Well, no wait, you believe in the Illuminati then? Because seriously, that would top the cake.
Advertisement

by Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:33 pm
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Shershah » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:33 pm
Lithosano wrote:You betray your ignorance of psychology... nay, of all of science. The Rorshach test is not something you can pass.
Your "definition" of disorder is illogical, wrong, and useless.

by The Truth and Light » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:33 pm

by Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:34 pm
Shershah wrote:Lithosano wrote:You betray your ignorance of psychology... nay, of all of science. The Rorshach test is not something you can pass.
Your "definition" of disorder is illogical, wrong, and useless.
Or the equivalent of passing it. Same thing.
And i have yet to see any reason why my "definition" of disorder is illogical, wrong, and useless. And yes, whatever reason you think you have provided have yet to do that.

Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Shershah » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:35 pm
Soldati senza confini wrote:Well, no wait, you believe in the Illuminati then? Because seriously, that would top the cake.

by Lithosano » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:35 pm
Shershah wrote:Lithosano wrote:You betray your ignorance of psychology... nay, of all of science. The Rorshach test is not something you can pass.
Your "definition" of disorder is illogical, wrong, and useless.
Or the equivalent of passing it. Same thing.
And i have yet to see any reason why my "definition" of disorder is illogical, wrong, and useless. And yes, whatever reason you think you have provided have yet to do that.

by Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:35 pm
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Liriena » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:35 pm
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by The Truth and Light » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:35 pm
Shershah wrote:Lithosano wrote:You betray your ignorance of psychology... nay, of all of science. The Rorshach test is not something you can pass.
Your "definition" of disorder is illogical, wrong, and useless.
Or the equivalent of passing it. Same thing.
And i have yet to see any reason why my "definition" of disorder is illogical, wrong, and useless. And yes, whatever reason you think you have provided have yet to do that.

by The State of Czecho-Slovakia » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:36 pm

by Shershah » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:36 pm
Lithosano wrote:Shershah wrote:
Or the equivalent of passing it. Same thing.
And i have yet to see any reason why my "definition" of disorder is illogical, wrong, and useless. And yes, whatever reason you think you have provided have yet to do that.
The only definition I have managed to extract is "anything I don't like." I should not have to explain why that is wrong.


by Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:36 pm
Shershah wrote:I don't claim to know whether they exist/existed or not. Frankly i don't care enough to find out.
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by Graknopia » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:36 pm

by The Scientific States » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:38 pm
Shershah wrote:The LGBT community needs help, not encouragement. We should be trying to cure it, not cultivate it.
I hold them in the same category as pedophiles.

by Shershah » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:38 pm
Liriena wrote:Shershah wrote:
Yet you try to do exactly that.
Yes and i am aware that it isn't free from the corruption of politics.
Yet research can be blatantly faulty or not, regardless of political bias. Thus far, research overwhelmingly proves homosexuality to be just another natural, normal and perfectly harmless sexual orientation.
The Truth and Light wrote:Shershah wrote:
Or the equivalent of passing it. Same thing.
And i have yet to see any reason why my "definition" of disorder is illogical, wrong, and useless. And yes, whatever reason you think you have provided have yet to do that.
It's been demonstrated. We gave a simple example of another characteristic that's statistically rare, literacy. Under your definition, literacy is a disorder.
Unfortunately, you're a selective learner, to put it nicely.

by Rabopari » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:38 pm

by Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:39 pm
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.

by The Truth and Light » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:40 pm
Shershah wrote:Liriena wrote:Yet research can be blatantly faulty or not, regardless of political bias. Thus far, research overwhelmingly proves homosexuality to be just another natural, normal and perfectly harmless sexual orientation.
And you have proved that it is free of political bias how again ?The Truth and Light wrote:It's been demonstrated. We gave a simple example of another characteristic that's statistically rare, literacy. Under your definition, literacy is a disorder.
Unfortunately, you're a selective learner, to put it nicely.
Strawman and it depends on your definition of the term literacy.

by The Scientific States » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:40 pm

by Liriena » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:42 pm
Shershah wrote:Liriena wrote:Yet research can be blatantly faulty or not, regardless of political bias. Thus far, research overwhelmingly proves homosexuality to be just another natural, normal and perfectly harmless sexual orientation.
And you have proved that it is free of political bias how again ?
| I am: A pansexual, pantheist, green socialist An aspiring writer and journalist | Political compass stuff: Economic Left/Right: -8.13 Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: -8.92 For: Grassroots democracy, workers' self-management, humanitarianism, pacifism, pluralism, environmentalism, interculturalism, indigenous rights, minority rights, LGBT+ rights, feminism, optimism Against: Nationalism, authoritarianism, fascism, conservatism, populism, violence, ethnocentrism, racism, sexism, religious bigotry, anti-LGBT+ bigotry, death penalty, neoliberalism, tribalism, cynicism ⚧Copy and paste this in your sig if you passed biology and know gender and sex aren't the same thing.⚧ |

by Shershah » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:42 pm
The Truth and Light wrote:Allow me to divine. Is literacy another one of those concepts that you'd rather define to suit your own prejudices, logic be damned?

by Soldati Senza Confini » Fri Nov 15, 2013 2:43 pm
Tekania wrote:Welcome to NSG, where informed opinions get to bump-heads with ignorant ideology under the pretense of an equal footing.
Advertisement
Users browsing this forum: Congress Poland, Ifreann, Nimzonia, Port Caverton, Soviet Haaregrad, The Rio Grande River Basin
Advertisement