Well, I guess I'll go read about honorable forms of suicide then, just in case I ever do lose my member in a tragic accident. *nods*
Advertisement

by Soldati Senza Confini » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:28 pm
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Oneracon » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:28 pm

Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
| Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
| Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |

by Threlizdun » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:28 pm
Auralia wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
You... do realize that post-menopausal women and women with certain disabilities CANNOT bear children right?
Yes. That doesn't mean that they cannot engage in the conjugal act, which is naturally ordered towards childbearing regardless of the fertility status of either spouse.
by Auralia » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:28 pm
Othelos wrote:
What do think of the idea of a child raised by his father and uncle, with his/her grandmother as a maternal figure?

by Olthar » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:28 pm
Auralia wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
You... do realize that post-menopausal women and women with certain disabilities CANNOT bear children right?
Yes. That doesn't mean that they cannot engage in the conjugal act, which is naturally ordered towards childbearing regardless of the fertility status of either spouse.

by Neutraligon » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:28 pm
Auralia wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
You... do realize that post-menopausal women and women with certain disabilities CANNOT bear children right?
Yes. That doesn't mean that they cannot engage in the conjugal act, which is naturally ordered towards childbearing regardless of the fertility status of either spouse.

by The Emerald Dawn » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:29 pm

by Pandeeria » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:29 pm
Auralia wrote:Othelos wrote:What do think of the idea of a child raised by his father and uncle, with his/her grandmother as a maternal figure?
I think it would be difficult for the grandmother to play as significant a role in his or her grandchild's life as that child's own mother could, because of her age, the nature of their relationship, the fact that they probably aren't living together, etc.
Ultimately, children are best off when raised by their mother and father.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.
In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

by Lost heros » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:29 pm
Auralia wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
You... do realize that post-menopausal women and women with certain disabilities CANNOT bear children right?
Yes. That doesn't mean that they cannot engage in the conjugal act, which is naturally ordered towards childbearing regardless of the fertility status of either spouse.

by Neutraligon » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:29 pm
Auralia wrote:Othelos wrote:What do think of the idea of a child raised by his father and uncle, with his/her grandmother as a maternal figure?
I think it would be difficult for the grandmother to play as significant a role in his or her grandchild's life as that child's own mother could, because of her age, the nature of their relationship, the fact that they probably aren't living together, etc.
Ultimately, children are best off when raised by their mother and father.

by Caecuser » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:29 pm
Auralia wrote:Othelos wrote:What do think of the idea of a child raised by his father and uncle, with his/her grandmother as a maternal figure?
I think it would be difficult for the grandmother to play as significant a role in his or her grandchild's life as that child's own mother could, because of her age, the nature of their relationship, the fact that they probably aren't living together, etc.
Ultimately, children are best off when raised by their mother and father.

by Olthar » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:30 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Olthar wrote:Oh, no problem. As a Traditional Manly ManTM, you'll just kill yourself, anyway, because life without a penis is life not worth living. *nods*
Well, I guess I'll go read about honorable forms of suicide then, just in case I ever do lose my member in a tragic accident. *nods*

by Soldati Senza Confini » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:30 pm
Auralia wrote:Soldati senza confini wrote:
You... do realize that post-menopausal women and women with certain disabilities CANNOT bear children right?
Yes. That doesn't mean that they cannot engage in the conjugal act, which is naturally ordered towards childbearing regardless of the fertility status of either spouse.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by The Tundra » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:30 pm
Conservative Conservationists wrote:Too many puns and bad media lines
Must... Stop.... Self....
Stuff it
Despite anal probe, no crack found by police
Anal probe was shitty
Implements inserted for a crap reason
Man seeking a rears for police brutality
Man sues asses for penetrating his own
Police demand to spread went too far
Long arm of law goes inside
Lesson: Only stick it up there with permission.
Jormengand wrote:If you wish to continue this banal line of thought about the whys and the wherefores, the wall is over there and is very interested in what you have to say

by Neutraligon » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:31 pm

by Shaggai » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:31 pm
Oneracon wrote:Lost heros wrote:I clearly did not. I've heard these arguments before by homophobes, and they sounded legit.
I'm not homophobic. I have gay friends and a boyfriend, I just support abandoning the outdated idea of quote]traditionalunquote marriage. Critique is best articulated from the privileged perspective

by Olthar » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:31 pm

by Lost heros » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:32 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Olthar wrote:Oh, no problem. As a Traditional Manly ManTM, you'll just kill yourself, anyway, because life without a penis is life not worth living. *nods*
Well, I guess I'll go read about honorable forms of suicide then, just in case I ever do lose my member in a tragic accident. *nods*

by Ifreann » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:32 pm
Neutraligon wrote:Auralia wrote:I think it would be difficult for the grandmother to play as significant a role in his or her grandchild's life as that child's own mother could, because of her age, the nature of their relationship, the fact that they probably aren't living together, etc.
Ultimately, children are best off when raised by their mother and father.
Really, so what about abusive households, or households where the child is the caretaker?

by Jormengand » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:33 pm
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

by Blasveck » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:33 pm
Auralia wrote:Othelos wrote:What do think of the idea of a child raised by his father and uncle, with his/her grandmother as a maternal figure?
I think it would be difficult for the grandmother to play as significant a role in his or her grandchild's life as that child's own mother could, because of her age, the nature of their relationship, the fact that they probably aren't living together, etc.
Ultimately, children are best off when raised by their mother and father.

by Oneracon » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:33 pm
Shaggai wrote:Oneracon wrote:I'm not homophobic. I have gay friends and a boyfriend, I just support abandoning the outdated idea of quote]traditionalunquote marriage. Critique is best articulated from the privileged perspectiveArgumentum ad black friends is a logical fallacy.
I was going to write that, until I saw the size 1 text.![]()
How the hell do you fit that much text in those spaces? Even at size 1?

Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
| Pro: | LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa |
| Anti: | Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza |
by Auralia » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:33 pm
Threlizdun wrote:Auralia wrote:
Yes. That doesn't mean that they cannot engage in the conjugal act, which is naturally ordered towards childbearing regardless of the fertility status of either spouse.
Fucking is fun. That's why it's usually done and is the sole reason why it will be happening when fertility is literally impossible. Sex is not naturally ordered towards childbearing, especially when it is naturally impossible.

by Federal Female Asian States » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:34 pm
The 93rd Coalition wrote:Now by the title, I don't mean slavery. I just had an idea a few days ago that may or may not be considered offensive by some of you. And hence this thread was made.
I was in class and we were talking about how when a homosexual goes to the hospital, their partner is a actually not considered a family member, rather as a stranger, and is not permitted. I investigated about other things that marriage does to benefit straight couples, and it obviously turns out - a lot.
So, to keep all the Republicans and the Church happy, could there not be an alternative to marriage? Like a legal bonding that says that these people are together, they are permitted to adopt a child, live under the same roof, treated as a family member, etc, etc. But rather than it be blessed by a judge or priest, it would merely be a document stating all the aforementioned rights by their attorney (Although treated with just the same respect as any marital commitment.)
So what do you thing, NSG? Could this work? Would it not? Has this been suggested? Am I blue?

by Jormengand » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:34 pm
Shaggai wrote:Oneracon wrote:I'm not homophobic. I have gay friends and a boyfriend, I just support abandoning the outdated idea of quote]traditionalunquote marriage. Critique is best articulated from the privileged perspectiveArgumentum ad black friends is a logical fallacy.
I was going to write that, until I saw the size 1 text.![]()
How the hell do you fit that much text in those spaces? Even at size 1?
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Arikea, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bombe, Cannot think of a name, Celritannia, Dakran, Democratic Martian States, El Lazaro, Emmatheeternal, Eurocom, EuroStralia, Fartsniffage, Fractalnavel, Galloism, Gawdzendia, Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Losche, Major-Tom, Malphe II, Norosia, Ostroeuropa, Port Caverton, Primitive Communism, Punished UMN, Stellar Colonies, Techocracy101010, The Huskar Social Union, The Jamesian Republic, Umeria, Upper Ireland, Washington Resistance Army, Zurkerx
Advertisement