NATION

PASSWORD

Your thoughts on communism?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
El Kuduro
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 140
Founded: Nov 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby El Kuduro » Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:32 pm

Communism could work in a small community. That is where the situations in which it could work start and end. Say you were on a ship that sank, washing you up on a small South Pacific island with 100 other survivors. You can all pool your resources by building shelters, collecting food and dividing it all 100 ways.

It simply wouldn't work in a nation of 3-4 million, let alone a nation with 100 million inhabitants. There is too much room for corruption there. No, communism is not always bad but it is the most easily tainted economic system. It's built on naïve optimism that humans inherently want to help and share with one another. And that's just not human nature. That is why true communism has never worked for any nation and never will. (Well, again maybe a nation with only a few thousand people but you get the gist).
Last edited by El Kuduro on Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:42 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Catholicism, USA, Christianity, free speech, racial integration, Spain, Fox News (even if it isn't wholly fair and balanced), conservatism, capitalism, democracy, the Republican party, death penalty, legal immigration, loving the sinner-hating the sin, Joyce Meyer and low taxes
Euthanasia, Germany.
Welfare state, terrorism, UN, liberalism, atheism, communism, socialism, same-sex marriage, eminent domain, illegal immigration, universal health care, gun control, human-cause global warming, racism, affirmative action and abortion.

User avatar
Totalise
Diplomat
 
Posts: 563
Founded: Jun 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Totalise » Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:32 pm

better dead then red

User avatar
Greater-London
Senator
 
Posts: 3791
Founded: Nov 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Greater-London » Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:33 pm

Just like any ideology it has its flaws although I have to say that it hasn't stood the test of time like Liberalism or Conservatism have. It has noble intentions but its hopelessly Utopian - that's not to say that Communism cant exist but it will not exist on a mass scale.
Born in Cambridge in 1993, just graduated with a 2.1 in Politics and International Relations from the University of Manchester - WHICH IS SICK

PRO: British Unionism, Commonwealth, Liberalism, Federalism, Palestine, NHS, Decriminalizing Drugs, West Ham UTD , Garage Music &, Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Tuition Fees, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties, Hypocrisy, Religious Fanaticism, Religion Bashing & Armchair activists

Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -4.87

User avatar
Qeno
Minister
 
Posts: 3204
Founded: Sep 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Qeno » Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:35 pm

I'm sort of indifferent to communism and there are apparently horrible feelings towards the idea. The war in Vietnam is proof of discrimination of ideals and Ideals are only just that. Equality among the people in all forms looks very nice on paper and the established government doesn't have to worry about the actions of the people who own that government.

It's an answer to the age old question "Why can't we all just get along?"
Desired Tech Level: Future Tech
My nation's pronounciation: Key-No
National government: A imperialist constitutional monarchy with a matriarch as a ruler and an assembly to advise her will
Anti-realist in RPs

User avatar
Marsisian
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26314
Founded: Aug 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Marsisian » Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:35 pm

Totalise wrote:better dead then red

Yes.
Last edited by Erich von Manstein on June 9, 1973, edited 24 times in total

MGSV: The Phantom Pain hype! Game of the decade!

User avatar
Frihetskommunen
Attaché
 
Posts: 79
Founded: Jul 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Frihetskommunen » Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:40 pm

Libertarian communism is alright in my book. Authoritarian communism is not so alright.
A lot of bad things have been done in the name of communism, things that I do not condone. However, I am very sympathetic towards the basic idea.
Economic Left/Right: -10.0
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -9.18
Cosmopolitan - 49%
Secular - 86%
Visionary - 84%
Anarchistic - 73%
Communistic - 73%
Pacifist - 57%
Ecological - 40%
Progressivism: 100
Socialism: 100
Tenderness: 50
Male. 24 years. Swedish. 1 on the Kinsey Scale. Atheist. Musician. Vegetarian. Pro-freedom. Chaotic Good. Can be pretty awkward sometimes, sorry 'bout that.
http://totemskin.bandcamp.com/
PRO: Civil rights, direct democracy, equality, feminism, freedom of speech, libertarian socialism, secularism, sexuality
ANTI: Authoritarianism, capitalism, EU, fascism, monarchy, nationalism, organized religion, racism, totalitarianism

User avatar
4years
Senator
 
Posts: 4971
Founded: Aug 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby 4years » Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:47 pm

Frihetskommunen wrote:Libertarian communism is alright in my book. Authoritarian communism is not so alright.
A lot of bad things have been done in the name of communism, things that I do not condone. However, I am very sympathetic towards the basic idea.


Authoritarian communism is oxymoronic.
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -10.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -10
"Those who do not move, do not notice their chains. "
-Rosa Luxemburg
"In place of bourgeois society with all of it's classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association, one in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all" -Karl Marx
There is no such thing as rational self interest; pure reason leads to the greatest good for the greatest number.


User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:50 pm

4years wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:
1A. So they were far better then the US? No, just their military strength. The USSR had military strength, is that a validation that it's system was successful and worked? 1B. I was just point it out.

2. Didn't the US army have a better military and more resources then Vietnam?


1. A) you were the one who began talking about military strength the the first place! Don't try to move the goalposts now. We can talk about the internal policies of the societies I mentioned (which were much better than those of the US, I might add), but it was you who made this about military success, you who lost that argument, and I have zero reason to allow you to worm your way out of it. B) And you pointed to an area where the communist societies in question preformed remarkably well.

2. Yes they did, which was part of my point.


1A. False. It was someone else who brought up that communist societies do not survive then you brought up three different examples and stated that it was foreign conflicts that caused them to fall. How did I make this about military success? 1B. That they got conquered?

2. So Vietnam held out against the US remarkably well. Does that means Vietnams system is superior?
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Agassix
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Dec 19, 2013
Ex-Nation

My thoughts?

Postby Agassix » Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:51 pm

Don't like it. Sorry, just don't.


User avatar
Khanastan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1989
Founded: May 15, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Khanastan » Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:55 pm

Good in theory, bugger-all useful in practice.
“The ancient Oracle said that I was the wisest of all the Greeks. It is because I alone, of all the Greeks, know that I know nothing.” - Socrates
Khanastan is an entirely fictional PMT nation somewhat similar to a larger, more free version of China. We are a massive federal representative republic of half a billion people with a self-sufficient, world-dominating economy. NS stats are not used. Use our Factbook instead.
Call me Khan. I've been here a while. I'm from Glasgow, Scotland. I think people should treat people like they want to be treated themselves. If you want to know more you're going have to buy me a drink or get to know me better, otherwise i'll stop being such a mystery.
Merry crisis one and all.


User avatar
The new russian empires
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 46
Founded: May 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The new russian empires » Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:55 pm

I believe communism is better than capitalism since i feel that being able to elect any person into office is stupid and flawed
Last edited by The new russian empires on Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:56 pm, edited 1 time in total.
“Death is nothing; but to live defeated and inglorious is to die daily.” -Napoleon Bonaparte
░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░░ ███████ ]▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄
░▂▄▅████████████████████████████
██████████████████████████████████].
◥⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙▲⊙◤
TOG
I also have a tog 2 fear me!

User avatar
4years
Senator
 
Posts: 4971
Founded: Aug 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby 4years » Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:57 pm

Pandeeria wrote:
4years wrote:
1. A) you were the one who began talking about military strength the the first place! Don't try to move the goalposts now. We can talk about the internal policies of the societies I mentioned (which were much better than those of the US, I might add), but it was you who made this about military success, you who lost that argument, and I have zero reason to allow you to worm your way out of it. B) And you pointed to an area where the communist societies in question preformed remarkably well.

2. Yes they did, which was part of my point.


1A. False. It was someone else who brought up that communist societies do not survive then you brought up three different examples and stated that it was foreign conflicts that caused them to fall. How did I make this about military success? 1B. That they got conquered?

2. So Vietnam held out against the US remarkably well. Does that means Vietnams system is superior?


1. A) You made it about military success when you stated that the societies getting conquered would lend weight to anti-communist arguments. B) That they preformed as well they did against numerically superior and better equipped opponents.

2. No, yet by your reasoning it would tend to lend weight to the argument that Vietnamese society is superior.

You can't have your cake and eat it to.
Last edited by 4years on Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -10.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -10
"Those who do not move, do not notice their chains. "
-Rosa Luxemburg
"In place of bourgeois society with all of it's classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association, one in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all" -Karl Marx
There is no such thing as rational self interest; pure reason leads to the greatest good for the greatest number.

User avatar
4years
Senator
 
Posts: 4971
Founded: Aug 17, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby 4years » Thu Dec 19, 2013 5:59 pm

The new russian empires wrote:I believe communism is better than capitalism since i feel that being able to elect any person into office is stupid and flawed


Then you should be implacably opposed to communism which is inherently very democratic and very supportive of capitalism which and a very poor record at correlating with democracy.
Political Compass: Economic Left/Right: -10.00 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -10
"Those who do not move, do not notice their chains. "
-Rosa Luxemburg
"In place of bourgeois society with all of it's classes and class antagonisms, we shall have an association, one in which the free development of each is the condition for the free development of all" -Karl Marx
There is no such thing as rational self interest; pure reason leads to the greatest good for the greatest number.


User avatar
Marsisian
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26314
Founded: Aug 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Marsisian » Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:01 pm

The new russian empires wrote:I believe communism is better than capitalism since i feel that being able to elect any person into office is stupid and flawed

That's called Democracy. You don't know? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy
Last edited by Erich von Manstein on June 9, 1973, edited 24 times in total

MGSV: The Phantom Pain hype! Game of the decade!

User avatar
Marxina
Secretary
 
Posts: 36
Founded: Nov 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Marxina » Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:15 pm

Personally, I admire Communism. I think that Communism is a wonderful ideology, and I really like the idea of it. I really love the stateless society that it attempted to create, but I really feel that it tried to accomplish it in the wrong way.
Named Hero of The Internationale, Third Class by Comrade Misley

User avatar
Marketalia
Envoy
 
Posts: 344
Founded: Nov 14, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Marketalia » Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:18 pm

I'm a welfare capitalist, so my feelings on communism are, essentially, that it was of naive conception, that it stifles innovation, it sacrifices important parts of individual autonomy and freedom by necessity, and that it is unworkable in practice - especially since people who've had experience with communists are often willing to risk getting shot in order to get away.

It also seems to be extraordinarily vulnerable to corruption into a dictatorship or oligarchy.

To put it another way, not one socialist or communist society has managed to create as good a life for its citizens as a well-run welfare capitalist republic. Or, considering the United States, even a somewhat-less-than-well-run one.

User avatar
Clone Creatures
Attaché
 
Posts: 83
Founded: Dec 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Clone Creatures » Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:20 pm

The new russian empires wrote:I believe communism is better than capitalism since i feel that being able to elect any person into office is stupid and flawed


Capitalism isn't a political ideology. Its a business philosophy, and it specifically supports dictatorial rule, which you
may have noticed is how it works in the supposed world of big business. They are all a bunch of little Hitlers who think they are special. :D

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:24 pm

Marketalia wrote:I'm a welfare capitalist, so my feelings on communism are, essentially, that it was of naive conception, that it stifles innovation, it sacrifices important parts of individual autonomy and freedom by necessity, and that it is unworkable in practice - especially since people who've had experience with communists are often willing to risk getting shot in order to get away.

It also seems to be extraordinarily vulnerable to corruption into a dictatorship or oligarchy.

To put it another way, not one socialist or communist society has managed to create as good a life for its citizens as a well-run welfare capitalist republic. Or, considering the United States, even a somewhat-less-than-well-run one.

Sir, you've been trusting propaganda.
States like the USSR were not communist (except in the sense of being governed by parties with names such as the Communist Party). The governments of these states never made this claim, though they maintained Revolutionary rhetoric for propaganda purposes (else they' become unstable, as Gorbachev showed when he permitted dissent).

States born of violence are vulnerable to dictatorship and/or oligarchy.
Last edited by Conscentia on Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:26 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Clone Creatures
Attaché
 
Posts: 83
Founded: Dec 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Clone Creatures » Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:26 pm

Marsisian wrote:
The new russian empires wrote:I believe communism is better than capitalism since i feel that being able to elect any person into office is stupid and flawed

That's called Democracy. You don't know? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Democracy




To believe that a person would also believe the TV Boobs daily stream of lies as well. :shock:

User avatar
Frihetskommunen
Attaché
 
Posts: 79
Founded: Jul 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Frihetskommunen » Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:27 pm

4years wrote:
Frihetskommunen wrote:Libertarian communism is alright in my book. Authoritarian communism is not so alright.
A lot of bad things have been done in the name of communism, things that I do not condone. However, I am very sympathetic towards the basic idea.


Authoritarian communism is oxymoronic.

I was referring to Stalinism and similiar ideologies. Maybe "Authoritarian" isn't really the best word to use, but the distinction between libertarian/authoritarian is the one I usually make when people bash communism.
Economic Left/Right: -10.0
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -9.18
Cosmopolitan - 49%
Secular - 86%
Visionary - 84%
Anarchistic - 73%
Communistic - 73%
Pacifist - 57%
Ecological - 40%
Progressivism: 100
Socialism: 100
Tenderness: 50
Male. 24 years. Swedish. 1 on the Kinsey Scale. Atheist. Musician. Vegetarian. Pro-freedom. Chaotic Good. Can be pretty awkward sometimes, sorry 'bout that.
http://totemskin.bandcamp.com/
PRO: Civil rights, direct democracy, equality, feminism, freedom of speech, libertarian socialism, secularism, sexuality
ANTI: Authoritarianism, capitalism, EU, fascism, monarchy, nationalism, organized religion, racism, totalitarianism

User avatar
Conscentia
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 26681
Founded: Feb 04, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Conscentia » Thu Dec 19, 2013 6:29 pm

Frihetskommunen wrote:
4years wrote:
Authoritarian communism is oxymoronic.

I was referring to Stalinism and similiar ideologies. Maybe "Authoritarian" isn't really the best word to use, but the distinction between libertarian/authoritarian is the one I usually make when people bash communism.

Red fascism isn't communism.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name, EuroStralia, Hypron, Necroghastia, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Page, Point Blob, Ryemarch, Shrillland, Tinhampton, Washington Resistance Army

Advertisement

Remove ads