Well, I really don't know. But I do know the reason why it fails is because the nozzle is too small.
Advertisement

by The Truth and Light » Sun Nov 17, 2013 9:43 pm

by YahRite » Sun Nov 17, 2013 9:43 pm
Condunum wrote:YahRite wrote:
wrong about.. ? i made a claim, and then i provided evidence. it's not good enough for some people, and that's fine. as for flaming, is it flaming to call people what they are? exposing yourself to people is pretty gross. you don't seem to have a problem with that.
Your "evidence" was a blogger finding an article about a transgender person using the facilities of a locker room as was intended. One of the mothers complained. The teacher complained. The teacher realized this woman is transgender and was only using the facilities as intended, and nothing came of it. If you can't accept that your own source is showing the lives of transgendered people slowly getting better, then well... sucks to suck.

by Condunum » Sun Nov 17, 2013 9:57 pm
YahRite wrote:Condunum wrote:Your "evidence" was a blogger finding an article about a transgender person using the facilities of a locker room as was intended. One of the mothers complained. The teacher complained. The teacher realized this woman is transgender and was only using the facilities as intended, and nothing came of it. If you can't accept that your own source is showing the lives of transgendered people slowly getting better, then well... sucks to suck.
i have nothing against their lives getting better. i hope they do.

by The Legion of War » Sun Nov 17, 2013 10:04 pm

by Condunum » Sun Nov 17, 2013 10:07 pm
The Legion of War wrote:Alright, so I posted way back that perhaps things should be separated by sex because it's easier for everyone.
However, some people went on about how having to identify as your sex is "miserable" (which I don't quite agree with because it's just a physical feature, much like how I would identify a a person with black hair). However, something came to my mind that might work.
In my residence, there is a unisex bathroom. The stalls are all like miniature rooms, with nothing but a toilet, toilet paper, and maybe a plunger. Since no one can see ANY part of you in these "room-stalls", you get total privacy.
So, the only time you see people is when you're entering, washing your hands, and leaving. Nothing too "icky" there. Do you think this could prevent feelings from getting hurt all around?
Granted, I found it weird at first but I got used to it upon realizing the "room stall" gave me total privacy.

by The Truth and Light » Sun Nov 17, 2013 10:07 pm
The Legion of War wrote:Alright, so I posted way back that perhaps things should be separated by sex because it's easier for everyone.
However, some people went on about how having to identify as your sex is "miserable" (which I don't quite agree with because it's just a physical feature, much like how I would identify a a person with black hair). However, something came to my mind that might work.
In my residence, there is a unisex bathroom. The stalls are all like miniature rooms, with nothing but a toilet, toilet paper, and maybe a plunger. Since no one can see ANY part of you in these "room-stalls", you get total privacy.
So, the only time you see people is when you're entering, washing your hands, and leaving. Nothing too "icky" there. Do you think this could prevent feelings from getting hurt all around?
Granted, I found it weird at first but I got used to it upon realizing the "room stall" gave me total privacy.

by Neutraligon » Sun Nov 17, 2013 10:07 pm
The Legion of War wrote:Alright, so I posted way back that perhaps things should be separated by sex because it's easier for everyone.
However, some people went on about how having to identify as your sex is "miserable" (which I don't quite agree with because it's just a physical feature, much like how I would identify a a person with black hair). However, something came to my mind that might work.
In my residence, there is a unisex bathroom. The stalls are all like miniature rooms, with nothing but a toilet, toilet paper, and maybe a plunger. Since no one can see ANY part of you in these "room-stalls", you get total privacy.
So, the only time you see people is when you're entering, washing your hands, and leaving. Nothing too "icky" there. Do you think this could prevent feelings from getting hurt all around?
Granted, I found it weird at first but I got used to it upon realizing the "room stall" gave me total privacy.

by The Legion of War » Sun Nov 17, 2013 10:10 pm
Neutraligon wrote:The Legion of War wrote:Alright, so I posted way back that perhaps things should be separated by sex because it's easier for everyone.
However, some people went on about how having to identify as your sex is "miserable" (which I don't quite agree with because it's just a physical feature, much like how I would identify a a person with black hair). However, something came to my mind that might work.
In my residence, there is a unisex bathroom. The stalls are all like miniature rooms, with nothing but a toilet, toilet paper, and maybe a plunger. Since no one can see ANY part of you in these "room-stalls", you get total privacy.
So, the only time you see people is when you're entering, washing your hands, and leaving. Nothing too "icky" there. Do you think this could prevent feelings from getting hurt all around?
Granted, I found it weird at first but I got used to it upon realizing the "room stall" gave me total privacy.
That is often what is meant by gender-neutral.

by Cameroi » Sun Nov 17, 2013 10:17 pm

by Falashania » Sun Nov 17, 2013 10:24 pm
Condunum wrote:YahRite wrote:
wrong about.. ? i made a claim, and then i provided evidence. it's not good enough for some people, and that's fine. as for flaming, is it flaming to call people what they are? exposing yourself to people is pretty gross. you don't seem to have a problem with that.
Your "evidence" was a blogger finding an article about a transgender person using the facilities of a locker room as was intended. One of the mothers complained. The teacher complained. The teacher realized this woman is transgender and was only using the facilities as intended, and nothing came of it. If you can't accept that your own source is showing the lives of transgendered people slowly getting better, then well... sucks to suck.

by Condunum » Sun Nov 17, 2013 10:25 pm
Falashania wrote:Condunum wrote:Your "evidence" was a blogger finding an article about a transgender person using the facilities of a locker room as was intended. One of the mothers complained. The teacher complained. The teacher realized this woman is transgender and was only using the facilities as intended, and nothing came of it. If you can't accept that your own source is showing the lives of transgendered people slowly getting better, then well... sucks to suck.
I'm not understanding how you fail to see the problem with a pre-op transexual walking around nude in a women's locker room. It's not as if we're talking about her using a stall in some public restroom here. And, to make matters worse, she did so in a facility that children are known to frequent. Does this mean any pervert who wants to expose their penis to children can just throw on a dress — oh, wait, that's not even necessary, is it? — and stride confidently into the girl's showers? As for the woman apologizing, that is bizarre. I can only assume that she caved in to some serious P.C. pressure. Sad.

by Aikayla » Sun Nov 17, 2013 10:25 pm
Falashania wrote:Condunum wrote:Your "evidence" was a blogger finding an article about a transgender person using the facilities of a locker room as was intended. One of the mothers complained. The teacher complained. The teacher realized this woman is transgender and was only using the facilities as intended, and nothing came of it. If you can't accept that your own source is showing the lives of transgendered people slowly getting better, then well... sucks to suck.
I'm not understanding how you fail to see the problem with a pre-op transexual walking around nude in a women's locker room. It's not as if we're talking about her using a stall in some public restroom here. And, to make matters worse, she did so in a facility that children are known to frequent. Does this mean any pervert who wants to expose their penis to children can just throw on a dress — oh, wait, that's not even necessary, is it? — and stride confidently into the girl's showers? As for the woman apologizing, that is bizarre. I can only assume that she caved in to some serious P.C. pressure. Sad.

by Condunum » Sun Nov 17, 2013 10:28 pm
Aikayla wrote:Falashania wrote:
I'm not understanding how you fail to see the problem with a pre-op transexual walking around nude in a women's locker room. It's not as if we're talking about her using a stall in some public restroom here. And, to make matters worse, she did so in a facility that children are known to frequent. Does this mean any pervert who wants to expose their penis to children can just throw on a dress — oh, wait, that's not even necessary, is it? — and stride confidently into the girl's showers? As for the woman apologizing, that is bizarre. I can only assume that she caved in to some serious P.C. pressure. Sad.
i kinda wanna make a post about some pervert exposing their vagina to children now

by YahRite » Sun Nov 17, 2013 10:30 pm
Condunum wrote:Aikayla wrote:
i kinda wanna make a post about some pervert exposing their vagina to children now
I dunno about in a bathroom, but I literally just looked up "Woman exposes self to children" and found this.
Clickity clicky click.

by Falashania » Sun Nov 17, 2013 10:31 pm
Condunum wrote:Falashania wrote:
I'm not understanding how you fail to see the problem with a pre-op transexual walking around nude in a women's locker room. It's not as if we're talking about her using a stall in some public restroom here. And, to make matters worse, she did so in a facility that children are known to frequent. Does this mean any pervert who wants to expose their penis to children can just throw on a dress — oh, wait, that's not even necessary, is it? — and stride confidently into the girl's showers? As for the woman apologizing, that is bizarre. I can only assume that she caved in to some serious P.C. pressure. Sad.
Can you explain to me the problem with someone who's confirmed a pre-op transsexual using the girl's locker room?

by Des-Bal » Sun Nov 17, 2013 10:32 pm
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Condunum » Sun Nov 17, 2013 10:33 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Government buildings should be made gender neutral but I don't like interfering with private business.

by Des-Bal » Sun Nov 17, 2013 10:34 pm
Condunum wrote:Pretty much this. No mandate for private business or anything, but fierce campaigning could get at least the pro-lgbt businesses to consider them.
Cekoviu wrote:DES-BAL: Introverted, blunt, focused, utilitarian. Hard to read; not verbose online or likely in real life. Places little emphasis on interpersonal relationships, particularly with online strangers for whom the investment would outweigh the returns.
Desired perception: Logical, intellectual
Public perception: Neutral-positive - blunt, cold, logical, skilled at debating
Mindset: Logos

by Falashania » Sun Nov 17, 2013 10:35 pm
Des-Bal wrote:Government buildings should be made gender neutral but I don't like interfering with private business.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: The Plough Islands
Advertisement