NATION

PASSWORD

India recriminalises homosexuality

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Absurdity
Envoy
 
Posts: 205
Founded: Jan 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Absurdity » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:10 pm

Jormengand wrote:
Absurdity wrote:Uh-huh, and homosexuals are more likely to contract it due to their... lifestyle.

The source that supposedly showed that also showed that black people are more likely than white people to get it.

Ban blacks from having sex, clearly.

What source are you referring to? If I'm not mistaken, blacks are far less likely to use condoms. So, that actually makes sense.

HIV is far more communicable through anal intercourse. How do homosexuals have sex? Oh, right.
Political Compass
"Our great error is that we suppose mankind to be more honest than they are."
- Alexander Hamilton

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36757
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:10 pm

Absurdity wrote:
Fascist Russian Empire wrote:HIV and AIDS affect all people regardless of sexual orientation

Uh-huh, and homosexuals are more likely to contract it due to their... lifestyle.

It's in everyone's best interests if sodomy is criminalized, but whatever.

You really do keep true to your nations name.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:10 pm

*looks around*

Now where's that damn checklist on homophobic arguments?
Forever a Communist

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:10 pm

Valcouria wrote:
Jormengand wrote:And how do you explain the large number of homosexuals who truly wish that they could have been heterosexual?

They apparently aren't trying hard enough.
If they can just "choose" to be homosexual then why do they need to have to try hard? Why did they "choose" it if they never wanted to be it in the first place?
Threlizdun wrote:You contradict yourself. You said humanity is predisposed to be heterosexual yet say sexual orientation is a choice. It is either one or the other. Scientists (which apparently you use as a slur) perfectly understand that all sexual orientations are predisposed.

I did no such thing; humanity is predisposed to heterosexuality, but then some choose to ignore this basic tenant and live contrary to these natrual, God-given laws. And the word 'scientist' in this context was those who try to convince gays that their chosen condition is 'normal.'[/quote]No, you can't just magically stop being attracted to the opposite sex when you didn't used to be and suddenly start liking members of the same sex. Human beings don't work that way. Nothing does. You either are predisposed with your sexual orientation or you aren't. There is nothing unnatural about homosexuality, and these scientists know because they, unlike you, actually research this stuff and compile evidence. Here, how about I show you how "unnatural" homosexuality is.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexual ... in_animals
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_an ... l_behavior
http://www.news-medical.net/news/2006/10/23/20718.aspx
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:10 pm

Northfront wrote:
Threlizdun wrote:[citation needed]
[citation needed]
which heterosexuals also have
Except the mental health community has firmly rejected that it's a mental disorder since the sixties. You still seem to be implying you know more about mental health than they do

Well you clearly do


Just check the STD and HIV stats. Guess who has more trouble with them?

People that dealt with the mental health classifications have been under constant attack of the gay groups. It was terror. Not based on science, to suddenly stop calling homosexualism a mental disorder. Read the history.

Under constant attack...reread the sources and get back to us. Also, HIV is spread in numerous ways, read this: http://aids.gov/hiv-aids-basics/hiv-aid ... -hiv-aids/
And for orientation read this: http://www.webmd.com/sex-relationships/ ... rientation

User avatar
Regnum Dominae
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12345
Founded: Feb 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Regnum Dominae » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:11 pm

Blasveck wrote:*looks around*

Now where's that damn checklist on homophobic arguments?

I have the link saved, gimme a minute.
I support peace in Israel and Palestine. The governments and people in power on all sides are an absolute disgrace, and their unwillingness to pursue peace is a disservice to the people they are meant to be serving. The status quo is not simply untenable; it is unquestionably unacceptable.

User avatar
Zolinde
Attaché
 
Posts: 89
Founded: Dec 08, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Zolinde » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:11 pm

Northfront wrote:
Threlizdun wrote:[citation needed]
[citation needed]
which heterosexuals also have
Except the mental health community has firmly rejected that it's a mental disorder since the sixties. You still seem to be implying you know more about mental health than they do

Well you clearly do


Just check the STD and HIV stats. Guess who has more trouble with them?

People that dealt with the mental health classifications have been under constant attack of the gay groups. It was terror. Not based on science, to suddenly stop calling homosexualism a mental disorder. Read the history.

:rofl:

Well, if you wanna prove your "argument", then you should show us an article.
Economic Left/Right: -6.75
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.10

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:11 pm

Northfront wrote:
Threlizdun wrote:[citation needed]
[citation needed]
which heterosexuals also have
Except the mental health community has firmly rejected that it's a mental disorder since the sixties. You still seem to be implying you know more about mental health than they do

Well you clearly do


Just check the STD and HIV stats. Guess who has more trouble with them?

People that dealt with the mental health classifications have been under constant attack of the gay groups. It was terror. Not based on science, to suddenly stop calling homosexualism a mental disorder. Read the history.


Care to actually leave a source to those stats. We're not going to do your homework for you.

Also, why aren't you responding to my arguments?
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:11 pm

Pandeeria wrote:Care to actually leave a source to those stats. We're not going to do your homework for you.

In fairness, someone else already did.
Northfront wrote:Just check the STD and HIV stats. Guess who has more trouble with them?

Male homosexuals do, but so do black people over white people. And lesbians barely have any transferal of STDs at all.
Last edited by Jormengand on Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

User avatar
Capital Zealand
Diplomat
 
Posts: 570
Founded: Dec 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Capital Zealand » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:11 pm

Absurdity wrote:
Fascist Russian Empire wrote:HIV and AIDS affect all people regardless of sexual orientation

Uh-huh, and homosexuals are more likely to contract it due to their... lifestyle.

It's in everyone's best interests if sodomy is criminalized, but whatever.

Your name suits your arguments the best for what they're worth. Without sources, that's what they are. Absurd.
Why did omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent and omnibenevolent God create impotent, anti-scientific, never-present-day, malevolent man?
When a discriminator invasion occurs in a thread, leave the thread. If you don't want to, then ignore their comments. Never give them attention.
Impeach government, legalize freedom, welfare is theft. RICHARD MCGRATH 2014
NZ ☆☆ Is for capitalizm, libertarianizm, McGrathism and zealousness.
ZN ☆☆ Is against Aussieism and commieism.

User avatar
Kelinfort
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16394
Founded: Nov 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kelinfort » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:11 pm

Absurdity wrote:
Jormengand wrote:The source that supposedly showed that also showed that black people are more likely than white people to get it.

Ban blacks from having sex, clearly.

What source are you referring to? If I'm not mistaken, blacks are far less likely to use condoms. So, that actually makes sense.

HIV is far more communicable through anal intercourse. How do homosexuals have sex? Oh, right.

Straight people can have anal sex...oh, also HIV is spread by blood to blood contact, so hemophiliacs should be banned!

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:12 pm

Northfront wrote:
Threlizdun wrote:[citation needed]
[citation needed]
which heterosexuals also have
Except the mental health community has firmly rejected that it's a mental disorder since the sixties. You still seem to be implying you know more about mental health than they do

Well you clearly do


Just check the STD and HIV stats. Guess who has more trouble with them?]/quote]

The sexually promiscuous who do not use protection, regardless of orientation.

People that dealt with the mental health classifications have been under constant attack of the gay groups. It was terror. Not based on science, to suddenly stop calling homosexualism a mental disorder. Read the history.


Wrong on all points. It was removed because it doesn't fit the definition of "disorder". A disorder has to be harmful.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:12 pm

Absurdity wrote:
Jormengand wrote:The source that supposedly showed that also showed that black people are more likely than white people to get it.

Ban blacks from having sex, clearly.

What source are you referring to? If I'm not mistaken, blacks are far less likely to use condoms. So, that actually makes sense.

HIV is far more communicable through anal intercourse. How do homosexuals have sex? Oh, right.


Who gives an actual fuck if something you do increases the chance of getting a disease. Nouns be ban sports? After all, you're far more likely to brake a bone or get a concussion.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Regnum Dominae
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12345
Founded: Feb 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Regnum Dominae » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:12 pm

Blasveck wrote:*looks around*

Now where's that damn checklist on homophobic arguments?

Here it is: (checkmark symbol to copy/paste: ☑)

B
I
N
G
O
It's just not natural. There's no gay gene. Gays are desperate, hopeless, sad, lonely, miserable people. Oh, and they're all really slutty, too. I LOVE gay people, but I just don't like what they do.
Anal sex causes AIDS/STDs/cancer/death. Gays can change, therefore they should. Gay parenting harms children. The gays already have equal rights, they want special rights! The Bible is crystal clear on the subject of homosexuality.
It's a sin and/or immoral. Sexuality is about inserting a peg (man) into a hole (woman). The gays just don't get that. Being gay is a lifestyle.
(FREE SPACE) ☑
Gays need to get right with God. Gays are sexual predators who want our children.
They'll ask us to tolerate bestiality, pedophilia, incest, and/or polygamy, next! They're out to destroy marriage/the family. I'm not a homophobe, I just think gay relationships are inferior to straight ones. The pro-gay media have clouded the people's judgement! A "family" means a man, a woman, and their biological children. Nothing else will do.
The purpose of marriage is to provide a stable home for children... ...but that only works if the parents are a mixed gender couple. Stop shoving it down my throat! We got along fine when you were all still in your closets! They're the ones who are intolerant of my opinion! They want us to think it's NORMAL!
I support peace in Israel and Palestine. The governments and people in power on all sides are an absolute disgrace, and their unwillingness to pursue peace is a disservice to the people they are meant to be serving. The status quo is not simply untenable; it is unquestionably unacceptable.

User avatar
Capital Zealand
Diplomat
 
Posts: 570
Founded: Dec 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Capital Zealand » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:13 pm

Grand Russian Federation wrote:
Regnum Dominae wrote:Doesn't work for tens of millions of Indians or the people who love them.


Well then, too bad for them. Here's an idea : move some place where homosexuality is legal.

Moving from a jail cell is hard. Try it once and you should think so too.
Why did omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent and omnibenevolent God create impotent, anti-scientific, never-present-day, malevolent man?
When a discriminator invasion occurs in a thread, leave the thread. If you don't want to, then ignore their comments. Never give them attention.
Impeach government, legalize freedom, welfare is theft. RICHARD MCGRATH 2014
NZ ☆☆ Is for capitalizm, libertarianizm, McGrathism and zealousness.
ZN ☆☆ Is against Aussieism and commieism.

User avatar
Aeken
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17135
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Aeken » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:13 pm

Regnum Dominae wrote:
Blasveck wrote:*looks around*

Now where's that damn checklist on homophobic arguments?

I have the link saved, gimme a minute.

Good. We need it.

User avatar
AiliailiA
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27722
Founded: Jul 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby AiliailiA » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:13 pm

Northfront wrote:You need hetero people in order to exist. But hetero people do not need gay people in order to exist.


We can reach some sort of arrangement I'm sure. Like ... paying our taxes, providing education and healthcare to support those who choose to raise children. Maybe some tax breaks for them.

Oh wait. We already do that.
My name is voiced AIL-EE-AIL-EE-AH. My time zone: UTC.

Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
Ethel mermania wrote:
Ifreann wrote:
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
: eugenics :
What are the colons meant to convey here?
In my experience Colons usually convey shit

NSG junkie. Getting good shit for free, why would I give it up?

User avatar
Salandriagado
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22831
Founded: Apr 03, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Salandriagado » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:13 pm

Absurdity wrote:
Jormengand wrote:The source that supposedly showed that also showed that black people are more likely than white people to get it.

Ban blacks from having sex, clearly.

What source are you referring to? If I'm not mistaken, blacks are far less likely to use condoms. So, that actually makes sense.

HIV is far more communicable through anal intercourse. How do homosexuals have sex? Oh, right.


In as wide a variety of methods as heterosexuals. Largely the same methods.
Cosara wrote:
Anachronous Rex wrote:Good thing most a majority of people aren't so small-minded, and frightened of other's sexuality.

Over 40% (including me), are, so I fixed the post for accuracy.

Vilatania wrote:
Salandriagado wrote:
Notice that the link is to the notes from a university course on probability. You clearly have nothing beyond the most absurdly simplistic understanding of the subject.
By choosing 1, you no longer have 0 probability of choosing 1. End of subject.

(read up the quote stack)

Deal. £3000 do?[/quote]

Of course.[/quote]

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:14 pm

Absurdity wrote:
Jormengand wrote:The source that supposedly showed that also showed that black people are more likely than white people to get it.

Ban blacks from having sex, clearly.

What source are you referring to? If I'm not mistaken, blacks are far less likely to use condoms. So, that actually makes sense.

HIV is far more communicable through anal intercourse. How do homosexuals have sex? Oh, right.

Yes, let's advocate for laws that regulate what people do in the bedroom.

I think the government should outlaw everything except vaginal sex, because society needs more children.
American & German, ich kann auch Deutsch. I have a B.S. in finance.
Pro: Human rights, equality, LGBT rights, socialized healthcare, the EU in theory, green energy, public transportation, the internet as a utility
Anti: Authoritarian regimes and systems, the Chinese government, identity politics, die AfD, populism, organized religion, Erdogan, assault weapon ownership
Free Tibet and Hong Kong | Keep Taiwan Independent

User avatar
The Batorys
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5703
Founded: Oct 12, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby The Batorys » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:14 pm

Furious Grandmothers wrote:
God Kefka wrote:
Yeah but then that would affect me so... no thanks... but if say, Iceland wanted to do it. Go for it...

Ah, would you like for the world to descend into a colorful cacophony of chaos as long as it doesn't affect you in your ivory tower?

Seems like he's attempting to literally embody the lyrics of Tool's "Vicariously." Kinda pathetic, really.
Mallorea and Riva should resign
This is an alternate history version of Callisdrun.
Here is the (incomplete) Factbook
Ask me about The Forgotten Lands!
Pro: Feminism, environmentalism, BLM, LGBTQUILTBAG, BDSM, unions, hyphy, Lenin, Ho Chi Minh, Oakland, old San Francisco, the Alliance to Restore the Republic, and fully automated gay luxury space communism
Anti: Misogyny, fossil fuels, racism, homophobia, kink-shaming, capitalism, LA, Silicon Valley, techies, Brezhnev, the Galactic Empire, and the "alt-right"

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:15 pm

Northfront wrote:Just check the STD and HIV stats. Guess who has more trouble with them?
Check STD and HIV stats amongst racial minorities and the poor. Should they be arrested for having sex?

People that dealt with the mental health classifications have been under constant attack of the gay groups. It was terror. Not based on science, to suddenly stop calling homosexualism a mental disorder. Read the history.
Yes, the belief that there is a global conspiracy amongst the mental health community lying to people about sexual orientation is far more likely than you being wrong.
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
Northfront
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 63
Founded: Dec 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Northfront » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:15 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
Valcouria wrote:You have the choice to attempt to refrain from your choice, but you do not. Ergo, in my opinion, you are only subjecting yourself to such torment.
People choose to be something that is hated and despised just for the hell of it and seem to lack any knowledge of ever making that choice? Yeah, that makes a hell of a lot of sense.


People choose to kill other people and sell drugs and all kinds of other crimes that makes other people to hate them. Others choose to start having anal sex and spread STDs.

People make bad decisions. And it does not help that people are spreading gay propaganda so more people would make those bad decisions.
Just a realist. Don't make life too complicated and use your common sense people.

User avatar
Regnum Dominae
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12345
Founded: Feb 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Regnum Dominae » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:15 pm

Aeken wrote:
Regnum Dominae wrote:I have the link saved, gimme a minute.

Good. We need it.

I posted it above: viewtopic.php?f=20&t=274666&p=17840454#p17840454
I support peace in Israel and Palestine. The governments and people in power on all sides are an absolute disgrace, and their unwillingness to pursue peace is a disservice to the people they are meant to be serving. The status quo is not simply untenable; it is unquestionably unacceptable.

User avatar
Capital Zealand
Diplomat
 
Posts: 570
Founded: Dec 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Capital Zealand » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:15 pm

Valcouria wrote:
Jormengand wrote:And how do you explain the large number of homosexuals who truly wish that they could have been heterosexual?

They apparently aren't trying hard enough.

But dad! I can't fly!

Shut up! All you need to do is have faith!

Dad! I still couldn't fly no matter how hard I tried!

Shut up! You're not trying hard enough!
Why did omnipotent, omniscient, omnipresent and omnibenevolent God create impotent, anti-scientific, never-present-day, malevolent man?
When a discriminator invasion occurs in a thread, leave the thread. If you don't want to, then ignore their comments. Never give them attention.
Impeach government, legalize freedom, welfare is theft. RICHARD MCGRATH 2014
NZ ☆☆ Is for capitalizm, libertarianizm, McGrathism and zealousness.
ZN ☆☆ Is against Aussieism and commieism.

User avatar
Erothin
Secretary
 
Posts: 38
Founded: Nov 02, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Erothin » Wed Dec 11, 2013 3:16 pm

Northfront wrote:Yeah right. Prove that and start the Gay Celibate Nation.

It would collapse and all the people would die. Face the truth. You need hetero people in order to exist. But hetero people do not need gay celibate people in order to exist.

I am not putting gay celibate people in jail. But it is sick that you people are trying to twist the facts of life. At some point it is very likely that it will backfire on you as you go against human's sexual nature. Against the untwisted human nature.

Northfront proves celibacy is immoral as hetero-sex is necessary for future human life. Somebody tell the Vatican! Clearly they must allow priests to marry immediately!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Best Mexico, Bombadil, Canarsia, Cannot think of a name, Celritannia, Dimetrodon Empire, EuroStralia, Floofybit, Hispida, Perikuresu, Pizza Friday Forever91, The Great Nevada Overlord, Trinchet, Washington Resistance Army, Washington-Columbia

Advertisement

Remove ads