NATION

PASSWORD

Should death row inmates be militarized instead?

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40510
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:27 am

Terra Sector Union wrote:
Distruzio wrote:
I don't support this. I'd rather they be executed.

It is execution......with a cause.


No, it is forcing people to use their bodies against their will. It is a very dangerous precedent to set, especially since people can be wrongly convicted (I wonder how many times I will mention this). It also completely destroys any moral high-ground we have against any other opponent (at least terrorists volunteer). Not to mention you will turn virtually every minority as well as the poor against your government.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Lies and Ignorance
Minister
 
Posts: 2632
Founded: Nov 21, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Lies and Ignorance » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:43 am

Terra Sector Union wrote:
Distruzio wrote:
I don't support this. I'd rather they be executed.

It is execution......with a cause.

Even "humane" forms of execution are on shaky ethical ground, but this is exceedingly ludicrous.
Last edited by Lies and Ignorance on Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:43 am, edited 1 time in total.
✡☭♀

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:50 am

Dracoria wrote:
God Kefka wrote:
They would also legitimize the terrorists' claims that the West is decadent and evil...


To be fair, we also do this every time we eat something wrapped in bacon.

Are you implying that Epic Meal Time is the one transgression that has caused the War on Terror to drag on for so long?
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Nov 25, 2013 3:54 am

Neutraligon wrote:
Regnum Dominae wrote:That's disgusting and sickening, TSU.


I am shocked people don't see the ethical problems of forcing certain subsections of the population (some of the most vulnerable) to be experimented on. How can there not be those ethical problems. I hate to Goodwin this one, but how is that any different from what Hitler did

Strictly speaking, Mengele, not Hitler.
New Laikland wrote:
Regnum Dominae wrote:That's disgusting and sickening, TSU.


How better can you advance human medicine than experimenting on humans?

I guess experiments on other animals are ok, I mean, we are above nature after all.

We experiment on other animals, because mice are very close to humans biologically, and it doesn't put lives at risk.
Geilinor wrote:
New Laikland wrote:
How better can you advance human medicine than experimenting on humans?

But doing it without their consent is no different from what Hitler did. We have clinical trials, which are a much safer and more humane way to advance medicine.

Even with "consent", you aren't allowed to experiment.
New Laikland wrote:
Jamjai wrote:the first question would be why did they committed the crime

How can someone dehumanize themselves?


What do you mean why? Murder being something not in self defense, just flat out killing someone. (If it was for revenge, that may be an exception). Rape, there isn't a possible excuse for.

Dehumanization would be killing someone or destroying their lives.

Your opinion is a social construct that is held as a populist viewpoint.
It is not "true".
New Laikland wrote:
Geilinor wrote:It still doesn't make you not biologically "human".


Theoretically, of course.

Your opinion does not hold to the criteria to become a "theory".
New Laikland wrote:
The Scientific States wrote:Theoretically? :eyebrow:

I'm sorry, did you mean to post factually? If not you might want to remove the part of your sig that claims you are "Pro-Science."


What is Science other than theories and ideas?

Theoretically as in, according to society, rather than nature. Sure, they're still humans by species, but they shouldn't be considered humans by society.

You clearly don't have an understanding as to the meaning of "theory" in a scientific context.
In scientific context, a "hypothesis" is the common use "theory", while a "theory" is a "fact".

Hence why creationism and intelligent design are not "theories".
Terra Sector Union wrote:
Dracoria wrote:
Exactly. Use a remote piloted drone instead, then you can steer the damned thing and maintain some semblence of the moral high ground.

Why waste drones when you have inmates?

I remember a statistic once, I don't care to find it to bother assessing its validity, but the US valued one of its personnel at equivalent 68 million dollars or something equally fantastic.

Drones cost less than this.
Terra Sector Union wrote:
Every human has dignity.

No. Some people are too messed up to have dignity.

Like you, it would seem.
Terra Sector Union wrote:
Dracoria wrote:
They'd be terribly inefficient in that role. How about putting them to work building the drones?

The ones that should build drones are ones that have committed minor offenses such as littering, loitering, tagging, public nudity and spitting, etc.

Since death row inmates serve very long terms prior to their execution, it'd probably be more financially viable (from a standpoint of having a high prisoner turnover for minor offences and having to retrain) to have them build the drones.
Terra Sector Union wrote:
God Kefka wrote:
This will promote terrorism...

No it wouldn't.
Terra Sector Union wrote:We get these men strapped on with IED's on the battlefield and have them to simply just die to scare off whatever enemy in whatever bloody conflict we're getting our noses in these days

You're right.
Actually, it is terrorism.
The Genoese Cromanatum wrote:
Orham wrote:
What would that accomplish, exactly?


They'd infect the populous of the enemy's populated areas. It's a pretty sound idea.

It wouldn't and it isn't.
Bioweapons fell out of favour largely because they were pretty shit.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Terra Sector Union
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1363
Founded: Sep 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Terra Sector Union » Mon Nov 25, 2013 4:00 am

Neutraligon wrote:
Terra Sector Union wrote:It is execution......with a cause.


No, it is forcing people to use their bodies against their will. It is a very dangerous precedent to set, especially since people can be wrongly convicted (I wonder how many times I will mention this). It also completely destroys any moral high-ground we have against any other opponent (at least terrorists volunteer). Not to mention you will turn virtually every minority as well as the poor against your government.

Minorities against the government?
So you're assuming the majority agrees with such methods?
Not everything is about this so-called "oppressive white people".
What does minorities have to do with extreme execution methods anyway?
For so long, Mankind has been plagued by division. Division by culture, creed, skin color, religion and nationality. These very divisions have been the cause of most human conflicts. But in the age of globalism, we can finally have that chance to implement a world government where all human beings are seen as equals. Isn't that what everyone wants? World peace? I do. You should support that too. It may not end all conflicts, but the reductions of Man on Man violence will be at an all time low when the entire planet gets administered by one governing body.


Strobe Talbot. wrote:n the next century (now), nations as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single global authority and realize national sovereignty wasn’t such a great deal after all.

User avatar
Vixia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 192
Founded: Apr 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Vixia » Mon Nov 25, 2013 5:32 am

Though there is a tax, rehabilitation is the answer.
●▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬๑Neutral Good๑▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬●
My Political Party : Swedish Social Democratic Party
My Religion : Lutheran, not very religious though.
Socialism, Feminism, Social Democracy, Religious Freedom, Democratic Socialism, LGBT rights, Environmental protection, Christian Democracy, Pro-Choice, Anti-Racism, Cosmopolitanism, Liberal Monarchism, Pro-Immigration, Liberal Christianity, Multiculturalism, Tolerating all ideologies,
-★ ★ ★ ★ ★-

User avatar
Czechanada
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 14851
Founded: Aug 31, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Czechanada » Mon Nov 25, 2013 6:58 am

Remember, Socrates was a death row inmate.
"You know what I was. You see what I am. Change me, change me!" - Randall Jarrell.

User avatar
Wind in the Willows
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6770
Founded: Apr 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wind in the Willows » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:16 am

Get them to run across fields and deserts to search for hidden bombs, or you could strap them to your tanks and other equipment to be used as human shields.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40510
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:23 am

Terra Sector Union wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
No, it is forcing people to use their bodies against their will. It is a very dangerous precedent to set, especially since people can be wrongly convicted (I wonder how many times I will mention this). It also completely destroys any moral high-ground we have against any other opponent (at least terrorists volunteer). Not to mention you will turn virtually every minority as well as the poor against your government.

Minorities against the government?
So you're assuming the majority agrees with such methods?
Not everything is about this so-called "oppressive white people".
What does minorities have to do with extreme execution methods anyway?


Minorities means those who are African American, Hispanic, etc, so no. I am pretty sure the majority would be sickened by such an idea.
Where did I say anything about oppressive white people?
Because minorities (specifically African American) are have a disproportionately large population in prison and on death row.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Wind in the Willows
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6770
Founded: Apr 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wind in the Willows » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:24 am

Neutraligon wrote:
Terra Sector Union wrote:Minorities against the government?
So you're assuming the majority agrees with such methods?
Not everything is about this so-called "oppressive white people".
What does minorities have to do with extreme execution methods anyway?


Minorities means those who are African American, Hispanic, etc, so no. I am pretty sure the majority would be sickened by such an idea.
Where did I say anything about oppressive white people?
Because minorities (specifically African American) are have a disproportionately large population in prison and on death row.


Oh my fucking god, here we go again with the race argument.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40510
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:29 am

Wind in the Willows wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
Minorities means those who are African American, Hispanic, etc, so no. I am pretty sure the majority would be sickened by such an idea.
Where did I say anything about oppressive white people?
Because minorities (specifically African American) are have a disproportionately large population in prison and on death row.


Oh my fucking god, here we go again with the race argument.


The fact is African Americans make up a large percentage of current death row inmates, in fact they are equal to white death row inmates at 41% despite being about 12.5% f the population. Do you think such a group would agree to such treatment of their family and community (The same could be said for whites, but as the are disproportionately represented I would think the outrage would be greater)?
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Wind in the Willows
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6770
Founded: Apr 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wind in the Willows » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:33 am

Neutraligon wrote:
Wind in the Willows wrote:
Oh my fucking god, here we go again with the race argument.


The fact is African Americans make up a large percentage of current death row inmates, in fact they are equal to white death row inmates at 41% despite being about 12.5% f the population. Do you think such a group would agree to such treatment of their family and community (The same could be said for whites, but as the are disproportionately represented I would think the outrage would be greater)?


WHY THE FUCK DOES RACE MATTER? They done something bad and will get their punishment, regardless of their fucking races. Seriously.

User avatar
Madenia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 582
Founded: Aug 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Madenia » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:34 am

No give them death.

Militarization is a really bad idea because murderers cannot be trusted on the battlefield. I'm sure more civilians would get killed overseas.

User avatar
Wind in the Willows
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6770
Founded: Apr 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wind in the Willows » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:35 am

Madenia wrote:No give them death.

Militarization is a really bad idea because murderers cannot be trusted on the battlefield. I'm sure more civilians would get killed overseas.


Who says they will be trusted with weapons? We could use the murderers to walk across deserts, fields and other surfaces to find hidden bombs and place them out in the open to find snipers.

User avatar
Morlodania
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8554
Founded: Oct 29, 2013
Father Knows Best State

Postby Morlodania » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:38 am

In my nation, yes, we use them as a human bomb.
In reality, no, horrible idea.
Beware, I live
Prophet of MorloKitty!

Officially Thernsymantic!
Statty: Un-Daughter
New Cinoth: Insane Mistress
Sungai: Cousin of Sorts
Pinki3: Living Cupcake
LadyRebels: The Witch
Fort: That Crazy Guy in the Corner
Gidge: The Fluffy Queen
Valerie: Vampire Cookie Queen
Glee: Glee-chan
Greater Appalachia: The Ghost
Earthy/Uni: Platonic Lover
Nana: Kitteh Mama

Gallade wrote:My Little Morlo, Abduction is Magic~

I am the Night. I am Nightmare and Shadow, I am Fear and Death, I am Rest and Peace. I am your deepest Fears, I am your greatest Comfort. I am all you hide from, and yet, I am all you want.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40510
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:39 am

Wind in the Willows wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
The fact is African Americans make up a large percentage of current death row inmates, in fact they are equal to white death row inmates at 41% despite being about 12.5% f the population. Do you think such a group would agree to such treatment of their family and community (The same could be said for whites, but as the are disproportionately represented I would think the outrage would be greater)?


WHY THE FUCK DOES RACE MATTER? They done something bad and will get their punishment, regardless of their fucking races. Seriously.


First, you are assuming that those on death row are actually guilty of the crime they are there for. Considering the number of people who have been exonerated over the years, this is unlikely. Second, I mention race because certain races are more affected then others due to who goes to jail, and the type of sentences they get. African Americans specifically get harsher punishments the whites, for the same crime.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40510
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:40 am

Morlodania wrote:In my nation, yes, we use them as a human bomb.
In reality, no, horrible idea.


General is OOC.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Wind in the Willows
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6770
Founded: Apr 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wind in the Willows » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:40 am

Neutraligon wrote:
Wind in the Willows wrote:
WHY THE FUCK DOES RACE MATTER? They done something bad and will get their punishment, regardless of their fucking races. Seriously.


First, you are assuming that those on death row are actually guilty of the crime they are there for. Considering the number of people who have been exonerated over the years, this is unlikely. Second, I mention race because certain races are more affected then others due to who goes to jail, and the type of sentences they get. African Americans specifically get harsher punishments the whites, for the same crime.


Please provide evidence that they get harsher punishments, go on, give me some evidence.

User avatar
Madenia
Diplomat
 
Posts: 582
Founded: Aug 30, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Madenia » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:40 am

Wind in the Willows wrote:
Madenia wrote:No give them death.

Militarization is a really bad idea because murderers cannot be trusted on the battlefield. I'm sure more civilians would get killed overseas.


Who says they will be trusted with weapons? We could use the murderers to walk across deserts, fields and other surfaces to find hidden bombs and place them out in the open to find snipers.


Still violates the eighth amendment.

User avatar
Wind in the Willows
Negotiator
 
Posts: 6770
Founded: Apr 02, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Wind in the Willows » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:40 am

Morlodania wrote:In my nation, yes, we use them as a human bomb.
In reality, no, horrible idea.


General is OCC, dude.

User avatar
Imperializt Russia
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 54847
Founded: Jun 03, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Imperializt Russia » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:45 am

Wind in the Willows wrote:
Madenia wrote:No give them death.

Militarization is a really bad idea because murderers cannot be trusted on the battlefield. I'm sure more civilians would get killed overseas.


Who says they will be trusted with weapons? We could use the murderers to walk across deserts, fields and other surfaces to find hidden bombs and place them out in the open to find snipers.

I don't see the point since western forces have systems built to do those things already.
Warning! This poster has:
PT puppet of the People's Republic of Samozaryadnyastan.

Lamadia wrote:dangerous socialist attitude
Also,
Imperializt Russia wrote:I'm English, you tit.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40510
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:45 am

Wind in the Willows wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
First, you are assuming that those on death row are actually guilty of the crime they are there for. Considering the number of people who have been exonerated over the years, this is unlikely. Second, I mention race because certain races are more affected then others due to who goes to jail, and the type of sentences they get. African Americans specifically get harsher punishments the whites, for the same crime.


Please provide evidence that they get harsher punishments, go on, give me some evidence.


http://www.sentencingproject.org/doc/pu ... review.pdf
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Jakob Max
Civilian
 
Posts: 1
Founded: Nov 04, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Jakob Max » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:50 am

I find it horrible, immoral, unethical, and a waste of human life. Sounds fun, let's try it.

User avatar
Immoren
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 65246
Founded: Mar 20, 2010
Democratic Socialists

Postby Immoren » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:51 am

Jakob Max wrote:I find it horrible, immoral, unethical, and a waste of human life. Sounds fun, let's try it.


MAybe in Warhammer 40k or Starcraft.
IC Flag Is a Pope Principia
discoursedrome wrote:everyone knows that quote, "I know not what weapons World War Three will be fought, but World War Four will be fought with sticks and stones," but in a way it's optimistic and inspiring because it suggests that even after destroying civilization and returning to the stone age we'll still be sufficiently globalized and bellicose to have another world war right then and there

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159035
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:51 am

Wind in the Willows wrote:Get them to run across fields and deserts to search for hidden bombs, or you could strap them to your tanks and other equipment to be used as human shields.

Why not just cut out the middleman and call for them to be delivered in chains and gimp suits to your sex dungeon?

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bovad, Canarsia, EuroStralia, Firb, Forsher, La Xinga, Loeje, Rusozak, Ryemarch, Velvoinka

Advertisement

Remove ads