I was talking about myths
Advertisement

by Dyakovo » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:43 am

by Sun Wukong » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:43 am

by Orham » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:47 am
Libertariamerica wrote:I know it sounds like I'm snorting peyote but bear with me, no scientific process can happen by itself without a greater or equal force driving it.
For example, the idea of gravity is explained to be the attraction of a small object to a much bigger one (ie the Earth's core).
This happens through magnetic molecules...
...but where did the molecules come from and how do they perform gravitational pull? They have to be intelligent beings themselves, perhaps influenced by what we see as God.

by Libertariamerica » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:48 am
Sun Wukong wrote:Libertariamerica wrote:
Ok, so what began it's process of movement? Inertia would only keep it from stopping, but something would have to begin the rotation.
Stellar formation. As the nebular cloud that created the Solar System collapsed inward it began to rotate. This momentum is conserved to this date.
You ask these questions in the belief they are impossible to answer but they are trivially easy.

by Dyakovo » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:50 am
Libertariamerica wrote:Sun Wukong wrote:Stellar formation. As the nebular cloud that created the Solar System collapsed inward it began to rotate. This momentum is conserved to this date.
You ask these questions in the belief they are impossible to answer but they are trivially easy.
Maybe that nebular cloud was God,1 point is I'm sure evolution happened but it had to have had a cause2. I rest my case, if you dont believe me that's fine3.

by Libertariamerica » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:51 am
Dyakovo wrote:Libertariamerica wrote:
Maybe that nebular cloud was God,1 point is I'm sure evolution happened but it had to have had a cause2. I rest my case, if you dont believe me that's fine3.
1: It wasn't.
2: No, it didn't. Not in the way you're talking about.
3: Not believing your bullshit ideas is more than just "fine" it's preferred.

by Orham » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:52 am
Libertariamerica wrote:Maybe that nebular cloud was God...
...point is I'm sure evolution happened but it had to have had a cause. I rest my case, if you dont believe me that's fine.

by Myrensis » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:53 am
Libertariamerica wrote:Myrensis wrote:
What caused God? This is ultimately the problem any time Christians start trying to pick at evolution scientifically or logically, one way or another they end up having to say, "Our side has magic, rules don't apply, we win!!"
Well, what caused Earth or the big bang? It couldn't have been nothing, for all we know the idea of "God" could just be metaphorical symbolism. Please dont confuse me with other Christians.

by Libertariamerica » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:53 am
That's sort of like saying that God is RNA and DNA.

by Aeken » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:53 am
Libertariamerica wrote:Dyakovo wrote:1: It wasn't.
2: No, it didn't. Not in the way you're talking about.
3: Not believing your bullshit ideas is more than just "fine" it's preferred.
The less amount of trolling you do the better it would be for you, I already filed a report to a moderator. Have a good day.

by Libertariamerica » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:54 am
Myrensis wrote:Libertariamerica wrote:
Well, what caused Earth or the big bang? It couldn't have been nothing, for all we know the idea of "God" could just be metaphorical symbolism. Please dont confuse me with other Christians.
We have a pretty good idea of how planets form. As to the nature of the universe before the Big Bang and why it happened the answer is we don't know...yet.
The problem with the God of the Gaps, which exactly what is invoked by ,"well what caused this." Is that those gaps are constantly shrinking.
It's one long continuous stream of. "You can't explain this! Obviously
Gd! Oh. You explained that? Well, you can't explain this, therefore God! Oh, you figured that out too? Well this you could never explain! QED, God!" etc ad infinitum.

by Libertariamerica » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:55 am

by Dyakovo » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:57 am

by Orham » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:57 am
Libertariamerica wrote:You never know

by Libertariamerica » Fri Jan 17, 2014 1:59 am

by Orham » Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:09 am
Libertariamerica wrote:You have a point, they aren't supernatural. But what's a better candidate for God than the building blocks of human life? There's a lot of building blocks, which would just prove that God is simply an idea instead of 1 person or entity.

by Dyakovo » Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:12 am
Libertariamerica wrote:Dyakovo wrote:Yes. We do know. We know what DNA and RNA are. They aren't supernatural, and thus are not "God".
You have a point, they aren't supernatural. But what's a better candidate for God than the building blocks of human life? There's a lot of building blocks, which would just prove that God is simply an idea instead of 1 person or entity.

by Libertariamerica » Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:14 am
Orham wrote:Libertariamerica wrote:You have a point, they aren't supernatural. But what's a better candidate for God than the building blocks of human life? There's a lot of building blocks, which would just prove that God is simply an idea instead of 1 person or entity.
But at this point one might as well worship water and oxygen molecules. If you want to call your DNA and RNA "god", that's fine as long as the following conditions hold:(a) You don't expect the idea to be taken seriously by anyone
(b) You don't demand that this idea become any part of schools' curricular standards for teaching about biodiversity or its origins
(c) You don't use this idea to inform your ideas about science policy
Given all that, go ahead and call your DNA and RNA "god". You can even worship it, I won't stop you. Here, I'll even write a prayer for you:Adenine, in thy holy wisdom lead us
Guanine, in thy infinite mercy defend us
Cytosine, in thy blessed love shelter us
Thymine, in thy sacred strength build us
Uracil, in thy perfection bind us
It doesn't make sense to me, but whatever. I'm a Christian Universalist who meets all three of the criteria I set.

by Orham » Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:18 am
Libertariamerica wrote:Those who think scientific processes happen for no reason or cause shouldn't be taken seriously.
Nothing can just happen by itself, apples don't fall off of trees without gravity. Therefore, monkeys don't become humans without molecules mutating and manipulating themselves.

by -The Unified Earth Governments- » Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:19 am
Libertariamerica wrote:Dyakovo wrote:1: It wasn't.
2: No, it didn't. Not in the way you're talking about.
3: Not believing your bullshit ideas is more than just "fine" it's preferred.
The less amount of trolling you do the better it would be for you, I already filed a report to a moderator. Have a good day.
News - 10/27/2558: Deglassing of Reach is going smoother than expected. | First prototype laser rifle is beginning experimentation. | The Sangheili Civil War is officially over, Arbiter Thel'Vadam and his Swords of Sanghelios have successfully eliminated remaining Covenant cells on Sanghelios. | President Ruth Charet to hold press meeting within the hour on the end of the Sangheili Civil War. | The Citadel Council official introduces the Unggoy as a member of the Citadel.

by Orham » Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:22 am
Libertariamerica wrote:Myrensis wrote:
We have a pretty good idea of how planets form. As to the nature of the universe before the Big Bang and why it happened the answer is we don't know...yet.
The problem with the God of the Gaps, which exactly what is invoked by ,"well what caused this." Is that those gaps are constantly shrinking.
It's one long continuous stream of. "You can't explain this! Obviously
Gd! Oh. You explained that? Well, you can't explain this, therefore God! Oh, you figured that out too? Well this you could never explain! QED, God!" etc ad infinitum.
As intelligent and open as I am...you lost me there

by Dyakovo » Fri Jan 17, 2014 2:22 am
Libertariamerica wrote:Orham wrote:
But at this point one might as well worship water and oxygen molecules. If you want to call your DNA and RNA "god", that's fine as long as the following conditions hold:(a) You don't expect the idea to be taken seriously by anyone
(b) You don't demand that this idea become any part of schools' curricular standards for teaching about biodiversity or its origins
(c) You don't use this idea to inform your ideas about science policy
Given all that, go ahead and call your DNA and RNA "god". You can even worship it, I won't stop you. Here, I'll even write a prayer for you:Adenine, in thy holy wisdom lead us
Guanine, in thy infinite mercy defend us
Cytosine, in thy blessed love shelter us
Thymine, in thy sacred strength build us
Uracil, in thy perfection bind us
It doesn't make sense to me, but whatever. I'm a Christian Universalist who meets all three of the criteria I set.
My points are:
a. Those who think scientific processes happen for no reason or cause shouldn't be taken seriously.
b. Nothing can just happen by itself, apples don't fall off of trees without gravity. Therefore, monkeys don't become humans without molecules mutating and manipulating themselves.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dazchan, Duvniask, Ethel mermania, EuroStralia, Google [Bot], Ifreann, Ilova, Loeje, Riviere Renard, Saiwana, Shrillland, Stellar Colonies, The Most Grand Feline Empire, The Rio Grande River Basin
Advertisement