Not Jesus. Mary was born without sin, but some will debate that she was free of sin too. Of course God is free of sin, even though God has killed people which is kind of a sin and all...
Advertisement

by Baader-Meinhof Gruppe » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:25 pm

by Euronion » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:26 pm
Salon noted that in spite of the exclusionary policy, Myrtle Grove will still be eligible for taxpayer-funded government subsidies in 2014.
Thomas Paine wrote:"to argue with someone who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead"

by Saint Kitten » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:26 pm

by Vazdania » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:26 pm
Saint Kitten wrote:Vazdania wrote:You are actually funding math english physical education and classes like it.
Government isn't entangled in this.
It is because they are funding teachers to teach kids who were forced to sign this. It is entangled. They didn't sign a check for the pledge, but they are funding the teachers who tell these kids they have to sign it to get in the school.
They have the public school option.
by Llamalandia » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:26 pm
Zottistan wrote:Link.
The letter.A Christian private school in Wilmington, NC has announced that it has adopted a so-called “Biblical Morality Policy” that allows the school to expel or refuse to admit LGBT children or children from families with LGBT members. According to Salon.com, the letter was written by Myrtle Grove Christian School President J. Stacy Miller.
The letter (embedded here) begins by evoking the childhood game “Duck Duck Goose.”
“Do you remember playing circle games like ‘Duck Duck Goose’ in elementary school?” Miller asked. “In order to form a circle, we would gather in close together, hold hands, and then back up away from the center” and form a circle.
“If we move to far from the center, we can’t hold hands anymore,” the principal warned.
He went on to say that all families with children at Myrtle Grove must sign the “Biblical Morality Policy,” swearing not to participate in, support or affirm “sexual immorality, homosexual activity, or bisexual activity; promoting such practices; or being unable to support the moral principles of the school.”
Compliance with the anti-LGBT policy will enable the school, he said, will help “students to develop a biblical understanding of morality and to pursue a life that is governed by the biblical moral code.”
“For this reason,” said Miller, “the school reserves the right, within its sole discretion, to refuse admission of an applicant or to discontinue enrollment of a student if the atmosphere or conduct within a particular home or the activities of the student are counter to or are in opposition to the biblical lifestyle the school teaches.”
Salon noted that in spite of the exclusionary policy, Myrtle Grove will still be eligible for taxpayer-funded government subsidies in 2014.
To sum up, a private school in North Carolina has adopted a policy that allows them to expel or refuse to admit sexual and gender minority students, or students from families with sexual and gender minority members. Their reasoning? Bible quotes and a terribly put-together metaphor about duck-duck-goose.
Honestly, isn't this illegal? Are private schools exempt from the Civil Rights Act? They shouldn't be. And isn't the school continuing to be open to government subsidies blatantly unconstitutional?
:)
by Geilinor » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:27 pm


by Saint Kitten » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:27 pm
Vazdania wrote:Saint Kitten wrote:It is because they are funding teachers to teach kids who were forced to sign this. It is entangled. They didn't sign a check for the pledge, but they are funding the teachers who tell these kids they have to sign it to get in the school.
Kids aren't forced to sign this.They have the public school option.


by Geilinor » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:28 pm
Vazdania wrote:Saint Kitten wrote:It is because they are funding teachers to teach kids who were forced to sign this. It is entangled. They didn't sign a check for the pledge, but they are funding the teachers who tell these kids they have to sign it to get in the school.
Kids aren't forced to sign this.They have the public school option.

by Vazdania » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:28 pm
They still have the public school option.
by Vazdania » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:29 pm
They have the public school option.
by Euronion » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:29 pm
Thomas Paine wrote:"to argue with someone who has renounced the use of reason is like administering medicine to the dead"

by Saint Kitten » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:30 pm
silly, we are talking about kids going to the school. Not The ones smart enough not too
by Pangus » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:31 pm

by Vazdania » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:32 pm

by Baader-Meinhof Gruppe » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:33 pm
Geilinor wrote:Baader-Meinhof Gruppe wrote:
Not Jesus. Mary was born without sin, but some will debate that she was free of sin too. Of course God is free of sin, even though God has killed people which is kind of a sin and all...
That's the joke. If the school really wanted to exclude sinners, they'd ban everyone and close down.
Nah, Jesus preached essentially the opposite of what they preach. What with all that "love thy neighbor" communist crap?
by Saint Kitten » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:34 pm

by Benuty » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:36 pm
Saint Kitten wrote:Vazdania wrote:I'm not sure that's valid.
The students are underage and therefore subject to what school their parents want them to attend.
Don't derail this. We are talking about the govt sending over $ to a school that makes the kids sign a pledge saying they aren't gay, and if they are they will be kicked out. That is government entanglement. Financially supporting a school that has a very strict anti-homosexuality policy.

by Geilinor » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:36 pm

by Arkandros » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:38 pm

by Saint Kitten » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:38 pm
Benuty wrote:Saint Kitten wrote:Don't derail this. We are talking about the govt sending over $ to a school that makes the kids sign a pledge saying they aren't gay, and if they are they will be kicked out. That is government entanglement. Financially supporting a school that has a very strict anti-homosexuality policy.
There is a fairly easy solution to this....yet everyone seems too busy to notice it.

by Geilinor » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:38 pm
Pangus wrote: If your a pro-LGBT family would you really want to continue sending your kid to this school?

by Des-Bal » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:38 pm
Geilinor wrote:Are you familiar with the terms "indoctrination" and "brainwashing"?
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Vazdania » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:39 pm
Saint Kitten wrote:Vazdania wrote:I'm not sure that's valid.
The students are underage and therefore subject to what school their parents want them to attend.
Don't derail this. We are talking about the govt sending over $ to a school that makes the kids sign a pledge saying they aren't gay, and if they are they will be kicked out. That is government entanglement. Financially supporting a school that has a very strict anti-homosexuality policy.

by Benuty » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:40 pm

by Vazdania » Wed Nov 27, 2013 10:40 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Dazchan, Kashimura, Necroghastia, Republica de Sierra Nevada, The Notorious Mad Jack, Upper Ireland
Advertisement