NATION

PASSWORD

Gay Civil Union Discussion

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Is this a good Idea?

Yes.
65
35%
No.
79
43%
Yes, but it would never stick.
5
3%
No, and it would never stick.
12
6%
PAPIST!
24
13%
 
Total votes : 185

User avatar
Lost heros
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9622
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost heros » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:20 pm

Auralia wrote:
Othelos wrote:So I'm assuming you would be opposed to a the idea of, say, a child raised by his father and uncle.

I would be concerned about the lack of a mother figure in that child's life, yes.

Defining the role of a person based on their sex, is sexism. You realize this right?
Last edited by Lost heros on Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:20 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by Lost Heros on Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:00, edited 173 times in total.


You can send me a TG. I won't mind.

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot." - Salvador Dali

User avatar
Blasveck
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 13877
Founded: Dec 21, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Blasveck » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:20 pm

Auralia wrote:
Oneracon wrote:I agree. We should be adding a condition to marriage licenses that all couples who enter marriages must have at least one child.

No. Childless marriages are still marriages, so long as they fulfill all of the requirements of marriage: complete union (emotional, spiritual and bodily union, the latter via the conjugal act), permanence, exclusivity, and a natural ordering towards childbearing.

Your whole "Children need a mother and a Father"?

http://www.bu.edu/today/2013/gay-parent ... ight-ones/

Yeah, it's bullshit.
Last edited by Blasveck on Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Forever a Communist

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:21 pm

Blasveck wrote:
Auralia wrote:No. Childless marriages are still marriages, so long as they fulfill all of the requirements of marriage: complete union (emotional, spiritual and bodily union, the latter via the conjugal act), permanence, exclusivity, and a natural ordering towards childbearing.

Your whole "Children need a mother and a Father"?

Yeah, it's bullshit.


Link is broken by the way.
Last edited by Pandeeria on Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Auralia
Senator
 
Posts: 4982
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Auralia » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:21 pm

Neutraligon wrote:
Auralia wrote:Mothers and fathers also have different parenting styles, and play different roles in a child's development.


Really, so what is the general parenting style for mothers verse fathers? Also, what different roles do they play. Please be exact. Also please answer whether post menopausal women should be allowed to marry. Also please provide sauce for all the pasta.


A quick Google search produced this article about the differences between mothers and fathers and how their parental styles complement each other. Here's another.

There is no reason why post-menopausal women should not be allowed to marry, so long as their marriage fulfills all of the requirements of marriage: complete union (both emotional and bodily, the latter via the conjugal act), permanence, exclusivity, and a natural ordering toward childbearing.
Catholic Commonwealth of Auralia
"Amor sequitur cognitionem."

User avatar
Lost heros
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9622
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost heros » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:21 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Olthar wrote:As long as you still have a penis, everything will be fine. That's far more important to raising children than personality. *nods*


But what if I don't have a penis? D: What if something happens that I might lose it? :meh:

Sorry, buddy. You're not allowed to be a father.
Last edited by Lost Heros on Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:00, edited 173 times in total.


You can send me a TG. I won't mind.

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot." - Salvador Dali

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159048
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:22 pm

Threlizdun wrote:
Auralia wrote:No. Childless marriages are still marriages, so long as they fulfill all of the requirements of marriage: complete union (emotional, spiritual and bodily union, the latter via the conjugal act), permanence, exclusivity, and a natural ordering towards childbearing.

None of those are requirements for marriage, nor have they ever been.

You have to remember that Auralia is talking about a special, imaginary institution that only exists in his head. Not the actual, real, legal institution of marriage.

User avatar
The Tundra
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1228
Founded: Sep 10, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby The Tundra » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:22 pm

Pandeeria wrote:
Blasveck wrote:Your whole "Children need a mother and a Father"?

Yeah, it's bullshit.


Link is broken by the way.

fixed it
I suffer from many communicative disorders with the written word do to brain damage sustained during surgery, i apologies for appalling grammar and spelling.
Conservative Conservationists wrote:Too many puns and bad media lines
Must... Stop.... Self....

Stuff it

Despite anal probe, no crack found by police
Anal probe was shitty
Implements inserted for a crap reason
Man seeking a rears for police brutality
Man sues asses for penetrating his own
Police demand to spread went too far
Long arm of law goes inside
Lesson: Only stick it up there with permission.


Jormengand wrote:If you wish to continue this banal line of thought about the whys and the wherefores, the wall is over there and is very interested in what you have to say

User avatar
Auralia
Senator
 
Posts: 4982
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Auralia » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:23 pm

Lost heros wrote:
Auralia wrote:I would be concerned about the lack of a mother figure in that child's life, yes.

Defining the role of a person based on their sex, is sexism. You realize this right?


So all difference feminists are sexists?
Catholic Commonwealth of Auralia
"Amor sequitur cognitionem."

User avatar
Pandeeria
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15269
Founded: Jun 12, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Pandeeria » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:23 pm

Auralia wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
Really, so what is the general parenting style for mothers verse fathers? Also, what different roles do they play. Please be exact. Also please answer whether post menopausal women should be allowed to marry. Also please provide sauce for all the pasta.


A quick Google search produced this article about the differences between mothers and fathers and how their parental styles complement each other. Here's another.

There is no reason why post-menopausal women should not be allowed to marry, so long as their marriage fulfills all of the requirements of marriage: complete union (both emotional and bodily, the latter via the conjugal act), permanence, exclusivity, and a natural ordering toward childbearing.


Is that the actual definition of marriage, or are you just making those arbitrary requirements up?
Lavochkin wrote:Never got why educated people support communism.

In capitalism, you pretty much have a 50/50 chance of being rich or poor. In communism, it's 1/99. What makes people think they have the luck/skill to become the 1% if they can't even succeed in a 50/50 society???

User avatar
Olthar
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 59474
Founded: Jun 23, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Olthar » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:23 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Olthar wrote:As long as you still have a penis, everything will be fine. That's far more important to raising children than personality. *nods*


But what if I don't have a penis? D: What if something happens that I might lose it? :meh:

Oh, no problem. As a Traditional Manly ManTM, you'll just kill yourself, anyway, because life without a penis is life not worth living. *nods*
The Second Cataclysm: My New RP

Roll Them Bones: A Guide to Dice RPs

My mommy says I'm special.
Add 37 to my post count for my previous nation.

Copy and paste this into your signature if you're a unique and special individual who won't conform to another person's demands.

User avatar
Oneracon
Senator
 
Posts: 4735
Founded: Jul 18, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Oneracon » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:23 pm

Lost heros wrote:
Oneracon wrote:Indeed not. You do realise this is sarcasm, right?

I clearly did not. I've heard these arguments before by homophobes, and they sounded legit.

I'm not homophobic. I have gay friends and a boyfriend, I just support abandoning the outdated idea of quote]traditionalunquote marriage. Critique is best articulated from the privileged perspective
Compass
Economic Left/Right: -8.13
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
Oneracon IC Links
Factbook
Embassies

"The abuse of greatness is when it disjoins remorse from power"
Pro:LGBTQ+ rights, basic income, secularism, gun control, internet freedom, civic nationalism, non-military national service, independent Scotland, antifa
Anti: Social conservatism, laissez-faire capitalism, NuAtheism, PETA, capital punishment, Putin, SWERF, TERF, GamerGate, "Alt-right" & neo-Nazism, Drumpf, ethnic nationalism, "anti-PC", pineapple on pizza

Your resident Canadian neutral good socdem graduate student.

*Here, queer, and not a prop for your right-wing nonsense.*

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:23 pm

Olthar wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
But what if I don't have a penis? D: What if something happens that I might lose it? :meh:

Oh, no problem. As a Traditional Manly ManTM, you'll just kill yourself, anyway, because life without a penis is life not worth living. *nods*

...I would be very sad without my member.

User avatar
Soldati Senza Confini
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 86050
Founded: Mar 11, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Soldati Senza Confini » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:24 pm

Auralia wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
Really, so what is the general parenting style for mothers verse fathers? Also, what different roles do they play. Please be exact. Also please answer whether post menopausal women should be allowed to marry. Also please provide sauce for all the pasta.


A quick Google search produced this article about the differences between mothers and fathers and how their parental styles complement each other. Here's another.

There is no reason why post-menopausal women should not be allowed to marry, so long as their marriage fulfills all of the requirements of marriage: complete union (both emotional and bodily, the latter via the conjugal act), permanence, exclusivity, and a natural ordering toward childbearing.


You... do realize that post-menopausal women and women/men with certain disabilities CANNOT bear children right?
Last edited by Soldati Senza Confini on Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:25 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Soldati senza confini: Better than an iPod in shuffle more with 20,000 songs.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

"When it’s a choice of putting food on the table, or thinking about your morals, it’s easier to say you’d think about your morals, but only if you’ve never faced that decision." - Anastasia Richardson

Current Goal: Flesh out nation factbook.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40528
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:24 pm

Auralia wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
Really, so what is the general parenting style for mothers verse fathers? Also, what different roles do they play. Please be exact. Also please answer whether post menopausal women should be allowed to marry. Also please provide sauce for all the pasta.


A quick Google search produced this article about the differences between mothers and fathers and how their parental styles complement each other. Here's another.

There is no reason why post-menopausal women should not be allowed to marry, so long as their marriage fulfills all of the requirements of marriage: complete union (both emotional and bodily, the latter via the conjugal act), permanence, exclusivity, and a natural ordering toward childbearing.


How can a post menopausal woman have a natural ordering toward children. By the way you never did define that

Considering my mother and father were in many ways the exact opposite of that article, considering that the articles provide no backing for those claims I pretty sure I can disregard them as worthless.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:24 pm

Auralia wrote:
Lost heros wrote:Defining the role of a person based on their sex, is sexism. You realize this right?


So all difference feminists are sexists?

No, because they are saying there are differences but those differences do not prescribe set roles.
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

User avatar
Othelos
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 12729
Founded: Feb 05, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Othelos » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:25 pm

Auralia wrote:
Lost heros wrote:Defining the role of a person based on their sex, is sexism. You realize this right?


So all difference feminists are sexists?

What do think of the idea of a child raised by his father and uncle, with his/her grandmother as a maternal figure?
American & German, ich kann auch Deutsch. I have a B.S. in finance.
Pro: Human rights, equality, LGBT rights, socialized healthcare, the EU in theory, green energy, public transportation, the internet as a utility
Anti: Authoritarian regimes and systems, the Chinese government, identity politics, die AfD, populism, organized religion, Erdogan, assault weapon ownership
Free Tibet and Hong Kong | Keep Taiwan Independent

User avatar
Auralia
Senator
 
Posts: 4982
Founded: Dec 15, 2011
Liberal Democratic Socialists

Postby Auralia » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:26 pm

Soldati senza confini wrote:
Auralia wrote:
A quick Google search produced this article about the differences between mothers and fathers and how their parental styles complement each other. Here's another.

There is no reason why post-menopausal women should not be allowed to marry, so long as their marriage fulfills all of the requirements of marriage: complete union (both emotional and bodily, the latter via the conjugal act), permanence, exclusivity, and a natural ordering toward childbearing.


You... do realize that post-menopausal women and women with certain disabilities CANNOT bear children right?


Yes. That doesn't mean that they cannot engage in the conjugal act, which is naturally ordered towards childbearing regardless of the fertility status of either spouse.
Catholic Commonwealth of Auralia
"Amor sequitur cognitionem."

User avatar
Threlizdun
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 15623
Founded: Jun 14, 2009
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Threlizdun » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:26 pm

Auralia wrote:
Neutraligon wrote:
Really, so what is the general parenting style for mothers verse fathers? Also, what different roles do they play. Please be exact. Also please answer whether post menopausal women should be allowed to marry. Also please provide sauce for all the pasta.


A quick Google search produced this article about the differences between mothers and fathers and how their parental styles complement each other. Here's another.
So a sexist book and a blog, got it. That's definitely better than the peer-reviewed research.

There is no reason why post-menopausal women should not be allowed to marry, so long as their marriage fulfills all of the requirements of marriage: complete union (both emotional and bodily, the latter via the conjugal act), permanence, exclusivity, and a natural ordering toward childbearing.
Again, are you just magically bringing children about? How the hell do you go about childbearing when you can't bear children?
Communalist, Social Ecologist, Bioregionalist,
Sex-Positive Feminist, Queer, Trans-woman, Polyamorous

This site stresses me out, so I rarely come on here anymore. I'll try to be civil and respectful towards those I'm debating on here. If you don't extend the same courtesy then I'll probably just ignore you.

If we've been friendly in the past and you want to keep in touch, shoot me a telegram

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:26 pm

Auralia wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
You... do realize that post-menopausal women and women with certain disabilities CANNOT bear children right?


Yes. That doesn't mean that they cannot engage in the conjugal act, which is naturally ordered towards childbearing regardless of the fertility status of either spouse.

Sex without procreation is a sin.

Why do you love sin?

User avatar
Lost heros
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9622
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost heros » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:26 pm

Auralia wrote:
Lost heros wrote:Defining the role of a person based on their sex, is sexism. You realize this right?


So all difference feminists are sexists?

Women and men are different is all they're saying. They're not defining a women's role based on they're sex.
Last edited by Lost Heros on Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:00, edited 173 times in total.


You can send me a TG. I won't mind.

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot." - Salvador Dali

User avatar
Jormengand
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8414
Founded: May 22, 2010
Ex-Nation

Postby Jormengand » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:26 pm

Auralia wrote:
Soldati senza confini wrote:
You... do realize that post-menopausal women and women with certain disabilities CANNOT bear children right?


Yes. That doesn't mean that they cannot engage in the conjugal act, which is naturally ordered towards childbearing regardless of the fertility status of either spouse.

How is it "Naturally ordered" towards something of which it is incapable?
Jormengand wrote:It would be really meta if I sigged this.

User avatar
Neutraligon
Game Moderator
 
Posts: 40528
Founded: Oct 01, 2011
New York Times Democracy

Postby Neutraligon » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:26 pm

Othelos wrote:
Auralia wrote:
So all difference feminists are sexists?

What do think of the idea of a child raised by his father and uncle, with his/her grandmother as a maternal figure?


Somehow biological parents are the best people to raise a child. I notice that Auralia never looks into adoption, or abusive homes.
If you want to call me by a nickname, call me Gon...or NS Batman.
Mod stuff: One Stop Rules Shop | Reppy's Sig Workshop | Getting Help Request
Just A Little though

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159048
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:27 pm

Auralia wrote:
Lost heros wrote:Defining the role of a person based on their sex, is sexism. You realize this right?


So all difference feminists are sexists?

I'm inclined to say yes. Calling some particular kind of sexism "something feminism" doesn't make it not sexist. Like how North Korea isn't actually a democratic people's republic.

User avatar
Lost heros
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9622
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost heros » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:27 pm

Oneracon wrote:
Lost heros wrote:I clearly did not. I've heard these arguments before by homophobes, and they sounded legit.

I'm not homophobic. I have gay friends and a boyfriend, I just support abandoning the outdated idea of quote]traditionalunquote marriage. Critique is best articulated from the privileged perspective

You should stop with the small text. It's rather annoying.
Last edited by Lost Heros on Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:00, edited 173 times in total.


You can send me a TG. I won't mind.

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot." - Salvador Dali

User avatar
Ifreann
Post Overlord
 
Posts: 159048
Founded: Aug 07, 2005
Scandinavian Liberal Paradise

Postby Ifreann » Tue Nov 19, 2013 3:28 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Auralia wrote:
Yes. That doesn't mean that they cannot engage in the conjugal act, which is naturally ordered towards childbearing regardless of the fertility status of either spouse.

Sex without procreation is a sin.

Why do you love sin?

Because it's fun, I expect.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Arikea, Austria-Bohemia-Hungary, Bombe, Cannot think of a name, Celritannia, Dakran, Democratic Martian States, El Lazaro, Emmatheeternal, Eurocom, EuroStralia, Fartsniffage, Fractalnavel, Galloism, Gawdzendia, Great Confederacy of Commonwealth States, Losche, Major-Tom, Malphe II, Norosia, Ostroeuropa, Port Caverton, Primitive Communism, Punished UMN, Stellar Colonies, Techocracy101010, The Grand Fifth Imperium, The Huskar Social Union, The Jamesian Republic, Umeria, Upper Ireland, Washington Resistance Army, Zurkerx

Advertisement

Remove ads