NATION

PASSWORD

Utah Now Has Gay Marriage... Wow

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Socialist Austrian Empire
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 59
Founded: Feb 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Socialist Austrian Empire » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:12 am

Siaos wrote:
Estado Paulista wrote:I'll only be truly amazed when North Dakota legalizes it.

I'll only be truly amazed when Texas legalizes it.


I am impressed as is, utah is probably the most conservative state in the U.S.
That being said I am waiting for Alabama to legalize it to be amazed.
Liberal Socialist Republic
Far-left moderate social libertarian.
Left: 7.57, Libertarian: 2.34

User avatar
Pratse
Diplomat
 
Posts: 869
Founded: Feb 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Pratse » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:12 am

Arglorand wrote:
Pratse wrote:
Am I not allowed to be cryptic?

Of course you're allowed to be cryptic. And I'm also allowed to point out how I don't think you will achieve any sort of communication with that amount of crypticness.


Okay then, suit yourself (and myself).
[Insert signature here].

User avatar
Caecuser
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6896
Founded: Jul 01, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Caecuser » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:13 am

Pratse wrote:
Arglorand wrote:Of course you're allowed to be cryptic. And I'm also allowed to point out how I don't think you will achieve any sort of communication with that amount of crypticness.


Okay then, suit yourself (and myself).


What was your original point again?

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:13 am

Pratse wrote:I have a question for you, my good sirs - what happens to kids who are adopted into growing in a gay household? I'm just curious.

They grow up with two mommies or two daddies.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Dalluria
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 100
Founded: Oct 16, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Dalluria » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:13 am

Fascist Russian Empire wrote:Democracy ain't a basic right. It's a terrible, massively flawed ideology that should have died with the Athenians.

No comment! :palm:
One interesting topic: viewtopic.php?f=23&t=266135 Present your people and culture.

User avatar
Pratse
Diplomat
 
Posts: 869
Founded: Feb 17, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Pratse » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:14 am

Dalluria wrote:
Fascist Russian Empire wrote:Democracy ain't a basic right. It's a terrible, massively flawed ideology that should have died with the Athenians.

No comment! :palm:


Amen to Fascist Russian Empire!
[Insert signature here].

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:15 am

Fascist Russian Empire wrote:
Nevanmaa wrote:Why the hell should anyone care what the people of Commiefornia/Vermont/[insert blue hellhole here] want? If they want gay marriage, that's a nope! Can't let them decide stuff like that.

Your attitude towards Utahns is disgusting. Apparently supporting political ideologies that you don't like makes it okay to deny Utahns their right to democracy.

Democracy ain't a basic right. It's a terrible, massively flawed ideology that should have died with the Athenians.


Uhuh, that must be why every country that has legalized same-sex marriage is a democracy. Makes sense, opposing something which leads to more rights for you.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:16 am

New Molsona wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
1. That's what basically EVERY church says. Doesn't mean its true.
2. Good for you. I'm not leaving TN unless its to go back to Louisiana or to visit a friend out of state. And I shouldn't have to do so just to be treated with the basic fucking dignity I deserve.
3. Mistranslated.

1. No protestant Church says it was founded by the apostles
2. Just wondering, how is it to live in Tennessee, I was thinking about moving there.
3. In every English translation, it says basically the same thing, just with different wording.


1. Uh, yeah, they do. I've been to several. The Baptist churches claim direct lineage (for lack of a better term) to the point from where John the Baptist baptized Jesus onwards.

2. It sucks, even if you're a straight white cisgender Christian guy. Nothing to do.

3. Because the mistranslations happened before the first English version was made.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
New Molsona
Diplomat
 
Posts: 969
Founded: Sep 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby New Molsona » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:18 am

Grenartia wrote:
New Molsona wrote:2. The feeling is mutual
3. Just don't talk about that stuff outside your porn blog
4. So you're saying, everything that God said before Jesus was born should be thrown out the window. Looks like I can kill people and steal now and it wouldn't be a sin.


3. No, because its not actually against the rules, any more than a woman showing her ankles and elbows.

4. Not really, because those things deprive people of their rights without informed consent. Which is arguably the highest ethical law there is, and is a corollary to the Golden Rule that Jesus preached.

Just because it's not against the rules it doesn't mean you should do it. Do you flip off old women or burp in a veteran's face.
Pro: Republican Party (US), Roman Catholic Church, United States, Tea Party, Constitution Party, conservatism, democracy, Pro-life, capitalism, militarism, gun rights.
Anti: Abortion, gay "marriage", liberals, Barack Obama, racism, Democratic Party, communism, socialism, Obamacare, secularism, "War on Christmas", Islam, atheism, paganism, North Korea, Iran.
"The American dream is not that every man must be level with every other man. The American dream is that every man must be free to become whatever God intends he should become."
"The Constitution was never meant to prevent people from praying; its declared purpose was to protect their freedom to pray."

-Both quotes are from Ronald Reagan

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:20 am

New Molsona wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
3. No, because its not actually against the rules, any more than a woman showing her ankles and elbows.

4. Not really, because those things deprive people of their rights without informed consent. Which is arguably the highest ethical law there is, and is a corollary to the Golden Rule that Jesus preached.

Just because it's not against the rules it doesn't mean you should do it. Do you flip off old women or burp in a veteran's face.

Just because it's against an ancient morality in an ancient piece of literature, doesn't mean you should listen to it.
Last edited by Kelinfort on Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:20 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:20 am

Pratse wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
1.

This obviously means that the Founding Fathers believed in freedom, at least until one's actions deprive others of their rights (or else there'd be no point, because then it would be an exercise in futility). All one would have to do is convince them of the known facts about being LGBT, and in conjunction with little more than that one sentence, you can convince them that SSM is ok.

4. Molsona isn't allowing for an "abstain" option for my human rights.



1. That phrase is extremely open-ended. Don't you have a more concrete example?

4. And I am the culprit of Molsona's actions? Hey, just like those kids I talked about earlier.


1. Open-ended? :palm: That sentence is almost literally the culmination of Enlightenment-era thought on the subject.

4. No. But if Molsona thinks my civil rights should be put up to vote, why can't I call for theirs to be?
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:22 am

New Molsona wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
3. No, because its not actually against the rules, any more than a woman showing her ankles and elbows.

4. Not really, because those things deprive people of their rights without informed consent. Which is arguably the highest ethical law there is, and is a corollary to the Golden Rule that Jesus preached.

Just because it's not against the rules it doesn't mean you should do it. Do you flip off old women or burp in a veteran's face.

I have, yes.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159013
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:23 am

Pratse wrote:(Hint: Think school, think a place in society.)

Maybe you'd like to just say your piece instead of beating around the bush, hmm?


Old Tyrannia wrote:
Fascist Russian Empire wrote:Nothing, nothing at all. They are no different than anyone else.

Except for the almost inevitable bullying.

I imagine that children adopted by straight couples get bullied from time to time.

User avatar
Arglorand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12597
Founded: Jan 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arglorand » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:23 am

New Molsona wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
3. No, because its not actually against the rules, any more than a woman showing her ankles and elbows.

4. Not really, because those things deprive people of their rights without informed consent. Which is arguably the highest ethical law there is, and is a corollary to the Golden Rule that Jesus preached.

Just because it's not against the rules it doesn't mean you should do it. Do you flip off old women or burp in a veteran's face.

Why is a veteran more exempt from burping into his face than anyone else?

Isn't it kind of rude to burp into anyone's face?
Kosovo is Morrowind. N'wah.
Impeach Dagoth Ur, legalise Daedra worship, the Empire is theft. Nerevarine 3E 427.

Pros: Dunmeri independence, abolition of the Empire, the Daedra, Morag Tong, House Redoran, Ashlander interests, abolitionism, Dissident Priests, canonisation of St. Jiub the Cliff Racer Slayer.
Cons: Imperials, the Empire, the False Tribunal, Dagoth Ur, House Hlaalu, Imperials, the Eight Divines, "Talos", "Nords", Imperial unionism, Imperials.

I am a: Social Democrat | Bright green | Republican | Intersectional feminist | Civic nationalist | Multiculturalist
(and i blatantly stole this from Old Tyrannia)

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:25 am

Siaos wrote:
Estado Paulista wrote:I'll only be truly amazed when North Dakota legalizes it.

I'll only be truly amazed when Texas legalizes it.

...Why?

I really wonder about you people who make these comments about Texas. Have you ever been here? A distinct majority of younger voters approve of gay marriage here and among Hispanics in general the numbers are reaching a majority, despite how conservative it currently is. I would be amazed if Texas didn't legalize it within the next 20 years or so.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:26 am

Pratse wrote:I have a question for you, my good sirs - what happens to kids who are adopted into growing in a gay household? I'm just curious.



they become adults?
whatever

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:28 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Siaos wrote:I'll only be truly amazed when Texas legalizes it.

...Why?

I really wonder about you people who make these comments about Texas. Have you ever been here? A distinct majority of younger voters approve of gay marriage here and among Hispanics in general the numbers are reaching a majority, despite how conservative it currently is. I would be amazed if Texas didn't legalize it within the next 20 years or so.


Mainly because the perception is that despite those facts, many of the most prominent anti-LGBT icons are Texan.

EDIT:

Much like how, despite how much I talk about how anti-LGBT the state of TN is, in many respects, its rather progressive, with the larger cities trying to pass same-sex spouse benefits for city workers. Hell, I went to a rural school, and at least 80% of my friends were some member of the LGBT alphabet soup, and the school system as a whole had an anti-bullying policy that included bullying based on sexual orientation. Really the most flak I've gotten so far up here was when I tried to wear ducttape for Day of Silence (mainly from two teachers I didn't have, and the principal), hearing other students casually toss around homophobic insults among their friends in the halls, and being pelted with paper balls and erasers by middle schoolers on the bus.
Last edited by Grenartia on Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:34 am, edited 1 time in total.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159013
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:30 am

Ashmoria wrote:
Pratse wrote:I have a question for you, my good sirs - what happens to kids who are adopted into growing in a gay household? I'm just curious.



they become adults?

Some will probably just become taller, hairier children. But then, that's true of everyone, regardless of being adopted or the sexuality of one's parents.

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:31 am

Grenartia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:...Why?

I really wonder about you people who make these comments about Texas. Have you ever been here? A distinct majority of younger voters approve of gay marriage here and among Hispanics in general the numbers are reaching a majority, despite how conservative it currently is. I would be amazed if Texas didn't legalize it within the next 20 years or so.


Mainly because the perception is that despite those facts, many of the most prominent anti-LGBT icons are Texan.

I'd be truly amazed if Texas legalized with a Republican governor. I'd probably suffer a seizure if Rick Perry changed his mind.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:32 am

Grenartia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:...Why?

I really wonder about you people who make these comments about Texas. Have you ever been here? A distinct majority of younger voters approve of gay marriage here and among Hispanics in general the numbers are reaching a majority, despite how conservative it currently is. I would be amazed if Texas didn't legalize it within the next 20 years or so.


Mainly because the perception is that despite those facts, many of the most prominent anti-LGBT icons are Texan.

Liberals in Texas need to organize better.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
The Scientific States
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18643
Founded: Apr 29, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Scientific States » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:34 am

Pratse wrote:I have a question for you, my good sirs - what happens to kids who are adopted into growing in a gay household? I'm just curious.


They grow up perfectly normal.
Centrist, Ordoliberal, Bisexual, Agnostic, Pro Social Market Economy, Pro Labour Union, Secular Humanist, Cautious Optimist, Pro LGBT, Pro Marijuana Legalization, Pro Humanitarian Intervention etc etc.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Liberal/Authoritarian: -6.62
Political Stuff I Wrote
Why Pinochet and Allende were both terrible
The UKIP: A Bad Choice for Britain
Why South Africa is in a sorry state, and how it can be fixed.
Massive List of My OOC Pros and Cons
Hey, Putin! Leave Ukraine Alone!

User avatar
Arglorand
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12597
Founded: Jan 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Arglorand » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:35 am

Ifreann wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:

they become adults?

Some will probably just become taller, hairier children. But then, that's true of everyone, regardless of being adopted or the sexuality of one's parents.

Some of the kids will also simply die.

Illnesses and all.
Kosovo is Morrowind. N'wah.
Impeach Dagoth Ur, legalise Daedra worship, the Empire is theft. Nerevarine 3E 427.

Pros: Dunmeri independence, abolition of the Empire, the Daedra, Morag Tong, House Redoran, Ashlander interests, abolitionism, Dissident Priests, canonisation of St. Jiub the Cliff Racer Slayer.
Cons: Imperials, the Empire, the False Tribunal, Dagoth Ur, House Hlaalu, Imperials, the Eight Divines, "Talos", "Nords", Imperial unionism, Imperials.

I am a: Social Democrat | Bright green | Republican | Intersectional feminist | Civic nationalist | Multiculturalist
(and i blatantly stole this from Old Tyrannia)

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:35 am

Pratse wrote:I have a question for you, my good sirs - what happens to kids who are adopted into growing in a gay household? I'm just curious.

They wake up, eat, go to school, come home, do homework, sleep, rinse and repeat, graduate, go to college(maybe), fall in love, and go into a professional career(maybe), all while growing up in a loving, caring household.
Last edited by Kelinfort on Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:35 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:36 am

Kelinfort wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
Mainly because the perception is that despite those facts, many of the most prominent anti-LGBT icons are Texan.

I'd be truly amazed if Texas legalized with a Republican governor. I'd probably suffer a seizure if Rick Perry changed his mind.
Mavorpen wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
Mainly because the perception is that despite those facts, many of the most prominent anti-LGBT icons are Texan.

Liberals in Texas need to organize better.


Might want to look at the edit.

And yeah, Mav, we need to organize better in all the red states. But progress isn't as far away as we think, especially in states we think its least likely to happen soon in.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Ashmoria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 46718
Founded: Mar 19, 2004
Left-Leaning College State

Postby Ashmoria » Sat Dec 21, 2013 8:38 am

Ifreann wrote:
Ashmoria wrote:

they become adults?

Some will probably just become taller, hairier children. But then, that's true of everyone, regardless of being adopted or the sexuality of one's parents.


lol

now i have the mental image of an oversized, bearded 3 year old.
whatever

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Duvniask, Maineiacs, Ostroeuropa

Advertisement

Remove ads