Russia To Debate Taking Children Away From Gay Parents

[Neo Rome Republic]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/09/russia-gay-parents-debate-_n_4072968.html
Russia is taking another step in the right direction of the morality that the rest of Europe is so lacking in. Thanks to their lawmakers, children there could be able to escape from a life of being the spawn of sinners. Your thoughts on this NSG.
I'm starting to really like Russia

The spawn of sinners...? Are you aware that gay people are born to straight people? You're saying straight couples who have straight sex and end up giving birth to gay kids are sinners themselves.

And that is why one should never take Theocrats seriously.

[Free Wexford]

You are against sin you say well guess what I am against intolerant fucktards who decide every one who is different is bad. Replace Gays with any race African Latina White ect and you will see how fucked up this is.

[Regnum Dominae]

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/09/russia-gay-parents-debate-_n_4072968.html
Russia is taking another step in the right direction of the morality that the rest of Europe is so lacking in. Thanks to their lawmakers, children there could be able to escape from a life of being the spawn of sinners. Your thoughts on this NSG.
I'm starting to really like Russia

Fucking disgraceful. Shame on Russia, and shame on you for supporting this.

[Zolinde]

No. It isn't sin in plenty of people's eyes, including my own. Next reason?

It's immoral, unnatural, sinful, and perverted. There, I gave you 4 reasons.

Explain why.

[Utceforp]

Therefore we should remove all children from their parents. Your logic is completely sound.

That's a good idea. PISS OFF ALL THE PEOPLE

It's not prejudice if you hate everyone equally!

[Roski]

YES I FUCKING UNDERSTAND HOMOSEXUALITY I"M HOMOSEXUAL MYSELF

So, you're in favor of outlawing part of who you are?

What?
"Re-law homosexuality"
is the opposite of
"Unlaw homosexuality"

Are you older than 12 years old and don't live in south USA?

[Beta Test]

No. It isn't sin in plenty of people's eyes, including my own. Next reason?

It's immoral, unnatural, sinful, and perverted. There, I gave you 4 reasons.

Opinion, opinion, opinion and opinion. These aren't facts.

[Blasveck]

No. It isn't sin in plenty of people's eyes, including my own. Next reason?

It's immoral, unnatural, sinful, and perverted. There, I gave you 4 reasons.

Yes, because that clearly justifies taking children away from their long parents.

[Sinica]

its for the kid's wellbeing, to be socialized from a young age as nature intended, so they can develop healthily and normally.

[Sandwich Territories]

I tell ya, sometimes, I feel ashamed to live on this planet.

[New Laikland]

I see no issues with this. I see a problem with gays raising children, while not seeing a problem with gays themselves. Being exposed to homosexuality could alter the child's own views, which wouldn't be all that great. Since heterosexuality is the majority sexuality, and the "proper" one (Meaning, that's how to reproduce), that can be a bad thing. If a person is gay, then they'll be gay, since they're born with it and all. Otherwise, this would just force it on them.

[Luveria]

No. It isn't sin in plenty of people's eyes, including my own. Next reason?

It's immoral, unnatural, sinful, and perverted. There, I gave you 4 reasons.

You really don't seem to get it that your religion is only one of many thousands.

[Utceforp]

No. It isn't sin in plenty of people's eyes, including my own. Next reason?

It's immoral, unnatural, sinful, and perverted. There, I gave you 4 reasons.

According to your interpretation of your religion. Those aren't reasons, they're opinions.

[ShadowDragons]

No. It isn't sin in plenty of people's eyes, including my own. Next reason?

It's immoral, unnatural, sinful, and perverted. There, I gave you 4 reasons.

Why do you care about others sin? It's not yours and it doesn't affect you

[Sinica]

I see no issues with this. I see a problem with gays raising children, while not seeing a problem with gays themselves. Being exposed to homosexuality could alter the child's own views, which wouldn't be all that great. Since heterosexuality is the majority sexuality, and the "proper" one (Meaning, that's how to reproduce), that can be a bad thing. If a person is gay, then they'll be gay, since they're born with it and all. Otherwise, this would just force it on them.

i concur good sir

[Gyrenaica]

Outlaw Russia.

How? Like nuke every square inch of their country? OK
, I like it.

[Regnum Dominae]

No. It isn't sin in plenty of people's eyes, including my own. Next reason?

It's immoral,

Incorrect.

unnatural,
Incorrect.

sinful,

Incorrect.

and perverted.

No, it's not.

There, I gave you 4 reasons.

And you're wrong on all counts.

[Beta Test]

I see no issues with this. I see a problem with gays raising children, while not seeing a problem with gays themselves. Being exposed to homosexuality could alter the child's own views, which wouldn't be all that great. Since heterosexuality is the majority sexuality, and the "proper" one (Meaning, that's how to reproduce), that can be a bad thing. If a person is gay, then they'll be gay, since they're born with it and all. Otherwise, this would just force it on them.

With your wonderfully sound logic, everyone should be straight because 40 years ago everyone was raised by straight parents.

[Othelos]

No. It isn't sin in plenty of people's eyes, including my own. Next reason?

It's immoral,

There isn't only one morality.

unnatural,

[citation needed]

sinful,

Irrelevent. The government is secular.

perverted

"Ew" is not a reason to outlaw something.

[Luxew]

No. It isn't sin in plenty of people's eyes, including my own. Next reason?

It's immoral, unnatural, sinful, and perverted. There, I gave you 4 reasons.

It is immoral or unnatural, nor perverted. People have rights to like whomever they want, even if that person is their same gender.
Listen to Francis, he's right.

[Freemopia]

I hope your being sarcastic.
Make it a poll.
Obviously it is bad. If the child likes their home they should be able to stay there. A home the child likes is much better than being taken away by the government and put in some government abuse/prison camp guised with a fancy name, or being forced to live with a family who is mean to the child.
More than 50million children are without and in need of a safe home in the world. Many are homeless, in need of a good home, and up for adoption in Russia. The government should start with giving homes to the homeless instead of taking children away from good care givers who the child likes.

What matters is that the home the child is in is not abusive, properly cares for the child, and the child likes it, other than that it does not matter.

Gayness is not a sin. Just because something is a sin does not mean it should be illegal. Wanting to take children away from gay car givers just because they are gay is a sin.

[Roski]

No. It isn't sin in plenty of people's eyes, including my own. Next reason?

It's immoral, unnatural, sinful, and perverted. There, I gave you 4 reasons.

Morals? I don't think you have those.
Unnatural? People are born this way.
Sinful? Wat. Religion. You mean that book made by Constantine?
Perverted? Yes, because when I adopt a child, the only thing I will do his have sex with him.

[Etha]

Really hope your trolling ... Taking children away from stable families because you disagree with the lifestyle of one of the parents... really not cool.

What do you mean stable, these "families" are lacking of either a mother or father. Children need both parents to properly devolop

So children of a Widowed parent are "Immoral"?
Shame, Russia. Shame.

[Neo Rome Republic]

I see no issues with this. I see a problem with gays raising children, while not seeing a problem with gays themselves. Being exposed to homosexuality could alter the child's own views, which wouldn't be all that great. Since heterosexuality is the majority sexuality, and the "proper" one (Meaning, that's how to reproduce), that can be a bad thing. If a person is gay, then they'll be gay, since they're born with it and all. Otherwise, this would just force it on them.

You know, every time I've red what an Anti-LGBT person says, its like you guys just FORGET, about the existence of sperm banks.

[New Laikland]

With your wonderfully sound logic, everyone should be straight because 40 years ago everyone was raised by straight parents.

Since people are born genetically with their sexuality, I don't understand your logic here.