Soldati senza confini wrote:Buse wrote:Excellent. This will at least help to prevent Obama from implementing his socialist policies.
It'd actually make it easier.
really? how?
Advertisement

by Soldati Senza Confini » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:33 pm
Buse wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:It'd actually make it easier.
really? how?
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Murkwood » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:37 pm
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Inyourfaceistan » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:39 pm
Murkwood wrote:Go Republicans! McConnell is just the beginning.

by Republic of Coldwater » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:40 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Buse wrote:really? how?
Obama can negotiate with an actual majority, for one.

by Murkwood » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:40 pm
Gauthier wrote:The GOP will simply blow their Congressional majority on negroblocking Obama every chance they get and trying to mold the United States into the Republic of Gilead.
Degenerate Heart of HetRio wrote:Murkwood, I'm surprised you're not an anti-Semite and don't mind most LGBT rights because boy, aren't you a constellation of the worst opinions to have about everything? o_o
Benuty wrote:I suppose Ken Ham, and the league of Republican-Neocolonialist-Zionist Catholics will not be pleased.
Soldati senza confini wrote:Did I just try to rationalize Murkwood's logic? Please shoot me.

by Inyourfaceistan » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:42 pm
Murkwood wrote:Gauthier wrote:The GOP will simply blow their Congressional majority on negroblocking Obama every chance they get and trying to mold the United States into the Republic of Gilead.
Negroblocking? When the Democrats tried to stop Clarence Thomas, were they "negroblocking"? It's despicable when Leftists use the race card.

by Atlanticatia » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:44 pm

by Soldati Senza Confini » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:46 pm
Republic of Coldwater wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:Obama can negotiate with an actual majority, for one.
Negotiate with 51 Conservative Statesmen trying to repeal his HealthCare Law.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Inyourfaceistan » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:46 pm
Buse wrote:Hopefully there would no be any illegal immigration from poor third world Latin American countries.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:48 pm
Buse wrote:Hopefully there would no be any illegal immigration from poor third world Latin American countries.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Buse » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:49 pm
Inyourfaceistan wrote:Buse wrote:Hopefully there would no be any illegal immigration from poor third world Latin American countries.
Well the current quota system needs to change, as do the requirement for citizenship.
However, lolamnesty is not the answer.
Keep in mind most people on the right aren't against immigration, just illegal immigration.

by Inyourfaceistan » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:51 pm
Buse wrote:Inyourfaceistan wrote:
Well the current quota system needs to change, as do the requirement for citizenship.
However, lolamnesty is not the answer.
Keep in mind most people on the right aren't against immigration, just illegal immigration.
Yes, nobody has anything against immigration only illegal one. But over 90% of Latinos are the results of the illegal one.
It wouldbe ok if anybody without a college degree cannot migrate to the US.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:52 pm
Buse wrote:Inyourfaceistan wrote:
Well the current quota system needs to change, as do the requirement for citizenship.
However, lolamnesty is not the answer.
Keep in mind most people on the right aren't against immigration, just illegal immigration.
Yes, nobody has anything against immigration only illegal one. But over 90% of Latinos are the results of the illegal one.
It wouldbe ok if anybody without a college degree cannot migrate to the US.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Giliberafta » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:53 pm
Atlanticatia wrote:I reallly hope that some of those Libertarian candidates that seem to be getting 2-3% of the votes in red-leaning states end up splitting the vote, and give Democrats a victory.

by The Liberated Territories » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:54 pm

by The Liberated Territories » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:55 pm
Atlanticatia wrote:I reallly hope that some of those Libertarian candidates that seem to be getting 2-3% of the votes in red-leaning states end up splitting the vote, and give Democrats a victory.
by Sibirsky » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:57 pm
Atlanticatia wrote:I reallly hope that some of those Libertarian candidates that seem to be getting 2-3% of the votes in red-leaning states end up splitting the vote, and give Democrats a victory.

by Jinwoy » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:59 pm
Sibirsky wrote:Atlanticatia wrote:I reallly hope that some of those Libertarian candidates that seem to be getting 2-3% of the votes in red-leaning states end up splitting the vote, and give Democrats a victory.
Yeah, why would Democrats want to vote for Libertarians?
Libertarians are against wars. And Democrats have not been against wars since the 2008 campaign.

by The Liberated Territories » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:59 pm
Sibirsky wrote:Atlanticatia wrote:I reallly hope that some of those Libertarian candidates that seem to be getting 2-3% of the votes in red-leaning states end up splitting the vote, and give Democrats a victory.
Yeah, why would Democrats want to vote for Libertarians?
Libertarians are against wars. And Democrats have not been against wars since the 2008 campaign.

by Jinwoy » Tue Nov 04, 2014 6:59 pm

by Buse » Tue Nov 04, 2014 7:00 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Buse wrote:Hopefully there would no be any illegal immigration from poor third world Latin American countries.
Illegal immigration is out of the power of the government to stop.
They can curb it, but they can't completely stop it unless you make a wall greater than the wall of China (hahahhahah right)

by Espresso and Insanity » Tue Nov 04, 2014 7:01 pm
Murkwood wrote:Go Republicans! McConnell is just the beginning.

Caffeine Addict, Bisexual, Moderate Social Democrat/Progressive, Atheist.

by Inyourfaceistan » Tue Nov 04, 2014 7:01 pm
Buse wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:Illegal immigration is out of the power of the government to stop.
They can curb it, but they can't completely stop it unless you make a wall greater than the wall of China (hahahhahah right)
the ussr had a good solution for that. the us gov. is just unwilling to use it.
the us might turn into vatican 2,0 or francoist spain one day.

Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Belogorod, Bing sung, Margraviate of Moravia, Norse Inuit Union, Riviere Renard, Senkaku, Soviet Haaregrad, Stellar Colonies, The Holy Therns
Advertisement