NATION

PASSWORD

Americans, Never Forget: December 7, 1941

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

What do you think of the Attack on Pearl Harbor on December 7, 1941 by the Japanese?

Unprovoked attack by a cowardly and imperialistic enemy that got what it deserved when the war ended.
57
22%
Imperialistic yet strategically intelligent.
104
41%
History's, history.
34
13%
America got what it deserved.
24
9%
My favorite holiday!
6
2%
No comment.
9
4%
Something about David Hasselhoff...
20
8%
 
Total votes : 254

User avatar
CTALNH
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9596
Founded: Jul 18, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby CTALNH » Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:47 am

Estado Paulista wrote:
CTALNH wrote:America.

I live for the day you collapse.


You're going to have to live a long time then kid.

Face facts: The US has the most defensible territory in the world, with greatest capacity for agricultural output, and the lowest natural transportaiton costs. This simply allows the US to consolidate internally and project outward becoming a natural balance-of-power in every other region ... it is classic divide and conquer. They did it between UK, France and Germany is Europe and then played Russia against its periphery. China is the game today and they encircle is From Alaska to S. Korea, to Japan, to Philippines to Vietnam, etc ...

I understand the natural inclination toward America bashing. I truly do. Especially when so many countries are stuck in seeming endless cycles of boom and bust or corruptions and internal political and economic turmous (Like Greece) being envious or hating on the superpower is easy.

America isn't going to collapse anytime soon.

I know.

I just want it okay,
"This guy is a State socialist, which doesn't so much mean mass murder and totalitarianism as it means trying to have a strong state to lead the way out of poverty and towards a bright future. Strict state control of the economy is necessary to make the great leap forward into that brighter future, and all elements of society must be sure to contribute or else."
Economic Left/Right: -9.25
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 3.64
Lawful Neutral/Lawful Evil half and half.
Authoritarian Extreme Leftist because fuck pre-existing Ideologies.
"Epicus Doomicus Metallicus"
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.
T.I.F: Trans Inclusionary Feminist

User avatar
Starkiller101
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5392
Founded: Dec 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Starkiller101 » Sat Dec 07, 2013 11:48 am

Americans didn't think the japensase would do that but guess what they're wrong.But other than that its a sad day for amercians that actually care.
Roll tide. Your local ''Floridman'' who should have left long ago xD

User avatar
Charellia
Minister
 
Posts: 3172
Founded: Jul 24, 2012
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Charellia » Sat Dec 07, 2013 12:09 pm

The Victorian Empire wrote:
So striking a country you're not at war with a sneak attack while most of them are sleeping isn't cowardly to you?

Not as cowardly as a drone strike.

User avatar
Spreewerke
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10910
Founded: Oct 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Spreewerke » Sat Dec 07, 2013 12:33 pm

The Victorian Empire wrote:Actually, this seems to be a recurring event in American History. Every time we finish kicking somebody's ass, everybody is all like "Pfft, America, what are they gonna do?", and some fool decides to get involved in a war with us. I can't understand for the life of me why people underestimate America's resolve.


At least off the top of my head, a fair amount of conflicts we've been in after World War II was the result of us deciding to enter it.

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36779
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Sat Dec 07, 2013 12:37 pm

Nervium wrote:
Condunum wrote:Perhaps the lack of a follow-up attack of our west coast. Japan didn't go nearly far enough to reach their goal of knocking us out of the war.


Not that they could, oil shortages and all.

Didn't they take Malaysia and Dutch Indonesia gaining a rather large supply of oil?
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Benuty
Post Czar
 
Posts: 36779
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Corrupt Dictatorship

Postby Benuty » Sat Dec 07, 2013 12:38 pm

Charellia wrote:
The Victorian Empire wrote:
So striking a country you're not at war with a sneak attack while most of them are sleeping isn't cowardly to you?

Not as cowardly as a drone strike.

Drones didn't exist in 1941.
Last edited by Hashem 13.8 billion years ago
King of Madness in the Right Wing Discussion Thread. Winner of 2016 Posters Award for Insanity.
Please be aware my posts in NSG, and P2TM are separate.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sat Dec 07, 2013 12:41 pm

In the spirit of this day I again demand Japan apologize and take back yoko ono.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sat Dec 07, 2013 12:42 pm

Benuty wrote:
Nervium wrote:
Not that they could, oil shortages and all.

Didn't they take Malaysia and Dutch Indonesia gaining a rather large supply of oil?

Yes they had, there was no need for picking a fight with the US.
Rather Japan felt the US was going to get pulled into this war regardless.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Alouite
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12476
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Alouite » Sat Dec 07, 2013 12:44 pm

Benuty wrote:
Charellia wrote:Not as cowardly as a drone strike.

Drones didn't exist in 1941.

They do now, and the US uses them all the time, I call that OPing real life, and it isn't cool, someone should tell the mods to warn the United States for these actions.
National Liberalism, National School Economics, National Dividend, Constitutional Originalism, Protection of US Domestic Trade, The Chinese Gov't in Exile in Taipei, and Ending the War on Nouns
Hyman Minsky
Totalitarianism, the Destruction of the Environment, Racism, and, most of all, people who end statements in questions?
The Patriot Act, The Illegitimate Communist Authorities in China, Economic Libertarianism, Absolutism and Communism

User avatar
Russadonia
Chargé d'Affaires
 
Posts: 377
Founded: Apr 06, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Russadonia » Sat Dec 07, 2013 12:49 pm

Charellia wrote:
The Victorian Empire wrote:
So striking a country you're not at war with a sneak attack while most of them are sleeping isn't cowardly to you?

Not as cowardly as a drone strike.


Touché.

User avatar
Prussia-Steinbach
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22386
Founded: Mar 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Prussia-Steinbach » Sat Dec 07, 2013 12:54 pm

Where's the option for "FDR pressured them into it so he could become involved in WWII?"
I don't care if people hate my guts; I assume most of them do.
The question is whether they are in a position to do anything about it. ― William S. Burroughs


User avatar
Rio Cana
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10780
Founded: Dec 21, 2005
Iron Fist Consumerists

Postby Rio Cana » Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:00 pm

Karthalia wrote:Japan's tactics was Impressive,

First attacking, Pearl Harbor, then Attack a Major US ''Colony''; Philippines, I find it amusing how the Japanese handled The Americans and the Filipinos, wherein, though it took them Months to finally Control The Philippines, they Actually Destroyed Fort Bataan and Fort Correggidor, Killing Tens of thousands of Americans/Filipinos, its Really creepy to live on a place where WWII Happened...


The island of Corregidor was not taken by the Japanese. It was too well fortified. US forces had to surrendered Corregidor because they had run out of food and ammunition. The Japanese had ammunition and bombarded that island to the max. Those fighting on Battan had the same problems. Running out of food and ammunition.

Found this. It is the last US radio message from the island of Corregidor before US forces surrendered. Year 1942.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viCAX8WupTY

This is on the retaking of Corregidor by the US in 1945.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AuOQyrgM0CU

Edit - Found this short video of the actual Japanese attack on Corregidor.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIlHMUa5biM
Last edited by Rio Cana on Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:04 pm, edited 1 time in total.
National Information
Empire of Rio Cana has been refounded.
We went from Empire to Peoples Republic to two divided Republics one called Marina to back to an Empire. And now a Republic under a military General. Our Popular Music
Our National Love SongOur Military Forces
Formerly appointed twice Minister of Defense and once Minister of Foreign Affairs for South America Region.

User avatar
95X
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1415
Founded: Sep 30, 2004
Capitalist Paradise

Re: December 7, 1941

Postby 95X » Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:10 pm

The Victorian Empire wrote:Fellow Americans, let us never forget that dreadful 7th day of December, when... "...the United States of America, was suddenly and deliberately attacked, by naval and air forces, of the Empire of Japan..." ...and how that date... "...will live in infamy..." ...in the minds of Americans for years to come.
Seriously, thanks for the reminder. I've got what seems like a million things going on right now, really makes one wonder if/what their life would be like if the country they lived in didn't exist.

Still, I think the internment camps were the wrong way for the US to respond. Germany was considered a far greater threat than Japan, but the US decided to single out one ethnic group which would lead to years and years of further unprovoked stereotypes.
Senyek wrote:They got back at us Americans by inventing HFCS.
And anime (including Pokémon). And J-pop. And transistor radios. And vehicles that were safer than American vehicles at the time.
Nation not my RL views, etc.
Poe's Law. Nonpartisan.
Is it sad that some I learned AO4LIFE from are no longer in Atlantian Oceania?

User avatar
Alouite
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12476
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Alouite » Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:12 pm

95X wrote:
The Victorian Empire wrote:Fellow Americans, let us never forget that dreadful 7th day of December, when... "...the United States of America, was suddenly and deliberately attacked, by naval and air forces, of the Empire of Japan..." ...and how that date... "...will live in infamy..." ...in the minds of Americans for years to come.
Seriously, thanks for the reminder. I've got what seems like a million things going on right now, really makes one wonder if/what their life would be like if the country they lived in didn't exist.

Still, I think the internment camps were the wrong way for the US to respond. Germany was considered a far greater threat than Japan, but the US decided to single out one ethnic group which would lead to years and years of further unprovoked stereotypes.
Senyek wrote:They got back at us Americans by inventing HFCS.
And anime (including Pokémon). And J-pop. And transistor radios. And vehicles that were safer than American vehicles at the time.


I dunno, J-pop could be a minus.
National Liberalism, National School Economics, National Dividend, Constitutional Originalism, Protection of US Domestic Trade, The Chinese Gov't in Exile in Taipei, and Ending the War on Nouns
Hyman Minsky
Totalitarianism, the Destruction of the Environment, Racism, and, most of all, people who end statements in questions?
The Patriot Act, The Illegitimate Communist Authorities in China, Economic Libertarianism, Absolutism and Communism

User avatar
Hathradic States
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29895
Founded: Mar 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hathradic States » Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:16 pm

Pearl Harbor...the only proof which argues against the "Bad Asian Driver" thingy.

Liberals: Honestly I was wrong bout em.
I swear I'm not as terrible as you remember.
Sadly Proven Right in 2016
Final text here.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:20 pm

Prussia-Steinbach wrote:Where's the option for "FDR pressured them into it so he could become involved in WWII?"

There was already defacto war in the Atlantic with convoys engaging subs.
http://militaryhistorynow.com/2013/01/0 ... nt-in-ww2/
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Alouite
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12476
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Alouite » Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:21 pm

Hathradic States wrote:Pearl Harbor...the only proof which argues against the "Bad Asian Driver" thingy.

Yet their driving still resulted in crashes. Perhaps rather than bad drivers, the Asians are good crashers.
National Liberalism, National School Economics, National Dividend, Constitutional Originalism, Protection of US Domestic Trade, The Chinese Gov't in Exile in Taipei, and Ending the War on Nouns
Hyman Minsky
Totalitarianism, the Destruction of the Environment, Racism, and, most of all, people who end statements in questions?
The Patriot Act, The Illegitimate Communist Authorities in China, Economic Libertarianism, Absolutism and Communism

User avatar
Hathradic States
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 29895
Founded: Mar 26, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Hathradic States » Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:25 pm

Alouite wrote:
Hathradic States wrote:Pearl Harbor...the only proof which argues against the "Bad Asian Driver" thingy.

Yet their driving still resulted in crashes. Perhaps rather than bad drivers, the Asians are good crashers.

I like that theory.

Liberals: Honestly I was wrong bout em.
I swear I'm not as terrible as you remember.
Sadly Proven Right in 2016
Final text here.

User avatar
Spreewerke
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10910
Founded: Oct 16, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Spreewerke » Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:27 pm

Alouite wrote:
Hathradic States wrote:Pearl Harbor...the only proof which argues against the "Bad Asian Driver" thingy.

Yet their driving still resulted in crashes. Perhaps rather than bad drivers, the Asians are good crashers.


IJA-tested, Kamikaze-approved.
Last edited by Spreewerke on Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Occupied Deutschland
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 18796
Founded: Oct 01, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Occupied Deutschland » Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:37 pm

Spreewerke wrote:
Alouite wrote:Yet their driving still resulted in crashes. Perhaps rather than bad drivers, the Asians are good crashers.


IJA-tested, Kamikaze-approved.

As a historical side-note, the whole kamikaze phenomenon was an accident.

The Japanese Air Force, requiring more pilots, softened its normally extremely brutal training regime and introduced 'positive reinforcement' techniques. This led to one squadron being told 'You da' bomb' by its commander.
They took it far too literally.
^Made-up, somewhat offensive, but still somewhat humorous in my eyes history
I'm General Patton.
Even those who are gone are with us as we go on.

Been busy lately--not around much.

User avatar
Alouite
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12476
Founded: Jan 21, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Alouite » Sat Dec 07, 2013 1:40 pm

Occupied Deutschland wrote:
Spreewerke wrote:
IJA-tested, Kamikaze-approved.

As a historical side-note, the whole kamikaze phenomenon was an accident.

The Japanese Air Force, requiring more pilots, softened its normally extremely brutal training regime and introduced 'positive reinforcement' techniques. This led to one squadron being told 'You da' bomb' by its commander.
They took it far too literally.
^Made-up, somewhat offensive, but still somewhat humorous in my eyes history

Lol. Good one.
National Liberalism, National School Economics, National Dividend, Constitutional Originalism, Protection of US Domestic Trade, The Chinese Gov't in Exile in Taipei, and Ending the War on Nouns
Hyman Minsky
Totalitarianism, the Destruction of the Environment, Racism, and, most of all, people who end statements in questions?
The Patriot Act, The Illegitimate Communist Authorities in China, Economic Libertarianism, Absolutism and Communism

User avatar
Scaevolus
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Jun 09, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Scaevolus » Sat Dec 07, 2013 2:38 pm

A cowardly attack, to be sure.

User avatar
Greed and Death
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 53383
Founded: Mar 20, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Greed and Death » Sat Dec 07, 2013 3:44 pm

Imperializt Russia wrote:
The Victorian Empire wrote:
So striking a country you're not at war with a sneak attack while most of them are sleeping isn't cowardly to you?

No. It's called a pre-emptive strike. It would have been how the Cold War went hot.
Besides, the strike was well after dawn and lasted for several hours. This is the time at which air defence troops should have been most alert. In fact, there were a series of points at which an attack could have been predicted and prepared for. All were either missed or outright ignored.

And, had Japanese intelligence correctly pinpointed the American carrier location, then it would have been a successful one.

Besides, assault is not the action of the coward.

Not just air defense all troops.

It is called stand to, because dawn attacks are very common.
"Trying to solve the healthcare problem by mandating people buy insurance is like trying to solve the homeless problem by mandating people buy a house."(paraphrase from debate with Hilary Clinton)
Barack Obama

User avatar
Vetalia
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13699
Founded: Mar 23, 2005
Corporate Bordello

Postby Vetalia » Sat Dec 07, 2013 3:48 pm

Great idea on paper, terrible idea in practice. The Japanese would have been much better off declaring war on the USSR and forcing the Soviets to relocate forces from the Eastern Front.
Economic Left/Right: 0.88
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.05

User avatar
Herskerstad
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10259
Founded: Dec 14, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Herskerstad » Sat Dec 07, 2013 4:28 pm

I love how some people are semi-defending the pre-emptive strike here.

Let's get some facts straight. Imperial Japan was neither a good place to live, a good society, and while some of their outlined 'victory goals' at least had some level of humanitarianism, it would literally provoke a world war. So short of a Korean annexation which proved to be one of the most brutal occupations for quite some time, the war on China truly demonstrated some of the most inhumane atrocities which gave the US every right to sever their trade relations with them, and impose a full embargo. Yes Japan was miserable economically, yes they stood largely reliant on US trade which the US kept on a tight leash, however, after the confict on the Manchurian bridge coupled with their treatment of Korean and Chinese, which under full knowledge from their high command had reached distopian levels of inhumanity, and while yes, they needed the armaments and fuel to continue their war in China giving them few choices short of a very limited victory, it stands to reason that their grounds of war stood largely based around conquest to become the sole super-power in the east, which, is the most detestable kind of imperialism when you could consider that they wanted to cut not just the US and China down, but every colonial region and the eastern part of the soviet union, ensuring all kinds of hell.

As for the strike itself, it was a tactical success, although they could have used their submarine carrier to cement the panama canal, perhaps slowing the Allied war effort on the east even further. It was however a gigantic strategic blunder of extraordinary disproportions. Even if they had managed to conquer every island in the pacific, the mainland of the US could easily be able to outproduce them on the naval front, making it just a matter of time before the tide would turn. Yamashita, probably their single best military mind stood against it, but the Japanese high command had faith in the unconquerable spirit of their armies, which did not prove too effective against superior firepower. With basic intelligence it could be argued that the political front of the US would probably largely have remained an arms-salesman to the European and Chinese frontier unless directly provoked, as it would have cost FDR too much political capital to be the one directly responsible for starting the war. Yes rainbow plans stood drawn, mostly against Germany, however in the worst case scenario there could be years of negotiation prior to the US directly starting an offensive campaign against Japan.

So to summarize, was it smart? Nope. Was it justified? No. Is the world better with the post-imperial Japan? It sure is.
Although the stars do not speak, even in being silent they cry out. - John Calvin

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Immoren, Pasong Tirad, Zapato

Advertisement

Remove ads