Gallup wrote:I just found out Sochi only has 300,000 people. Why did they get the Olympics?
The IOC took pity on them?
Advertisement

by Liriena » Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:02 am
Gallup wrote:I just found out Sochi only has 300,000 people. Why did they get the Olympics?
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Gallup » Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:15 am

by Liriena » Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:19 am
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Gallup » Wed Jan 29, 2014 9:20 am
by Shofercia » Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:04 am

by Gallup » Wed Jan 29, 2014 10:33 am
Shofercia wrote:Liriena wrote:The IOC took pity on them?
While I understand that you're both trying to be edgy, to those who know anything about the Olympics, you're also hilariously wrong. Unlike the Summer Olympics, which are held in places like London, LA and Moscow, the Winter Olympics call places like St. Moritz, population 5,147, their home. Other cities include Chamonix, 9,514, Lake Placid, 2,521, Oslo, 626,313, Cortina, 6,150, Truckee, (Squaw Valley,) 16,180, Innsbruck, 121,329, Grenoble, 156,659, Sarajevo, 515,012, Albertville, 18,480, Lillehammer, 26,639, etc.
Sure there are also the Winter Olympics in larger cities, but those are the exception, not the rule. The reason for this is that Winter Olympics require those thingies called mountains, and an amazing tourism infrastructure, and amazing mountainous tourist cities tend to be small. Compared with reality, Sochi has a perfectly normal population size for the Winter Olympics.

by Shamhnan Insir » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:42 am
Darwinish Brentsylvania wrote:Shamhnan Insir started this wonderful tranquility, ALL PRAISE THE SHEPHERD KING

by Gallup » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:43 am
Shamhnan Insir wrote:Hope this doesn't count as "gravedig" but I couldn't think of where else it should go.
http://www.scotsman.com/news/odd/scots-brewer-brewdog-launches-anti-putin-beer-1-3293497
Yes, Brewdog (a brewery company from Aberdeenshire, famed for its potent ales) has unveiled its latest 8.4% creation.
'Hello My Name is Vladimir' is now retailing and a case has actually been sent to Putin himself for approval.
Whoever said that beer can't solve problems?

by Gallup » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:44 am

by Shofercia » Tue Feb 04, 2014 10:59 am
The first and foremost attack revolved around the supposed corruption surrounding the Sochi Olympics. In 2010, the Russian magazine Esquire estimated that 48km of roads around Sochi consumed a cool $8 billion of taxpayer money, a sum that implied the asphalt might as well have been made of elite beluga caviar. Julia Ioffe cheerily transmitted these sophomoric calculations to the Anglosphere. The only problem with these actuarial wisecracks? Said road also included a railway, 50 bridges, and 27km worth of tunnels over mountainous terrain… which presumably made it something more than just a road. What was intended as a metaphor for Sochi corruption turned out to be, ironically, a metaphor for unfounded attacks against it...The lion’s share of the $50 billion investment in Sochi – some 80% of it or so – consists of infrastructure projects to make Sochi into a world-class ski resort that will provide employment in the restive North Caucasus, kickstart the development of a Russian snowsports culture, and draw at least some of the more patriotic elites away from Courcheval.
Consequent criticisms become increasingly deranged and unhinged from reality, much like the murderous HAL supercomputer fading away into childish gibberishness after it gets turned off. Thousands of people got evicted, their land stolen from them… except that the average compensation per person was $100,000. Sochi is apparently built on the bones of Circassians… well, if it’s a graveyard, I wonder what that makes the North American continent - a death world? The assertion that Sochi is an ”unsuitable subtropical resort” with no snow… an assessment that would surely surprise the denizens of California’s Bay Area, who go skiing in Tahoe up until late April, and where average February temperatures are significantly higher than around Sochi. If anything, conditions are looking downright steezy. The metaphorical rock-bottom was attained by the BBC’s Steve Rosenberg, who made a photograph of a pair of side-by-side toilets that were then splashed around the media – up to and including The New York Times - as evidence of the graft and imbecility that characterized the Sochi preparations. The only problem being that the photograph was taken in the middle of a renovation. But, hey, we wouldn’t want to deny the Brits their toilet humor, now would we…

by Gallup » Tue Feb 04, 2014 11:08 am
Shofercia wrote:Ainin wrote:Is that spending or revenue?
It's spending. Sochi spent $51 billion on the Olympics. Since this is the most, Russophobes usually tout this number as "hurr durr Rusha iz corruptz, lolzorz!" What they don't realize is that Sochi's infrastructure had to be rebuilt from the ground up: http://darussophile.com/2014/01/shreddi ... -good-way/
For instance, it'd be pointless comparing Sochi to Vancouver, since Vancouver had most of the infrastructure in place. Likewise, Russia could've held the Olympics in Leningrad/St. Petersburg, and the cost would be reduced in half, perhaps to even a third or fourth of that sum. But the Games should be in Sochi, for several reasons:
1. Provides jobs for a region that's only been stable for a couple of years
2. Develops sports infrastructure in that region, i.e. Krasnodar Krai has no hockey team, whereas Sakha Republic does.
3. Provides a Russian ski resort, so that wealthy Russians stop spending money abroad
4. Promotes quite a bit of cultural interaction between Russians and Caucasians, thus providing Russia with Unity
And so on...
On the actual Olympics, only $7 billion was spent, out of which only $3 billion was spent by the Government.The first and foremost attack revolved around the supposed corruption surrounding the Sochi Olympics. In 2010, the Russian magazine Esquire estimated that 48km of roads around Sochi consumed a cool $8 billion of taxpayer money, a sum that implied the asphalt might as well have been made of elite beluga caviar. Julia Ioffe cheerily transmitted these sophomoric calculations to the Anglosphere. The only problem with these actuarial wisecracks? Said road also included a railway, 50 bridges, and 27km worth of tunnels over mountainous terrain… which presumably made it something more than just a road. What was intended as a metaphor for Sochi corruption turned out to be, ironically, a metaphor for unfounded attacks against it...The lion’s share of the $50 billion investment in Sochi – some 80% of it or so – consists of infrastructure projects to make Sochi into a world-class ski resort that will provide employment in the restive North Caucasus, kickstart the development of a Russian snowsports culture, and draw at least some of the more patriotic elites away from Courcheval.
Courcheval is a Russian symbol of elites wasting too much money abroad, and it's also a World class ski resort.Consequent criticisms become increasingly deranged and unhinged from reality, much like the murderous HAL supercomputer fading away into childish gibberishness after it gets turned off. Thousands of people got evicted, their land stolen from them… except that the average compensation per person was $100,000. Sochi is apparently built on the bones of Circassians… well, if it’s a graveyard, I wonder what that makes the North American continent - a death world? The assertion that Sochi is an ”unsuitable subtropical resort” with no snow… an assessment that would surely surprise the denizens of California’s Bay Area, who go skiing in Tahoe up until late April, and where average February temperatures are significantly higher than around Sochi. If anything, conditions are looking downright steezy. The metaphorical rock-bottom was attained by the BBC’s Steve Rosenberg, who made a photograph of a pair of side-by-side toilets that were then splashed around the media – up to and including The New York Times - as evidence of the graft and imbecility that characterized the Sochi preparations. The only problem being that the photograph was taken in the middle of a renovation. But, hey, we wouldn’t want to deny the Brits their toilet humor, now would we…
by Shofercia » Tue Feb 04, 2014 11:12 am
Gallup wrote:Shofercia wrote:
It's spending. Sochi spent $51 billion on the Olympics. Since this is the most, Russophobes usually tout this number as "hurr durr Rusha iz corruptz, lolzorz!" What they don't realize is that Sochi's infrastructure had to be rebuilt from the ground up: http://darussophile.com/2014/01/shreddi ... -good-way/
For instance, it'd be pointless comparing Sochi to Vancouver, since Vancouver had most of the infrastructure in place. Likewise, Russia could've held the Olympics in Leningrad/St. Petersburg, and the cost would be reduced in half, perhaps to even a third or fourth of that sum. But the Games should be in Sochi, for several reasons:
1. Provides jobs for a region that's only been stable for a couple of years
2. Develops sports infrastructure in that region, i.e. Krasnodar Krai has no hockey team, whereas Sakha Republic does.
3. Provides a Russian ski resort, so that wealthy Russians stop spending money abroad
4. Promotes quite a bit of cultural interaction between Russians and Caucasians, thus providing Russia with Unity
And so on...
On the actual Olympics, only $7 billion was spent, out of which only $3 billion was spent by the Government.
Courcheval is a Russian symbol of elites wasting too much money abroad, and it's also a World class ski resort.
I learned something new today. I thought it was just corruption.


by Gallup » Tue Feb 04, 2014 12:01 pm


by Srboslavija » Tue Feb 04, 2014 8:58 pm
Russia's female athletes in soft porn shoot ahead of Sochi Olympics
http://www.news.com.au/sport/russias-female-athletes-in-soft-porn-shoot-ahead-of-sochi-olympics/story-fnl6khi7-1226818561852

by Meowfoundland » Tue Feb 04, 2014 9:11 pm
Gallup wrote:I learned something new today. I thought it was just corruption.
by Shofercia » Tue Feb 04, 2014 11:14 pm
Meowfoundland wrote:Gallup wrote:I learned something new today. I thought it was just corruption.
I found this website a few days ago, but I'm not sure about its accuracy. It's very interesting though.
The billionaire is building an alpine skiing resort Roza Khutor, an Olympic university, and a hotel. 82.6% of the total $3.1 bn budget is contributed by the state owned Vnesheconombank (privately held banks rarely fund over 66% of any project in order to limit their exposure). The project turned out to be quite expensive — and will be of no interest to either Mr. Potanin or the state after the Olympics. In an interview to the business newspaper Vedomosti in the fall of 2013, Mr. Potanin claims that the expenses for Roza Khutor will not be covered, as the project exceeds the Sochi’s market capacity. “In its current state, all it can generate is losses”, — Mr. Potanin admitted.
by Shofercia » Tue Feb 04, 2014 11:16 pm
Srboslavija wrote:Putin strikes again.
Oh Putin, is there anything you don't control?!?Russia's female athletes in soft porn shoot ahead of Sochi Olympics
http://www.news.com.au/sport/russias-female-athletes-in-soft-porn-shoot-ahead-of-sochi-olympics/story-fnl6khi7-1226818561852
*Warning, lots of delicious pictures


by Australian rePublic » Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:04 am

by Australian rePublic » Wed Feb 05, 2014 4:06 am
Srboslavija wrote:Putin strikes again.
Oh Putin, is there anything you don't control?!?Russia's female athletes in soft porn shoot ahead of Sochi Olympics
http://www.news.com.au/sport/russias-female-athletes-in-soft-porn-shoot-ahead-of-sochi-olympics/story-fnl6khi7-1226818561852
*Warning, lots of delicious pictures

by Destiny Island » Wed Feb 05, 2014 5:50 am
Gallup wrote:I just found out Sochi only has 300,000 people. Why did they get the Olympics?

by Gallup » Wed Feb 05, 2014 6:50 am

by Gallup » Wed Feb 05, 2014 6:56 am

by Blekksprutia » Wed Feb 05, 2014 7:00 am


by Zapato » Wed Feb 05, 2014 8:04 am
“It is particularly nice for me to see what is happening here as I chose this place personally,” Putin said immodestly as the documentary showed him skiing down the slopes at the Olympic alpine centre of Krasnaya Polyana.
“In 2001 or 2002 I came in in my little UAZ (Russian jeep) and we went around here, came out at this river and I said, ‘let’s begin here,’” said Putin, wearing a jacket adorned with his name “V.V. Putin.”
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cerespasia, Eurocom, EuroStralia, Nilokeras
Advertisement