NATION

PASSWORD

Is Affirmative Action Racist?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Is Affirmative Action Just, or Racist?

Extremely Racist
182
37%
Racist
173
35%
Unimportant
41
8%
Fair
31
6%
Much Needed, Just Service
66
13%
 
Total votes : 493

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Tue Dec 24, 2013 7:31 pm

Alien Space Bats wrote:And yet white males have higher average income, greater average wealth, lower unemployment, and greater overall social mobility than everyone else within society. Clearly, if there's some kind of systematic institutionalized policy of economic genocide against white males, it isn't working, now is it?


Asians have a higher household income than Whites in the US, I doubt their success was primarily brought about by affirmative action.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Dec 24, 2013 7:50 pm

Saiwania wrote:
Alien Space Bats wrote:And yet white males have higher average income, greater average wealth, lower unemployment, and greater overall social mobility than everyone else within society. Clearly, if there's some kind of systematic institutionalized policy of economic genocide against white males, it isn't working, now is it?


Asians have a higher household income than Whites in the US, I doubt their success was primarily brought about by affirmative action.

Well, no shit. That's because a majority of the Asian groups doing well have parents who have gone to college in another country and obtained graduate degrees then immigrated here. What, exactly, does that have to do with ASB's post, though?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Tue Dec 24, 2013 7:53 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Saiwania wrote:
Asians have a higher household income than Whites in the US, I doubt their success was primarily brought about by affirmative action.

What, exactly, does that have to do with ASB's post, though?

Apparently all minorities are the same and Asians are a monolithic group of college-educated professionals.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Dec 24, 2013 7:56 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Mavorpen wrote: What, exactly, does that have to do with ASB's post, though?

Apparently all minorities are the same and Asians are a monolithic group of college-educated professionals.

Well, the second part is slightly true. On a whole, Asians are more educated than whites. And yet, they make up a tiny percentage of the senior-level managers in Fortune 500 companies and are underrepresented in a wide arrange of jobs.

I mean, let's not forget that Asians were the first illegal immigrants in this country and faced a shit ton of discrimination and hardships. The notion that they haven't benefited from affirmative action nor do they need it is quite frankly, silly.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:30 pm

Mavorpen wrote:Well, no shit. That's because a majority of the Asian groups doing well have parents who have gone to college in another country and obtained graduate degrees then immigrated here. What, exactly, does that have to do with ASB's post, though?


That should be proof enough that minorities don't need affirmative action to succeed in America, devotion to education and discipline can easily trump any disadvantage from being of minority status. The Asian American community did not reach out a hand and whine for external assistance metaphorically speaking, instead they successfully out competed Whites and now enjoy the highest household income. Of all the non-Whites I'd have to live next to, Asians would be the most preferable judging from experience.
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:33 pm

Saiwania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Well, no shit. That's because a majority of the Asian groups doing well have parents who have gone to college in another country and obtained graduate degrees then immigrated here. What, exactly, does that have to do with ASB's post, though?


That should be proof enough that minorities don't need affirmative action to succeed in America, devotion to education and discipline can easily trump any disadvantage from being of minority status. The Asian American community did not reach out a hand and whine for external assistance metaphorically speaking, instead they successfully out competed Whites and now enjoy the highest household income. Of all the non-Whites I'd have to live next to, Asians would be the most preferable judging from experience.

Many Asian-Americans went to college in another country and then immigrated here, which explains the rate of college-educated Asians.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:34 pm

Saiwania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Well, no shit. That's because a majority of the Asian groups doing well have parents who have gone to college in another country and obtained graduate degrees then immigrated here. What, exactly, does that have to do with ASB's post, though?


That should be proof enough that minorities don't need affirmative action to succeed in America, devotion to education and discipline can easily trump any disadvantage from being of minority status. The Asian American community did not reach out a hand and whine for external assistance metaphorically speaking, instead they successfully out competed Whites and now enjoy the highest household income. Of all the non-Whites I'd have to live next to, Asians would be the most preferable judging from experience.


Apparently all minorities are a monolithic group.
Forever a Communist

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:37 pm

Saiwania wrote:That should be proof enough that minorities don't need affirmative action to succeed in America, devotion to education and discipline can easily trump any disadvantage from being of minority status.

Sorry, doesn't work that way.

These people who come to the country already have parents who are well off, can help them immensely with their school work, etc. They have a distinct advantage over minorities who are doomed to poor neighborhoods, poor education, lack of access to nutritious food, etc.
Saiwania wrote:The Asian American community did not reach out a hand and whine for external assistance metaphorically speaking, instead they successfully out competed Whites and now enjoy the highest household income.

Uh... yes they did. Asian Americans have historically been one of the most discriminated against groups in American history. They have asked for government assistance, have received it, and still do support government assistance due to discrimination in the workplace.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:39 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Saiwania wrote:That should be proof enough that minorities don't need affirmative action to succeed in America, devotion to education and discipline can easily trump any disadvantage from being of minority status.

Sorry, doesn't work that way.

These people who come to the country already have parents who are well off, can help them immensely with their school work, etc.

I can attest to that personally. Despite being a minority, my situation is nothing like someone who has poor parents, lives in a poor neighborhood, doesn't have access to good schools, etc.
Last edited by Geilinor on Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:39 pm, edited 2 times in total.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:41 pm

Geilinor wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Sorry, doesn't work that way.

These people who come to the country already have parents who are well off, can help them immensely with their school work, etc.

I can attest to that personally. Despite being a minority, my situation is nothing like someone who has poor parents, lives in a poor neighborhood, doesn't have access to good schools, etc.

See, what he doesn't seem to understand is that these families immigrate here because of America's great policy which seeks out highly qualified immigrants (and it honestly is the primary reason for our STEM sector being as good as it is). Thus, comparing these families, who already have a significant advantage in education, income, etc. to minorities who are facing a disproportionate amount of problems against them, is naive.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:49 pm

Mavorpen wrote:
Geilinor wrote:I can attest to that personally. Despite being a minority, my situation is nothing like someone who has poor parents, lives in a poor neighborhood, doesn't have access to good schools, etc.

See, what he doesn't seem to understand is that these families immigrate here because of America's great policy which seeks out highly qualified immigrants (and it honestly is the primary reason for our STEM sector being as good as it is).

The policy is good, but there are countries that do it better.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Saiwania
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 22269
Founded: Jun 30, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Saiwania » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:57 pm

Mavorpen wrote:See, what he doesn't seem to understand is that these families immigrate here because of America's great policy which seeks out highly qualified immigrants (and it honestly is the primary reason for our STEM sector being as good as it is). Thus, comparing these families, who already have a significant advantage in education, income, etc. to minorities who are facing a disproportionate amount of problems against them, is naive.


If they are so great, why didn't these immigrants stay in their own countries and improve their own countries' standard of living? Could it be because they could become richer in the US than they could back home, despite any ill treatment that could be gotten from the majority as outsiders?
Sith Acolyte
Peace is a lie, there is only passion. Through passion, I gain strength. Through strength, I gain power. Through power, I gain victory. Through victory, my chains are broken!

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Tue Dec 24, 2013 8:59 pm

Saiwania wrote:If they are so great, why didn't these immigrants stay in their own countries and improve their own countries' standard of living?

I can't give you an answer, because Asians aren't a hive mind.
Saiwania wrote:Could it be because they could become richer in the US than they could back home, despite any ill treatment that could be gotten from the majority as outsiders?

Maybe. They could also have come from a country with an unstable government. Or were offered more stable jobs without necessarily caring about how "richer" they could be. There are quite a lot of factors.

Not sure what this has to do with my post, though.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Geilinor
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41328
Founded: Feb 20, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Geilinor » Tue Dec 24, 2013 9:01 pm

Saiwania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:See, what he doesn't seem to understand is that these families immigrate here because of America's great policy which seeks out highly qualified immigrants (and it honestly is the primary reason for our STEM sector being as good as it is). Thus, comparing these families, who already have a significant advantage in education, income, etc. to minorities who are facing a disproportionate amount of problems against them, is naive.


If they are so great, why didn't these immigrants stay in their own countries and improve their own countries' standard of living?

Direct yourself to brain drain. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brain_drain Also, it should be fairly apparent that more educated people will tend to face less disdain from more established residents.
Member of the Free Democratic Party. Not left. Not right. Forward.
Economic Left/Right: -1.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.41

User avatar
Coccygia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7521
Founded: Nov 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Coccygia » Fri Dec 27, 2013 10:47 am

Alien Space Bats wrote:
Coccygia wrote:Why should they not accept people based on their qualifications rather than their race or gender? That seems rather fairer to me. But what do I know, I don't even know that universities are supposed to achieve "balance" at the expense of merit.

Universities are supposed to provide (among other things) an optimal environment for both research and education.

That does not necessarily mean accepting only the best students.

Why not?
"Nobody deserves anything. You get what you get." - House
"Hope is for sissies." - House
“Qokedy qokedy dal qokedy qokedy." - The Voynich Manuscript
"We're not ordinary people - we're morons!" - Jerome Horwitz
"A book, any book, is a sacred object." - Jorge Luis Borges
"I am a survivor. I am like a cockroach, you just can't get rid of me." - Madonna

User avatar
Coccygia
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 7521
Founded: Nov 24, 2009
Ex-Nation

Postby Coccygia » Fri Dec 27, 2013 10:48 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Alien Space Bats wrote:Universities are supposed to provide (among other things) an optimal environment for both research and education.

That does not necessarily mean accepting only the best students.

Fuck, I know people who got higher GPAs than their peers but weren't accepted to universities because they didn't do any volunteer work at all.

Proving what, exactly?
"Nobody deserves anything. You get what you get." - House
"Hope is for sissies." - House
“Qokedy qokedy dal qokedy qokedy." - The Voynich Manuscript
"We're not ordinary people - we're morons!" - Jerome Horwitz
"A book, any book, is a sacred object." - Jorge Luis Borges
"I am a survivor. I am like a cockroach, you just can't get rid of me." - Madonna

User avatar
Norstal
Post Czar
 
Posts: 41465
Founded: Mar 07, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Norstal » Fri Dec 27, 2013 10:49 am

Saiwania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Well, no shit. That's because a majority of the Asian groups doing well have parents who have gone to college in another country and obtained graduate degrees then immigrated here. What, exactly, does that have to do with ASB's post, though?


That should be proof enough that minorities don't need affirmative action to succeed in America, devotion to education and discipline can easily trump any disadvantage from being of minority status. The Asian American community did not reach out a hand and whine for external assistance metaphorically speaking, instead they successfully out competed Whites and now enjoy the highest household income. Of all the non-Whites I'd have to live next to, Asians would be the most preferable judging from experience.

Where do black people came from? Where do Latinos came from? Because I'm pretty sure black people and Latinos don't come from a country like Japan or China where there's quality secondary-education and other opportunities.
Last edited by Norstal on Fri Dec 27, 2013 10:49 am, edited 1 time in total.
Toronto Sun wrote:Best poster ever. ★★★★★


New York Times wrote:No one can beat him in debates. 5/5.


IGN wrote:Literally the best game I've ever played. 10/10


NSG Public wrote:What a fucking douchebag.



Supreme Chairman for Life of the Itty Bitty Kitty Committee

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri Dec 27, 2013 11:01 am

Coccygia wrote:
Alien Space Bats wrote:Universities are supposed to provide (among other things) an optimal environment for both research and education.

That does not necessarily mean accepting only the best students.

Why not?

Because your grades on tests in high school doesn't necessarily reflect how you contribute to the university.
Coccygia wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:Fuck, I know people who got higher GPAs than their peers but weren't accepted to universities because they didn't do any volunteer work at all.

Proving what, exactly?

Really? Within the context of the post I was responding to, you're really asking me what it proves?

Wow.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
The Dutch Crusader
Secretary
 
Posts: 31
Founded: Dec 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Dutch Crusader » Fri Dec 27, 2013 11:02 am

Poll numbers like this gives me hope.

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Fri Dec 27, 2013 11:04 am

Race-Based Affirmative Action is inherently racist.
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri Dec 27, 2013 11:06 am

Vazdania wrote:Race-Based Affirmative Action is inherently racist.

You've heard it here, folks. Giving minorities equal opportunity is racist.
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

User avatar
Vazdania
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 19448
Founded: Mar 06, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Vazdania » Fri Dec 27, 2013 11:07 am

Mavorpen wrote:
Vazdania wrote:Race-Based Affirmative Action is inherently racist.

You've heard it here, folks. Giving minorities equal opportunity is racist.

Equal rights? No. It gives them preferential treatment. Equality does not equate to retribution. :roll:
NSG's Resident Constitutional Executive Monarchist!
We Monarchists Stand With The Morals Of The Past, As We Hatch Impossible Treasons Against The Present.

They Have No Voice; So I will Speak For Them. The Right To Life Is Fundamental To All Humans Regardless Of How Developed They Are. Pro-Woman. Pro-Child. Pro-Life.

NSG's Newest Vegetarian!

User avatar
Galloism
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 72160
Founded: Aug 20, 2005
Father Knows Best State

Postby Galloism » Fri Dec 27, 2013 11:08 am

Vazdania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:You've heard it here, folks. Giving minorities equal opportunity is racist.

Equal rights? No. It gives them preferential treatment. Equality does not equate to retribution. :roll:

You have no idea what affirmative action actually does, do you?
Venicilian: wow. Jesus hung around with everyone. boys, girls, rich, poor(mostly), sick, healthy, etc. in fact, i bet he even went up to gay people and tried to heal them so they would be straight.
The Parkus Empire: Being serious on NSG is like wearing a suit to a nude beach.
New Kereptica: Since power is changed energy over time, an increase in power would mean, in this case, an increase in energy. As energy is equivalent to mass and the density of the government is static, the volume of the government must increase.


User avatar
The Dutch Crusader
Secretary
 
Posts: 31
Founded: Dec 27, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Dutch Crusader » Fri Dec 27, 2013 11:09 am

Vazdania wrote:Race-Based Affirmative Action is inherently racist.


Yep, I'd say people of low socio-economic status, whether they be black, hispanic, asian or even white, are more discriminated against than just ethnic minorities.

User avatar
Mavorpen
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 63266
Founded: Dec 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Mavorpen » Fri Dec 27, 2013 11:10 am

Vazdania wrote:
Mavorpen wrote:You've heard it here, folks. Giving minorities equal opportunity is racist.

Equal rights? No. It gives them preferential treatment. Equality does not equate to retribution. :roll:

You've never read the Affirmative Action laws, have you?
"The Nixon campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar left and black people. You understand what I'm saying? We knew we couldn't make it illegal to be either against the war or black, but by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders. raid their homes, break up their meetings, and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did."—former Nixon domestic policy chief John Ehrlichman

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, American Legionaries, Dimetrodon Empire, Djiman, Habsburg Mexico, Ifreann, La Xinga, Narland, Necroghastia, New Ciencia, Tarsonis, Terra dei Cittadini, The Black Forrest, The Jamesian Republic, Tlaceceyaya, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads