We have much more experience with various shit to deal with now.
Advertisement

by Arglorand » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:15 am

by Good Mind » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:15 am

by Unitaristic Regions » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:16 am
. Or maybe it was, but only compared to our current brand of neo-imperialism.
by Kronstad » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:17 am
Shinpitekina wrote:No, I won't. Firstly because it is my right to hold such opinion no matter what it is

by Unitaristic Regions » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:17 am

by Duvniask » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:17 am
Arglorand wrote:Unitaristic Regions wrote:
Feudalism is just honest capitalism anyways.
It's also ineffective due to the pretty limited capabilities of the ruling class to replace themselves if they ever, well, die out. In capitalism, the ruling class is constantly renewed by a few lucky members of the lower and middle classes who make it upwards.


by Unitaristic Regions » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:17 am


by Good Mind » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:18 am

by Unitaristic Regions » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:18 am
Duvniask wrote:Arglorand wrote:It's also ineffective due to the pretty limited capabilities of the ruling class to replace themselves if they ever, well, die out. In capitalism, the ruling class is constantly renewed by a few lucky members of the lower and middle classes who make it upwards.
I suppose watching a few episodes of GoT, that this is the conclusion one should arrive at.


by Arglorand » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:18 am

by Unitaristic Regions » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:19 am
Arglorand wrote:Unitaristic Regions wrote:
Feudalism is just honest capitalism anyways.
It's also ineffective due to the pretty limited capabilities of the ruling class to replace themselves if they ever, well, die out. In capitalism, the ruling class is constantly renewed by a few lucky members of the lower and middle classes who make it upwards.


by Arglorand » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:20 am
Duvniask wrote:Arglorand wrote:It's also ineffective due to the pretty limited capabilities of the ruling class to replace themselves if they ever, well, die out. In capitalism, the ruling class is constantly renewed by a few lucky members of the lower and middle classes who make it upwards.
I suppose watching a few episodes of GoT, that this is the conclusion one should arrive at.

by Shinpitekina » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:20 am
Kronstad wrote:Shinpitekina wrote:No, I won't. Firstly because it is my right to hold such opinion no matter what it is
The Dark Ages have passed, we are in 2013. Also, no, if you go to the USA, Britain, France, Germany, Israel, Italy, Russia etc. and yell a Nazi opinion, you might find that you are not entitled to whatever opinion it is.
Of course, it's useless to argue against ignorance, so yes, I am wasting my time trying to convert ignorance and stupidity into humanity.

by Unitaristic Regions » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:20 am
Arglorand wrote:Unitaristic Regions wrote:
Imperialism is anything but honest tho. Or maybe it was, but only compared to our current brand of neo-imperialism.
Neo-imperialism is really just the natural side effect of a worldwide capitalist mode of production coupled with a huge gap in, let's say, technological and educational advancement between the first and third worlds.
Parecon's ideas about a class of those holding all the knowledge gain new meaning when you consider the whole first world to be said class in modernday society.

by Arglorand » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:21 am
Unitaristic Regions wrote:Arglorand wrote:Neo-imperialism is really just the natural side effect of a worldwide capitalist mode of production coupled with a huge gap in, let's say, technological and educational advancement between the first and third worlds.
Parecon's ideas about a class of those holding all the knowledge gain new meaning when you consider the whole first world to be said class in modernday society.
And yet the first world bows to its own elite... *sigh*.
But really, the reason that the 3d world is so unequal is because we cracked open their markets and forced them to privatize.

by Unitaristic Regions » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:22 am

by Unitaristic Regions » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:22 am
Arglorand wrote:Unitaristic Regions wrote:
And yet the first world bows to its own elite... *sigh*.
But really, the reason that the 3d world is so unequal is because we cracked open their markets and forced them to privatize.
The reason why the third world is so unequal is, first of all, because we came down on them like a rapist in the era of actual imperialism.

by United British Union » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:23 am

by Shinpitekina » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:23 am
Unitaristic Regions wrote:Arglorand wrote:Neo-imperialism is really just the natural side effect of a worldwide capitalist mode of production coupled with a huge gap in, let's say, technological and educational advancement between the first and third worlds.
Parecon's ideas about a class of those holding all the knowledge gain new meaning when you consider the whole first world to be said class in modernday society.
And yet the first world bows to its own elite... *sigh*.
But really, the reason that the 3d world is so unequal is because we cracked open their markets and forced them to privatize.


by Duvniask » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:24 am
United British Union wrote:A party cannot function without the Aristocracy, sir.

by Shinpitekina » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:24 am
United British Union wrote:A party cannot function without the Aristocracy, sir.

by Unitaristic Regions » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:25 am


by Arglorand » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:25 am
United British Union wrote:A party cannot function without the Aristocracy, sir.

by Arglorand » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:26 am

by Unitaristic Regions » Mon Dec 23, 2013 5:27 am
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Cannot think of a name, EuroStralia, Hypron, Necroghastia, Northern Socialist Council Republics, Page, Point Blob, Ryemarch, Shrillland, Tinhampton, Washington Resistance Army
Advertisement