I guess homeopathy would generally be better for your health than LSD, true.
Advertisement

by DesAnges » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:12 pm

by The Puritan Empire » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:14 pm

by Vanagon » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:14 pm

by Ostroeuropa » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:16 pm
Vanagon wrote:I have quite a lot of allergies and when I was young my eyes would often swell till I could not see anymore. Luckily my neighbor has a homeopathy clinic and afther I got some medicine my eyes hurt less and the swelling would gradually dissapear so I think it works.

by Vazdania » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:16 pm
Things such as how natural vs artifical it is. How well it, in the future, helps your immune system....things like that.
by Ostroeuropa » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:17 pm

by An All-Natural Nation » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:17 pm

by Geilinor » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:17 pm

by New Laikland » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:18 pm

by Ostroeuropa » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:19 pm
An All-Natural Nation wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
1. Naturalistic Fallacy
2. Source on it helping your immune system. Preferably from a scientific journal.
http://www.whale.to/b/pfeiffer_h.html

by Chishimotata » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:19 pm
An All-Natural Nation wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
1. Naturalistic Fallacy
2. Source on it helping your immune system. Preferably from a scientific journal.
http://www.whale.to/b/pfeiffer_h.html


by Vazdania » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:21 pm


by Vazdania » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:21 pm
As stated previously, its entirely subjective.
by Ostroeuropa » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:22 pm
Vazdania wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
1. Naturalistic Fallacy
2. Source on it helping your immune system. Preferably from a scientific journal.
1.) The naturalistic fallacy in this case is Irrelevant. Some people prefer natural over artificial, the "naturalness" of anything can serve as a basis for superiority.
2.) ...I never claimed anything helping your immune system? I said these things may be used to subjectively determine what is superior.

by Vazdania » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:22 pm
Vanagon wrote:I have quite a lot of allergies and when I was young my eyes would often swell till I could not see anymore. Luckily my neighbor has a homeopathy clinic and afther I got some medicine my eyes hurt less and the swelling would gradually dissapear so I think it works.

by Vazdania » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:23 pm
Ostroeuropa wrote:Vazdania wrote:
1.) The naturalistic fallacy in this case is Irrelevant. Some people prefer natural over artificial, the "naturalness" of anything can serve as a basis for superiority.
2.) ...I never claimed anything helping your immune system? I said these things may be used to subjectively determine what is superior.
You literally just claimed it.

by The Godly Nations » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:23 pm

by Ifreann » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:23 pm
Vazdania wrote:Ostroeuropa wrote:
1. Naturalistic Fallacy
2. Source on it helping your immune system. Preferably from a scientific journal.
1.) The naturalistic fallacy in this case is Irrelevant. Some people prefer natural over artificial, the "naturalness" of anything can serve as a basis for superiority.
2.) ...I never claimed anything helping your immune system? I said these things may be used to subjectively determine what is superior.

by Ostroeuropa » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:23 pm
Vazdania wrote:Vanagon wrote:I have quite a lot of allergies and when I was young my eyes would often swell till I could not see anymore. Luckily my neighbor has a homeopathy clinic and afther I got some medicine my eyes hurt less and the swelling would gradually dissapear so I think it works.
While this is an isolated personal story, it just goes to show that it can work for some people.

by An All-Natural Nation » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:23 pm
Vazdania wrote:Vanagon wrote:I have quite a lot of allergies and when I was young my eyes would often swell till I could not see anymore. Luckily my neighbor has a homeopathy clinic and afther I got some medicine my eyes hurt less and the swelling would gradually dissapear so I think it works.
While this is an isolated personal story, it just goes to show that it can work for some people.

by Vazdania » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:25 pm
Ifreann wrote:Vazdania wrote:
1.) The naturalistic fallacy in this case is Irrelevant. Some people prefer natural over artificial, the "naturalness" of anything can serve as a basis for superiority.
2.) ...I never claimed anything helping your immune system? I said these things may be used to subjectively determine what is superior.
You said no such thing. I asked how you determined homeopathy to be superior. Here is your answer, in case you've forgotten.

by New Laikland » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:25 pm

by Ostroeuropa » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:26 pm
An All-Natural Nation wrote:Vazdania wrote:While this is an isolated personal story, it just goes to show that it can work for some people.
And unfortunately, the misguided obsession with "science" and "evidence" disregards these entirely true stories of homoeopathy and other natural treatments healing people, in favor of cold, impersonal allopathic chemical "medicines" that do nothing but poison you.

by Vazdania » Sun Dec 08, 2013 1:26 pm
New Laikland wrote:I wonder if anybody realizes that medicine is mostly mental. You can give someone a sugar pill, convince them it's what they need, and it'll most likely work
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Australian rePublic, Empire of Donner land, Gun Manufacturers
Advertisement