Well, besides the obvious.
Advertisement

by Gallup » Thu Feb 06, 2014 7:12 am

by Frisivisia » Thu Feb 06, 2014 7:18 am

by Gallup » Thu Feb 06, 2014 7:25 am

by Soviet Russia Republic » Thu Feb 06, 2014 7:33 am

by Heart Attack Grill » Thu Feb 06, 2014 7:53 am

by Gallup » Thu Feb 06, 2014 8:01 am
Soviet Russia Republic wrote:Gallup wrote:Well, besides the obvious.
An extremely beautiful region that has been a favored resort region, having the games there goes well with long term plans of the region, and the desire/plans to purpose to hold the games Sochi was in Russia before the creation of the Russia Federation.

by Soviet Russia Republic » Thu Feb 06, 2014 8:11 am
Heart Attack Grill wrote:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/05/reporters-sochi-hotel-olympics-tweets_n_4729443.html
mmm sochi seems like such a wonderful place to visit
wonder how like it'll take before im called a russophobe

by The Scientific States » Thu Feb 06, 2014 8:32 am

by Regnum Dominae » Thu Feb 06, 2014 8:33 am

by The Scientific States » Thu Feb 06, 2014 8:34 am

by Regnum Dominae » Thu Feb 06, 2014 8:36 am

by The Scientific States » Thu Feb 06, 2014 8:38 am
Regnum Dominae wrote:The Scientific States wrote:
Hopefully Russia doesn't host an Olympic game for a long time.
They were very unprepared. Hotels are uncomplete, they went way over budget, there's a large threat of a terrorist attack etc.
I mean seriously, when you're spending more than every other winter olympics combined, you should at least have the hotels built on time.

by Gallup » Thu Feb 06, 2014 9:21 am
Regnum Dominae wrote:The Scientific States wrote:
Hopefully Russia doesn't host an Olympic game for a long time.
They were very unprepared. Hotels are uncomplete, they went way over budget, there's a large threat of a terrorist attack etc.
I mean seriously, when you're spending more than every other winter olympics combined, you should at least have the hotels built on time.
by Shofercia » Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:35 am
Lemanrussland wrote:NBC: All Visitors to Sochi Olympics Immediately Hacked
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waEeJJVZ5P8
Welp. Stinks of sensationalism, but I wouldn't be surprised if there are serious information security problems.
Australian Republic wrote:Why not mention the terrorism in the name of the thread?
Heart Attack Grill wrote:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/05/reporters-sochi-hotel-olympics-tweets_n_4729443.html
mmm sochi seems like such a wonderful place to visit
wonder how like it'll take before im called a russophobe
Regnum Dominae wrote:The Scientific States wrote:
Hopefully Russia doesn't host an Olympic game for a long time.
They were very unprepared. Hotels are uncomplete, they went way over budget, there's a large threat of a terrorist attack etc.
I mean seriously, when you're spending more than every other winter olympics combined, you should at least have the hotels built on time.
Shofercia wrote:It's spending. Sochi spent $51 billion on the Olympics. Since this is the most, Russophobes usually tout this number as "hurr durr Rusha iz corruptz, lolzorz!" What they don't realize is that Sochi's infrastructure had to be rebuilt from the ground up: http://darussophile.com/2014/01/shreddi ... -good-way/
For instance, it'd be pointless comparing Sochi to Vancouver, since Vancouver had most of the infrastructure in place. Likewise, Russia could've held the Olympics in Leningrad/St. Petersburg, and the cost would be reduced in half, perhaps to even a third or fourth of that sum. But the Games should be in Sochi, for several reasons:
1. Provides jobs for a region that's only been stable for a couple of years
2. Develops sports infrastructure in that region, i.e. Krasnodar Krai has no hockey team, whereas Sakha Republic does.
3. Provides a Russian ski resort, so that wealthy Russians stop spending money abroad
4. Promotes quite a bit of cultural interaction between Russians and Caucasians, thus providing Russia with Unity
And so on...
On the actual Olympics, only $7 billion was spent, out of which only $3 billion was spent by the Government.The first and foremost attack revolved around the supposed corruption surrounding the Sochi Olympics. In 2010, the Russian magazine Esquire estimated that 48km of roads around Sochi consumed a cool $8 billion of taxpayer money, a sum that implied the asphalt might as well have been made of elite beluga caviar. Julia Ioffe cheerily transmitted these sophomoric calculations to the Anglosphere. The only problem with these actuarial wisecracks? Said road also included a railway, 50 bridges, and 27km worth of tunnels over mountainous terrain… which presumably made it something more than just a road. What was intended as a metaphor for Sochi corruption turned out to be, ironically, a metaphor for unfounded attacks against it...The lion’s share of the $50 billion investment in Sochi – some 80% of it or so – consists of infrastructure projects to make Sochi into a world-class ski resort that will provide employment in the restive North Caucasus, kickstart the development of a Russian snowsports culture, and draw at least some of the more patriotic elites away from Courcheval.
Courcheval is a Russian symbol of elites wasting too much money abroad, and it's also a World class ski resort.Consequent criticisms become increasingly deranged and unhinged from reality, much like the murderous HAL supercomputer fading away into childish gibberishness after it gets turned off. Thousands of people got evicted, their land stolen from them… except that the average compensation per person was $100,000. Sochi is apparently built on the bones of Circassians… well, if it’s a graveyard, I wonder what that makes the North American continent - a death world? The assertion that Sochi is an ”unsuitable subtropical resort” with no snow… an assessment that would surely surprise the denizens of California’s Bay Area, who go skiing in Tahoe up until late April, and where average February temperatures are significantly higher than around Sochi. If anything, conditions are looking downright steezy. The metaphorical rock-bottom was attained by the BBC’s Steve Rosenberg, who made a photograph of a pair of side-by-side toilets that were then splashed around the media – up to and including The New York Times - as evidence of the graft and imbecility that characterized the Sochi preparations. The only problem being that the photograph was taken in the middle of a renovation. But, hey, we wouldn’t want to deny the Brits their toilet humor, now would we…

by Gallup » Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:38 am
Shofercia wrote:Lemanrussland wrote:NBC: All Visitors to Sochi Olympics Immediately Hacked
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waEeJJVZ5P8
Welp. Stinks of sensationalism, but I wouldn't be surprised if there are serious information security problems.
Should read "anyone who didn't install Kaspersky Anti-Virus at risk of being hacked". Not to mention one can probably get all the personal data from Facebook. FB sells it to virtually any ad agency, so just pose as an ad agency, and get the data.Australian Republic wrote:Why not mention the terrorism in the name of the thread?
Because the OP isn't a wimp.Heart Attack Grill wrote:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/05/reporters-sochi-hotel-olympics-tweets_n_4729443.html
mmm sochi seems like such a wonderful place to visit
wonder how like it'll take before im called a russophobe
You posted an article of journalist bitching about everything; not sure what your intent was, aside from making fun of the journalists and HuffPo. I loved this bashing: "tangerines are 3.5 times more expensive in city center than on the outskirts, bawww!" To the idiot who wrote that: welcome to Eastern Europe. Items are usually more expensive, sometimes 3-4 times as much, in places that have to pay expensive lease, than in place where they're actually produced. This is known as common sense, which is absent from the brains of Natalya Vasilyeva and Jack Mirkinson. And no, having a bad hotel room isn't the worst thing that can happen to a journalist Jack. Being shot at, tortured, oh, but that kind of coverage is sooo last century for the likes of you: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7FTF4Oz4dI
Of course to a "reporter" like Jack Mirkinson, having a bad hotel room is probably "like the worst thing ever".Regnum Dominae wrote:I mean seriously, when you're spending more than every other winter olympics combined, you should at least have the hotels built on time.
1) Considering that the next Olympics is after 2020, (in the bid,) it's doubtful that the hotels will still be "uncomplete" or incomplete.
2) See Below
3) So should America never have Olympics in California or New York? There's a terrorist threat. Or, how about we stop being fucking wimps, take terrorism seriously, but not to the point of letting it terrorize us into doing anything else, except for taking decent security measures. Because anything else will enable those fucks to claim a win. You guys want that?
Regarding the costs: only about $3 billion was spent on the Games from the Government Budget. The rest was spent on infrastructure, or came from private financing. I already covered this:Shofercia wrote:It's spending. Sochi spent $51 billion on the Olympics. Since this is the most, Russophobes usually tout this number as "hurr durr Rusha iz corruptz, lolzorz!" What they don't realize is that Sochi's infrastructure had to be rebuilt from the ground up: http://darussophile.com/2014/01/shreddi ... -good-way/
For instance, it'd be pointless comparing Sochi to Vancouver, since Vancouver had most of the infrastructure in place. Likewise, Russia could've held the Olympics in Leningrad/St. Petersburg, and the cost would be reduced in half, perhaps to even a third or fourth of that sum. But the Games should be in Sochi, for several reasons:
1. Provides jobs for a region that's only been stable for a couple of years
2. Develops sports infrastructure in that region, i.e. Krasnodar Krai has no hockey team, whereas Sakha Republic does.
3. Provides a Russian ski resort, so that wealthy Russians stop spending money abroad
4. Promotes quite a bit of cultural interaction between Russians and Caucasians, thus providing Russia with Unity
And so on...
On the actual Olympics, only $7 billion was spent, out of which only $3 billion was spent by the Government.
Courcheval is a Russian symbol of elites wasting too much money abroad, and it's also a World class ski resort.
by Ainin » Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:38 am

by Shofercia » Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:38 am
Gallup wrote:Soviet Russia Republic wrote:
An extremely beautiful region that has been a favored resort region, having the games there goes well with long term plans of the region, and the desire/plans to purpose to hold the games Sochi was in Russia before the creation of the Russia Federation.
Maybe for the summer, but the winter? I heard they have to import snow!

by Gallup » Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:41 am
by Shofercia » Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:45 am
Gallup wrote:Shofercia wrote:
Should read "anyone who didn't install Kaspersky Anti-Virus at risk of being hacked". Not to mention one can probably get all the personal data from Facebook. FB sells it to virtually any ad agency, so just pose as an ad agency, and get the data.
Because the OP isn't a wimp.
You posted an article of journalist bitching about everything; not sure what your intent was, aside from making fun of the journalists and HuffPo. I loved this bashing: "tangerines are 3.5 times more expensive in city center than on the outskirts, bawww!" To the idiot who wrote that: welcome to Eastern Europe. Items are usually more expensive, sometimes 3-4 times as much, in places that have to pay expensive lease, than in place where they're actually produced. This is known as common sense, which is absent from the brains of Natalya Vasilyeva and Jack Mirkinson. And no, having a bad hotel room isn't the worst thing that can happen to a journalist Jack. Being shot at, tortured, oh, but that kind of coverage is sooo last century for the likes of you: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U7FTF4Oz4dI
Of course to a "reporter" like Jack Mirkinson, having a bad hotel room is probably "like the worst thing ever".
1) Considering that the next Olympics is after 2020, (in the bid,) it's doubtful that the hotels will still be "uncomplete" or incomplete.
2) See Below
3) So should America never have Olympics in California or New York? There's a terrorist threat. Or, how about we stop being fucking wimps, take terrorism seriously, but not to the point of letting it terrorize us into doing anything else, except for taking decent security measures. Because anything else will enable those fucks to claim a win. You guys want that?
Regarding the costs: only about $3 billion was spent on the Games from the Government Budget. The rest was spent on infrastructure, or came from private financing. I already covered this:
This will not be good for Russia. All journalists care about is there hotel room, and NBC will bitch about that forever.

by Gallup » Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:47 am
Shofercia wrote:Gallup wrote:This will not be good for Russia. All journalists care about is there hotel room, and NBC will bitch about that forever.
It won't be good for those "journalists". All of their whining is getting really pathetic, and soon the readers will be tuned off. And they'll look for better journalism online, one that covers sports, not tangerine prices. If I was in Putin's shoes, I'd start paying money to online journalists, not to control them or get my point across, but to get people to ignore those "journalists", because at this point, ruthless and unbiased coverage of Russia will still be better than this type of "journalism".
by Ainin » Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:47 am


by Gallup » Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:48 am
by Shofercia » Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:51 am
by Shofercia » Thu Feb 06, 2014 10:52 am
Gallup wrote:Shofercia wrote:
It won't be good for those "journalists". All of their whining is getting really pathetic, and soon the readers will be tuned off. And they'll look for better journalism online, one that covers sports, not tangerine prices. If I was in Putin's shoes, I'd start paying money to online journalists, not to control them or get my point across, but to get people to ignore those "journalists", because at this point, ruthless and unbiased coverage of Russia will still be better than this type of "journalism".
RT was supposed to be like that, now it's turned into a pro-Russia lapdog.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aguaria Major, Ameriganastan, Dimetrodon Empire, El Lazaro, Heavenly Assault, Klubetya, Necroghastia, New Temecula, Nyoskova, Pizza Friday Forever91, Rostavykhan, Spirit of Hope
Advertisement