by Czechanada » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:14 pm
by Pandeeria » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:16 pm
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???
by Greed and Death » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:16 pm
by Estado Paulista » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:18 pm
by Czechanada » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:19 pm
by Pandeeria » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:20 pm
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???
by Czechanada » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:21 pm
by Avenio » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:21 pm
Czechanada wrote:There has been a biological technology discovered where women could become pregnant without male fertilization through an egg only being fertilized with another x chromosome.
by Frisivisia » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:21 pm
by Olthar » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:21 pm
by Ifreann » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:25 pm
Czechanada wrote:There has been a biological technology discovered where women could become pregnant without male fertilization through an egg only being fertilized with another x chromosome.
Given that males would no longer be necessary for reproduction, should society consider removing the male gender?
by Czechanada » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:26 pm
Avenio wrote:Czechanada wrote:There has been a biological technology discovered where women could become pregnant without male fertilization through an egg only being fertilized with another x chromosome.
And where's the money going to come from to pay for expensive biotechnology to provide for artificial reproduction for ~7 billion people?
by Ifreann » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:26 pm
Olthar wrote:YES! LESBIAN UTOPIA AWAITS ME! I'M COMING!!!
by Occupied Deutschland » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:27 pm
by Cannot think of a name » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:28 pm
Czechanada wrote:sex is no longer a necessity
by Blazedtown » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:28 pm
Czechanada wrote:The female gender does not have these negative traits such as aggression,
by Meinkraft » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:28 pm
Soldier wrote:And then he used his fight money to buy two of every animal on earth. And then he hearded them onto a boat, and then he beat the crap out of every single one!
by Geilinor » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:29 pm
by Blazedtown » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:29 pm
greed and death wrote:Since most sex is not for reproduction I imagine not needing men for reproduction would decrease sex by much.
by Ifreann » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:30 pm
Meinkraft wrote:Sex is about widening the Gene Pool, about differentiating the human race. So by making everything asexual, you're practically asking for extinction.
by Sanguinea » Tue Nov 19, 2013 4:30 pm
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Almonaster Nuevo, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Deblar, GMS Greater Miami Shores 1, Grinning Dragon, Ifreann, Repreteop, The Jamesian Republic
Advertisement