Monarchist Discussion Thread

by **Dangelia** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:33 pm

I'm just curious. How many people in NS are monarchists? Do you support the monarchy? What do you think of it? This is the thread to discuss about the Hasburgs and the Romanovs. To discuss about the monarchy or the democracy. Let the discussions begin! DEO REGI PATRIAE!!!

by **Old Tyrannia** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:36 pm

I'm a republican, I hate monarchies, the scum.

That is, of course, a joke. Long live the Queen!

by **Forster Keys** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:37 pm

An ideology of sycophants and narcissists.

by **Trolldonia** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:37 pm

Now, there are two ways I could contribute to this thread. The first is an anti-monarchist rant, but that's overdone and others are gonna do it anyways. The second is this website I found yesterday. "The Mad Monarchist" is a very fitting name here: this guy seems to support literally everything and everyone that styles him/herself a monarch (to a pathological level, I would say), regardless of any other circumstances. Aside from being an interesting insight into the mind of a more lunatic kind of monarchist, there is a respectable amount of information in there nonetheless that some of you monarchists might be interested in.

by **Old Tyrannia** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:39 pm

Trolldonia wrote:Now, there are two ways I could contribute to this thread. The first is an anti-monarchist rant, but that's overdone and others are gonna do it anyways. The second is this website I found yesterday. "The Mad Monarchist" is a very fitting name here: this guy seems to support literally everything and everyone that styles him/herself a monarch, regardless of any other circumstances. Aside from being an interesting insight into the mind of a more lunatic kind of monarchist, there is a respectable amount of information in there nonetheless that some of you monarchists might be interested in.

I see you've found my favourite blogger.

by **The IASM** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:39 pm

Elective absolute monarchy, for the king and the head of state!

by **Dangelia** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:40 pm

Old Tyrannia wrote:
Trolldonia wrote:Now, there are two ways I could contribute to this thread. The first is an anti-monarchist rant, but that's overdone and others are gonna do it anyways. The second is this website I found yesterday. "The Mad Monarchist" is a very fitting name here: this guy seems to support literally everything and everyone that styles him/herself a monarch, regardless of any other circumstances. Aside from being an interesting insight into the mind of a more lunatic kind of monarchist, there is a respectable amount of information in there nonetheless that some of you monarchists might be interested in.

I see you've found my favourite blogger.

I just bookmarked that sight.

by **Olivaero** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:42 pm

Tactically a monarchist I see them being about as imperfect as having any type of power inherited. To me if your going to strip a monarch of it's power you should strip a rich kid of their inheritance. I'd like to see The monarchy in the UK being granted a more house of lords type power with the upper house being used for something else.

by **Dangelia** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:43 pm

The IASM wrote:Elective absolute monarchy, for the king and the head of state!

Hmmm?

by **Agritum** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:44 pm

I'm fine with monarchy as long as it is relegated to a virtually ceremonial role. Revenue from tourism is nice.

by **Alcase** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:45 pm

long live the king and stuff

by **Vazdania** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:46 pm

Ay yis! FINALLY a proper Monarchist Discussion Thread!

:clap:

by **Vazdania** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:46 pm

Agritum wrote:I'm fine with monarchy as long as it is relegated to a virtually ceremonial role. Revenue from tourism is nice.

Then you sir or madam are not a true monarchist.

by **Dangelia** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:46 pm

Vazdania wrote:Ay yis! FINALLY a proper Monarchist Discussion Thread!

I was surprised there wasn't one already!

by **The Kingdom Historia** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:46 pm

My countries monarchy was created by the people to protect them from the politicians. The monarchy is really a landlord of an apartment

by **Vazdania** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:46 pm

The IASM wrote:Elective absolute monarchy, for the king and the head of state!

Sounds like an elected dictator if you ask me!

by **Vazdania** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:47 pm

The Kingdom Historia wrote:My countries monarchy was created by the people to protect them from the politicians. The monarchy is really a landlord of an apartment

This is out of character.....

by **The IASM** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:47 pm

Dangelia wrote:
The IASM wrote:Elective absolute monarchy, for the king and the head of state!

Hmmm?

The title of king holds far more sway over the populous than prime minister and why not unite the titles in order to solidify the fascist state?

by **Celritannia** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:47 pm

I support Executive Constitutional Monarchy, I am just indifferent towards the hereditary principle. If it was a Meritocratic Hereditary Monarchy that would be a good idea.
Equally a Meritocratic Executive Constitutional Monarchy would also be a good idea.

by **Forster Keys** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:48 pm

Agritum wrote:I'm fine with monarchy as long as it is relegated to a virtually ceremonial role. Revenue from tourism is nice.

You don't need a monarchy for tourism though. The top ten tourism destinations of 2012 contained just two monarchies. The top one being France. People still visit the Hall of Mirrors even though there's no king.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Tourism_rankings

by **The Kingdom Historia** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:48 pm

Vazdania wrote:
The Kingdom Historia wrote:My countries monarchy was created by the people to protect them from the politicians. The monarchy is really a landlord of an apartment

This is out of character.....

How so

by **Dangelia** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:48 pm

Vazdania wrote:
The IASM wrote:Elective absolute monarchy, for the king and the head of state!

Sounds like an elected dictator if you ask me!

Well, it does have a better ring when called his His Imperial Majesty.

by **Agritum** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:49 pm

Forster Keys wrote:
Agritum wrote:I'm fine with monarchy as long as it is relegated to a virtually ceremonial role. Revenue from tourism is nice.

You don't need a monarchy for tourism though. The top ten tourism destinations of 2012 contained just two monarchies. The top one being France. People still visit the Hall of Mirrors even though there's no king.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Tourism_rankings

Well, good point.

by **Vazdania** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:49 pm

Celritannia wrote:I support Executive Constitutional Monarchy, I am just indifferent towards the hereditary principle. If it was a Meritocratic Hereditary Monarchy that would be a good idea.
Equally a Meritocratic Executive Constitutional Monarchy would also be a good idea.

Hereditary Monarchy is a good thing

by **Libertechie** » Mon Dec 23, 2013 2:49 pm

I am a republican rather than a monarchist, and I see monarchism as elitist and undemocratic. Can I ask, what draws you guys to monarchism? Is it national pride and heritage and culture?

Monarchist Discussion Thread

Do you support...?

Monarchist Discussion Thread

Who is online