Your thoughts on communism?

[Nationes Pii Redivivi]

Source?

Your life, sir. You (if not, somebody they know,) work harder to try and achieve a better job. This occurs in all classes but the Upper-Class. If you make it all the same, then one wouldn't know what one had to work too.

Capitalism and the pull yourself by the bootstrap myth looks great on paper, but always fail in practice.

[Carto-Geography]

In true communism, the total wealth of a nation is divided up between all the workers. Since a very productive worker would get paid just as much as one who meets the minimum requirements, there would be little incentive to work, fewer goods would be produced, and the system would crumble. Communism isn't all .

[Socialist Tera]

Source?

Your life, sir. You (if not, somebody they know,) work harder to try and achieve a better job. This occurs in all classes but the Upper-Class. If you make it all the same, then one wouldn't know what one had to work too.

http://filipspagnoli.wordpress.com/stat ... education/
If life was so easy that all you do is work harder and you'll be upper class, then nearly everyone would be upper class. My father, a boilermaker, hard worker, would take as much overtime and public day shifts as possible to make sure his family could succeed and he is lower class. Class and work ethics are not linked in the slightest.

[The Scientific States]

Now, why would that be the case?

That's untrue, people don't work hard just because they want to become wealthier. Is it a factor of hardwork? Yes, it is, but most people work to support themselves, and to benefit society, not just so they can become wealthier.

[Great Israel]

A Utopia dream doomed to fail.

[Socialist Tera]

In true communism, the total wealth of a nation is divided up between all the workers. Since a very productive worker would get paid just as much as one who meets the minimum requirements, there would be little incentive to work, fewer goods would be produced, and the system would crumble. Communism isn't all .

The problem is that the CEO of a company does not work harder than the very productive worker, does he?

[United British Union]

This is what the Communists would do:

1. Strip the Upper-Class of our Estates, Money and such.

2. They give a tiny fraction to the people and keep the rest.

3. As the working class works on the land, the fruit of it is taken and given to 'The State,' or, as it really is, sirs, the Party.

[Duvniask]

Your life, sir. You (if not, somebody they know,) work harder to try and achieve a better job. This occurs in all classes but the Upper-Class. If you make it all the same, then one wouldn't know what one had to work too.

I don't want a better job - I want a stable job as a scientist. I strive to learn, not to be a parasite who feeds on the fruits of the labour of others.

Guess I won't need to respond to that now.

In true communism, the total wealth of a nation is divided up between all the workers. Since a very productive worker would get paid just as much as one who meets the minimum requirements, there would be little incentive to work, fewer goods would be produced, and the system would crumble. Communism isn't all .

And you think this because? Wages wouldn't exist in a communist society.

[The Scientific States]

In true communism, the total wealth of a nation is divided up between all the workers. Since a very productive worker would get paid just as much as one who meets the minimum requirements, there would be little incentive to work, fewer goods would be produced, and the system would crumble. Communism isn't all .

In a communist society, there are no wages.

[Luveria]

Your life, sir. You (if not, somebody they know,) work harder to try and achieve a better job. This occurs in all classes but the Upper-Class. If you make it all the same, then one wouldn't know what one had to work too.

Capitalism and the pull yourself by the bootstrap myth looks great on paper, but always fail in practice.

Like how Canada is on the brink of collapse from capitalism?

[British Monarchist2]

This is what the Communists would do:

1. Strip the Upper-Class of our Estates, Money and such.

2. They give a tiny fraction to the people and keep the rest.

3. As the working class works on the land, the fruit of it is taken and given to 'The State,' or, as it really is, sirs, the Party.

Yeah

[The Scientific States]

This is what the Communists would do:

1. Strip the Upper-Class of our Estates, Money and such.

2. They give a tiny fraction to the people and keep the rest.

3. As the working class works on the land, the fruit of it is taken and given to 'The State,' or, as it really is, sirs, the Party.

1. Somewhat true.
2. What?
3. No, most communists want to give all that money and land to the people, not the state. Unless we're talking about crazy Stalinists and the like.

[Shinpitekina]

Source?

Your life, sir. You (if not, somebody they know,) work harder to try and achieve a better job. This occurs in all classes but the Upper-Class. If you make it all the same, then one wouldn't know what one had to work too.

The incentive to be better than someone else works without classes implemented and not all people even work that way either by conscious choice or due to their altruist brain.

[The Scientific States]

Capitalism and the pull yourself by the bootstrap myth looks great on paper, but always fail in practice.

Like how Canada is on the brink of collapse from capitalism?

I heard Scandinavia is on the brink of collapse from capitalism as well!

[Nationes Pii Redivivi]

This is what the Communists would do:

1. Strip the Upper-Class of our Estates, Money and such.

This is bad because...the Jacobins did it?

2. They give a tiny fraction to the people and keep the rest.

Proof?

3. As the working class works on the land, the fruit of it is taken and given to 'The State,' or, as it really is, sirs, the Party.

Proof?

[Free market Viet Nam]

Three clues
1. In my country, we fought against a communist occupying force that had ruled since 1975
2. A New Years tradition that began in 1998 involves taking the metal of a Hammer and sickle and melting them into a mold with a design, which is then hung from the wall as a decoration.
3. the President, Phan Sinh Thieu, once said "The union boss will eat my lobster and my fish, then turn to my neighbor and pay him for it,"

[United British Union]

Communism basically wants to destroy the chain of events-the traditions and history of nations and use the psychical land of this history for their own gain. One believes that this has occurred in all Communist nations.

[Conscentia]

This is what the Communists would do:
1. Strip the Upper-Class of our Estates, Money and such.
2. They give a tiny fraction to the people and keep the rest.
3. As the working class works on the land, the fruit of it is taken and given to 'The State,' or, as it really is, sirs, the Party.

1. That's a criticism of communists not communism, thus irrelevant to the thread.
2. Source?

[Luveria]

Like how Canada is on the brink of collapse from capitalism?

I heard Scandinavia is on the brink of collapse from capitalism as well!

Any day now... yup....

[Duvniask]

Communism basically wants to destroy the chain of events-the traditions and history of nations and use the psychical land of this history for their own gain. One believes that this has occurred in all Communist nations.

One should not care about tradition, when it stands in the way of progress.

[The Scientific States]

Communism basically wants to destroy the chain of events-the traditions and history of nations and use the psychical land of this history for their own gain. One believes that this has occurred in all Communist nations.

Bullshit.

Not to mention, there has never been a communist nation before. Your arguments against communism are so silly, you're basing them off of falsehoods.

It feels weird arguing against those who are opposed to communism, given that I'm also opposed to communism, for reasons other than "communism fails"

[Luveria]

Communism basically wants to destroy the chain of events-the traditions and history of nations and use the psychical land of this history for their own gain. One believes that this has occurred in all Communist nations.

I wish you were a communist so you wouldn't be supporting it from your fallacious arguments against it.

[Duvniask]

Communism basically wants to destroy the chain of events-the traditions and history of nations and use the psychical land of this history for their own gain. One believes that this has occurred in all Communist nations.

Bullshit.

Not to mention, there has never been a communist nation before. Your arguments against communism are so silly, you're basing them off of falsehoods.

It feels weird arguing against those who are opposed to communism, given that I'm also opposed to communism, for reasons other than "communism fails"

I would like for you to explain then.

[United British Union]

Communism basically wants to destroy the chain of events-the traditions and history of nations and use the psychical land of this history for their own gain. One believes that this has occurred in all Communist nations.

One should not care about tradition, when it stands in the way of progress.

Without tradition, many people (myself included,) would have no need for existence. Communism wants to eliminate everything and put it in the State.

[Socialist Tera]

This is what the Communists would do:

1. Strip the Upper-Class of our Estates, Money and such.

2. They give a tiny fraction to the people and keep the rest.

3. As the working class works on the land, the fruit of it is taken and given to 'The State,' or, as it really is, sirs, the Party.

1. Many revolutions did that e.g. French Revolution
2. Why would I want to do that? I'm for the working class not myself. If I wanted the money for myself I would be a capitalist.
3. No, it would be redistributed to the workers and the lower class, not to the state.