs Nigeria, is no concern of mine, though i'd be happy to send aid.

i) You're assuming they'll be capable of this after getting the shit bombed out of them.
ii) You're also assuming the government would try to stop them.
iii) AKA most of the electorate.

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:10 am

Swedish Realm wrote:
Risottia wrote:It's very comfy to ignore how Nigeria is behaving towards its gay citizens in the same way apartheid-times South Africa behaved towards its non-white citizens.

What I mean is, let them handle on their own, we need to worry about our own affairs.

There affairs are our affairs because they are human too.
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:10 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Luveria wrote:
It would be for the best. There is an obligation to guide democracies to adhering to a minimum standard of human rights.


Just like we did in Iraq, right.

Remind me how that was such a good idea?


It was. Saddam was removed. He was bad for regional stability.

G-Tech Corporation wrote:
Luveria wrote:It is especially problematic for AIDS relief groups trying to help LGBT Nigerians, as that is considered a "meeting". Effectively, international groups are barred from distributing any medical help to LGBT Nigerians under fear of being jailed.


That is unfortunate. Even so, as I mentioned earlier, a more sensible interpretation of the law would to prohibit meetings of two or more LGBT Nigerians who are meeting due to their LGBT nature; that is how prohibition of assembly laws are categorically interpreted, and would leave ample room for assembly of LGBT persons in Nigeria for reasons aside from their sexual orientation, such as political rallies, healthcare reasons, family events, etc. which would cover the distribution of AIDS relief supplies. The law as it stands now could, by straight verbiage, be used to arrest and imprison everyone in a political rally that happened to include two LGBT individuals, but I sincerely doubt you will see it utilized in such a manner; if it is, that would obviously be a gross abuse of the law's purpose.


The UN has already expressed concerns about AIDS relief to LGBT Nigerians. The Nigerian government is refusing to budge. They very well know what they are doing. This makes it an international health issue as the Nigerian government is using AIDS as a passive weapon to eradicate its LGBT citizens.
Last edited by Luveria on Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:11 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:11 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
The New Lowlands wrote:So after invading, costing who knows how many innocent civilians' lives and damaging the already-shit reputation of LGBT people in Nigeria, we leave, and rather than state-sponsored violence we get violence by private citizens. Remind me how this is a solution?


Private citizens can be arrested by the government of Nigeria for violence against other private citizens.
There is no solution other than boxing up the creeps or warring at them.
That the war becomes one of Nigerian Government VS Nigerian Homophobes instead of UN Vs Nigeria, is no concern of mine, though i'd be happy to send aid.


Well this is grand.

You obviously have no idea how the aftermath of war works. Homophobes are not going to go against their government. Oh no, they will hate and make life miserable for LGBT people down in Nigeria, and then you just say "fuck them, we did our job, we showed the world. Good fucking job everyone" while we will hear more cases about LGBT people getting killed or raped.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
United Misotheist
Envoy
 
Posts: 220
Founded: Aug 20, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby United Misotheist » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:12 am

Luveria wrote:
United Misotheist wrote:
You know what I am so sick of liberals sitting behind their computer and convincing themselves they call the shots. Our troops go through alot, and liberals, communist, your all alike, all you want is international intervention and war. War causes suffering and death, more people would die than they are now. War would make things worse. It is such a small minority its not worth it. Gays make up a very small portion of Nigeria, I mean its not worth it. We should take diplomatic route, negotiate with them. Negotitian should be our priority not war, I mean you just want to see Nigeria suffer because of your own liberal agenda.


Huh, a totalitarian giving an anti-war sermon but only when it's because he doesn't want LGBT rights restored? :roll:


I am a anti-war because liberals are using this an excuse to go in to a country, destroy through war, then establish a puppet government. War is not the answer, diplomacy is the answer. The liberal agenda needs to stop.
Pro: Fascism, Authoritarianism, Oligarchy, Single Party State, Corporatocratic Government, National Sovereignty, and Misotheism.

Anti: LGBT, Communism, Democracy, Labor Unions, Capitalism, Gun Rights, Illegal Drugs, Multi-Party State, and Libertarianism.

User avatar
Swedish Realm
Diplomat
 
Posts: 906
Founded: Oct 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Swedish Realm » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:12 am

United Misotheist wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
It might not help the nigerians.
But what it will do is sufficiently stem the tide.
You wont see other nations thinking they can get away with this shit.


You know what I am so sick of liberals sitting behind their computer and convincing themselves they call the shots. Our troops go through alot, and liberals, communist, your all alike, all you want is international intervention and war. War causes suffering and death, more people would die than they are now. War would make things worse. It is such a small minority its not worth it. Gays make up a very small portion of Nigeria, I mean its not worth it. We should take diplomatic route, negotiate with them. Negotitian should be our priority not war, I mean you just want to see Nigeria suffer because of your own liberal agenda.

You're right, diplomacy might be the key. Going to fight in a country to save like 2 percent of the population is fucking pointless. Left wingers show too much compassion for the LGBT community and not their military. I highly doubt our troops want to be sent out to fight for 2 percent a nation.
Long live the King! Long live Lutheranism! Long live Sweden!
So I herd u liek cultural marxism?
Pro : KD, SD, (Sometimes the Moderates, I said SOMETIMES!)
Anti : SAP, V,
"Everything is better with more Testosterone"

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:12 am

United Misotheist wrote:
Luveria wrote:
Huh, a totalitarian giving an anti-war sermon but only when it's because he doesn't want LGBT rights restored? :roll:


I am a anti-war because liberals are using this an excuse to go in to a country, destroy through war, then establish a puppet government. War is not the answer, diplomacy is the answer. The liberal agenda needs to stop.


Nah, you're anti-war only when you want any excuse to see LGBT people exterminated.
Last edited by Luveria on Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:12 am, edited 2 times in total.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:12 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Just like we did in Iraq, right.

Remind me how that was such a good idea?


It was a good idea executed poorly.
Which is almost worse than being a bad idea.


It was a complete failure and a political vacuum which more radicals could take up for grabs, which forced us to spend almost a decade there you mean.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
The New Lowlands
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12498
Founded: Jun 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Lowlands » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:12 am

Swedish Realm wrote:
United Misotheist wrote:
You know what I am so sick of liberals sitting behind their computer and convincing themselves they call the shots. Our troops go through alot, and liberals, communist, your all alike, all you want is international intervention and war. War causes suffering and death, more people would die than they are now. War would make things worse. It is such a small minority its not worth it. Gays make up a very small portion of Nigeria, I mean its not worth it. We should take diplomatic route, negotiate with them. Negotitian should be our priority not war, I mean you just want to see Nigeria suffer because of your own liberal agenda.

You're right, diplomacy might be the key. Going to fight in a country to save like 2 percent of the population is fucking pointless. Left wingers show too much compassion for the LGBT community and not their military. I highly doubt our troops want to be sent out to fight for 2 percent a nation.

What else did they sign up for?

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57854
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:13 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
Private citizens can be arrested by the government of Nigeria for violence against other private citizens.
There is no solution other than boxing up the creeps or warring at them.
That the war becomes one of Nigerian Government VS Nigerian Homophobes instead of UN Vs Nigeria, is no concern of mine, though i'd be happy to send aid.


Well this is grand.

You obviously have no idea how the aftermath of war works. Homophobes are not going to go against their government. Oh no, they will hate and make life miserable for LGBT people down in Nigeria, and then you just say "fuck them, we did our job, we showed the world. Good fucking job everyone" while we will hear more cases about LGBT people getting killed or raped.


If I could turn them into Liberals overnight I would.
We can't uproot their culture, it has to grow organically.
What we CAN do is trim it if it gets out of line.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:13 am

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
It was a good idea executed poorly.
Which is almost worse than being a bad idea.


It was a complete failure and a political vacuum which more radicals could take up for grabs, which forced us to spend almost a decade there you mean.


You're missing the point that a warmongering dictator is often very bad for regional stability, just as Nigeria refusing to allow LGBT citizens to get AIDs treatment is creating an international health situation that needs to be addressed.

User avatar
The New Lowlands
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12498
Founded: Jun 26, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby The New Lowlands » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:13 am

United Misotheist wrote:
Luveria wrote:
Huh, a totalitarian giving an anti-war sermon but only when it's because he doesn't want LGBT rights restored? :roll:


I am a anti-war because liberals are using this an excuse to go in to a country, destroy through war, then establish a puppet government. War is not the answer, diplomacy is the answer. The liberal agenda needs to stop.

You know that liberals predominantly oppose war and imperialism, right?
Puppet states are generally on the other side of the spectrum.

User avatar
Olivaero
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8012
Founded: Jun 17, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Olivaero » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:14 am

United Misotheist wrote:
Luveria wrote:
Huh, a totalitarian giving an anti-war sermon but only when it's because he doesn't want LGBT rights restored? :roll:


I am a anti-war because liberals are using this an excuse to go in to a country, destroy through war, then establish a puppet government. War is not the answer, diplomacy is the answer. The liberal agenda needs to stop.

Are you just using liberal to mean "people who support democracy" here? It doesn't really make sense any other way.
British, Anglo Celtic, English, Northerner.

Transhumanist, Left Hegelian, Marxist, Communist.

Agnostic Theist, Culturally Christian.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Thu Jan 16, 2014 8:14 am

Luveria wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
Just like we did in Iraq, right.

Remind me how that was such a good idea?


It was. Saddam was removed. He was bad for regional stability.


It was our worst failure in the history of foreign intervention as well.

Imagine that, an asshole of a dictator keeping political stability within the country and keeping Iran under check. Who would have thought?
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Forsher, Likhinia

Advertisement

Remove ads