New Laikland wrote:Affirmative action is the belief that the majority race is superior, and the minority races are inferior and can't handle themselves.
No it isn't.
Advertisement

by Mavorpen » Wed Dec 11, 2013 7:43 pm
New Laikland wrote:Affirmative action is the belief that the majority race is superior, and the minority races are inferior and can't handle themselves.


by Mavorpen » Wed Dec 11, 2013 7:48 pm

by New Laikland » Wed Dec 11, 2013 7:50 pm
Mavorpen wrote:So you believe minorities aren't discriminated against.
I don't think anyone can post anything that can top that in terms of ignorance.

by Mavorpen » Wed Dec 11, 2013 7:52 pm
Mavorpen wrote:Jedi8246 wrote: You must live in some rural backwater town full of racist whites to continue to think that most blacks are still discriminated against.
No, I just live in reality. I mean really, I'm not surprised that you're completely oblivious to facts, but don't pretend as though you have a clue what you're talking about. Black people, whether you want to believe they are or not, are in fact constantly discriminated against.
http://www.ucdenver.edu/academics/colle ... 2011_6.pdf
http://www.civilrights.org/resources/ci ... yment.html
http://www.nber.org/digest/sep03/w9873.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/1 ... 43824.html
Are we, on a whole trying to combat the discrimination against black? Absolutely. But that's only because African Americans are a protected groups. Only someone with their head in the sand sincerely believes that black people would be perfectly fine if the Civil Rights Act was repealed.

by New Laikland » Wed Dec 11, 2013 7:56 pm
Mavorpen wrote:Again, do you believe minorities aren't discriminated against?
Because that's demonstrably bullshit.


by Mavorpen » Wed Dec 11, 2013 7:57 pm

by New Laikland » Wed Dec 11, 2013 7:58 pm
Mavorpen wrote:That's good.
Then affirmative action isn't the belief that minorities are inferior. Thank you for admitted your post was wrong.

by Mavorpen » Wed Dec 11, 2013 7:58 pm

by New Laikland » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:00 pm
Mavorpen wrote:I'll just take that as a concession, then.

by Mavorpen » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:02 pm

by Uieurnthlaal » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:02 pm

by New Laikland » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:04 pm
Mavorpen wrote:Like I said, I accept your concession.
When you're ready to formulate a coherent argument, I'll be here.

by Mavorpen » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:05 pm
New Laikland wrote:Mavorpen wrote:Like I said, I accept your concession.
When you're ready to formulate a coherent argument, I'll be here.
I'll take this as a surrender, since you obviously aren't capable of reading a basic, simple sentence without slaughtering the poor strawmen.
When you're ready to properly read a sentence, I'll be here, waiting.

by New Laikland » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:06 pm
Mavorpen wrote:
So that's a no on trying to give an actual argument?

by Mavorpen » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:09 pm

by Swedish Realm » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:11 pm

by New Laikland » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:11 pm
Mavorpen wrote:You didn't give an argument. You made a claim. I then responded to it by asking you whether you believed that minorities aren't discriminated against, because that's what Affirmative Action is trying to combat.
You could try fleshing out your argument.

by Mavorpen » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:14 pm
New Laikland wrote:Mavorpen wrote:You didn't give an argument. You made a claim. I then responded to it by asking you whether you believed that minorities aren't discriminated against, because that's what Affirmative Action is trying to combat.
You could try fleshing out your argument.
I gave a claim, which you could have then escalated that into an intelligent argument, but instead you gave me some random bigotted gibberish that had nothing to do with what I said.

by New Laikland » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:17 pm
Mavorpen wrote:I did escalate it into an intelligent argument.
You claimed that Affirmative Action claims that minorities are inferior. It doesn't. It claims that minorities are discriminated against and thus they need some way to combat it. I asked you if you believed that minorities aren't discriminated against because such a belief could produce a claim that affirmative action claims that minorities are inferior.
All you had to do, was specifically explain what your evidence and/or reasoning is for your claim. Could you do that?

by Frisivisia » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:21 pm

by Frisivisia » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:21 pm
New Laikland wrote:Mavorpen wrote:I did escalate it into an intelligent argument.
You claimed that Affirmative Action claims that minorities are inferior. It doesn't. It claims that minorities are discriminated against and thus they need some way to combat it. I asked you if you believed that minorities aren't discriminated against because such a belief could produce a claim that affirmative action claims that minorities are inferior.
All you had to do, was specifically explain what your evidence and/or reasoning is for your claim. Could you do that?
No, you made a bigotted, random claim.
I claimed that Affirmative Action believes that minorities are inferior, because it believes that they need help getting a job or whatnot. That is a pretty good definition of inferiority. It does not claim that minorities are discriminated against, it discriminates against the majority. The last part is irrelevant, and has nothing to do with the argument. The minorities and majority are discriminated against just as much, and adding mandatory discrimination doesn't make it better.
All you had to do with read a bloody sentence and process it with a tiny bit of brain power. Do you think you're capable of doing that, or do we need to break it down into child's terms?

by Mavorpen » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:24 pm
New Laikland wrote:No, you made a bigotted, random claim.
New Laikland wrote:I claimed that Affirmative Action believes that minorities are inferior, because it believes that they need help getting a job or whatnot.
New Laikland wrote:That is a pretty good definition of inferiority.
New Laikland wrote:It does not claim that minorities are discriminated against, it discriminates against the majority.
New Laikland wrote: The last part is irrelevant, and has nothing to do with the argument. The minorities and majority are discriminated against just as much, and adding mandatory discrimination doesn't make it better.
Mavorpen wrote:Jedi8246 wrote: You must live in some rural backwater town full of racist whites to continue to think that most blacks are still discriminated against.
No, I just live in reality. I mean really, I'm not surprised that you're completely oblivious to facts, but don't pretend as though you have a clue what you're talking about. Black people, whether you want to believe they are or not, are in fact constantly discriminated against.
http://www.ucdenver.edu/academics/colle ... 2011_6.pdf
http://www.civilrights.org/resources/ci ... yment.html
http://www.nber.org/digest/sep03/w9873.html
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/1 ... 43824.html
Are we, on a whole trying to combat the discrimination against black? Absolutely. But that's only because African Americans are a protected groups. Only someone with their head in the sand sincerely believes that black people would be perfectly fine if the Civil Rights Act was repealed.
New Laikland wrote:All you had to do with read a bloody sentence and process it with a tiny bit of brain power. Do you think you're capable of doing that, or do we need to break it down into child's terms?

by Uieurnthlaal » Wed Dec 11, 2013 8:54 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Aggicificicerous, American Legionaries, Dimetrodon Empire, Habsburg Mexico, Ifreann, La Xinga, Narland, Necroghastia, New Ciencia, Terra dei Cittadini, The Black Forrest, The Jamesian Republic, Zurkerx
Advertisement