Advertisement

by Gulf of Nungfienrt » Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:44 am

by Nervium » Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:45 am
Gulf of Nungfienrt wrote:You could say Santa is all ethnicity but he appears as white because it is also the color of snow. Not the skin itself but the name of the skin.

by United British Union » Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:46 am
Ovisterra wrote:I think I spent too much time off Nationstates. I find myself looking around in horrified incredulity and wondering who the hell could actually care about something so ridiculous.
I thought Fox News' piece on it was pretty funny, though, but Jon Stewart's reaction to it was even funnier.

by Gulf of Nungfienrt » Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:46 am

by Immoren » Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:46 am
Gulf of Nungfienrt wrote:You could say Santa is all ethnicity but he appears as white because it is also the color of snow. Not the skin itself but the name of the skin.
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Immoren » Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:47 am
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

by Gulf of Nungfienrt » Mon Dec 16, 2013 10:49 am
Immoren wrote:Gulf of Nungfienrt wrote:You could say Santa is all ethnicity but he appears as white because it is also the color of snow. Not the skin itself but the name of the skin.
Santa is an anthropomorphic personification of winter solstice and new year. Thus his appearance is shaped by people's beliefs about him.

by Constitutional Commonwealth » Mon Dec 16, 2013 11:55 am
United British Union wrote:Dear God! Why does it matter?

by Constitutional Commonwealth » Mon Dec 16, 2013 11:57 am

by Nationes Pii Redivivi » Mon Dec 16, 2013 11:58 am

by God Kefka » Mon Dec 16, 2013 12:44 pm

by Tekania » Mon Dec 16, 2013 12:51 pm
Imperial Nilfgaard wrote:Ok, irrespective of the fact that St. Nicholas was white (which lets face it; he was), I think it's somewhat hypocritical of the author of the slate article to demand we make Santa black so as to represent everyone.
If she really feels so alienated by a white santa then why shouldn't Megyn Kelly feel equally alienated by a black one? The entire article is blatant race bait which Fox, unsurprisingly, gulped up like a hungry hippo.

by Nationes Pii Redivivi » Mon Dec 16, 2013 12:58 pm
God Kefka wrote:Santa Claus is definitely white.
His modern, canonical incarnation was not born until ALL of the sources of inspiration including the British Father Christmas were incorporated into it (along with St. Nicholas, Sinterklass and so on).
The material factor is... by that point in history, when the canon was just formed... what did the majority of the people imagine? They universally imagined and depicted Santa as a white man.
Therefore... he has been white for hundreds of years and it has formed the basis for the modern canonical tradition. A lot of you are focusing on the wrong things such as was Odin white or was St Nicholas white. This doesn't matter. What matters is... WHEN the modern canonical Santa was first formed and since then starting from some point perhaps in the eighteenth or nineteenth century (having incorporated all elements including traits from the British Father Christmas)... WHAT did the majority of believers, tale-tellers, and artists depict and imagine Santa as? Clearly... white. It doesn't matter if this is based on some misunderstanding that St Nicholas was white or not what matters is what is believed and what forms the popular imagination. And in that eurocentric age and in that age of colonization and warfare... you will not convince me that people in western europe, where this myth was born and finalized, were imagining Santas that were anything but white. Certainly, all the artwork depicted caucasian features. Hence this is what I mean by saying Santa was always white. To prove this, I don't need to show that St Nick was white or that Odin was white. I just need to show that since the day the modern Santa Claus was born the overwhelming consensus... the OVERWHELMING European concensus and thus the foundation for the modern canon, has always incontrovertibly been the image of a WHITE Santa Claus.
People in the 18th and 19th century when the canon was finally born (having sufficiently absorbed elements of Father Christmas, Sinterklass, St NIck and other influential figures to form a RECOGNIZABLE face of the modern Santa Claus canon) were not scientifically trying to determine what race any of these people were to decide on a race. No, they just arbitrarily decided that it was going to be white. Since this is art and this is fiction, that is what is material. What did the founders of the canon imagine? When the modern legend was born... WHAT was in the minds of consensus of believers? And in that day and age of imperialism and eurocentrism in Western Europe, they were imagining white Santas.
Throughout modern history this has continued to form a rich and respectable artistic tradition. Even when America benevolently inherited the legacy and carried it on, their alterations never touched on the issue of race. Santa has always been a western European legend and America respected that. He has been always been overwhelmingly depicted as white and thus the whiteness is a fundemental part of his depiction... to deny this is to deny reality I have to say.
Yes there are off-shoots and different depictions in other parts of the world but these are non-canon... these are responses to the European canon and not part of the canon. The canon I insist, was born in Western Europe and it's what these original creators imagined that matters. And in the 19th and 18th century when the British Father Christmas was finally considered, looking at all the historical, social and cultural factors of the day in Western Europe and all the artwork from the era and ethos of the day... it is self-evident that white Santas were at the time universally imagined.
This tradition is sacred and can no longer be altered because it forms such a great artistic legacy and has (thankfully) left such a deep on the minds of everyone.
Even to this day this is the popular image. The European roots are respected and Santa's whiteness remained. A simple google search will suffice to tell you what the popular image of Santa is in the heads of remaining believers. If you were to go out into the Western world and write this survey (''Describe Santa Claus as you imagine him using as many descriptors as you can'') you will undoubtedly get almost 99% mention of ''whiteness'' or ''Caucasian'' where race is mentioned.
To assume that Santa is color-blind or somehow a multicultural legacy is to deny a very European legacy and to alter an artistic legacy to the cultural detriment of mankind.
Hence Santa Claus has been and shall always remain white.

by Constitutional Commonwealth » Mon Dec 16, 2013 1:01 pm
God Kefka wrote:Santa Claus is definitely white.
His modern, canonical incarnation was not born until ALL of the sources of inspiration including the British Father Christmas were incorporated into it (along with St. Nicholas, Sinterklass and so on).
The material factor is... by that point in history, when the canon was just formed... what did the majority of the people imagine? They universally imagined and depicted Santa as a white man.
Therefore... he has been white for hundreds of years and it has formed the basis for the modern canonical tradition. A lot of you are focusing on the wrong things such as was Odin white or was St Nicholas white. This doesn't matter. What matters is... WHEN the modern canonical Santa was first formed and since then starting from some point perhaps in the eighteenth or nineteenth century (having incorporated all elements including traits from the British Father Christmas)... WHAT did the majority of believers, tale-tellers, and artists depict and imagine Santa as? Clearly... white. It doesn't matter if this is based on some misunderstanding that St Nicholas was white or not what matters is what is believed and what forms the popular imagination. And in that eurocentric age and in that age of colonization and warfare... you will not convince me that people in western europe, where this myth was born and finalized, were imagining Santas that were anything but white. Certainly, all the artwork depicted caucasian features. Hence this is what I mean by saying Santa was always white. To prove this, I don't need to show that St Nick was white or that Odin was white. I just need to show that since the day the modern Santa Claus was born the overwhelming consensus... the OVERWHELMING European concensus and thus the foundation for the modern canon, has always incontrovertibly been the image of a WHITE Santa Claus.
People in the 18th and 19th century when the canon was finally born (having sufficiently absorbed elements of Father Christmas, Sinterklass, St NIck and other influential figures to form a RECOGNIZABLE face of the modern Santa Claus canon) were not scientifically trying to determine what race any of these people were to decide on a race. No, they just arbitrarily decided that it was going to be white. Since this is art and this is fiction, that is what is material. What did the founders of the canon imagine? When the modern legend was born... WHAT was in the minds of consensus of believers? And in that day and age of imperialism and eurocentrism in Western Europe, they were imagining white Santas.
Throughout modern history this has continued to form a rich and respectable artistic tradition. Even when America benevolently inherited the legacy and carried it on, their alterations never touched on the issue of race. Santa has always been a western European legend and America respected that. He has been always been overwhelmingly depicted as white and thus the whiteness is a fundemental part of his depiction... to deny this is to deny reality I have to say.
Yes there are off-shoots and different depictions in other parts of the world but these are non-canon... these are responses to the European canon and not part of the canon. The canon I insist, was born in Western Europe and it's what these original creators imagined that matters. And in the 19th and 18th century when the British Father Christmas was finally considered, looking at all the historical, social and cultural factors of the day in Western Europe and all the artwork from the era and ethos of the day... it is self-evident that white Santas were at the time universally imagined.
This tradition is sacred and can no longer be altered because it forms such a great artistic legacy and has (thankfully) left such a deep mark on the minds of everyone.
Even to this day this is the popular image. The European roots are respected and Santa's whiteness remained. A simple google search will suffice to tell you what the popular image of Santa is in the heads of remaining believers. If you were to go out into the Western world and write this survey (''Describe Santa Claus as you imagine him using as many descriptors as you can'') you will undoubtedly get almost 99% mention of ''whiteness'' or ''Caucasian'' where race is mentioned.
To assume that Santa is color-blind or somehow a multicultural legacy is to deny a very European legacy and to alter an artistic legacy to the cultural detriment of mankind.
Hence Santa Claus has been and shall always remain white.

by ALMF » Mon Dec 16, 2013 1:29 pm
Imperial Nilfgaard wrote:ALMF wrote:If you call this wite (center)I call it turkoman/namibian.
One is objecting to wite only and the other is objecting to a (singular) black santa: see the difference.
What is wite? If you mean WHITE then yes even that photo looks white (tho tanned). Not that it means anything, everyone knows most forensic reconstructions are BS anyway. I remember when the CIA tried to 'reconstruct' Bin Laden to account for age and it wound up seriously pissing off some Spanish politician who looked identical. Then when they actually got him, he didn't look anything like that in any case.
And there is no difference. They are both objecting to Santa being a certain color because they are threatened by people who look different. Not exactly a helpful conversation in terms of healthy racial relations.


by ALMF » Mon Dec 16, 2013 1:32 pm

by God Kefka » Mon Dec 16, 2013 1:57 pm
Constitutional Commonwealth wrote:God Kefka wrote:Santa Claus is definitely white.
His modern, canonical incarnation was not born until ALL of the sources of inspiration including the British Father Christmas were incorporated into it (along with St. Nicholas, Sinterklass and so on).
The material factor is... by that point in history, when the canon was just formed... what did the majority of the people imagine? They universally imagined and depicted Santa as a white man.
Therefore... he has been white for hundreds of years and it has formed the basis for the modern canonical tradition. A lot of you are focusing on the wrong things such as was Odin white or was St Nicholas white. This doesn't matter. What matters is... WHEN the modern canonical Santa was first formed and since then starting from some point perhaps in the eighteenth or nineteenth century (having incorporated all elements including traits from the British Father Christmas)... WHAT did the majority of believers, tale-tellers, and artists depict and imagine Santa as? Clearly... white. It doesn't matter if this is based on some misunderstanding that St Nicholas was white or not what matters is what is believed and what forms the popular imagination. And in that eurocentric age and in that age of colonization and warfare... you will not convince me that people in western europe, where this myth was born and finalized, were imagining Santas that were anything but white. Certainly, all the artwork depicted caucasian features. Hence this is what I mean by saying Santa was always white. To prove this, I don't need to show that St Nick was white or that Odin was white. I just need to show that since the day the modern Santa Claus was born the overwhelming consensus... the OVERWHELMING European concensus and thus the foundation for the modern canon, has always incontrovertibly been the image of a WHITE Santa Claus.
People in the 18th and 19th century when the canon was finally born (having sufficiently absorbed elements of Father Christmas, Sinterklass, St NIck and other influential figures to form a RECOGNIZABLE face of the modern Santa Claus canon) were not scientifically trying to determine what race any of these people were to decide on a race. No, they just arbitrarily decided that it was going to be white. Since this is art and this is fiction, that is what is material. What did the founders of the canon imagine? When the modern legend was born... WHAT was in the minds of consensus of believers? And in that day and age of imperialism and eurocentrism in Western Europe, they were imagining white Santas.
Throughout modern history this has continued to form a rich and respectable artistic tradition. Even when America benevolently inherited the legacy and carried it on, their alterations never touched on the issue of race. Santa has always been a western European legend and America respected that. He has been always been overwhelmingly depicted as white and thus the whiteness is a fundemental part of his depiction... to deny this is to deny reality I have to say.
Yes there are off-shoots and different depictions in other parts of the world but these are non-canon... these are responses to the European canon and not part of the canon. The canon I insist, was born in Western Europe and it's what these original creators imagined that matters. And in the 19th and 18th century when the British Father Christmas was finally considered, looking at all the historical, social and cultural factors of the day in Western Europe and all the artwork from the era and ethos of the day... it is self-evident that white Santas were at the time universally imagined.
This tradition is sacred and can no longer be altered because it forms such a great artistic legacy and has (thankfully) left such a deep mark on the minds of everyone.
Even to this day this is the popular image. The European roots are respected and Santa's whiteness remained. A simple google search will suffice to tell you what the popular image of Santa is in the heads of remaining believers. If you were to go out into the Western world and write this survey (''Describe Santa Claus as you imagine him using as many descriptors as you can'') you will undoubtedly get almost 99% mention of ''whiteness'' or ''Caucasian'' where race is mentioned.
To assume that Santa is color-blind or somehow a multicultural legacy is to deny a very European legacy and to alter an artistic legacy to the cultural detriment of mankind.
Hence Santa Claus has been and shall always remain white.
You have yet to source us this 'Santa' canon even existing and not being just a figment of your imagination.


by God Kefka » Mon Dec 16, 2013 2:10 pm

by Constitutional Commonwealth » Mon Dec 16, 2013 2:10 pm

by Constitutional Commonwealth » Mon Dec 16, 2013 2:11 pm
God Kefka wrote:
for every ''several thousand'' pictures you can post I can post ''several thousand multiplied by 99'' times the number of pictures of him as white... and out of every ''several thousand'' pictures you post most of them will be satire and all of them non-canon.

by Aeken » Mon Dec 16, 2013 2:12 pm
God Kefka wrote:
for every ''several thousand'' pictures you can post I can post ''several thousand multiplied by 99'' times the number of pictures of him as white... and out of every ''several thousand'' pictures you post most of them will be satire and all of them non-canon.

by God Kefka » Mon Dec 16, 2013 2:14 pm
Constitutional Commonwealth wrote:God Kefka wrote:
for every ''several thousand'' pictures you can post I can post ''several thousand multiplied by 99'' times the number of pictures of him as white... and out of every ''several thousand'' pictures you post most of them will be satire and all of them non-canon.
That alone proves there's no canon and that you're a disturbed white supremacist who feels the need to alter evidence to back his claims.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Achan, Angvar, Baidu [Spider], Dtn, Floofybit, Germanic Templars, Google [Bot], Ifreann, Kandorith, Likhinia, Senscaria, Violetist Britannia, West Deapol Laulandingedk
Advertisement