Gay Weddings Legalized in....wait, Vietnam?

[Shershah]

Right... so if the moon landings were indeed fake, they would have no problem saying so. If we had encountered aliens, same thing ? Or what about some kind of accidental epidemic outbreak ?

If you honestly believe that politics plays no part then i have no idea what to say.

So much conspiracy theory.

So much bullshit I can disprove but isn't the topic of this thread.

First try to disprove the one on hand will you ? Don't bite too much at the same time... or do.

[The Truth and Light]

>Logically unsound, possibly dangerous definition of "disorder"
>Paranoid that he can't express opinions without criticism
>Literally admits to have sociopathic tendencies

Yeah, there's no ethos left here.

[Shershah]

Then how the hell do you function?

I'm dead fucking serious. Human society and even fucking etiquette as relating to how to say "hello" in certain settings is built upon being aware that other people are people. If you're incapable of understanding the worthiness of other human beings, I can't imagine you have much of a pedestal from which to talk about the "way things should be."

I am just being realistic.

[The Emerald Dawn]

Then how the hell do you function?

I'm dead fucking serious. Human society and even fucking etiquette as relating to how to say "hello" in certain settings is built upon being aware that other people are people. If you're incapable of understanding the worthiness of other human beings, I can't imagine you have much of a pedestal from which to talk about the "way things should be."

I am just being realistic.

I wouldn't accuse you of it.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

1 - It WAS, past tense. The fact that there has been peer-reviewed research on the subject is what you are missing up there, champ.

2 - No, just better document your beliefs with more recent data. You are starting to sound like a 70 year old person who's bitter he didn't get a chance in life.

1 - And i have already said everything that i have to about that in previous posts.

2 - The recent data is corrupted, so sorry, can't do. And if i was that old, then i wouldn't have to see what this world will become in a few decades.

3 - And i am saying that this so called evidence is made up. Just so that their feelings won't get hurt.

1 - Yes, which was all debunked by smarter people than you or I, so sorry.

2 - The data is corrupted? Wow, what's next, the Jewminati were the ones who planted the data?

3 - Yea, because Jews, isn't it?

[Lemanrussland]

And i am saying that this so called evidence is made up. Just so that their feelings won't get hurt.

See, this is your problem. You are not actually interested in empiricism, but instead only deem evidence which supports your position as "worthy". Anytime conflicting evidence appears, you just dismiss it as being "made up".

Try to be more objective if you want people to take you seriously.

[The Truth and Light]

Then how the hell do you function?

I'm dead fucking serious. Human society and even fucking etiquette as relating to how to say "hello" in certain settings is built upon being aware that other people are people. If you're incapable of understanding the worthiness of other human beings, I can't imagine you have much of a pedestal from which to talk about the "way things should be."

I am just being realistic.

That's just a blatant falsehood.

[Lemanrussland]

So much conspiracy theory.

So much bullshit I can disprove but isn't the topic of this thread.

First try to disprove the one on hand will you ? Don't bite too much at the same time... or do.

This is too much for these sheeple to handle!

[Soldati Senza Confini]

So much conspiracy theory.

So much bullshit I can disprove but isn't the topic of this thread.

First try to disprove the one on hand will you ? Don't bite too much at the same time... or do.

So now homosexuality is a conspiracy theory?

Let me laugh and point at you.

[Liriena]

No. I want you to provide sources.

Been there, done that. And no you are not going to get a different source each time you ask.

If your only sources are pre-1950's beliefs on homosexuality and paraphilias, then I am sorry, but your claims are bullshit.

[Shershah]

>Logically unsound, possibly dangerous definition of "disorder"
>Paranoid that he can't express opinions without criticism
>Literally admits to have sociopathic tendencies

Yeah, there's no ethos left here.

You got the 3rd one right.

And as for the second one it is not about me, but others. And the first one should be "sound", not unsound. Other than that, perfect.

Also you might want to know that if i am being truthful i can't pass the rosarch inkblot test even once. That wikipedia article on what they are supposed to me was just...

[Soldati Senza Confini]

First try to disprove the one on hand will you ? Don't bite too much at the same time... or do.

This is too much for these sheeple to handle!

I don't even know how can I deal with this.

[Immoren]

So much conspiracy theory.

So much bullshit I can disprove but isn't the topic of this thread.

First try to disprove the one on hand will you ? Don't bite too much at the same time... or do.

It's not our job to disprove.

[Liriena]

>Logically unsound, possibly dangerous definition of "disorder"
>Paranoid that he can't express opinions without criticism
>Literally admits to have sociopathic tendencies

Yeah, there's no ethos left here.

You got the 3rd one right.

And as for the second one it is not about me, but others. And the first one should be "sound", not unsound. Other than that, perfect.

Also you might want to know that if i am being truthful i can't pass the rosarch inkblot test even once. That wikipedia article on what they are supposed to me was just...

You claim your definition of "disorder" is logically sound? That's hilarious.

[Liriena]

First try to disprove the one on hand will you ? Don't bite too much at the same time... or do.

It's not our job to disprove.

I bet he doesn't give a shit about the burden of proof.

[Soldati Senza Confini]

It's not our job to disprove.

I bet he doesn't give a shit about the burden of proof.

Now, did you REALLY expected anything better?

[The Truth and Light]

You got the 3rd one right.

And as for the second one it is not about me, but others. And the first one should be "sound", not unsound. Other than that, perfect.

Also you might want to know that if i am being truthful i can't pass the rosarch inkblot test even once. That wikipedia article on what they are supposed to me was just...

You claim your definition of "disorder" is logically sound? That's hilarious.

Maybe I misjudged, Liri.

His definition isn't, "characteristics that are statistically rare." Oh, no, that was my error. His definition is, "whatever the hell I just don't like, fuck all y'all."

[Liriena]

I bet he doesn't give a shit about the burden of proof.

Now, did you REALLY expected anything better?

*shrugs* Hope is the last thing you lose, we Argies say.

[Shershah]

1 - Yes, which was all debunked by smarter people than you or I, so sorry.

2 - The data is corrupted? Wow, what's next, the Jewminati were the ones who planted the data?

3 - Yea, because Jews, isn't it?

I have nothing against jews...

If your only sources are pre-1950's beliefs on homosexuality and paraphilias, then I am sorry, but your claims are bullshit.

If you are interested in buying manure, you can just say so. The price is same for everyone regardless. Just name the quantity.

And i am saying that this so called evidence is made up. Just so that their feelings won't get hurt.

See, this is your problem. You are not actually interested in empiricism, but instead only deem evidence which supports your position as "worthy". Anytime conflicting evidence appears, you just dismiss it as being "made up".

In the ideal world i would agree with you.

[Liriena]

If your only sources are pre-1950's beliefs on homosexuality and paraphilias, then I am sorry, but your claims are bullshit.

If you are interested in buying manure, you can just say so. The price is same for everyone regardless. Just name the quantity.

Ain't that cute.

Do you even understand how the scientific method works?

[Lithosano]

>Logically unsound, possibly dangerous definition of "disorder"
>Paranoid that he can't express opinions without criticism
>Literally admits to have sociopathic tendencies

Yeah, there's no ethos left here.

You got the 3rd one right.

And as for the second one it is not about me, but others. And the first one should be "sound", not unsound. Other than that, perfect.

Also you might want to know that if i am being truthful i can't pass the rosarch inkblot test even once. That wikipedia article on what they are supposed to me was just...

You betray your ignorance of psychology... nay, of all of science. The Rorshach test is not something you can pass.

Your "definition" of disorder is illogical, wrong, and useless.

[Shershah]

First try to disprove the one on hand will you ? Don't bite too much at the same time... or do.

It's not our job to disprove.

Yet you try to do exactly that.

If you are interested in buying manure, you can just say so. The price is same for everyone regardless. Just name the quantity.

Ain't that cute.

Do you even understand how the scientific method works?

Yes and i am aware that it isn't free from the corruption of politics.

[Liriena]

You betray your ignorance of psychology... nay, of all of science. The Rorshach test is not something you can pass.

I don't know... I think Rorschach breaking all your fingers pretty much means you failed the test.

[The Emerald Dawn]

It's not our job to disprove.

Yet you try to do exactly that.

Ain't that cute.

Do you even understand how the scientific method works?

Yes and i am aware that it isn't free from the corruption of politics.

You wot?

[Aeken]

It's not our job to disprove.

Yet you try to do exactly that.

Ain't that cute.

Do you even understand how the scientific method works?

Yes and i am aware that it isn't free from the corruption of politics.

Do you really think politics always influences everything?