NATION

PASSWORD

gender-neutral bathroom mandate? poll

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should gender-neutral bathrooms be mandated?

Yes for private business and government buildings
222
32%
Yes only for government buildings, not private business
69
10%
No, not even for government buildings
404
58%
 
Total votes : 695

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:31 am

Luveria wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
That actively harms transgender people. This man shouldn't be told to use the women's room.


For the new system Lianhua proposed, lets have one restroom door with a penis on it, and the other with a vagina. That means FtMs use the vagina restroom until they get a penis, and MtFs use the penis restroom until they have had SRS. Intersex people can go into whichever restroom they want. People who have lost their genitalia aren't allowed to use any restroom. It will be enforced by having a genitalia inspector at the restroom entrance to have a look at everyone's genitalia before they can go in. Children will not be exempt from genitalia inspections.

What about the transgender females who don't ever want SRS, and thus will be forever forced to go into the men's restroom to get harassed by every man inside who will know the person is a transgender women since the genitalia inspector forced them to use the men's room? As usual, these proposals of grouping people by their genitalia are nothing more than a less-than-subtle way to remind transgender people how hated they are.

A bit off-topic, but I'm curious about reasons for a trans* not wanting SRS... I can think of one (it's major surgery and Thus carries with it significant risk), I was wondering if there were any others...
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:39 am

Dyakovo wrote:
Luveria wrote:
For the new system Lianhua proposed, lets have one restroom door with a penis on it, and the other with a vagina. That means FtMs use the vagina restroom until they get a penis, and MtFs use the penis restroom until they have had SRS. Intersex people can go into whichever restroom they want. People who have lost their genitalia aren't allowed to use any restroom. It will be enforced by having a genitalia inspector at the restroom entrance to have a look at everyone's genitalia before they can go in. Children will not be exempt from genitalia inspections.

What about the transgender females who don't ever want SRS, and thus will be forever forced to go into the men's restroom to get harassed by every man inside who will know the person is a transgender women since the genitalia inspector forced them to use the men's room? As usual, these proposals of grouping people by their genitalia are nothing more than a less-than-subtle way to remind transgender people how hated they are.

A bit off-topic, but I'm curious about reasons for a trans* not wanting SRS... I can think of one (it's major surgery and Thus carries with it significant risk), I was wondering if there were any others...


The second most common reason after fearing surgery risks would be women who would rather have a penis. That causes problems for them in countries like Canada where they aren't legally recognized as a female on any documents unless they get SRS. With a legal attitude like that already in place, I'm not surprised people like Lianhau would extend their restrooms system to treating non-SRS women the same way. Additionally, it takes no less than two years of having been on HRT to get SRS, so genitalia-based systems affect everyone unfairly.

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:44 am

Luveria wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
That actively harms transgender people. This man shouldn't be told to use the women's room.


For the new system Lianhua proposed, lets have one restroom door with a penis on it, and the other with a vagina. That means FtMs use the vagina restroom until they get a penis, and MtFs use the penis restroom until they have had SRS. Intersex people can go into whichever restroom they want. People who have lost their genitalia aren't allowed to use any restroom. It will be enforced by having a genitalia inspector at the restroom entrance to have a look at everyone's genitalia before they can go in. Children will not be exempt from genitalia inspections.

What about the transgender females who don't ever want SRS, and thus will be forever forced to go into the men's restroom to get harassed by every man inside who will know the person is a transgender women since the genitalia inspector forced them to use the men's room? As usual, these proposals of grouping people by their genitalia are nothing more than a less-than-subtle way to remind transgender people how hated they are.


Indeed.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:44 am

Luveria wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:A bit off-topic, but I'm curious about reasons for a trans* not wanting SRS... I can think of one (it's major surgery and Thus carries with it significant risk), I was wondering if there were any others...


The second most common reason after fearing surgery risks would be women who would rather have a penis. That causes problems for them in countries like Canada where they aren't legally recognized as a female on any documents unless they get SRS. With a legal attitude like that already in place, I'm not surprised people like Lianhau would extend their restrooms system to treating non-SRS women the same way. Additionally, it takes no less than two years of having been on HRT to get SRS, so genitalia-based systems affect everyone unfairly.

Ah, okay. Thanks. It seems strange to me but, as we've discussed before, being transgender seems strange on it's own.
Last edited by Dyakovo on Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:45 am, edited 1 time in total.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Linux and the X
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5481
Founded: Apr 29, 2006
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Linux and the X » Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:56 am

Dyakovo wrote:A bit off-topic, but I'm curious about reasons for a trans* not wanting SRS... I can think of one (it's major surgery and Thus carries with it significant risk), I was wondering if there were any others...

Some may want it but be unable to afford it. Also, FTM bottom surgery is not very well-developed; many trans men therefore don't bother.
If you see I've made a mistake in my wording or a factual detail, telegram me and I'll fix it. I'll even give you credit for pointing it out, if you'd like.
BLUE LIVES MURDER

[violet]: Maybe we could power our new search engine from the sexual tension between you two.
Me, responding to a request to vote for a liberation: But... but that would blemish my near-perfect history of spitefully voting against anything the SC does!
Farnhamia: That is not to be taken as license to start calling people "buttmunch."

GPG key ID: A8960638 fingerprint: 2239 2687 0B50 2CEC 28F7 D950 CCD0 26FC A896 0638

they/them pronouns

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:05 am

Linux and the X wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:A bit off-topic, but I'm curious about reasons for a trans* not wanting SRS... I can think of one (it's major surgery and Thus carries with it significant risk), I was wondering if there were any others...

Some may want it but be unable to afford it. Also, FTM bottom surgery is not very well-developed; many trans men therefore don't bother.


Indeed. IIRC, FtM bottom surgery options are either inconvenient, risky/dangerous, or both.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:07 am

Linux and the X wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:A bit off-topic, but I'm curious about reasons for a trans* not wanting SRS... I can think of one (it's major surgery and Thus carries with it significant risk), I was wondering if there were any others...

Some may want it but be unable to afford it. Also, FTM bottom surgery is not very well-developed; many trans men therefore don't bother.


The problem of being unable to afford it is a phenomenon mainly limited to the US in the western world.
Last edited by Luveria on Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:08 am, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:20 am

Luveria wrote:
Linux and the X wrote:Some may want it but be unable to afford it. Also, FTM bottom surgery is not very well-developed; many trans men therefore don't bother.


The problem of being unable to afford it is a phenomenon mainly limited to the US in the western world.


And beyond that, i'm more than happy to grandfather clause in currently installed bathrooms and give them a little slack, provided all future bathrooms meet the gender neutrality requirement.
We don't have to do it all overnight.

This has the added benefit of making Gender Neutral bathrooms seem "Futuristic" and "New", which will mean large businesses will probably calculate it's to their public images interest to renovate.
Last edited by Ostroeuropa on Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:27 am

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Luveria wrote:
The problem of being unable to afford it is a phenomenon mainly limited to the US in the western world.


And beyond that, i'm more than happy to grandfather clause in currently installed bathrooms and give them a little slack, provided all future bathrooms meet the gender neutrality requirement.
We don't have to do it all overnight.

This has the added benefit of making Gender Neutral bathrooms seem "Futuristic" and "New", which will mean large businesses will probably calculate it's to their public images interest to renovate.


The religious right will be unhappy about it.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:27 am

Linux and the X wrote:
Dyakovo wrote:A bit off-topic, but I'm curious about reasons for a trans* not wanting SRS... I can think of one (it's major surgery and Thus carries with it significant risk), I was wondering if there were any others...

Some may want it but be unable to afford it. Also, FTM bottom surgery is not very well-developed; many trans men therefore don't bother.

Wanting the surgery but not being able to afford it is not "not wanting the surgery", so congratulations on completely failing to address my question.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Tue Nov 26, 2013 9:29 am

Luveria wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
And beyond that, i'm more than happy to grandfather clause in currently installed bathrooms and give them a little slack, provided all future bathrooms meet the gender neutrality requirement.
We don't have to do it all overnight.

This has the added benefit of making Gender Neutral bathrooms seem "Futuristic" and "New", which will mean large businesses will probably calculate it's to their public images interest to renovate.


The religious right will be unhappy about it.


I doubt they'd be in the voter base for the government willing to consider this action.
So... fuckem.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:19 pm

Ostroeuropa wrote:
Luveria wrote:
The religious right will be unhappy about it.


I doubt they'd be in the voter base for the government willing to consider this action.
So... fuckem.


You can't get elected without the support of the religious right.

User avatar
The Emerald Dawn
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 20824
Founded: Jun 11, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Emerald Dawn » Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:20 pm

Luveria wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
I doubt they'd be in the voter base for the government willing to consider this action.
So... fuckem.


Republicans can't get elected without the support of the religious right.

FTFY.

User avatar
Rapidblaze
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 182
Founded: Sep 21, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Rapidblaze » Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:24 pm

if it does not affect hygiene, then i am fine

User avatar
Ostroeuropa
Khan of Spam
 
Posts: 57903
Founded: Jun 14, 2006
Inoffensive Centrist Democracy

Postby Ostroeuropa » Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:30 pm

The Emerald Dawn wrote:
Luveria wrote:
Republicans can't get elected without the support of the religious right.

FTFY.


This.
Ostro.MOV

There is an out of control trolley speeding towards Jeremy Bentham, who is tied to the track. You can pull the lever to cause the trolley to switch tracks, but on the other track is Immanuel Kant. Bentham is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Critique of Pure Reason. Kant is clutching the only copy in the universe of The Principles of Moral Legislation. Both men are shouting at you that they have recently started to reconsider their ethical stances.

User avatar
Charzak
Diplomat
 
Posts: 561
Founded: Jun 22, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Charzak » Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:02 pm

Grenartia wrote:
Lianhua wrote:Bathrooms/restrooms should be segregated based on what genitals you have.


That actively harms transgender people. This man shouldn't be told to use the women's room.

Charzak wrote:1. Two genders based on your genitalia. 2. Two bathrooms. 3. Why fix it if it isn't broke? 4. Never actually seen someone complain about two bathrooms in real life.


1. Except there's more than two genders, and gender isn't based on sex.
2. And there's a need for more than two bathrooms.
3. The current system is very much broke, and needs fixing.
4. Doesn't mean we don't exist.


There are two genders determined by your sex chromosomes. You get XX you're a female. You get XY you're a male. If you have a sex change, boom you are now the opposite gender/sex. Use the bathroom you have designated. You were comfortable enough in your situation to switch your sex, now accept the life you are living and what comes with it. You shouldn't be insecure in who you are. I'm a straight male and I have no problem with that. That's me, that's who I am. Does that make me a homophobe or a transsexualphobe(?). No. But why should you get any special treatment just because you decided to accept how you are inside? That's the part people don't get. Once you accept it, stop getting up in our face about it all. We're happy that you did it yes, but you don't deserve special treatment. As for the people who don't accept you, well that's a hate crime if they harm you in anyway so bring it to the authorities.
(Note: Only the first two sentences are directed at the author of the quote.)

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:06 pm

Charzak wrote:
Grenartia wrote:
That actively harms transgender people. This man shouldn't be told to use the women's room.



1. Except there's more than two genders, and gender isn't based on sex.
2. And there's a need for more than two bathrooms.
3. The current system is very much broke, and needs fixing.
4. Doesn't mean we don't exist.


There are two genders determined by your sex chromosomes. You get XX you're a female. You get XY you're a male. If you have a sex change, boom you are now the opposite gender/sex. Use the bathroom you have designated. You were comfortable enough in your situation to switch your sex, now accept the life you are living and what comes with it. You shouldn't be insecure in who you are. I'm a straight male and I have no problem with that. That's me, that's who I am. Does that make me a homophobe or a transsexualphobe(?). No. But why should you get any special treatment just because you decided to accept how you are inside? That's the part people don't get. Once you accept it, stop getting up in our face about it all. We're happy that you did it yes, but you don't deserve special treatment. As for the people who don't accept you, well that's a hate crime if they harm you in anyway so bring it to the authorities.
(Note: Only the first two sentences are directed at the author of the quote.)


Gender being what a person self-identifies as... what relevancy are their chromosomes to their gender?
Last edited by Luveria on Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:06 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Kumrann
Diplomat
 
Posts: 507
Founded: Oct 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kumrann » Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:10 pm

It's not something I disagree with in principle. Although their is a bar where I live with gender neutral toilets and the girls take forever! which is a nightmare when your waiting in a line to pee ...
Born in Cambridge 1993
Messed around a lot for 18 years
Now a student of Politics & Intentional Relations at the University of Manchester


If you cant say something simply, then you simply don't understand it.

PRO: British Unionism, Liberalism, Commonwealth, Decriminalizing Drugs, WestHam, Garage Music, Dancing & Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties
Cosmopolitan 32%
Secular 37%
Visionary 20%
Anarchist 32%
Capitalistic 17%
Militaristic 21%
Anthropocentric 95%

User avatar
Kumrann
Diplomat
 
Posts: 507
Founded: Oct 01, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Kumrann » Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:12 pm

Luveria wrote:
Ostroeuropa wrote:
I doubt they'd be in the voter base for the government willing to consider this action.
So... fuckem.


You can't get elected without the support of the religious right.


where do you live? if that's true, then it sounds awful!
Born in Cambridge 1993
Messed around a lot for 18 years
Now a student of Politics & Intentional Relations at the University of Manchester


If you cant say something simply, then you simply don't understand it.

PRO: British Unionism, Liberalism, Commonwealth, Decriminalizing Drugs, WestHam, Garage Music, Dancing & Lager
ANTI: EU, Smoking Ban, Conservatism, Crypto-Fascist lefties
Cosmopolitan 32%
Secular 37%
Visionary 20%
Anarchist 32%
Capitalistic 17%
Militaristic 21%
Anthropocentric 95%

User avatar
Charzak
Diplomat
 
Posts: 561
Founded: Jun 22, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Charzak » Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:13 pm

Luveria wrote:
Charzak wrote:
There are two genders determined by your sex chromosomes. You get XX you're a female. You get XY you're a male. If you have a sex change, boom you are now the opposite gender/sex. Use the bathroom you have designated. You were comfortable enough in your situation to switch your sex, now accept the life you are living and what comes with it. You shouldn't be insecure in who you are. I'm a straight male and I have no problem with that. That's me, that's who I am. Does that make me a homophobe or a transsexualphobe(?). No. But why should you get any special treatment just because you decided to accept how you are inside? That's the part people don't get. Once you accept it, stop getting up in our face about it all. We're happy that you did it yes, but you don't deserve special treatment. As for the people who don't accept you, well that's a hate crime if they harm you in anyway so bring it to the authorities.
(Note: Only the first two sentences are directed at the author of the quote.)


Gender being what a person self-identifies as... what relevancy are their chromosomes to their gender?


Chromosomes determine your physical sex/gender. I don't know how anyone else was raised but I always thought the two were interchangeable and that's how I meant it. I don't buy into the whole homosexuality, bisexuality, asexuality, etc. is genetic thing, though I don't think its necessarily a choice either. Your physical gender and how you choose to identify yourself are different and a choice each individual can make.

User avatar
Lost heros
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9622
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost heros » Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:17 pm

Charzak wrote:
Luveria wrote:
Gender being what a person self-identifies as... what relevancy are their chromosomes to their gender?


Chromosomes determine your physical sex/gender. I don't know how anyone else was raised but I always thought the two were interchangeable and that's how I meant it. I don't buy into the whole homosexuality, bisexuality, asexuality, etc. is genetic thing, though I don't think its necessarily a choice either. Your physical gender and how you choose to identify yourself are different and a choice each individual can make.

Gender is a social construct and an identity with which someone identifies with. Sex is a biological characteristic. The two are NOT interchangeable.
Last edited by Lost Heros on Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:00, edited 173 times in total.


You can send me a TG. I won't mind.

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot." - Salvador Dali

User avatar
The Carlisle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10024
Founded: Aug 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Carlisle » Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:20 pm

Charzak wrote:
Luveria wrote:
Gender being what a person self-identifies as... what relevancy are their chromosomes to their gender?


Chromosomes determine your physical sex/gender. I don't know how anyone else was raised but I always thought the two were interchangeable and that's how I meant it. I don't buy into the whole homosexuality, bisexuality, asexuality, etc. is genetic thing, though I don't think its necessarily a choice either. Your physical gender and how you choose to identify yourself are different and a choice each individual can make.

Did you pass high school biology? Because we were taught about chromosomal pairings and its not all XX and XY. There is XXY or more commonly known as Klinfelter's Syndrome. There's also X, XXX, XXXX, and a lot more variations. If we used chromosomal pairings as our basis of gender, there would be over a dozen genders.
Last edited by The Carlisle on Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Call me Carly
Gayism enabler
Trans Girl
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.

User avatar
Charzak
Diplomat
 
Posts: 561
Founded: Jun 22, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Charzak » Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:23 pm

Lost heros wrote:
Charzak wrote:
Chromosomes determine your physical sex/gender. I don't know how anyone else was raised but I always thought the two were interchangeable and that's how I meant it. I don't buy into the whole homosexuality, bisexuality, asexuality, etc. is genetic thing, though I don't think its necessarily a choice either. Your physical gender and how you choose to identify yourself are different and a choice each individual can make.

Gender is a social construct and an identity with which someone identifies with. Sex is a biological characteristic. The two are NOT interchangeable.


Well then I apologize. I'll own my mistake. But my point still stands. Two sexes. Choose one or the other of your own free will. Go to the bathroom which corresponds to your current physical sex. If you were comfortable enough to have a sex change then go to the bathroom of which you changed to. Stalls are present in almost every bathroom. No one has to know your business. You've accepted who you are and the majority of people will not bother you. Don't ask for special treatment because you are different.

User avatar
Jerusalem and Damascus
Negotiator
 
Posts: 5632
Founded: Oct 29, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Jerusalem and Damascus » Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:26 pm

I'm supportive of the idea of de-segregating bathrooms. Such stringent separation is a fairly new and I feel damaging development in human society and it's inefficient, too. By having co-ed bathrooms, we'd save more space in buildings.
Roman Catholic, Constitutional Monarchist ala the Duma, Political Pluralist, Laissez-Faire Capitalist, Civil Libertarian (Don't have a link for this one -- just let people do as they do, so to speak)
Economic Left/Right: 3.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -2.00

NUMBER ONE ON KARINZISTAN'S NATION STATES LIST. HELLS YEAH.
Official recipient of Cu Math's "Let's Be Civil" Potato
How physicists I've met seem to function.

User avatar
The Carlisle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10024
Founded: Aug 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Carlisle » Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:27 pm

Charzak wrote:
Lost heros wrote:Gender is a social construct and an identity with which someone identifies with. Sex is a biological characteristic. The two are NOT interchangeable.


Well then I apologize. I'll own my mistake. But my point still stands. Two sexes. Choose one or the other of your own free will. Go to the bathroom which corresponds to your current physical sex. If you were comfortable enough to have a sex change then go to the bathroom of which you changed to. Stalls are present in almost every bathroom. No one has to know your business. You've accepted who you are and the majority of people will not bother you. Don't ask for special treatment because you are different.

We're not asking for special treatment. All we ask is to be treated the same.
Call me Carly
Gayism enabler
Trans Girl
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Belogorod, Best Mexico, Bing sung, Margraviate of Moravia, Norse Inuit Union, Riviere Renard, Senkaku, Soviet Haaregrad, Stellar Colonies, The Holy Therns, Tlaceceyaya

Advertisement

Remove ads