NATION

PASSWORD

Luxembourg swears in openly gay PM

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:56 pm

Luveria wrote:
Need a name wrote:Are you implying that I don't support human rights?


Yes.

http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/

(1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
(2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
(3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

And in case the anti-marriage equality types counter with "UDHR is nonbinding":

1. The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.
2. The right of men and women of marriageable age to marry and to found a family shall be recognized.
-Article 23, International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Petacada
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 59
Founded: Nov 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Petacada » Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:56 pm

Othelos wrote:
Petacada wrote:You can do whatever you want. I disagree with it though. Whats wrong with that?

What's wrong is that because some people feel mild discomfort for a few moments, they want to deny other people equal rights.

Ive never said that i want to deny people rights. All i said earlier was that i dont want someone to represent me who doesnt share some of my highest held beliefs.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57854
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:57 pm

Kistan wrote:
Oneracon wrote:Where the hell does this keep coming from? :palm:



http://www.navytimes.com/article/201308 ... 308140021/

"Gay service members who want to tie the knot may be eligible for up to 10 days of extra “marriage leave” so they can travel to a state that legally recognizes same-sex marriage, under a new Pentagon policy unveiled Wednesday."


Specifically, they are looking to be able to publicly and forcibly tell me what their sexuality is and ask me to change my life to suit theirs. They are looking for government authorization to ram into others' lives and ask religions to marry them against their will, as an example.

In short, I don't give a crap what you want or do unless it effects me or those I care about.


That isn't extra rights.
They have the right to get married. So do heterosexuals.
If you have to travel to get married, then you have to travel.
Their rights are being ENFORCED. Not EXPANDED.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Fascist Russian Empire
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9267
Founded: Aug 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Fascist Russian Empire » Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:58 pm

Petacada wrote:
Othelos wrote:What's wrong is that because some people feel mild discomfort for a few moments, they want to deny other people equal rights.

Ive never said that i want to deny people rights. All i said earlier was that i dont want someone to represent me who doesnt share some of my highest held beliefs.

How the hell is two people of the same sex marrying even remotely comparable to 'representing' you and you're precious beliefs?

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:58 pm

Petacada wrote:
Othelos wrote:What's wrong is that because some people feel mild discomfort for a few moments, they want to deny other people equal rights.

Ive never said that i want to deny people rights. All i said earlier was that i dont want someone to represent me who doesnt share some of my highest held beliefs.

Gays can be Christian.
American & German, ich kann auch Deutsch. I have a B.S. in finance.
Pro: Human rights, equality, LGBT rights, socialized healthcare, the EU in theory, green energy, public transportation, the internet as a utility
Anti: Authoritarian regimes and systems, the Chinese government, identity politics, die AfD, populism, organized religion, Erdogan, assault weapon ownership
Free Tibet and Hong Kong | Keep Taiwan Independent

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:58 pm

Need a name wrote:
Luveria wrote:
Yes.

http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/

(1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
(2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
(3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

Whatever, I'm not a big fan if the UN anyway. It's too.... capitalist.


The ever-shifting goalposts which can never be reached. :)

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Luveria wrote:
Yes.

http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/

(1) Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.
(2) Marriage shall be entered into only with the free and full consent of the intending spouses.
(3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.



Strange minds think alike. I just went to grab that. But with other articles too.

1. All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

2. Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

3. Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.


(Note, the language of 3 does not specify the men and women have to marry EACHOTHER.)
(Note2, the language of 1+2, especially 1, clearly implies discrimination on the basis of sexuality is not ok.)


The language of men and women implies men and men and women and women can marry each other. It does not specify only between man and woman. There is a reason the UN as an organization is working to extend marriage rights.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:59 pm

Othelos wrote:
Petacada wrote:Ive never said that i want to deny people rights. All i said earlier was that i dont want someone to represent me who doesnt share some of my highest held beliefs.

Gays can be Christian.


If they swear to never have sex again? :eyebrow:

User avatar
Blouman Empire
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16184
Founded: Sep 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Blouman Empire » Thu Dec 05, 2013 6:59 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:That isn't extra rights.
They have the right to get married. So do heterosexuals.
If you have to travel to get married, then you have to travel.
Their rights are being ENFORCED. Not EXPANDED.


It is extra entitlements that other service members don't get.

Though the fact that there is such a thing as marraige leave shouldn't be around anyway, if you want to get married use your annual leave otherwise they get an unfair advantage over those who don't or can't get married.
You know you've made it on NSG when you have a whole thread created around what you said.
On the American/United Statesian matter "I'd suggest Americans go to their nation settings and change their nation prefix to something cooler." - The Kangaroo Republic
http://nswiki.net/index.php?title=Blouman_Empire

DBC26-Winner

User avatar
Kistan
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1336
Founded: Oct 02, 2012
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Kistan » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:00 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
That isn't extra rights.
They have the right to get married. So do heterosexuals.
If you have to travel to get married, then you have to travel.
Their rights are being ENFORCEDDOWNRELIGIONSTHROAT. Not EXPANDED.


There.

You see, religions can't legally act against it, so why the need to force churches to marry gays? Isn't that a violation of another groups' rights?
Last edited by Kistan on Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:00 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Humor:
"It's the Vrell Fuel and Oils Corporation, not Kistani Oils. Kistani Oils makes lotions and petrolium jellies."
Disclaimer: Kistan is for fun, and you should not expect the IRL me to do the things Kistan may do.

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:00 pm

Kistan wrote:
Oneracon wrote:Where the hell does this keep coming from? :palm:



http://www.navytimes.com/article/201308 ... 308140021/

"Gay service members who want to tie the knot may be eligible for up to 10 days of extra “marriage leave” so they can travel to a state that legally recognizes same-sex marriage, under a new Pentagon policy unveiled Wednesday."


Specifically, they are looking to be able to publicly and forcibly tell me what their sexuality is and ask me to change my life to suit theirs. They are looking for government authorization to ram into others' lives and ask religions to marry them against their will, as an example.

In short, I don't give a crap what you want or do unless it effects me or those I care about.

You realize that if same sex marriage was legalized nationally, they wouldn't receive the extra ten days?
American & German, ich kann auch Deutsch. I have a B.S. in finance.
Pro: Human rights, equality, LGBT rights, socialized healthcare, the EU in theory, green energy, public transportation, the internet as a utility
Anti: Authoritarian regimes and systems, the Chinese government, identity politics, die AfD, populism, organized religion, Erdogan, assault weapon ownership
Free Tibet and Hong Kong | Keep Taiwan Independent

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:00 pm

Othelos wrote:
Petacada wrote:Ive never said that i want to deny people rights. All i said earlier was that i dont want someone to represent me who doesnt share some of my highest held beliefs.

Gays can be Christian.


I never understood why some gays are Christian.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Petacada
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 59
Founded: Nov 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Petacada » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:00 pm

Fascist Russian Empire wrote:
Petacada wrote:Ive never said that i want to deny people rights. All i said earlier was that i dont want someone to represent me who doesnt share some of my highest held beliefs.

How the hell is two people of the same sex marrying even remotely comparable to 'representing' you and you're precious beliefs?

If you dont understand by now you never will. Would you vote for someone who is anti-gay? No. Because its against your beliefs. P

User avatar
Oneracon
Senator
 
Posts: 4735
Founded: Jul 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Oneracon » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:00 pm

Kistan wrote:
Oneracon wrote:Where the hell does this keep coming from? :palm:



http://www.navytimes.com/article/201308 ... 308140021/

"Gay service members who want to tie the knot may be eligible for up to 10 days of extra “marriage leave” so they can travel to a state that legally recognizes same-sex marriage, under a new Pentagon policy unveiled Wednesday."

Fun fact: If all states recognized and performed same-sex civil marriages then this would not need to happen.

Specifically, they are looking to be able to publicly and forcibly tell me what their sexuality is and ask me to change my life to suit theirs.

Vague point is vague.

They are looking for government authorization to ram into others' lives and ask religions to marry them against their will, as an example.

If that was truly the case, then why has every single law in the world that recognized equality of marriage specifically included provisions exempting religious groups from performing marriages that contradict their beliefs?

You are exercising tired rhetoric and nothing more.
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Oneracon IC Links
Factbook
Embassies

"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power"
Pro:LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa
Anti: Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza

Your resident Canadian neutral good socdem graduate student.

*Here, queer, and not a prop for your right-wing nonsense.*

User avatar
Fascist Russian Empire
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9267
Founded: Aug 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Fascist Russian Empire » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:00 pm

Luveria wrote:
Othelos wrote:Gays can be Christian.


If they swear to never have sex again? :eyebrow:

Um...People can still follow religious creeds even if they ain't heterosexual.

User avatar
Aeken
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17135
Founded: Feb 12, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Aeken » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:00 pm

Luveria wrote:
Othelos wrote:Gays can be Christian.


If they swear to never have sex again? :eyebrow:

There are many sects of Christianity, Luv.

User avatar
Blouman Empire
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 16184
Founded: Sep 05, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Blouman Empire » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:01 pm

Luveria wrote:
Othelos wrote:Gays can be Christian.


If they swear to never have sex again? :eyebrow:


Really? It is entirely possible to be a Christian and be gay and have sex with soemone of the same sex. Maybe not your 'fathers' christianity but your 'fathers' christianity isn't the only one.
Last edited by Blouman Empire on Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
You know you've made it on NSG when you have a whole thread created around what you said.
On the American/United Statesian matter "I'd suggest Americans go to their nation settings and change their nation prefix to something cooler." - The Kangaroo Republic
http://nswiki.net/index.php?title=Blouman_Empire

DBC26-Winner

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57854
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:01 pm

Luveria wrote:
Need a name wrote:Whatever, I'm not a big fan if the UN anyway. It's too.... capitalist.


The ever-shifting goalposts which can never be reached. :)

Ostroeuropa wrote:

Strange minds think alike. I just went to grab that. But with other articles too.

1. All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

2. Everyone is entitled to all the rights and freedoms set forth in this Declaration, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. Furthermore, no distinction shall be made on the basis of the political, jurisdictional or international status of the country or territory to which a person belongs, whether it be independent, trust, non-self-governing or under any other limitation of sovereignty.

3. Men and women of full age, without any limitation due to race, nationality or religion, have the right to marry and to found a family. They are entitled to equal rights as to marriage, during marriage and at its dissolution.


(Note, the language of 3 does not specify the men and women have to marry EACHOTHER.)
(Note2, the language of 1+2, especially 1, clearly implies discrimination on the basis of sexuality is not ok.)


The language of men and women implies men and men and women and women can marry each other. It does not specify only between man and woman. There is a reason the UN as an organization is working to extend marriage rights.


Exactly.
BOTH men AND Women have the right to marry and found a family.
Nowhere is it specified which gender they have to marry.
Coupled with the anti-discrimination along gender grounds, and it becomes incredibly obvious that gay marriage is a fundamental human right for the same reasons the supreme court laid out.


Jack and Jill love eachother.
They can get married.
But Jack and Jack love eachother, they cannot get married.
Why? Because of their gender.
That's discrimination based on gender.

The sexuality doesn't even enter into it.

Your sexuality matters for jack shit when getting married, it's the GENDER or possibly the Sex (EXPLICITLY forbidden) that is being discriminated against.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Ainin
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13979
Founded: Mar 05, 2011
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Ainin » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:01 pm

Kistan wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
That isn't extra rights.
They have the right to get married. So do heterosexuals.
If you have to travel to get married, then you have to travel.
Their rights are being ENFORCEDDOWNRELIGIONSTHROAT. Not EXPANDED.


There.

You see, religions can't legally act against it, so why the need to force churches to marry gays? Isn't that a violation of another groups' rights?

Your source says "to compensate for the fact that same-sex couples cannot legally marry in 37 states, DoD will grant special leave to gay troops who want to get married but are stationed more than 100 miles from a state that legally recognizes same-sex marriages".

You say they're forcing churches to marry gays.

I'm not seeing the connection here.
"And when the last law was down, and the Devil turned round on you — where would you hide, Roper, the laws all being flat?"

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:01 pm

Pandeeria wrote:
Othelos wrote:Gays can be Christian.


I never understood why some gays are Christian.


Probably because they follow a strain of Christianity which doesn't tell gays they are nasty sinful fucks for loving someone of the same sex.

User avatar
Fascist Russian Empire
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9267
Founded: Aug 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Fascist Russian Empire » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:01 pm

Petacada wrote:
Fascist Russian Empire wrote:How the hell is two people of the same sex marrying even remotely comparable to 'representing' you and you're precious beliefs?

If you dont understand by now you never will. Would you vote for someone who is anti-gay? No. Because its against your beliefs. P

And yet my beliefs aren't based on theocratic religious texts that don't even apply to Christians.

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:02 pm

Luveria wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:
I never understood why some gays are Christian.


Probably because they follow a strain of Christianity which doesn't tell gays they are nasty sinful fucks for loving someone of the same sex.


Is there any mainstream strain that is neutral or pro-LGBT?
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Petacada
Bureaucrat
 
Posts: 59
Founded: Nov 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Petacada » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:02 pm

Pandeeria wrote:
Othelos wrote:Gays can be Christian.


I never understood why some gays are Christian.

Me either. We agree on something! Ha

User avatar
Ruridova
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15860
Founded: Jun 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Ruridova » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:02 pm

Kistan wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
That isn't extra rights.
They have the right to get married. So do heterosexuals.
If you have to travel to get married, then you have to travel.
Their rights are being ENFORCEDDOWNRELIGIONSTHROAT. Not EXPANDED.


There.

You see, religions can't legally act against it, so why the need to force churches to marry gays? Isn't that a violation of another groups' rights?

.... You've never heard of civil marriage, have you? That's the marriage we're talking about, not forcing churches to marry homosexuals. Civil, not religious.
Республіка Рюрідова - Королівство Вілкія
"For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat; I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink; I was a stranger and you invited me in; I needed clothes and you clothed me; I was sick and you looked after me; I was in prison and you came to visit me... Truly, whatever you did for one of the least of my brothers and sisters, you did for me."
- the Gospel of Matthew, 25:35-40

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:03 pm

Petacada wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:
I never understood why some gays are Christian.

Me either. We agree on something! Ha


Yay!
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57854
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Thu Dec 05, 2013 7:03 pm

Kistan wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
That isn't extra rights.
They have the right to get married. So do heterosexuals.
If you have to travel to get married, then you have to travel.
Their rights are being ENFORCEDDOWNRELIGIONSTHROAT. Not EXPANDED.


There.

You see, religions can't legally act against it, so why the need to force churches to marry gays? Isn't that a violation of another groups' rights?



Nobody is forcing churches to marry gays.
We're saying they are allowed to.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ameriganastan, Bovad, Canarsia, Corrian, Costa Fierro, Eisen Fatherland, EuroStralia, Gun Manufacturers, Loeje, Lord Dominator, Ryemarch, Velvoinka

Advertisement

Remove ads