Advertisement

by Kamisia » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:38 pm

by The High Guardians » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:38 pm
Souseiseki wrote:The High Guardians wrote:
Germany had its infrastructure modernised on a mass scale....Just maybe. While the U.K did not have its industries completely bombed into the ground and rebuilt for them at the expense of the allies. Lets not pretend that didn't help at all.
before that. you know. how they got the ability to bomb the U.K. into the ground?

by Dooom35796821595 » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:41 pm
Souseiseki wrote:The High Guardians wrote:
Germany had its infrastructure modernised on a mass scale....Just maybe. While the U.K did not have its industries completely bombed into the ground and rebuilt for them at the expense of the allies. Lets not pretend that didn't help at all.
before that. you know. how they got the ability to bomb the U.K. into the ground?

by Brilliant Brittania » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:42 pm

by Frisivisia » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:43 pm

by Priory Academy USSR » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:43 pm
The High Guardians wrote:Souseiseki wrote:
before that. you know. how they got the ability to bomb the U.K. into the ground?
That's what I'm talking about. Germany overtook us pre WW2 for very simple reasons. Germany pre war had an abundance of natural resources that it could exploit for industry. Let me compare this to the U.K, we did not, we have to import everything to do anything. Thus driving up costs of about everything.

by New Acardia » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:43 pm
by Souseiseki » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:44 pm
New acardia wrote:The High Guardians wrote:
They wouldn't be broke either? If its not less than 100 K I'm not bothered. Sitting on piles of money doesn't help the economy at all.
How long until the first million is targeted for this outrageous tax. In the words of Gerard Depardieu this is the government punishing success..

by Frisivisia » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:44 pm
New acardia wrote:The High Guardians wrote:
They wouldn't be broke either? If its not less than 100 K I'm not bothered. Sitting on piles of money doesn't help the economy at all.
How long until the first million is targeted for this outrageous tax. In the words of Gerard Depardieu this is the government punishing success..
by Ainin » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:44 pm
New acardia wrote:The High Guardians wrote:
They wouldn't be broke either? If its not less than 100 K I'm not bothered. Sitting on piles of money doesn't help the economy at all.
How long until the first million is targeted for this outrageous tax. In the words of Gerard Depardieu this is the government punishing success..


by The High Guardians » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:45 pm
Priory Academy USSR wrote:The High Guardians wrote:
That's what I'm talking about. Germany overtook us pre WW2 for very simple reasons. Germany pre war had an abundance of natural resources that it could exploit for industry. Let me compare this to the U.K, we did not, we have to import everything to do anything. Thus driving up costs of about everything.
Nope.
Britain was one of the world's foremost producers of coal, copper (the mining towns in Yorkshire and South Wales are clear cut evidence of those, respectively) and a host of other materials were produced too. The only major import the UK had was food (which was in plentiful supply from the Americas), which really wouldn't impact industrial development.

by Olivaero » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:47 pm

by Priory Academy USSR » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:50 pm
The High Guardians wrote:Priory Academy USSR wrote:
Nope.
Britain was one of the world's foremost producers of coal, copper (the mining towns in Yorkshire and South Wales are clear cut evidence of those, respectively) and a host of other materials were produced too. The only major import the UK had was food (which was in plentiful supply from the Americas), which really wouldn't impact industrial development.
Coal and Copper are two resources out of many which can be exploited. Why are you talking about so far back? Also, if Prussia was so powerful at the time, why did it not achieve such a grand empire? Could its economy not handle it?

by New Acardia » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:50 pm

by Frisivisia » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:51 pm
New acardia wrote:75% tax
that is taking 75 cents out each dollar a person makes.
that does not include local and prvinceal taxes as well.
by Ainin » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:52 pm
New acardia wrote:75% tax
that is taking 75 cents out each dollar a person makes.
that does not include local and prvinceal taxes as well.

by Estado Paulista » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:55 pm
New acardia wrote:75% tax
that is taking 75 cents out each dollar a person makes.
that does not include local and prvinceal taxes as well.
by Ainin » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:57 pm
Estado Paulista wrote:New acardia wrote:75% tax
that is taking 75 cents out each dollar a person makes.
that does not include local and prvinceal taxes as well.
Not really. Forgive me if I'm wrong, but from what I understood, you'll have to pay 75% of your income, if you earn more than €1 million by year.

by America Libertaria » Mon Dec 30, 2013 3:58 pm
Frisivisia wrote:New acardia wrote:How long until the first million is targeted for this outrageous tax. In the words of Gerard Depardieu this is the government punishing success..
If you have two toys and I ask you to share one of yours with another little boy who has none, am I punishing you for your successful toy gathering? Is this acceptable?

by Frisivisia » Mon Dec 30, 2013 4:00 pm
America Libertaria wrote:Frisivisia wrote:If you have two toys and I ask you to share one of yours with another little boy who has none, am I punishing you for your successful toy gathering? Is this acceptable?
If the boy with the two toys earned those toys through hard work and finally got those toys he wanted why should he have to share with the other boy who did nothing to help earn those toys?

by New Acardia » Mon Dec 30, 2013 4:00 pm
Olivaero wrote:Gee I will feel sorry for all those poor millionaires that are hurt by this... They are often the worst off in society I struggle to think how they keep their heads above water sometimes all these taxes reducing them to mere incomes of several hundred thousand. Clearly they need the money more than the poor people who being feckless and greedy it would be just wasted upon.
by Souseiseki » Mon Dec 30, 2013 4:00 pm
America Libertaria wrote:Frisivisia wrote:If you have two toys and I ask you to share one of yours with another little boy who has none, am I punishing you for your successful toy gathering? Is this acceptable?
If the boy with the two toys earned those toys through hard work and finally got those toys he wanted why should he have to share with the other boy who did nothing to help earn those toys?
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dimetrodon Empire, Elejamie, Valyxias, Vassenor
Advertisement