Advertisement

by Aurora Novus » Mon Jan 06, 2014 11:55 am

by Aurora Novus » Mon Jan 06, 2014 11:57 am
Talsinki wrote:It isn't. They don't belive in god so it seems logical that they are not.

by Sociobiology » Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:01 pm

by Conscentia » Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:02 pm
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Dyakovo » Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:04 pm

by Mavorpen » Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:04 pm

by Czechanada » Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:05 pm

by Talsinki » Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:10 pm
Aurora Novus wrote:Talsinki wrote:It isn't. They don't belive in god so it seems logical that they are not.
Well, faith has nothing to do with deity. You can have faith, and not believe in God. Everyone has faith, even atheists. The belief that there is a mind-independant reality is itself a faith. But beliefs like these we prefer to call properly basic beliefs.
It is simply that the rejection of the notion of deity is not (or least, does not have to be) a faith-based one.

by Sociobiology » Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:17 pm

by Dyakovo » Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:18 pm
Aurora Novus wrote:Talsinki wrote:It isn't. They don't belive in god so it seems logical that they are not.
Well, faith has nothing to do with deity. You can have faith, and not believe in God. Everyone has faith, even atheists. The belief that there is a mind-independant reality is itself a faith. But beliefs like these we prefer to call properly basic beliefs.
It is simply that the rejection of the notion of deity is not (or least, does not have to be) a faith-based one.

by Aurora Novus » Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:22 pm
Dyakovo wrote:Aurora Novus wrote:
Well, faith has nothing to do with deity. You can have faith, and not believe in God. Everyone has faith, even atheists. The belief that there is a mind-independant reality is itself a faith. But beliefs like these we prefer to call properly basic beliefs.
It is simply that the rejection of the notion of deity is not (or least, does not have to be) a faith-based one.
Unsurprising that you would misuse a word.

by Aurora Novus » Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:22 pm
Talsinki wrote:Aurora Novus wrote:
Well, faith has nothing to do with deity. You can have faith, and not believe in God. Everyone has faith, even atheists. The belief that there is a mind-independant reality is itself a faith. But beliefs like these we prefer to call properly basic beliefs.
It is simply that the rejection of the notion of deity is not (or least, does not have to be) a faith-based one.
Everyone has their own choices. It isn't a faith but a fact.

by Seriong » Mon Jan 06, 2014 12:55 pm
Aurora Novus wrote:Can we at least be honest about something? There is no realistic inbetween here. There is no "Oh, I simply lack a belief in God, that's not saying I believe no God exists". Yes, it is. You either believe a god exists, or you don't. You can be unsure in your stance, but it is still your stance. Let's at least own up to them.
And that does not mean that the rejecting of deity is a faith-based decision. It's not, as I've already stated earlier in the topic. But let's at least be honest about our positions.
Drawkland wrote:I think it delegitimizes true cases of sexual assault, like real dangerous cases being dismissed, "Oh it's only sexual assault"
Like racism. If everything's "racist," then you can't tell what really is racist.
Murkwood wrote:As a trans MtF Bi Pansexual Transautistic CAMAB Demiplatonic Asensual Better-Abled Planetkin Singlet Afro-Centric Vegan Socialist Therian, I'm immune from criticism.

by Dyakovo » Mon Jan 06, 2014 1:00 pm
Aurora Novus wrote:Can we at least be honest about something? There is no realistic inbetween here. There is no "Oh, I simply lack a belief in God, that's not saying I believe no God exists". Yes, it is. You either believe a god exists, or you don't. You can be unsure in your stance, but it is still your stance. Let's at least own up to them.
And that does not mean that the rejecting of deity is a faith-based decision. It's not, as I've already stated earlier in the topic. But let's at least be honest about our positions.

by Aurora Novus » Mon Jan 06, 2014 1:46 pm
Seriong wrote:Aurora Novus wrote:Can we at least be honest about something? There is no realistic inbetween here. There is no "Oh, I simply lack a belief in God, that's not saying I believe no God exists". Yes, it is. You either believe a god exists, or you don't. You can be unsure in your stance, but it is still your stance. Let's at least own up to them.
And that does not mean that the rejecting of deity is a faith-based decision. It's not, as I've already stated earlier in the topic. But let's at least be honest about our positions.
So, either we assert that a god exists, or we assert that one does not exist? Can we not simply say "I don't know"? The only honest position one can take?

by Othelos » Mon Jan 06, 2014 1:47 pm
Aurora Novus wrote:Seriong wrote:So, either we assert that a god exists, or we assert that one does not exist? Can we not simply say "I don't know"? The only honest position one can take?
Yes and no. You can certainly express your lack of definite knowlege on a given claim, but the fact is you live your day to day life in one of two ways. You either live it as if a god exists, or you don't. You may even shift positions from each ay to the next. You may flip flop even during the same day. But you do, in fact, live your life in one of those two realms, even when you express your lack of definite knowledge.
So even if you assert that you don't know, you still also assert one position.

by Aurora Novus » Mon Jan 06, 2014 1:48 pm
Dyakovo wrote:Aurora Novus wrote:Can we at least be honest about something? There is no realistic inbetween here. There is no "Oh, I simply lack a belief in God, that's not saying I believe no God exists". Yes, it is. You either believe a god exists, or you don't. You can be unsure in your stance, but it is still your stance. Let's at least own up to them.
And that does not mean that the rejecting of deity is a faith-based decision. It's not, as I've already stated earlier in the topic. But let's at least be honest about our positions.
Misstating a position is honesty now?

by Aurora Novus » Mon Jan 06, 2014 1:50 pm
Othelos wrote:Aurora Novus wrote:
Yes and no. You can certainly express your lack of definite knowlege on a given claim, but the fact is you live your day to day life in one of two ways. You either live it as if a god exists, or you don't. You may even shift positions from each ay to the next. You may flip flop even during the same day. But you do, in fact, live your life in one of those two realms, even when you express your lack of definite knowledge.
So even if you assert that you don't know, you still also assert one position.
Hence, agnostic atheism or agnostic theism.

by Seriong » Mon Jan 06, 2014 1:53 pm
Aurora Novus wrote:Seriong wrote:So, either we assert that a god exists, or we assert that one does not exist? Can we not simply say "I don't know"? The only honest position one can take?
Yes and no. You can certainly express your lack of definite knowlege on a given claim, but the fact is you live your day to day life in one of two ways. You either live it as if a god exists, or you don't. You may even shift positions from each ay to the next. You may flip flop even during the same day. But you do, in fact, live your life in one of those two realms, even when you express your lack of definite knowledge.
So even if you assert that you don't know, you still also assert one position.
believe no God exists"
Drawkland wrote:I think it delegitimizes true cases of sexual assault, like real dangerous cases being dismissed, "Oh it's only sexual assault"
Like racism. If everything's "racist," then you can't tell what really is racist.
Murkwood wrote:As a trans MtF Bi Pansexual Transautistic CAMAB Demiplatonic Asensual Better-Abled Planetkin Singlet Afro-Centric Vegan Socialist Therian, I'm immune from criticism.

by Aurora Novus » Mon Jan 06, 2014 1:59 pm
Seriong wrote:Aurora Novus wrote:
Yes and no. You can certainly express your lack of definite knowlege on a given claim, but the fact is you live your day to day life in one of two ways. You either live it as if a god exists, or you don't. You may even shift positions from each ay to the next. You may flip flop even during the same day. But you do, in fact, live your life in one of those two realms, even when you express your lack of definite knowledge.
So even if you assert that you don't know, you still also assert one position.
I live my life, as though God may or may not exist. Thus, it doesn't impact me, I do not howeverbelieve no God exists"
As you assert I must.

by Seriong » Mon Jan 06, 2014 2:07 pm
Aurora Novus wrote:Seriong wrote:I live my life, as though God may or may not exist. Thus, it doesn't impact me, I do not however
As you assert I must.
Actually, yes, you do. even if you are wary in standing by that position, by not living your life as if god exists, you live it as if one does not exist. That behavior is an expression of the position you hold. You're simply not being honest with yourself if you say you don't hold that position during those times.
Drawkland wrote:I think it delegitimizes true cases of sexual assault, like real dangerous cases being dismissed, "Oh it's only sexual assault"
Like racism. If everything's "racist," then you can't tell what really is racist.
Murkwood wrote:As a trans MtF Bi Pansexual Transautistic CAMAB Demiplatonic Asensual Better-Abled Planetkin Singlet Afro-Centric Vegan Socialist Therian, I'm immune from criticism.

by Conscentia » Mon Jan 06, 2014 2:15 pm
So someone who has never heard of god, and thus does not believe in god, believes no god exists?Aurora Novus wrote:Seriong wrote:I live my life, as though God may or may not exist. Thus, it doesn't impact me, I do not however
As you assert I must.
Actually, yes, you do. even if you are wary in standing by that position, by not living your life as if god exists, you live it as if one does not exist. That behavior is an expression of the position you hold. You're simply not being honest with yourself if you say you don't hold that position during those times.
| Misc. Test Results And Assorted Other | The NSG Soviet Last Updated: Test Results (2018/02/02) | ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ |

by Breadknife » Mon Jan 06, 2014 2:46 pm
It seems I fail to comprehend your arguments (which is probably my own failing in comprehension). But I don't want to be thought to be ignoring you out of spite, so I thought I ought to tell you this.Seljuq Kyiv wrote:It is exactly the same thing, assuming the Big Bang is the event that causes Nothing to be Something(s).
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Alvecia, Buryatia and Zabaykalsky, Dimetrodon Empire, Duvniask, Emotional Support Crocodile, Escalia, Google [Bot], Ifreann, Mearisse, Neo-American States, Ostroeuropa, Pabajk, Phobos Drilling and Manufacturing, Rusozak, Ryemarch, Sklavopoli, The United Penguin Commonwealth, Uminaku, Valyxias, Zelenorossiya
Advertisement