Damnit. I didn't even realize it.
Advertisement
by Estado Paulista » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:46 pm
by Vazdania » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:46 pm
by Ashmoria » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:47 pm
Old Tyrannia wrote:Shinpitekina wrote:And neither should anyone else in my opinion. Just be yourselves, everyone.
That's a terrible idea. Correct behaviour and etiquette is the foundation of society.Ashmoria wrote:I assume that in Britain formality is all the upper class HAS. what else could possibly separate them from the masses?
Well, vast wealth and, in the case of the aristocracy, titles and illustrious family histories.
by Caninope » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:47 pm
Agritum wrote:Arg, Caninope is Captain America under disguise. Everyone knows it.
Frisivisia wrote:Me wrote:Just don't. It'll get you a whole lot further in life if you come to realize you're not the smartest guy in the room, even if you probably are.
Because Caninope may be in that room with you.
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Thankfully, we have you and EM to guide us to wisdom and truth, holy one. :p
Norstal wrote:What I am saying of course is that we should clone Caninope.
by Arglorand » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:47 pm
Vazdania wrote:Arglorand wrote:They already have cut back on expenses. They can barely EAT. And with malnutrition comes weakness and frailty. And with those, come the fucking realization that laissez faire is shit, and that you haven't yet said a single way they can actually make a job.
Come on, Vazdania. My friend's family are depending on this. Think of something that can earn them cash.
Laissez faire IS shit. Just for your information. Corportism works best when it has proper regulation.
Grow your own food? Make your own company? Go to a damn Church or religious organization where people will help them? There are many things to help people.
by Luveria » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:47 pm
Vazdania wrote:Arglorand wrote:They already have cut back on expenses. They can barely EAT. And with malnutrition comes weakness and frailty. And with those, come the fucking realization that laissez faire is shit, and that you haven't yet said a single way they can actually make a job.
Come on, Vazdania. My friend's family are depending on this. Think of something that can earn them cash.
Laissez faire IS shit. Just for your information. Corportism works best when it has proper regulation.
Grow your own food?
Vazdania wrote:Make your own company?
Vazdania wrote:Go to a damn Church or religious organization where people will help them?
Vazdania wrote:There are many things to help people.
by Unitaristic Regions » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:47 pm
Vazdania wrote:Arglorand wrote:They already have cut back on expenses. They can barely EAT. And with malnutrition comes weakness and frailty. And with those, come the fucking realization that laissez faire is shit, and that you haven't yet said a single way they can actually make a job.
Come on, Vazdania. My friend's family are depending on this. Think of something that can earn them cash.
Laissez faire IS shit. Just for your information. Corportism works best when it has proper regulation.
Grow your own food? Make your own company? Go to a damn Church or religious organization where people will help them? There are many things to help people.
by Ashmoria » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:48 pm
United British Union wrote:Ashmoria wrote:I assume that in Britain formality is all the upper class HAS. what else could possibly separate them from the masses?
We have much more than formality, sir, that separates us from the masses: more wealth then they have, titles and estates. This does not make us better than them, of course. It is simply their manner.
by Arglorand » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:48 pm
Unitaristic Regions wrote:Vazdania wrote:
Laissez faire IS shit. Just for your information. Corportism works best when it has proper regulation.
Grow your own food? Make your own company? Go to a damn Church or religious organization where people will help them? There are many things to help people.
Corporatism works best when it has proper regulation...
A certain rather lively, bald italian would be a rather good chap to have a lively talk with for you, I think.
by Forster Keys » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:48 pm
by Shinpitekina » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:49 pm
by Unitaristic Regions » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:49 pm
by Luveria » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:49 pm
by Arglorand » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:50 pm
by Estado Paulista » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:50 pm
Unitaristic Regions wrote:Mussolini. The economy of Italian fascism was all about state-managed corporatism.
by Unitaristic Regions » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:50 pm
by Kamchastkia » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:50 pm
by Caninope » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:51 pm
Agritum wrote:Arg, Caninope is Captain America under disguise. Everyone knows it.
Frisivisia wrote:Me wrote:Just don't. It'll get you a whole lot further in life if you come to realize you're not the smartest guy in the room, even if you probably are.
Because Caninope may be in that room with you.
Nightkill the Emperor wrote:Thankfully, we have you and EM to guide us to wisdom and truth, holy one. :p
Norstal wrote:What I am saying of course is that we should clone Caninope.
by Arglorand » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:51 pm
Caninope wrote:Forster Keys wrote:
If they keep acting like that you won't have to.
See, here's the thing.
I go to university with a bunch of people who might broadly be described as "upper class"- the old money, the new money, people from professional/managerial/corporate class(es). Everyone I've met so far has been amazing. No one I've met has been so classist, even the people who advocate the near dismantling of the state.
IOW, Vazdania is the exception, if he truly is monied.
by Unitaristic Regions » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:52 pm
by Crumlark » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:52 pm
Ashmoria wrote:Crumlark wrote:Are you trying to imply that formality is EXCLUSIVE to the upper class?
no it also includes those lower class people who want to act like upper class people.
formality IS the way upper class people act. if the behaviors were reversed it would still be considered that the upper class behavior was better and more formal.
Luveria wrote:Crumlark wrote:It is a question, is all. Yes or no would suffice.
I derived that train of thinking by you explaining that the lower classes act more informal because they are not the upper class. Yes, that is a slanted question with the obvious assumption that the lower class are entirely devoid of formality, but your answer seems to reinforce its assumption, though.
No, it does not, and it is was not a slanted question. You are making it into what you want it to be.
by Arglorand » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:53 pm
by Unitaristic Regions » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:53 pm
Ile Tobi wrote:Has any one not considered the option varzadania is trolling.After all the debate is about informality in lower classes and he bait all of you with his opinion. Successful troll is successful.
by Grand Longueville » Sun Dec 22, 2013 12:53 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Bovad, Caffeinated, Floofybit, Ineva, Kostane, Likhinia, New Temecula, Shrillland, Spirit of Hope, Trump Almighty
Advertisement