Iran among other things.
Advertisement

by The Scientific States » Tue Jan 07, 2014 8:51 am

by Vulpae » Tue Jan 07, 2014 9:33 am
New Laikland wrote:Vulpae wrote:I was referring to the economic model, and despite the appearance, the US is not run by corporations. it is influenced by them greatly, stupidly so. But those companies have no interest in ruling anything. They just want to make stupid amounts of money.
Thus the country has a Democratic Republic style of government.
Something it has maintained in one form or another since it's inception. It is slow, ponderous, and often bogged down, but the US government is ultimately answering to it's people.
People need to take more of an interest in their country's government, it's the lack of majority involvement over the last 30 years that has created this problem.
The economy waffles between various forms of free market systems depending on economic conditions, and desires of the people at that time.
Corporatism is where the government is run by the corporations, I corrected you to the corporatocracy we are in now and under Bush. Corporatocracy is where the corporate interests are upheld by the government.

by Lerodan Chinamerica » Tue Jan 07, 2014 2:15 pm
Bobanopula wrote:Jimmy Carter

by Roski » Tue Jan 07, 2014 3:35 pm
Baader-Meinhof Gruppe wrote:It's a tough one. Johnson, Hoover, Eisenhower, LBJ, Nixon, Reagan, W. Bush, Obama...pretty much every president has done less than they could have done really.

by Roski » Tue Jan 07, 2014 3:35 pm
Vulpae wrote:New Laikland wrote:Corporatism is where the government is run by the corporations, I corrected you to the corporatocracy we are in now and under Bush. Corporatocracy is where the corporate interests are upheld by the government.
That is called corruption. Plain and Simple. Private companies do not run the United States of America because nobody wants to actually run the place, they just want to profit from it.

by Roski » Tue Jan 07, 2014 3:37 pm

by Roski » Tue Jan 07, 2014 3:41 pm

by Blakk Metal » Tue Jan 07, 2014 5:31 pm
New Laikland wrote:The Scientific States wrote:You do relax is most of his policies, were scrapped, right?![]()
In fact, his policies helped end the Great Depression. If anything, he was the best president of the 20th century.
So welfare, social security and unemployment were stopped?
oh
Seventeen trillion dollars in debt to China?!

by Sociobiology » Tue Jan 07, 2014 5:35 pm

by Ulvena » Tue Jan 07, 2014 5:49 pm

by MERIZoC » Tue Jan 07, 2014 5:58 pm
Ulvena wrote:In no particular order: George W. Bush, Jimmy Carter, Woodrow Wilson, Andrew Johnson, Barrack Obama, Ronald Reagan, Lyndon B. Johnson. To prevent repeats about Obama, I will address all of them except Obama as the reasons I do not like Obama has already been addressed at least Infinity2 times.
1. George W. Bush: He created a system of true entitlement. The idea that you can wage two wars, implement retarded unworkable policies such as No Child Left Behind, justify one of the two wars with false information, AND still have low taxes. Bush brought us into a deficit and while Obama can be faulted for many things, he cannot be faulted for the deficit any more than Bush, in fact, less than Bush. Bush put us in a $1.3 trillion deficit.
2. Jimmy Carter: He was a weak President. If he were President in the year 2000, perhaps he wouldn't have been all bad. However, this was the Cold War era. An era in which he oversaw a botched attack on Iran in response to the embassy attack, America not being taken seriously by the rest of the world, as well as the failure to facilitate the Iranian embassy attack.
3. Andrew Johnson: Definitely for failing to control Reconstruction in any way, shape, or form that was logical. He was far too busy fighting with Congress to do anything meaningful in handling the South. While this cannot be considered entirely his fault, Johnson was still very much at fault in handling the South and enmity felt by the Southerners.
4. Ronald Reagan: While he's the champion of Conservatives and Republicans, as well as an amazing orator, Reagan brought us short term prosperity in exchange for long term downturn. He essentially started our debt problem. Not to say there was no debt before Reagan but Reagan expanded the debt greatly.
5. Woodrow Wilson: Woodrow Wilson had little reason to bring the United States to war or establish the Federal Reserve in its current state. The Zimmerman Telegram's deal could not and was not implemented by Mexico, who had just finished a bloody and crippling Civil War. The Lusitania episode was also very much the United States' fault, specifically the citizens, as they were warned before boarding by the GERMANS that British ships will be indiscriminately attacked and they still rode it into a hotspot of attack. In regards to the Federal Reserve, the Federal Reserve itself is a system designed to be independent of the government as well as expanding the inflation of the dollar far more than before. I am not against Central Banking, just the Federal Reserve's methodology and policy.
6. Lyndon B. Johnson. Vietnam was not justified. That is all.

by Jinos » Tue Jan 07, 2014 7:50 pm

by Yumyumsuppertime » Tue Jan 07, 2014 7:53 pm

by Yumyumsuppertime » Tue Jan 07, 2014 8:04 pm
Big Jim P wrote:I can't say about history (having not lived it) but within my adult lifetime, the worst would be a toss-up between Obama and both of the Bushes, Reagan and Clinton being the only good ones.

by The Nuclear Fist » Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:06 pm
Yumyumsuppertime wrote:Big Jim P wrote:I can't say about history (having not lived it) but within my adult lifetime, the worst would be a toss-up between Obama and both of the Bushes, Reagan and Clinton being the only good ones.
Reagan? Cut taxes for the wealthy while actually increasing them for the middle class, tripled the national debt, sold arms to our enemies (the very ones whose actions had embarrassed America before the world, and was the major cause of his predecessor's loss to him), propped up any and every corrupt, violent tinpot dictator willing to give lip service to anti-communism, implemented economic policies that made it easier to ship jobs overseas (Clinton is also at fault here), completely ignored the AIDS epidemic until a close friend died of it (and then barely acknowledged the scope and gravity of the issue), and gave aid and comfort to the brutal apartheid regime in South Africa. That Reagan?
He's not the worst of all time by a long shot, but he may qualify as the most overrated President in history.
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.

by Roski » Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:08 pm
Ulvena wrote:6. Lyndon B. Johnson. Vietnam was not justified. That is all.

by Kalgeron » Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:17 pm

by Gauthier » Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:18 pm
Jinos wrote:Barrack Obama: His term isn't over and I'll always say you can never judge a president until he's out of office. That said, his "failures" have been grossly over exaggerated and it is extremely clear by the sheer unrepentant vilification that many only label him the "worst" because he's black. No president in history has ever been so put down. Not even Bush during the Iraq war.

by Roski » Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:34 pm
Gauthier wrote:Jinos wrote:Barrack Obama: His term isn't over and I'll always say you can never judge a president until he's out of office. That said, his "failures" have been grossly over exaggerated and it is extremely clear by the sheer unrepentant vilification that many only label him the "worst" because he's black. No president in history has ever been so put down. Not even Bush during the Iraq war.
No other President since the 20th Century ever had to deal with a pathologically obstructive Congress like Obama had to put up with. It's rather predictable that the hipsters crowing about how Obama got nothing done or broke his campaign promises like to pretend he had a Congress that would bend over backwards for him. That or they bring up the myth of the Democratic Supermajority which never truly existed because Norm Coleman was throwing a bitchfit in Minnesota and by the time that was settled there was only a total of 6 weeks actual supermajority before Ted Kennedy died and history shows us how the Democratic Party fucked that up.
If the Republicans do win back Congress in 2014 I will boldly state my prediction that Obama will become the next Andrew Johnson, with Radical Republicans (and not the kind that do awesome skateboard tricks) filing motions for impeachment on top of cockblocking everything he wants done.

by Gauthier » Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:40 pm
Roski wrote:Gauthier wrote:
No other President since the 20th Century ever had to deal with a pathologically obstructive Congress like Obama had to put up with. It's rather predictable that the hipsters crowing about how Obama got nothing done or broke his campaign promises like to pretend he had a Congress that would bend over backwards for him. That or they bring up the myth of the Democratic Supermajority which never truly existed because Norm Coleman was throwing a bitchfit in Minnesota and by the time that was settled there was only a total of 6 weeks actual supermajority before Ted Kennedy died and history shows us how the Democratic Party fucked that up.
If the Republicans do win back Congress in 2014 I will boldly state my prediction that Obama will become the next Andrew Johnson, with Radical Republicans (and not the kind that do awesome skateboard tricks) filing motions for impeachment on top of cockblocking everything he wants done.
The Republican leader will never support an impeachment vote against Barack Obama because of a fear of Joe Biden

by Jamjai » Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:40 pm

by The Nuclear Fist » Tue Jan 07, 2014 11:44 pm
Jamjai wrote:I don't know, I don't like Abraham Lincoln during the American Civil War. He just could've made North, South and the West separated, I mean all three of them have their own separate cultures. I don't like how he handled the situation
And you touch the distant beaches with tales of brave Ulysses. . .Farnhamia wrote:You're getting a little too fond of the jerkoff motions.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Dod Resa, Dreria, Fractalnavel, Necroghastia, NOAHDONY, Rary, Risottia, Rostavykhan, The Jamesian Republic, Tur Monkadzii, Uiiop, Urkennalaid, Valles Marineris Mining co
Advertisement