I see what you did there.
Advertisement
by Arglorand » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:39 pm
by Ashmoria » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:39 pm
United British Union wrote:It is clear they are either too laid-back or too relaxed to keep up appearances, when the Aristocracy and other Upper-Class peoples strive to make a good impression of both themselves and the British Nation.
by Unitaristic Regions » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:40 pm
by Vazdania » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:40 pm
Luveria wrote:Vazdania wrote:If they are on welfare they probably do not pay very much in taxes at all.
Are you doing this on purpose?Estado Paulista wrote:
Did you miss the part where he said they survive on welfare and can barely pay their taxes?Luveria wrote:
How when there are no jobs available, and they have no money because they are surviving on donations from friends and family? Do explain how they are supposed to make their own job.
by Crumlark » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:40 pm
by Shinpitekina » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:41 pm
United British Union wrote:It is clear they are either too laid-back or too relaxed to keep up appearances, when the Aristocracy and other Upper-Class peoples strive to make a good impression of both themselves and the British Nation.
by Luveria » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:41 pm
Vazdania wrote:
Oh gosh I'm so sorry, My Luv!
Well obviously if you are surviving off of welfare you should cut back on expenses in order to get ahead.
When there are no jobs available that is when you CREATE your own jobs. You make your own jobs by actually doing stuff. There are many different ways you can make your own job.
by Vazdania » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:41 pm
by Old Tyrannia » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:42 pm
Ashmoria wrote:United British Union wrote:It is clear they are either too laid-back or too relaxed to keep up appearances, when the Aristocracy and other Upper-Class peoples strive to make a good impression of both themselves and the British Nation.
I assume that in Britain formality is all the upper class HAS. what else could possibly separate them from the masses?
by Arglorand » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:42 pm
Vazdania wrote:
Oh gosh I'm so sorry, My Luv!
Well obviously if you are surviving off of welfare you should cut back on expenses in order to get ahead.
When there are no jobs available that is when you CREATE your own jobs. You make your own jobs by actually doing stuff. There are many different ways you can make your own job.
by United British Union » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:42 pm
Ashmoria wrote:United British Union wrote:It is clear they are either too laid-back or too relaxed to keep up appearances, when the Aristocracy and other Upper-Class peoples strive to make a good impression of both themselves and the British Nation.
I assume that in Britain formality is all the upper class HAS. what else could possibly separate them from the masses?
by Luveria » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:42 pm
Crumlark wrote:Luveria wrote:
I do wonder how you got that out of my post.
Read the thread topic question:
"Why do you think the Lower-Classes Act More Informal?"
It is a question, is all. Yes or no would suffice.
I derived that train of thinking by you explaining that the lower classes act more informal because they are not the upper class. Yes, that is a slanted question with the obvious assumption that the lower class are entirely devoid of formality, but your answer seems to reinforce its assumption, though.
by Shinpitekina » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:42 pm
by Vazdania » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:43 pm
Luveria wrote:The Joseon Dynasty wrote:Now we've got the Poles coming in.
I've been here since page 1.Vazdania wrote:Oh gosh I'm so sorry, My Luv!
Well obviously if you are surviving off of welfare you should cut back on expenses in order to get ahead.
When there are no jobs available that is when you CREATE your own jobs. You make your own jobs by actually doing stuff. There are many different ways you can make your own job.
Did you miss the part about how they can't afford food after cutting expenses and only have enough to eat because friends and family give donations?
by Estado Paulista » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:44 pm
Luveria wrote:Did you miss the part about how they can't afford food after cutting expenses and only have enough to eat because friends and family give donations?
by Arglorand » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:44 pm
by Seriong » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:44 pm
Drawkland wrote:I think it delegitimizes true cases of sexual assault, like real dangerous cases being dismissed, "Oh it's only sexual assault"
Like racism. If everything's "racist," then you can't tell what really is racist.
Murkwood wrote:As a trans MtF Bi Pansexual Transautistic CAMAB Demiplatonic Asensual Better-Abled Planetkin Singlet Afro-Centric Vegan Socialist Therian, I'm immune from criticism.
by Arglorand » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:45 pm
by Unitaristic Regions » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:45 pm
by Glasgia » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:45 pm
by Vazdania » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:45 pm
Arglorand wrote:Vazdania wrote:Oh gosh I'm so sorry, My Luv!
Well obviously if you are surviving off of welfare you should cut back on expenses in order to get ahead.
When there are no jobs available that is when you CREATE your own jobs. You make your own jobs by actually doing stuff. There are many different ways you can make your own job.
They already have cut back on expenses. They can barely EAT. And with malnutrition comes weakness and frailty. And with those, come the fucking realization that laissez faire is shit, and that you haven't yet said a single way they can actually make a job.
Come on, Vazdania. My friend's family are depending on this. Think of something that can earn them cash.
by Shinpitekina » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:46 pm
by Arglorand » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:46 pm
Glasgia wrote:Because we're 'ard bruv, you cannae 'stand our talk when you're a wee bastard with a ton o' cash
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, Albaaa, Almonaster Nuevo, Benuty, Darcy Liu, Dumb Ideologies, Emotional Support Crocodile, Google [Bot], Kaumudeen, Minoa, Ravemath, The Last World, Tungstan
Advertisement