Your thoughts on communism?

[United British Union]

A party cannot function without the Aristocracy, sir.

Every single political party holding office in every parliamentary democracy say otherwise, my lady.

Yes, but the Communists removed the Aristocracy- and a nation without an Aristocracy is as useful as a glass hammer, sir. That one must see!

[Flammaland]

I think that Communism is a great idea that works on paper, but doesn't work so well in practice. There are of course exeptions, but generally speaking Communism is a tad impractical.

[Unitaristic Regions]

Every single political party holding office in every parliamentary democracy say otherwise, my lady.

Yes, but the Communists removed the Aristocracy- and a nation without an Aristocracy is as useful as a glass hammer, sir. That one must see!

Like I said, the intellectuals became the new elite. And aristocracy is useless.

[United British Union]

I think that Communism is a great idea that works on paper, but doesn't work so well in practice. There are of course exeptions, but generally speaking Communism is a tad impractical.

It is not great in any way, I belive!

[Dracolich]

I think all government types r stupid because they can easily become corrupted through money

Exactly!
People are by nature greedy selfish jerks.
Communism is usually corrupted by the ruling party into an authoritarian hellhole, because people are greedy selfish jerks.
Capitalism usually results in the rich doing whatever they want at the expense of the poor, because people are greedy selfish jerks.
Until this problem with the people running the system is solved, all political and economic systems are going to suck.

[Duvniask]

Every single political party holding office in every parliamentary democracy say otherwise, my lady.

Yes, but the Communists removed the Aristocracy- and a nation without an Aristocracy is as useful as a glass hammer, sir. That one must see!

No, why do you think this inherent? Decision making does not require rulers in a social-hierarchical fashion, and is entirely possible with social consensus. Decentralized decision making is not impossible at all.

[United British Union]

Yes, but the Communists removed the Aristocracy- and a nation without an Aristocracy is as useful as a glass hammer, sir. That one must see!

Like I said, the intellectuals became the new elite. And aristocracy is useless.

We very well are not, sir! One must see that! We provide employment, often keep estates with farmland and such! We are not useless in any shape or form!

[Shinpitekina]

Every single political party holding office in every parliamentary democracy say otherwise, my lady.

Yes, but the Communists removed the Aristocracy- and a nation without an Aristocracy is as useful as a glass hammer, sir. That one must see!

Every republic with parliamentary democracy implemented still says otherwise, my lady.

[Unitaristic Regions]

Yes, but the Communists removed the Aristocracy- and a nation without an Aristocracy is as useful as a glass hammer, sir. That one must see!

No, why do you think this inherent? Decision making does not require rulers in a social-hierarchical fashion, and is entirely possible with social consensus. Decentralized decision making is not impossible at all.

You're never going to sell that to her

[Arglorand]

Like I said, the intellectuals became the new elite. And aristocracy is useless.

We very well are not, sir! One must see that! We provide employment, often keep estates with farmland and such! We are not useless in any shape or form!

And why cannot anyone else do so?

[Duvniask]

Like I said, the intellectuals became the new elite. And aristocracy is useless.

We very well are not, sir! One must see that! We provide employment,

Provide employment in the form of exploitation, that is.

often keep estates with farmland and such!

Which you are not exceptional in doing.

We are not useless in any shape or form!

Yes, you are.

[Unitaristic Regions]

Like I said, the intellectuals became the new elite. And aristocracy is useless.

We very well are not, sir! One must see that! We provide employment, often keep estates with farmland and such! We are not useless in any shape or form!

You have a use in capitalist economics. I'm not a capitalist. I rather dislike the upper class, as your providing of employment isn't necessarily something only aristocrats can do.

[Divair]

Too idealistic for me. I prefer social democracy.

[United British Union]

No, why do you think this inherent? Decision making does not require rulers in a social-hierarchical fashion, and is entirely possible with social consensus. Decentralized decision making is not impossible at all.

You're never going to sell that to her

I am British. I have lived in this way for my entire life, as so you are correct- I shall never accept it.
I shall, though, be interested in your opinions.

[Unitaristic Regions]

Too idealistic for me. I prefer social democracy.

Bwegh. Ideals. Why have 'em? *nods.*

[Arglorand]

We very well are not, sir! One must see that! We provide employment, often keep estates with farmland and such! We are not useless in any shape or form!

You have a use in capitalist economics. I'm not a capitalist. I rather dislike the upper class, as your providing of employment isn't necessarily something only aristocrats can do.

Aristocracy is arguably useless even in a capitalist economy and impeding to the growth of a nation's economy.

[Duvniask]

You're never going to sell that to her

I am British. I have lived in this way for my entire life, as so you are correct- I shall never accept it.
I shall, though, be interested in your opinions.

Why be interested if you are never going to change your mind anyway?

[San Whoopee]

Like all-you-can-eat pancakes at a particularly generous Denny's. Sounds great in theory, starts off great too, but around the fourth plate in, you realize you might have made a mistake.

[Arglorand]

Too idealistic for me. I prefer social democracy.

I'm an idealistic social democrat.

wat now

[United British Union]

We very well are not, sir! One must see that! We provide employment,

Provide employment in the form of exploitation, that is.
No, we pay well for service in our houses and on the farmland, sir. One must understand.

often keep estates with farmland and such!

Which you are not exceptional in doing.
As a matter of fact, sir, many of our estates provide food for thousands of people!

We are not useless in any shape or form!

Yes, you are.

How, sir?

[Unitaristic Regions]

You're never going to sell that to her

I am British. I have lived in this way for my entire life, as so you are correct- I shall never accept it.
I shall, though, be interested in your opinions.

And my opinion is that aristocracy is redundant, because the things you mentioned don't have to be managed by aristocracy.

[Unitaristic Regions]

You have a use in capitalist economics. I'm not a capitalist. I rather dislike the upper class, as your providing of employment isn't necessarily something only aristocrats can do.

Aristocracy is arguably useless even in a capitalist economy and impeding to the growth of a nation's economy.

Ah, you mean inherited aristocracy? Yeah, I kinda see them as parasites.

[United British Union]

I am British. I have lived in this way for my entire life, as so you are correct- I shall never accept it.
I shall, though, be interested in your opinions.

And my opinion is that aristocracy is redundant, because the things you mentioned don't have to be managed by aristocracy.

Communism is terrible, as it steals our land and houses. Put that in your pipe and smoke it, sir.

[Divair]

Too idealistic for me. I prefer social democracy.

I'm an idealistic social democrat.

wat now

Reality blows up.

[Unitaristic Regions]

Like all-you-can-eat pancakes at a particularly generous Denny's. Sounds great in theory, starts off great too, but around the fourth plate in, you realize you might have made a mistake.

I don't get how it makes sense, but it was awefully witty.