NATION

PASSWORD

Would you kill children to become smarter?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Seperates
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14622
Founded: Sep 03, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Seperates » Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:42 am

Nope. I'll die eventually and somebody has to take over for me.
This Debate is simply an exercise in Rhetoric. Truth is a fickle being with no intentions of showing itself today.

Non fui, fui, non sum, non curo

"The most important fact about us: that we are greater than the institutions and cultures we build."--Roberto Mangabeira Unger

User avatar
Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10235
Founded: Jul 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Hetalian Indie Rio de Janeiro » Sun Dec 08, 2013 4:59 am

Dracoria wrote:
Luveria wrote:Abortions would only count in countries which legally consider the aborted human to be a child.

Wait a second. Wouldn't this give pro-life regions a huge advantage?

With 5 million illegal back-alley abortion procedures between 1985 and 2005, and many more victims of the purposeful use of weird pills like Cytotec and even [often deadly] toxic plants like the common European rue, world-leaders in illegal abortion, with the most common cause for internment and surgery in the public healthcare service being its afterward complications...

I recommend you all for one bend over to your new Brazilian overlords. :twisted:
Aequalitia's bromancey mancrush.
Test: Seemingly, libertarian communism was renamed "social democracy"
Compass: economic left -9.85, social libertarian -8.97
Socio-Economic Ideology: Democratic Socialist (92% ditto/Marxist, 75% Anarchist/Social democrat, 0% etc)

Born 12/94. Weird in all senses starting at 07/2000. NSG's resident euro-carioca bara-fudanshi useless lazy perv. Agnostic atheist (not anti-religious), bi-affective homosexual/demiheterosexual (and bi-curious i.e. chronologically 95% bisexual-ish but 5% true bi), slightly more masculine of both tad neutral and tad ambiguous gender (human-/oneself-identified genderqueer; he, xe or ou, your preference), naturist, "worker" class, mildly hipster/japanophile, etc.

User avatar
Chestaan
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6977
Founded: Sep 30, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Chestaan » Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:04 am

This thread made me lose my faith in humanity. There is no morally sound reason to answer yes to this question.
Council Communist
TG me if you want to chat, especially about economics, you can never have enough discussions on economics.Especially game theory :)
Economic Left/Right: -9.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.62

Getting the Guillotine

User avatar
Bacony
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 127
Founded: Oct 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Bacony » Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:07 am

Chestaan wrote:This thread made me lose my faith in humanity. There is no morally sound reason to answer yes to this question.

I think Crownariam was just asking this as a joke. A sick, twisted joke.

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54742
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:08 am

Crumlark wrote:
Risottia wrote:
Oooh, you're so edgy that my jeans just became skinnier by merely reading this post. Now, wouldn't you kill for waffles? I bet you fucking love waffles.

Reading this, I'm tempted to make a thread on how old contempt for edginess is getting, along with it being more or less a workaround for discrediting someone's actual arguments.


Is there anything in IM's post but "I'm a prick who doesn't give a fuck about people and cares only for personal gain"? Only reworked in a sort of edgy intellectual masturbation, because it's clear he's also scared of getting caught.

There's no need to discredit that more than he did himself already, if you can actually read and understand a text.
Last edited by Risottia on Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:08 am, edited 1 time in total.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
DrakoLand
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1496
Founded: Nov 12, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby DrakoLand » Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:10 am

Bacony wrote:
Chestaan wrote:This thread made me lose my faith in humanity. There is no morally sound reason to answer yes to this question.

I think Crownariam was just asking this as a joke. A sick, twisted joke.


Which for some reason, people have to think about before answering... Is this what we've become?

User avatar
The New United States
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 193
Founded: Jun 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The New United States » Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:15 am

No... That's disgusting.

User avatar
Bacony
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 127
Founded: Oct 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Bacony » Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:17 am

DrakoLand wrote:
Bacony wrote:I think Crownariam was just asking this as a joke. A sick, twisted joke.


Which for some reason, people have to think about before answering... Is this what we've become?

I think some people on here think it is a serious question. I don't think it is. At least I hope Crownariam wasn't being serious about this.
I agree, this is sad.

User avatar
Crumlark
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1809
Founded: Jul 08, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Crumlark » Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:24 am

Risottia wrote:
Crumlark wrote:Reading this, I'm tempted to make a thread on how old contempt for edginess is getting, along with it being more or less a workaround for discrediting someone's actual arguments.


Is there anything in IM's post but "I'm a prick who doesn't give a fuck about people and cares only for personal gain"? Only reworked in a sort of edgy intellectual masturbation, because it's clear he's also scared of getting caught.

There's no need to discredit that more than he did himself already, if you can actually read and understand a text.

Getting caught masturbating or killing? :P
And no, there isn't any substance to his OP apart from that. But then you should attack the ridiculous power fantasy that inspired this. When some stand out in a crowd of opinions though, it isn't always for the sake of being different. I am FAR from defending this topic, because it is a bit... obvious it was made to get attention. But solely claiming it is '2edgy' lends little to the conversation, and can be incendiary to people who were serious about their opinions. Thusly... edginess contempt has my own contempt.
Anarchist. I'm dating TotallyNotEvilLand, and I love him. I am made whole.

Melly, merely living, surviving, is to suffer. You must fill your life with more to be happy.
Liberate Mallorea and Riva!

User avatar
Magna Libero
Minister
 
Posts: 2864
Founded: Jun 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Magna Libero » Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:27 am

Of course not. Nothing justifies murder.

Besides, a smart person wouldn't kill, only insane people or insane and smart people kill.
hi

User avatar
European Socialist Republic
Senator
 
Posts: 4844
Founded: Apr 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby European Socialist Republic » Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:29 am

Depends. Would the child become Hitler II somewhere in the future?
If so, then yes.
If not, then nope.
Economic Left/Right: -7
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -5.9
I am a far-left moderate social libertarian.
Left: 9.13
Libertarian: 2.62
Non-interventionalist: 7.34
Cultural liberal: 9.12
I am a Trotskyist.
Cosmopolitan: 71%
Secular: 80%
Visionary: 62%
Anarchistic: 43%
Communistic: 78%
Pacifist: 40%
Anthropocentric: 50%

Legalize Tyranny, Impeach the Twenty-second Amendment, Term Limits are Theft, Barack Obama 2016!
HOI4

User avatar
Freemopia
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1207
Founded: Sep 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Freemopia » Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:31 am

Make it a poll.
No.

User avatar
Esternial
Technical Moderator
 
Posts: 54369
Founded: May 09, 2009
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Esternial » Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:32 am

Vamtrl wrote:They take care of a fetus so its not considered a child. A child is a being between birth and puberty.

No differentiation was made in the OP, and fetuses are children to some people, so their belief fuels my intelligence-boosting powers.

User avatar
Soled
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1768
Founded: Aug 26, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soled » Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:40 am

-_- no
Member of Tiandi and Ajax
Norwegian | they/them and she/her pronouns

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:48 am

If I don't manage to have biological children, I'd like to adopt one. Maybe I'll do both if I'm rich enough. I want to be a good father despite whatever flaws I might have. I want the experience of paternal bonding and family interactions.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Kadolha
Diplomat
 
Posts: 911
Founded: Oct 04, 2013
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kadolha » Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:53 am

Hell No! No! Fucking fuck NO!
dead signature

User avatar
Risottia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54742
Founded: Sep 05, 2006
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Risottia » Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:56 am

Crumlark wrote:
Risottia wrote:
Is there anything in IM's post but "I'm a prick who doesn't give a fuck about people and cares only for personal gain"? Only reworked in a sort of edgy intellectual masturbation, because it's clear he's also scared of getting caught.

There's no need to discredit that more than he did himself already, if you can actually read and understand a text.

Getting caught masturbating or killing? :P


Ceiling cat is watching you anyway.
Image

And no, there isn't any substance to his OP apart from that. But then you should attack the ridiculous power fantasy that inspired this. When some stand out in a crowd of opinions though, it isn't always for the sake of being different. I am FAR from defending this topic, because it is a bit... obvious it was made to get attention.

Some arguments deserve a proper dismantling. Some deserve only shaming.

But solely claiming it is '2edgy' lends little to the conversation, and can be incendiary to people who were serious about their opinions. Thusly... edginess contempt has my own contempt.

Considering how I try and be a gentleman, I can't picture how to show you properly how much I fail at being affected by this contempt. Maybe someone else can.
Statanist through and through.
Evilutionist Atheist Crusadjihadist. "Darwinu Akhbar! Dawkins vult!"
Founder of the NSG Peace Prize Committee.
I'm back.
SUMMER, BLOODY SUMMER!

User avatar
Pannonitaca
Political Columnist
 
Posts: 2
Founded: Nov 09, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Pannonitaca » Sun Dec 08, 2013 5:57 am

No. I would not kill children for any reason. He who considers this must go to a psychiatrist.

User avatar
Frihetskommunen
Attaché
 
Posts: 79
Founded: Jul 15, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Frihetskommunen » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:05 am

Why even dwell on this thought? It's not like you would ever actually gain intelligence from killing a child, so why even contemplate it? I understand that questioning yourself and putting yourself in hypothetical situations can be a good thing, but this is just impossible on every level. There is 0% chance of this happening. If you seriously need to question yourself about killing children (which if you do, seek help or talk to someone), then atleast ask yourself a question that has even a small chance (or risk?) of happening. Like, would you kill a child for a million dollars? That scenario is still very much unlikely to happen, but it's at the very least not impossible.
Economic Left/Right: -10.0
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -9.18
Cosmopolitan - 49%
Secular - 86%
Visionary - 84%
Anarchistic - 73%
Communistic - 73%
Pacifist - 57%
Ecological - 40%
Progressivism: 100
Socialism: 100
Tenderness: 50
Male. 24 years. Swedish. 1 on the Kinsey Scale. Atheist. Musician. Vegetarian. Pro-freedom. Chaotic Good. Can be pretty awkward sometimes, sorry 'bout that.
http://totemskin.bandcamp.com/
PRO: Civil rights, direct democracy, equality, feminism, freedom of speech, libertarian socialism, secularism, sexuality
ANTI: Authoritarianism, capitalism, EU, fascism, monarchy, nationalism, organized religion, racism, totalitarianism

User avatar
The Black Dragon Empire
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 148
Founded: Oct 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Black Dragon Empire » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:34 am

Esternial wrote:I'd become an abortion doctor.

User avatar
Xsyne
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6537
Founded: Apr 30, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Xsyne » Sun Dec 08, 2013 6:42 am

Well, if their current IQ is added to mine then killing a single kid of average intelligence will somehow increase the population by a number greater than the number of cells in every human alive today because IQ is a goddamned normal distribution I'm going to go with "no".
If global warming is real, why are there still monkeys? - Msigroeg
Pro: Stuff
Anti: Things
Chernoslavia wrote:
Free Soviets wrote:according to both the law library of congress and wikipedia, both automatics and semi-autos that can be easily converted are outright banned in norway.


Source?

User avatar
Lemanrussland
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5078
Founded: Dec 10, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lemanrussland » Sun Dec 08, 2013 7:12 am

No.

User avatar
The Emerald Legion
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10695
Founded: Mar 18, 2011
Father Knows Best State

Postby The Emerald Legion » Sun Dec 08, 2013 7:13 am

Chestaan wrote:This thread made me lose my faith in humanity. There is no morally sound reason to answer yes to this question.


How is there not? What rubric are you using? Or are you merely using the childish style of blanket prohibitions that no sane person should endorse?
"23.The unwise man is awake all night, and ponders everything over; when morning comes he is weary in mind, and all is a burden as ever." - Havamal

User avatar
New Carloso
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5377
Founded: Feb 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby New Carloso » Sun Dec 08, 2013 7:17 am

Didn't some Chinese man kill children and eat their brains to cure his epilepsy?
THE OFFICIAL FACTBOOK OF CARLOSO | FatChineseGuy: Official Mascot | Proud Member and Minister for Defence of the INTERNATIONAL FREEDOM COALITION! | FEEL FREE TO JOIN ATLAS | CARLOSSIAN BROADCASTING CORPORATION

User avatar
Torrumbarry
Diplomat
 
Posts: 924
Founded: Sep 08, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Torrumbarry » Sun Dec 08, 2013 7:25 am

WTF... NO!

How stoned will the author of this thread have been when he dreamt up this notion?
BUSY IRL - UNABLE TO POST



President: Rt. Hon. Lance Hemingway
Chancellor of the Exchequer: Rt. Hon. Abigail Thorpe
Constitutional King: His Eminence Edmund VII of House Adelaide
Population: RENOVATING-HARD HAT ZONE

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: American Legionaries, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Buhers Mk II, Cannot think of a name, EuroStralia, Floofybit, Galloism, Hispida, Immonas Gae, La Xinga, Manidontcare, Ratateague, Ryemarch

Advertisement

Remove ads