NATION

PASSWORD

gender-neutral bathroom mandate? poll

For discussion and debate about anything. (Not a roleplay related forum; out-of-character commentary only.)

Advertisement

Remove ads

Should gender-neutral bathrooms be mandated?

Yes for private business and government buildings
222
32%
Yes only for government buildings, not private business
69
10%
No, not even for government buildings
404
58%
 
Total votes : 695

User avatar
Marshill
Envoy
 
Posts: 225
Founded: Oct 24, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Marshill » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:05 pm

greed and death wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:I think bathrooms should be used by physical sex, not gender.

The ones that can stand up while urinating uses the men's room the one that must sit down while urinating uses the women's room.


Well, what about the kind of man who sits down to pee?

We in Marshill are fairly broad-minded about calls of nature. But I think the principle should be one gender, or whatever, at a time...

True story: many, many years ago I was in a department store (Nordstrom's) and had to spend a penny. I walked into what I thought was the men's room, but right there by the sinks was a baby changing table! "Crikey, I've got in the ladies," I think, so I turn on my heels, march straight to the room across the hall, look up at the sign and see:

WOMEN

:blush:
Last edited by Marshill on Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:05 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:09 pm

Marshill wrote:
greed and death wrote:The ones that can stand up while urinating uses the men's room the one that must sit down while urinating uses the women's room.


Well, what about the kind of man who sits down to pee?


It's more likely than you think.

Marshill wrote:We in Marshill are fairly broad-minded about calls of nature.


This thread is OOC.

User avatar
NERVUN
Retired Moderator
 
Posts: 29451
Founded: Mar 24, 2005
Ex-Nation

Postby NERVUN » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:23 pm

The Lone Alliance wrote:
Linux and the X wrote:We would suggest that you choke on thousands of spiders.

But still yeah, I suggest you jump off a cliff because you're no better than the bigots.

And I suggest that the BOTH of you settle down before we have to start swinging the ban hammers again.

That's not sarcasm btw.
To those who feel, life is a tragedy. To those who think, it's a comedy.
"Men, today you'll be issued small trees. Do what you can for the emperor's glory." -Daistallia 2104 on bonsai charges in WWII
Science may provide the means while religion provides the motivation but humanity and humanity alone provides the vehicle -DaWoad

One-Stop Rules Shop, read it, love it, live by it. Getting Help Mod email: nervun@nationstates.net NSG Glossary
Add 10,145 to post count from Jolt: I have it from an unimpeachable source, that Dark Side cookies look like the Death Star. The other ones look like butterflies, or bunnies, or something.-Grave_n_Idle

Proud Member of FMGADHPAC. Join today!

User avatar
The Lone Alliance
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 8855
Founded: May 25, 2005
Left-Leaning College State

Postby The Lone Alliance » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:29 pm

NERVUN wrote:
The Lone Alliance wrote:But still yeah, I suggest you jump off a cliff because you're no better than the bigots.

And I suggest that the BOTH of you settle down before we have to start swinging the ban hammers again.

That's not sarcasm btw.
Ah, sorry NERVUN, I'll make sure not to snip back at people next time.
"Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger." -Herman Goering
--------------
War is cruelty, and you cannot refine it; -William Tecumseh Sherman
Free Kraven

User avatar
Aurora Novus
Senator
 
Posts: 4067
Founded: Jan 25, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Aurora Novus » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:32 pm

Luveria wrote:
Marshill wrote:
Well, what about the kind of man who sits down to pee?


It's more likely than you think.


Indeed. I usually only stand if I'm in a hurry, otherwise I prefer to sit down.

User avatar
The Carlisle
Postmaster-General
 
Posts: 10024
Founded: Aug 25, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby The Carlisle » Mon Nov 25, 2013 7:33 pm

Aurora Novus wrote:
Luveria wrote:
It's more likely than you think.


Indeed. I usually only stand if I'm in a hurry, otherwise I prefer to sit down.

Since the creation of the smartphone, sitting down to go has increased greatly. :p
Call me Carly
Gayism enabler
Trans Girl
Radical Anti-Radical Feminist Feminist
S.W.I.F: Sex Worker Inclusionary Feminist.

User avatar
Lianhua (Ancient)
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9164
Founded: Nov 06, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Lianhua (Ancient) » Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:12 am

Bathrooms/restrooms should be segregated based on what genitals you have.
21 y.o. Sine-Japanese female from Tokyo, Japan; Song Xingyiquan/Dai Xinyiquan/Xinyi Liuhe Quan. Sister+Lover of Kapao Pango & Nabeshima. <3.

Careful, jack. My patience has limits, unlike my Kung Fuuuuuuuu.. (^~^) - Lian Sifu

Resistance is futile if less than one ohm.
Remember this, and you shall go far.
Taoist-Buddhist; apparently retainer and daughter of Divair and Stern des Meeres, and sister to Aeken.

I love you, -New Sealand-! Why so pretty, Chinese lady? <3 RenaxJiao!
Quotes about me go here, because I still want a sig, tyvm. Also, Esternial
ヽ(^Д^)ノ Bee doo bee doo bee doo! ヽ(‘ ∇‘ )ノ

User avatar
Charzak
Diplomat
 
Posts: 561
Founded: Jun 22, 2008
Ex-Nation

Postby Charzak » Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:14 am

Two genders based on your genitalia. Two bathrooms. Why fix it if it isn't broke? Never actually seen someone complain about two bathrooms in real life.

User avatar
Orham
Minister
 
Posts: 2286
Founded: Feb 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Orham » Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:28 am

Charzak wrote:Two genders based on your genitalia.


Must we do this again? Must we?

Two bathrooms. Why fix it if it isn't broke?


For the intersexed and transgendered a lack of unisex bathrooms can lead to complications ranging from minor inconveniences to life-threatening situations. Now, a mandate requiring that all public edifices (or all public accommodations, for that matter) bear unisex bathrooms might not be the ideal solution, but let's not pretend there isn't a problem.

Never actually seen someone complain about two bathrooms in real life.


...and? Are you in the habit of only acknowledging problems if you have personally witnessed their effects? That's a bad habit, you should break it.

EDIT: Typo.
Last edited by Orham on Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:29 am, edited 1 time in total.
I'm female, so please remember to say "she" or "her" when referring to me.

Medical student, aspiring to be a USN sailor. Pass the scalpel, and hooyah!

If I go too far, tell me in a TG and we can talk about it. Really, I care about that.

User avatar
Mushet
Post Marshal
 
Posts: 17402
Founded: Apr 29, 2008
Civil Rights Lovefest

Postby Mushet » Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:32 am

Lianhua wrote:Bathrooms/restrooms should be segregated based on what genitals you have.

Why?
"what I believe is like a box, and we’re taking the energy of our thinking and putting into a box of beliefs, pretending that we’re thinking...I’ve gone through most of my life not believing anything. Either I know or I don’t know, or I think." - John Trudell

Gun control is, and always has been, a tool of white supremacy.

Puppet: E-City ranked #1 in the world for Highest Drug Use on 5/25/2015
Puppet Sacred Heart Church ranked #2 in the world for Nudest 2/25/2010
OP of a 5 page archived thread The Forum Seven Tit Museum
Previous Official King of Forum 7 (2010-2012/13), relinquished own title
First person to get AQ'd Quote was funnier in 2011, you had to have been there
Celebrating over a decade on Nationstates!

User avatar
Microsol
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 168
Founded: Apr 13, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Microsol » Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:37 am

Pandeeria wrote:I think bathrooms should be used by physical sex, not gender.

/thread

User avatar
Orham
Minister
 
Posts: 2286
Founded: Feb 18, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Orham » Tue Nov 26, 2013 12:42 am

Microsol wrote:
Pandeeria wrote:I think bathrooms should be used by physical sex, not gender.

/thread


No, not /thread. You haven't given the why of it yet.
I'm female, so please remember to say "she" or "her" when referring to me.

Medical student, aspiring to be a USN sailor. Pass the scalpel, and hooyah!

If I go too far, tell me in a TG and we can talk about it. Really, I care about that.

User avatar
Dusk_Kittens
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1216
Founded: May 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Dusk_Kittens » Tue Nov 26, 2013 1:17 am

The Lone Alliance wrote:
Linux and the X wrote:We would suggest that you choke on thousands of spiders.

It's sarcasm, I realized you wouldn't get it so I edited.

someone pointed out earlier in thread that they couldn't understand how such people could exist, hence mythical.


If you're talking about what I posted, that's not what I said. I said I don't understand the use of "Asexual" as meaning "not being sexually attracted to anyone" (because, biologically speaking, "Asexual" pertains to a form of reproduction -- although I can see why the term would be borrowed and redirected in this context), and plainly stated that I wasn't denying the existence of such persons:

Dusk_Kittens wrote:(snipped)

However, I should correct myself on the earlier post. I was using "Asexual" in the sense of those Intersex persons whose Gender Identities are neither male nor female (in which case, A-gender would probably be correct). I' do not understand the current phenomenon of people saying that they're "Asexual" because they're not sexually attracted to anyone. I'm not denying their situation; I'm just saying I don't understand it (but it seems from what I have been able to find out that they don't, as a general rule, have any particular desire or need to use gender-neutral restrooms).


This has nothing to do with gender, and that was part of what I was attempting to correct myself on from my previous post.

What I intended to convey was that I'm not very familiar with Asexual in this sense, and that I've been led to believe (by an admittedly brief bit of research on the net between the time I made the previous post and the time I made the post from which I've just quoted) that this usage of the term is a recent development. Among other things, a BBC article (published last month) pertaining to otaku culture in Japan touched on the subject, and was among the things I read during that brief bit of research; this article seemed fairly certain that the phenomenon was something new-ish (at least in Japan), these particular otaku preferring "virtual girlfriends" to actual sexual intercourse.

Hell, I only recently started using "LGBTI" instead of "LGBT" -- and I'm still trying to decide if I should instead use "LGBTQIA" or something less complex (like a suggestion made earlier, which I believe was in this thread, something like VRA [that wasn't it; I'm just trying to remember the acronym by virtue of the meaning, which was something like "Various Romantic Attractions"]). I don't believe I'll be using "QUILTBAG." It smells demeaning.

Disclaimer: I'm the B in the LGBTI, and no, it's not a phase (at my age? and having known this about myself for a few decades?) or attempt to get attention or any such thing. Having experienced and observed misunderstandings of Bisexuality often enough, I am certainly aware that people who don't have personal experience of a particular situation may not understand it and mischaracterize it (intentionally or unintentionally). So really, rather than Straw Man what I said, you should see I was admitting that I had limited grasp of the meaning of the term, and hinting that I would welcome further enlightenment.
Her Divine Grace,
the Sovereign Principessa Luna,
Ulata-Druidessâ Teutâs di Genovâs,
Ardua-Druidessâ of Dusk Kittens

The Tribal Confederacy of Dusk_Kittens
(a Factbook in progress)
~ Stairsneach ~

My Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: -7.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
(Left Libertarian)

My C4SS Ratings
58% Economic Leftist
63% Anarchist
79% Anti-Militarist
67% Socio-Cultural Liberal
80% Civil Libertarian

"... perché lo universale degli uomini
si pascono così di quel che pare come di quello che è:
anzi, molte volte si muovono
più per le cose che paiono che per quelle che sono."
-- Niccolò Machiavelli,
Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio,
Libro Primo, Capitolo 25.

User avatar
Dusk_Kittens
Ambassador
 
Posts: 1216
Founded: May 18, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby Dusk_Kittens » Tue Nov 26, 2013 2:17 am

Luveria wrote:
Maqtrybama wrote:Men go in the men's restroom, women go in the women's restroom, transsexuals can...flip a coin. Or they can go into the restroom for whichever one they physically look like.


That's usually what they do, simply because it's the easiest option and doesn't cause any problems.

Secondly, a transexual nearly always looks like the gender they identify as, because they are post-op, which is what transexual means...


I don't think that's what "Transsexual" (sic) means, or else there wouldn't be terms like "Pre-Op MtF TS," "Pre-Op FtM TS," "Non-Op FtM TS," and "Non-Op MtF TS."

"Transsexual" is a more specific term than "Transgender," which includes "Transsexual," but is not limited thereto (and I also know that this usage has not always been the case, but it seems to be the currently most popular usage, within the Trans* community itself, and among those medical and psych professionals who work with Trans* people):

Transgender is an umbrella term for persons whose gender identity, gender expression, or behavior does not conform to that typically associated with the sex to which they were assigned at birth. Gender identity refers to a person’s internal sense of being male, female, or something else; gender expression refers to the way a person communicates gender identity to others through behavior, clothing, hairstyles, voice, or body characteristics.

Source: American Psychological Association

The term transsexual refers to people whose gender identity is different from their assigned sex. Often, transsexual people alter or wish to alter their bodies through hormones, surgery, and other means to make their bodies as congruent as possible with their gender identities. This process of transition through medical intervention is often referred to as sex or gender reassignment, but more recently is also referred to as gender affirmation. People who were assigned female, but identify and live as male and alter or wish to alter their bodies through medical intervention to more closely resemble their gender identity are known as transsexual men or transmen (also known as female-to-male or FTM). Conversely, people who were assigned male, but identify and live as female and alter or wish to alter their bodies through medical intervention to more closely resemble their gender identity are known as transsexual women or transwomen (also known as male-to-female or MTF). Some individuals who transition from one gender to another prefer to be referred to as a man or a woman, rather than as transgender.

Source: American Psychological Association

What else might fall under the "Transgender" umbrella term is a matter of debate. Wikipedia lists:
Transsexual
Transvestite or cross-dresser
Genderqueer
Androgyne
Bigender
Drag kings and queens

According to a couple of Trans* folk I know personally, grouping "Transvestite" together with "cross-dresser," as if the terms are interchangeable, is a mistake, because (according to these two people) they're not synonymous -- "Transvestite" has been excluded from the category of "Transgender" by them because they say that Transvestites have a sexual fetish which has little or nothing to do with Gender Identity or Gender Expression (although Wikipedia says "Transvestic Fetishism" is something else, and I myself have pointed out to these two that "Transvestite" literally means "Cross-Dressed").

Anyway, I would think this is a more reliable source than Wikipedia:
What are some categories or types of transgender people? at the American Psychlogical Association website.

While I admit to being fairly unfamiliar with the use of the term "Asexual" as meaning "not sexually attracted to anyone, regardless of sex and/or gender," I'm quite familiar with "Transgender" and "Transsexual" (I run an "LGBT" group at another site, by the way, and I was previously an officer in the group from its inception until I inherited the role of "group leader" as the officer with the most seniority after the founder of the group left to pursue other concerns elsewhere). I'm also aware that the two terms are not used in the same way by everyone, and that some Trans* persons may dislike one or the other term, or prefer one over the other, regardless of whether others would classify them by the less preferred term or not (and, while personal preference is real, standard usage of terms makes things a lot easier to understand, both for Trans* people themselves, and for others who would like to understand).
Last edited by Dusk_Kittens on Tue Nov 26, 2013 2:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
Her Divine Grace,
the Sovereign Principessa Luna,
Ulata-Druidessâ Teutâs di Genovâs,
Ardua-Druidessâ of Dusk Kittens

The Tribal Confederacy of Dusk_Kittens
(a Factbook in progress)
~ Stairsneach ~

My Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: -7.12
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -6.72
(Left Libertarian)

My C4SS Ratings
58% Economic Leftist
63% Anarchist
79% Anti-Militarist
67% Socio-Cultural Liberal
80% Civil Libertarian

"... perché lo universale degli uomini
si pascono così di quel che pare come di quello che è:
anzi, molte volte si muovono
più per le cose che paiono che per quelle che sono."
-- Niccolò Machiavelli,
Discorsi sopra la prima deca di Tito Livio,
Libro Primo, Capitolo 25.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:43 am

Lianhua wrote:Bathrooms/restrooms should be segregated based on what genitals you have.

Why? Also, who's going to be checking people's genitals before they enter the restrooms?
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:45 am

Charzak wrote:Two genders based on your genitalia.

Gender isn't based on genitalia.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

User avatar
Lost heros
Powerbroker
 
Posts: 9622
Founded: Jan 19, 2012
Ex-Nation

Postby Lost heros » Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:50 am

Lianhua wrote:Bathrooms/restrooms should be segregated based on what genitals you have.

Because fuck transgenders.
Last edited by Lost Heros on Sun Mar 6, 2016 12:00, edited 173 times in total.


You can send me a TG. I won't mind.

"The first man to compare the cheeks of a young woman to a rose was obviously a poet; the first to repeat it was possibly an idiot." - Salvador Dali

User avatar
Undivulged Principles
Diplomat
 
Posts: 713
Founded: Antiquity
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Undivulged Principles » Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:51 am

Many facilities in many countries already have these. They are generally called family rooms (they are officially for parents with infants but can serve the same purpose just as well). No need for a specialized room unless you just want to feel special.
- I could RP my big toe to be more powerful than your nation. That doesn't mean it applies in NS
~ Source? I'm not your mommy. Do your own homework. Not providing third party support for opinions. Don't believe look it up yourself, or not. Idc
~ democracy allows the least qualified to judge the most..

User avatar
Vixia
Spokesperson
 
Posts: 192
Founded: Apr 23, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Vixia » Tue Nov 26, 2013 6:57 am

Gender only AND Gender Neutral, thats okay.
●▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬๑Neutral Good๑▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬●
My Political Party : Swedish Social Democratic Party
My Religion : Lutheran, not very religious though.
Socialism, Feminism, Social Democracy, Religious Freedom, Democratic Socialism, LGBT rights, Environmental protection, Christian Democracy, Pro-Choice, Anti-Racism, Cosmopolitanism, Liberal Monarchism, Pro-Immigration, Liberal Christianity, Multiculturalism, Tolerating all ideologies,
-★ ★ ★ ★ ★-

User avatar
AiliailiA
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27722
Founded: Jul 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby AiliailiA » Tue Nov 26, 2013 7:05 am

Wow, 59 pages and I missed it? This is one of my favorite topics!

I must be getting a life ...
My name is voiced AIL-EE-AIL-EE-AH. My time zone: UTC.

Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
Ethel mermania wrote:
Ifreann wrote:
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
: eugenics :
What are the colons meant to convey here?
In my experience Colons usually convey shit

NSG junkie. Getting good shit for free, why would I give it up?

User avatar
Grenartia
Post Czar
 
Posts: 44623
Founded: Feb 14, 2010
Left-wing Utopia

Postby Grenartia » Tue Nov 26, 2013 7:39 am

Lianhua wrote:Bathrooms/restrooms should be segregated based on what genitals you have.


That actively harms transgender people. This man shouldn't be told to use the women's room.

Charzak wrote:1. Two genders based on your genitalia. 2. Two bathrooms. 3. Why fix it if it isn't broke? 4. Never actually seen someone complain about two bathrooms in real life.


1. Except there's more than two genders, and gender isn't based on sex.
2. And there's a need for more than two bathrooms.
3. The current system is very much broke, and needs fixing.
4. Doesn't mean we don't exist.
Lib-left. Antifascist, antitankie, anti-capitalist, anti-imperialist (including the imperialism of non-western countries). Christian (Unitarian Universalist). Background in physics.
Mostly a girl. She or they pronouns, please. Unrepentant transbian.
Reject tradition, embrace modernity.
People who call themselves based NEVER are.
The truth about kids transitioning.

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Tue Nov 26, 2013 7:57 am

Lianhua wrote:Bathrooms/restrooms should be segregated based on what genitals you have.


Why do you want to force these men to use the women's restroom?

Image

Image


I thought you were better than that, but no, you care more about what genitalia someone has than their gender and appearance.

User avatar
AiliailiA
Postmaster of the Fleet
 
Posts: 27722
Founded: Jul 20, 2011
Ex-Nation

Postby AiliailiA » Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:05 am

How does anyone think two separate bathrooms is an efficient way of providing bathrooms?

It's inefficient! Imagine if we provided elevators and staircases on the same basis. Imagine if we provided cafeterias or public telephones or wireless access points on that basis.

Why divide the population into two classes of roughly equal numbers, and provide equal facilities for both? It's simply inefficient, inevitably leaving some people waiting for a resource which is unused at that time in the "other" facility.

It's wasteful, and I think based in the convergence of two taboos: a taboo on sex and a taboo on excretory functions. Whether or not those taboos have any rational basis, their convergence is not rational at all. Whatever differences there may be in how men and women excrete and wash up, they are trivial and have nothing to do with sexual intercourse.
My name is voiced AIL-EE-AIL-EE-AH. My time zone: UTC.

Cannot think of a name wrote:"Where's my immortality?" will be the new "Where's my jetpack?"
Maineiacs wrote:"We're going to build a canal, and we're going to make Columbia pay for it!" -- Teddy Roosevelt
Ifreann wrote:That's not a Freudian slip. A Freudian slip is when you say one thing and mean your mother.
Ethel mermania wrote:
Ifreann wrote:
DnalweN acilbupeR wrote:
: eugenics :
What are the colons meant to convey here?
In my experience Colons usually convey shit

NSG junkie. Getting good shit for free, why would I give it up?

User avatar
Luveria
Post Czar
 
Posts: 31339
Founded: Feb 22, 2013
Ex-Nation

Postby Luveria » Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:10 am

Grenartia wrote:
Lianhua wrote:Bathrooms/restrooms should be segregated based on what genitals you have.


That actively harms transgender people. This man shouldn't be told to use the women's room.


For the new system Lianhua proposed, lets have one restroom door with a penis on it, and the other with a vagina. That means FtMs use the vagina restroom until they get a penis, and MtFs use the penis restroom until they have had SRS. Intersex people can go into whichever restroom they want. People who have lost their genitalia aren't allowed to use any restroom. It will be enforced by having a genitalia inspector at the restroom entrance to have a look at everyone's genitalia before they can go in. Children will not be exempt from genitalia inspections.

What about the transgender females who don't ever want SRS, and thus will be forever forced to go into the men's restroom to get harassed by every man inside who will know the person is a transgender woman since the genitalia inspector forced them to use the men's room? As usual, these proposals of grouping people by their genitalia are nothing more than a less-than-subtle way to remind transgender people how hated they are.
Last edited by Luveria on Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:50 am, edited 6 times in total.

User avatar
Dyakovo
Post Kaiser
 
Posts: 83162
Founded: Nov 13, 2007
Ex-Nation

Postby Dyakovo » Tue Nov 26, 2013 8:23 am

Undivulged Principles wrote:Many facilities in many countries already have these. They are generally called family rooms (they are officially for parents with infants but can serve the same purpose just as well). No need for a specialized room unless you just want to feel special.

No-one is asking for specialized rooms. Gender neutral=/=trans-specific.
Don't take life so serious... It isn't permanent...
Freedom from religion is an integral part of Freedom of religion
Married to Koshka
USMC veteran MOS 0331/8152
Grave_n_Idle: Maybe that's why the bible is so anti-other-gods, the other gods do exist, but they diss on Jehovah all the time for his shitty work.
Ifreann: Odds are you're secretly a zebra with a very special keyboard.
Ostro: I think women need to be trained
Margno, Llamalandia, Tarsonis Survivors, Bachmann's America, Internationalist Bastard B'awwwww! You're mean!

PreviousNext

Advertisement

Remove ads

Return to General

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Belogorod, Best Mexico, Bing sung, Margraviate of Moravia, Norse Inuit Union, Riviere Renard, Senkaku, Soviet Haaregrad, Stellar Colonies, The Holy Therns, Tlaceceyaya

Advertisement

Remove ads