Who isn't a crack whore? You didn't specify.
Advertisement

by Dyakovo » Wed Nov 27, 2013 12:35 pm
Terra Sector Union wrote:Lethal Injection on death row inmates is wrong. Humans are good as a resource. So why waste one by simply killing them for their terrible crimes? The answer is this.
We get these men strapped on with IED's on the battlefield and have them to simply just die to scare off whatever enemy in whatever bloody conflict we're getting our noses in these days These inmates make good cannon fodder. You can't waste good resources like this. Capital Punishment must be like this for now on. I think using inmates as pawns will save more honorable lives of soldiers. Lethal Injection is a waste.
Ethical? Not quite. Reasonable? Yes.
Would you support this?

by Dyakovo » Wed Nov 27, 2013 12:36 pm

by Dyakovo » Wed Nov 27, 2013 12:37 pm

by Luveria » Wed Nov 27, 2013 12:39 pm
Terra Sector Union wrote:Would you support this?

by Magna Libero » Wed Nov 27, 2013 12:45 pm
Luveria wrote:Blasveck wrote:
You of all people should know that it depends on where you shop.
The only time I was charging $20 for a quickie was when I was trying to drive my competitors out of my area by undercutting them. Realistically, you're unlikely to find a working girl selling her services for $20, which is why I doubt the poster's claims.

by The Nihilistic view » Wed Nov 27, 2013 3:50 pm
Luveria wrote:The Nihilistic view wrote:Not in the way you describe, the British courts used to offer convicted criminals the choice between hanging/prison depending on the crime and joining the army. I would say it was quite successful.
Would it work now? say instead of 10 years for armed robbery offer them 10 years in the military instead? Possibly, I would not mind but the OP version of making them walking IED's/suicide bombers is silly.
That's such a great idea placing a convicted thief into the army where they have access to military weaponry they can steal and sell.

by Sun Wukong » Wed Nov 27, 2013 3:57 pm

by Verdum » Wed Nov 27, 2013 4:03 pm

by Kingdom of Cambria » Wed Nov 27, 2013 4:09 pm

by Sun Wukong » Wed Nov 27, 2013 4:12 pm
Kingdom of Cambria wrote:I think death row inmates should be put to death within 365 days of their conviction (dependent that they are not appealing...which would only be allowed once) and thus would eliminate the need for militarization. Also, all executions should be public and by choice of a) hanging b) firing squad or c) cyanide capsule.
Naturally, this is all conjecture and off the record as the government of the Kingdom of Cambria has no provision for the death penalty, nor would the realm seek such a course.

by Katganistan » Wed Nov 27, 2013 4:17 pm

by Luveria » Wed Nov 27, 2013 4:25 pm
Katganistan wrote:Yeah, strapping bombs to prisoners and sending them to die is like, not a horrendous human rights violation or terrorism or anything like that.....
Katganistan wrote:Seriously? MILITARIZED? Stop using weasel words and just say what you mean: murdering them in an umbelievable cruel and inhumane way, along with whatever other poor bastards happen to be around them.

by Kumrann » Wed Nov 27, 2013 5:45 pm

by The Wycihowsiist Ascendancy » Wed Nov 27, 2013 5:53 pm

by The Wycihowsiist Ascendancy » Wed Nov 27, 2013 6:00 pm

by Aurora Novus » Wed Nov 27, 2013 6:35 pm
The Wycihowsiist Ascendancy wrote:Aurora Novus wrote:
I couldn't tell you off the top of my head, but it's almost certainly going to be higher for "normal" people. That's partially why serial killers fascinate the public. Most people can think of tons of reasons to kill someone; the simple joy of killing, however, isn't what most people think of.
But what I mean is, I'm not seeing the relevance here. Why ask the question?
You've never heard of Sandy Hook ? OR the National Rifle Association ? I respond to such blanket statements strongly. My point is by statistics, your safer with US. You would less safe statistical my within normal people. Why I do people have the propensity to blame us? I can't figure it out....

by Chernoslavia » Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:38 pm
Terra Sector Union wrote:Lethal Injection on death row inmates is wrong. Humans are good as a resource. So why waste one by simply killing them for their terrible crimes? The answer is this.
We get these men strapped on with IED's on the battlefield and have them to simply just die to scare off whatever enemy in whatever bloody conflict we're getting our noses in these days These inmates make good cannon fodder. You can't waste good resources like this. Capital Punishment must be like this for now on. I think using inmates as pawns will save more honorable lives of soldiers. Lethal Injection is a waste.
Ethical? Not quite. Reasonable? Yes.
Would you support this?

by The Holy Therns » Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:39 pm
Terra Sector Union wrote:Lethal Injection on death row inmates is wrong. Humans are good as a resource. So why waste one by simply killing them for their terrible crimes? The answer is this.
We get these men strapped on with IED's on the battlefield and have them to simply just die to scare off whatever enemy in whatever bloody conflict we're getting our noses in these days These inmates make good cannon fodder. You can't waste good resources like this. Capital Punishment must be like this for now on. I think using inmates as pawns will save more honorable lives of soldiers. Lethal Injection is a waste.
Ethical? Not quite. Reasonable? Yes.
Would you support this?
Gallade wrote:Love, cake, wine and banter. No greater meaning to life (〜^∇^)〜
Ethel mermania wrote:to therns is to transend the pettiness of the field of play into the field of dreams.

by Chernoslavia » Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:45 pm
Luveria wrote:Terra Sector Union wrote:Would you support this?
Here's where you went wrong. "Death row inmates".... those are total psychos and sociopaths, and you want to give them military training, a gun, and send them to a foreign land where they can escape rape and pillage wherever they please, now armed with US infantry training and weapons issued courtesy of the US government.
Now if you said, "lets force all prisoners in on non-violent charges of drug possession (primarily marijuana) to serve in the military's penal battalions...then you may have been onto something.Dyakovo wrote:I'm over 40, and have no idea how much prostitutes charge.
I'm 22 and also have no idea how much prostitutes charge.

by Chernoslavia » Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:46 pm
The Holy Therns wrote:Terra Sector Union wrote:Lethal Injection on death row inmates is wrong. Humans are good as a resource. So why waste one by simply killing them for their terrible crimes? The answer is this.
We get these men strapped on with IED's on the battlefield and have them to simply just die to scare off whatever enemy in whatever bloody conflict we're getting our noses in these days These inmates make good cannon fodder. You can't waste good resources like this. Capital Punishment must be like this for now on. I think using inmates as pawns will save more honorable lives of soldiers. Lethal Injection is a waste.
Ethical? Not quite. Reasonable? Yes.
Would you support this?
Please tell me you're joking.

by Luveria » Wed Nov 27, 2013 7:53 pm
Chernoslavia wrote:Luveria wrote:
Here's where you went wrong. "Death row inmates".... those are total psychos and sociopaths, and you want to give them military training, a gun, and send them to a foreign land where they can escape rape and pillage wherever they please, now armed with US infantry training and weapons issued courtesy of the US government.
Now if you said, "lets force all prisoners in on non-violent charges of drug possession (primarily marijuana) to serve in the military's penal battalions...then you may have been onto something.
I'm 22 and also have no idea how much prostitutes charge.
Why the hell would you even want to know? ....Nevermind.
About drafting in people of drug possession, I'd say "nay". Not all people in possession of marijuana or narcotics are dealers, some are users, junkies. Give a junky a gun, and your asking for trouble.

by Chernoslavia » Wed Nov 27, 2013 8:04 pm
Luveria wrote:Chernoslavia wrote:
Why the hell would you even want to know? ....Nevermind.
About drafting in people of drug possession, I'd say "nay". Not all people in possession of marijuana or narcotics are dealers, some are users, junkies. Give a junky a gun, and your asking for trouble.
I don't want any prisoners drafted.
It's just a lot less stupid drafting non-violent offenders than to "militarize" hardened psychopaths.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Ameriganastan, Bovad, Canarsia, EuroStralia, Firb, Forsher, La Xinga, Loeje, Ryemarch, Velvoinka
Advertisement