Advertisement

by Seleucas » Wed Jan 08, 2014 9:05 pm

by Mikia » Wed Jan 08, 2014 9:16 pm
The Genoese Cromanatum wrote:American Union wrote:Andrew Johnson. He totally botched Reconstruction and pardoned the Confederate traitors. Thanks to him, a North-South reconciliation was never achieved and we missed out on the opportunity of building a stronger identity. Did I mention how he fucked up Reconstruction and let terrorism run rampant in the South?
Andrew Johnson was a fine president. (given the situation) The Confederates were not traitors for seceeding because they felt that their state rights were threatened. (Unless your one of the folk who think the entire war was about slavery.)
Anyways, in my opinion, perhaps Nixon, given he made the American people lose so much trust in the government's leadership.

by Lack there of » Wed Jan 08, 2014 9:26 pm

by Demencia » Thu Jan 09, 2014 2:45 pm

by Post-Keynesian Economics » Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:17 pm
Lack there of wrote:100% Woodrow Wilson. With the creation of the Federal Reserve System and the 16th amendment he plunged the American public into never ending debt slavery. Also, prohibition, WW1, numerous stiflings of the press and free speech, and blatantly racist

by Gauthier » Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:41 pm
WRIF Army wrote:Obama was the worse, hands down.

by Mirkana » Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:45 pm

by Post-Keynesian Economics » Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:47 pm

by WRIF Army » Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:52 pm

by Yumyumsuppertime » Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:52 pm
WRIF Army wrote:Obama was the worse, hands down.

by Yumyumsuppertime » Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:55 pm
WRIF Army wrote:Post-Keynesian Economics wrote:
Starting point = Great Recession, two wars, rising distrust of government in general and rapidly escalating income inequality.
Starting point = from greatest economic juggernaut in history, unparalleled military power to record food stamps, poverty, long term unemployment, two lost wars, chaos in Middle East, disrespected/hated more than even Bush.....
Need I say more, my good man ?

by Post-Keynesian Economics » Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:56 pm
WRIF Army wrote:Post-Keynesian Economics wrote:
Starting point = Great Recession, two wars, rising distrust of government in general and rapidly escalating income inequality.
Starting point = from greatest economic juggernaut in history, unparalleled military power to record food stamps, poverty, long term unemployment, two lost wars, chaos in Middle East, disrespected/hated more than even Bush.....
Need I say more, my good man ?

by Gauthier » Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:57 pm
WRIF Army wrote:Post-Keynesian Economics wrote:
Starting point = Great Recession, two wars, rising distrust of government in general and rapidly escalating income inequality.
Starting point = from greatest economic juggernaut in history, unparalleled military power to record food stamps, poverty, long term unemployment, two lost wars, chaos in Middle East, disrespected/hated more than even Bush.....
Need I say more, my good man ?

by Yumyumsuppertime » Thu Jan 09, 2014 7:58 pm


by WRIF Army » Thu Jan 09, 2014 8:03 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:WRIF Army wrote:
Starting point = from greatest economic juggernaut in history, unparalleled military power to record food stamps, poverty, long term unemployment, two lost wars, chaos in Middle East, disrespected/hated more than even Bush.....
Need I say more, my good man ?
Greatest economic juggernaut in history? The economy had collapsed.
Unparalleled military power? Bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Record food stamps and poverty started under Bush. As every single major jobs program proposed by the administration was blocked by Congress, long-term unemployment must be laid at their feet as well. The wars were lost by the time he took office. Chaos in the Middle East is a constant state of affairs, but it was our invasion of Iraq that made it impossible.
For your final comment, I'll need a source.


by Seveth » Thu Jan 09, 2014 8:10 pm
WRIF Army wrote:Post-Keynesian Economics wrote:
Starting point = Great Recession, two wars, rising distrust of government in general and rapidly escalating income inequality.
Starting point = from greatest economic juggernaut in history, unparalleled military power to record food stamps, poverty, long term unemployment, two lost wars, chaos in Middle East, disrespected/hated more than even Bush.....
Need I say more, my good man ?


by WRIF Army » Thu Jan 09, 2014 8:12 pm
Gauthier wrote:WRIF Army wrote:
Starting point = from greatest economic juggernaut in history, unparalleled military power to record food stamps, poverty, long term unemployment, two lost wars, chaos in Middle East, disrespected/hated more than even Bush.....
Need I say more, my good man ?
1) So Obama gave tax cuts to the rich at the same time he waged two wars in the Middle East?
2) Military families are one of the biggest dependents of SNAP assistance. And contrary to popular beliefs, whites tend to be the biggest dependents.
3) Proof of massive poverty?
4) You mean the unemployments that Obama wanted to fix with job bills that Congress blocked because Republicans have negrophobia?
5) Because toppling an admittedly stable dictatorship to open up a country to sectarian influence and half-assing a justifiable invasion to let the Taliban rebound from extinction in the same breath was a sign of success.
6) Proof Obama is more unpopular than Bush in the world?

by The Republic Of Ardenhelm » Thu Jan 09, 2014 8:14 pm

by Yumyumsuppertime » Thu Jan 09, 2014 8:20 pm
WRIF Army wrote:Yumyumsuppertime wrote:
Greatest economic juggernaut in history? The economy had collapsed.
Unparalleled military power? Bogged down in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Record food stamps and poverty started under Bush. As every single major jobs program proposed by the administration was blocked by Congress, long-term unemployment must be laid at their feet as well. The wars were lost by the time he took office. Chaos in the Middle East is a constant state of affairs, but it was our invasion of Iraq that made it impossible.
For your final comment, I'll need a source.
Obama said that w/o the stimulus that unemployment would reach 8.5%. It reached 10% with it.
That pretty much tells me, the guy is clueless. But here is context for you:


by The Republic of Llamas » Thu Jan 09, 2014 8:26 pm
Lack there of wrote:100% Woodrow Wilson. With the creation of the Federal Reserve System and the 16th amendment
Lack there of wrote:he plunged the American public into never ending debt slavery.
Lack there of wrote:Also, prohibition,
Lack there of wrote:WW1,
Lack there of wrote:numerous stiflings of the press and free speech,
Lack there of wrote:and blatantly racist
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Arklatravar-Istertia, Greater Marine, Hirota
Advertisement